About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Matthews questions whether Obama is "too darn intellectual, too much the egghead"

November 20, 2009 5:27 pm ET

From the November 20 edition of MSNBC's Hardball:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by congero6189599 (November 20, 2009 5:30 pm ET)
      6  
      Some liberal huh!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by rugger69 (November 20, 2009 5:39 pm ET)
        1 21
        That has to be it he is so smart and we are so dumb, well if he was so smart why is unemployment above 10 percent, no decision on the war, manufacturing jobs keep going overseas. That must be it he is too smart yet lacks any common sense.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by smarshall1432997 (November 20, 2009 5:45 pm ET)
          8 1
          Are you speaking about former Pres. Bush, LOL.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by christopher howard (November 20, 2009 5:47 pm ET)
          13 1
          So the answer to growing unemployment, handling two wars at the same time, and a 30 year pattern of off-shoring American jobs is to have "common sense"? Why didn't we think of it before? If you were president, surely you would have had all three problems solved by now. Don't keep us in suspense. What are your solutions to these common sense problems?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jjamele2880 (November 20, 2009 6:09 pm ET)
            6 1
            Sounds like the Republican Health care "plan," brilliantly articulated by Sen Judd Gregg (Moron-NH) on the same show: "We've got a lot of good ideas. We want, um Tort Reform. And to eliminate waste. And to let younger people buy only catastrophic health insurance, and to encourage people to make healthier lifestyle choices."

            Yep, Common Sense. Solves all problems. That, and calling Senator Bernie Sanders a "Socialist" who believes in "Socialism" every couple of minutes when you realize you are losing the argument by having no actual ideas of your own.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (November 20, 2009 5:51 pm ET)
          8  
          Gee . . . and I thought you were a Republican. Every one of those things were caused by the LAST president.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by captfoster2 (November 20, 2009 5:57 pm ET)
          11  
          rugger69

          I suppose you assume that president Obama was supposed to make everything all better in less than a year after 30 years of Reaganomics??

          Even FDR took almost 4 years to get things going... not that I like the idea of Obama waiting that long... regardless, your post stinks of wanting to ignore all the economic damage done by Bush policies and that those of us who voted for him somehow figured he would make things all better by now?

          Only the right-wing mouth pieces brought that up! At no time did any one not corporate owned bring such trash up!

          You want to know why things have not gotten better... it is because president Obama is a centrist and unfortunately has surrounded himself with a few too many Republican leaning advisors!

          Obama is not a liberal and is not surrounded by any for if he was, we would be out of the economic turmoil by now created by Reaganomics!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bruce1ace (November 20, 2009 8:44 pm ET)
              6
            According to your last statement you are saying that there were solutions but the President chose to do things differently. I thought he was a smart guy.

            Obama has about 6 more months to create some jobs before the runup to the midterms where Democrats are going to lose ground if things don't improve. I don't care who's fault it is the party in power will get the blame from the voters.

            After that...well pretty soon it's time for Obama to start running for reelection so that second two years is going to be pretty uneventful.

            Maybe Obama's 2012 campaign slogan should be:

            Yes We Can....but we won't.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mjh (November 20, 2009 9:04 pm ET)
              4  
              "Maybe Obama's 2012 campaign slogan should be:

              Yes We Can....but the GOP doesn't want to."




              FIXED



              Report Abuse
              • Author by bruce1ace (November 20, 2009 9:24 pm ET)
                  4
                Isn't it amazing how much "stupid" GWB was able to accomplish? He got bipartisan support all over the place for all this nonsensical stuff that was ruining the country.

                Now Obama is trying to fix everything and nobody wants to play with him, not even his own party. You think maybe Democrats aren't on board with your version of what "fixing" things is? They can cover themselves by blaming Republicans while really having no intention of playing ball in the first place. As Rachel Maddow said on her show last night (after documenting all the demands the moderate Dems have made to the health care bill) "When will the moderates take "yes" for an answer?

                Wierd.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by DellDolly (November 21, 2009 1:01 am ET)
                  4  
                  No, it's not weird.

                  It's called unwise bipartisanship after we were attacked on 9/11. They trusted him to do the right things, and they were stupid to do so. Those of us who had been in Texas while he was Governor kept trying to tell everyone to not trust Bush and Rove - too few listened.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by bruce1ace (November 21, 2009 9:52 am ET)
                      2
                    Great. So Democrats in congress were unwise during the Bush years and now they are being unwise in the Obama years.

                    Maybe they aren't very wise no matter what.

                    I acknowledge that Republicans screwed up bigtime which is why they have lost so badly the last two ekections.

                    Also Obama has called the war in Afghanistan a war of necessity. If we send more troops we are looking at another 5 years minimum over there and $$$$$$$$ dollars that we don't have. I hope he reconsiders.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by benjr (November 23, 2009 12:44 pm ET)
                         
                      I think that's a good point, but I would argue that both the Republicans and Democrats were unwise during the Bush years. I just wish that politicians would learn from their mistakes.
                      Report Abuse
                • Author by foghornleghorn (November 21, 2009 2:36 pm ET)
                     
                  He got bipartisan support all over the place

                  The only bipartisan support he got was the war authorization. That's it.
                  Report Abuse
      • Author by bilbo_dies (November 20, 2009 5:42 pm ET)
        2 2
        I think that this is just Matthews version of sarcasm.
        I know pretty bad.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by christopher howard (November 20, 2009 5:50 pm ET)
          3 1
          By the way, Bilbo, been meaning to mention it... I love your screen avatar.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by smarshall1432997 (November 20, 2009 5:51 pm ET)
          4 1
          But Bilbo, you know Chris is developing a pattern with his sarcasm when there are decisions to be made on important issues i.e. HealthCare Reform procedural votes tomorrow in the Senate. Remember back during the Spring '09 how Chris kept asking every Dem. if they would use Reconciliation to pass HealthCare Reform? Chris kept going on and on and on which led to the Tea Bag Rallys, Death Panels, and "NO" passage of the HealthCare Reform Bill. What is up with Chris?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by dirtylittlereligion (November 20, 2009 5:33 pm ET)
         
      That fellar is just too gosh-darn rootin' tootin' inty-lecktool. We needs us a guy that just DOES, none of that fancy librul "thunking" nassasary.

      Great. They're bringing back stupid as a virtue.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by smarshall1432997 (November 20, 2009 5:34 pm ET)
      7  
      What is going on with Chris Matthews these days to show so much resentment towards Pres. Obama? Was it when Pres. Obama showed respect in Japan? Did Chris not get a promise interview with Pres. Obama liked he had hoped for before Japan? What happened? Maybe Pres. Obama needs to invite Chris to the WH for some kind of Beer-fest, LOL.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rlwyorkie3517 (November 20, 2009 5:36 pm ET)
         
      Chris Matthews, as of late, has been using language that underminds Barack Obama. He keeps harping on how the White House needs a win.

      He went on a rant discussing how Jackie Kennedy stood beside LBJ to show there was no coup going on in America. He called it "class" or something like that, then continued to spout that this President (Obama ) does not have "it."

      Of oourse he has Ron Brownstein as his guest, a lightweight at best.

      I'm afraid that Matthews has fallen over the edge. At least today he didn't concentrate on abortion.

      Obama doesn't have a chance. The right goes after him with everything they've got, and the left is doing the same.

      What scares me is that the Democrats, if they do not support Barack Obama, will hand power back to the Republicans who have become more right wing and dangerous than before. And I fear that this time, they will make sure they keep power for a very long time.

      And tell Chris that then he won't have to worry about intellectuals; we'll be governed by knee-jerk, gut, cowboy, religious mentality.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dmhack (November 20, 2009 5:44 pm ET)
      7  
      Somebody misses George Bush.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jcalton (November 20, 2009 5:53 pm ET)
      5  
      I really think Chris Matthews is losing it. Maybe since around Tim Russert died, either he's become more of a buffoon or I'm just seeing more coverage of it. I used to be able to watch him on Sundays.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by zamfir273114 (November 20, 2009 6:31 pm ET)
      3 3
      I don't think he's smart enough. First, I think the last President screwed everything up so I don't blame Obama for that. Bush and Cheney ruined everything. I just don't know if Obama is the very best. I hope he is. I hope he is as great as everyone leads on because we are going to need next to a miracle to get the economy back to what it was during Clinton.

      Full disclosure: I voted for Hillary in the primaries and Obama for the President because McCain is lower than Lieberman on my respect scale.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jjamele2880 (November 20, 2009 6:48 pm ET)
        2 2
        I, too, voted for Hillary in the primaries and Obama in the general, and was (and still am) about Obama's ability to set an agenda and lead his party to it. I have my fingers crossed because if Obama does succeed, we all do. But I'm still skeptical.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by zamfir273114 (November 20, 2009 6:59 pm ET)
          7 1
          Exactly. A good economy is good for everyone. I also really hope health care passes because I think it would make things easier.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by MickD (November 20, 2009 6:43 pm ET)
      5  
      Matthews will say anything to hear Matthews speak.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bobbygoode (November 20, 2009 7:45 pm ET)
      4  
      This tiresome loudmouthed imbecile is now talking about Obama's "humiliating bow" - right out of the Fox&Friends. Fox's OWN POLL says 63% of Americans are not bothered by the bow. What a freaking jerk. And he's using the term "dithering" in reference to Obama's Afghanistan deliberations - right out of Cheney's mouth. And then, OF COURSE, he has some lame ultra mild liberations (Ron Brownstein? PLEASE) as counterpoint. I'm done with him. MSNBC's value can only be narrowed down to Olbermann and Maddow - true journalists with superb information, and about 50% of Ed Schultz (he insists on ultra conservatives on as pundits of "the other side").
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mjh (November 20, 2009 8:16 pm ET)
      4  
      Matthews questions whether Obama is "too darn intellectual, too much the egghead"


      Right, Tweety -- 'cause the last thing America needs is a president who can speak in complete sentences WITHOUT saying things like: "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, fool me -- I won't get fooled again!"



      Report Abuse
    • Author by goesto11 (November 20, 2009 8:16 pm ET)
      3  
      Chris, that's exactly what I would expect a moron to say.

      You never disappoint.
      Report Abuse