About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Beck: "Progressives have built up this wall of separation between church and state, and it's nonsense"

November 25, 2009 5:49 pm ET

From the November 25 edition of Fox News' Glenn Beck:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by RKAllen (November 25, 2009 5:51 pm ET)
      37 1
      No... the founders put up a wall of separation between church and state.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (November 25, 2009 5:54 pm ET)
        24  
        But remember, RK, its in the Constitution -- and ever since Bubble Boy said the US Constitution was "just a g-d piece of paper," anything neoKKKons like Beck see in it that they don't like is "nonsense" . . .

        Report Abuse
        • Author by all your eyes (November 26, 2009 10:03 am ET)
          16 1
          Funny how the trolls stay away from certain threads...
          Report Abuse
          • Author by DellDolly (November 27, 2009 10:29 pm ET)
            4  
            I think it's because most of the paid ones are off for the long holiday weekend, and the other ones are busy with family.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by Romario (November 25, 2009 8:20 pm ET)
        23 2
        The Founding Fathers would be called "marxists" and "communists" by Glenn Beck if they were alive today.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by loonz (November 26, 2009 7:28 am ET)
        20 1
        I would say the founders were progressives.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jeff191 (November 26, 2009 4:05 pm ET)
             
          the founding fathers were generally students of the enlightenment. some wee progressive for their time. certainly many of their ideas were regressive, slavery, franchise for property holding males etc. what is important is that many of the founding fathers were not Christian, but rather deists or athiests. Thomas Jefferson called the new testament"a heap of dung" George Washington stressed that in no way was the constitution based on Judeo -Christian ideals. Ben Franklin said churches were less important structures for the new republic than light houses were etc, etc
          Report Abuse
        • Author by wzwriter (November 27, 2009 4:10 am ET)
          16 1
          Absolutely. And the Torries (those who remained loyal to the British Crown) were the conservatives of the day.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bbowyer (November 27, 2009 9:53 am ET)
               
            Your analysis really is flawed considering today's progressives want to expand the sphere of government, while the true conservatives/libertarians of today(not neocons) want to shrink the size of government back to where the founders intended it. Also, you were partially right that the Torries were "conservatives" but in the traditional sense of the word which means in favor of excessive government. The titles "liberal" and "conservative" have switched meanings over the years with today's "liberals" seeking to expand government and today's "conservatives" seeking to uphold the principles of limited government.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj (November 27, 2009 2:04 am ET)
        11 1
        Actually Mr. Beck, every last time you make a statement like that, we become more and more aware of how absolutely uninformed you ARE about what the Constitution really does say. Duh, ever hear of the "No Establishment" clause in the Constitution. Of course, I can see it does not fit in with your theology but actually, all of us LDS folks are very supportive of the "No Establishment" clause. It is what allows us to freely practice our beliefs and not fear any governmental interference.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by dobber316 (November 28, 2009 4:25 pm ET)
           
        show me where it says that in any of our constatuion or the declaration of independence and i no my spelling is bad
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Demotruk (November 25, 2009 5:56 pm ET)
      16 1
      Beck should research the origins of the phrase. I'd say he'd be disappointed, if he wasn't a "rodeo clown" who doesn't really believe what he says anyway.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ReasonAndResolve (November 25, 2009 6:01 pm ET)
      20 1
      It is true that Jefferson was a progressive...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by dirtylittlereligion (November 25, 2009 6:32 pm ET)
        16 4
        All of the founding fathers were pretty progressive by their standards, but that's the beauty of progressives: we continually PROGRESS. Unlike some REgressives I could mention.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 25, 2009 9:41 pm ET)
          20 2
          What I find interesting is talking to individual conservatives about what changes they find scariest in the world. The pattern is pretty much (from my limited and un-scientific research) that wingnuts would like the world to be just the way it was when they were 5 - 15 years old.

          That is, cons I know who grew up in the 50s seem upset about everything that happened after the 50s, same for people who were kids in the 60s, 40s, etc.

          They all have some imaginary utopia that really seems to be about them not having to work and just playing all day.I think they get really protective of Jesus because of the trauma of losing Santa. But that's just my opinion.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by ReasonAndResolve (November 26, 2009 11:30 am ET)
            17 2
            Well, we should play their game, I say. Let's go back to the 50s, when the top marginal tax rate was 91 percent against 400,000 dollars of income. They want their utopia, but they don't realize that people were willing to pay for it back then.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 26, 2009 12:17 pm ET)
              16 2
              Heh, that's why I said "imaginary utopia". Like most lazy people, conservatives want all of the benefits and none of the cost.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by worrierking (November 26, 2009 11:33 am ET)
            11 1
            I'm sure you're right that some of them would like it to be just like it was in the fifties and sixties.

            Back when mom was always in the kitchen in her dress, apron and pearl necklace, waiting for father to return from the office to speak to Bud about those magazines he found in the drawer.

            And dad had to sit in his chair with his pipe waiting for Kitten's first boyfriend to come knocking on the door.

            I think a lot of them would also like to see the events of 1963 and 1968 repeated.

            Some, hopefully, not all.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 26, 2009 12:21 pm ET)
              16  
              Hopefully not, King. Happy Thanksgiving. I've got to meet my two moms down at the strip club for a few drinks, while my gay uncle microwaves a Tofurkey. I hope I have time to associate with some commies and negroes and squeeze in an abortion before dinner time.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by worrierking (November 26, 2009 12:25 pm ET)
                11  
                Happy Thanksgiving to you too Colonel.

                Funny you should mention gay uncles. My gay uncle is a commie and an abortionist. He's hit the progressive trifecta. But unfortunately, he's a white devil.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 26, 2009 3:33 pm ET)
                  9  
                  I'm going to give him bonus points for being a gay abortion enthusiast. The degree of difficulty is impressive.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (November 27, 2009 10:20 am ET)
              6  
              Hew WK, that's becks position on a palin beck ticket! If y'all hadn't seen it yet, they asked beck about a palin beck vs beck palin ticket, and no surprise that his sexist stereotypes just rolled off his tongue like velvet against skin!
              Report Abuse
    • Author by dirtylittlereligion (November 25, 2009 6:01 pm ET)
      24 3
      The goal of neocons is a Christian Republic of America. A theocracy. Who really wants to control lives here? Progressives who want a state that represents and respects every religion or Conservatives who want every American to live in a Christian state with obvious preference given to Christians?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by epkklk851 (November 25, 2009 6:39 pm ET)
        16 2
        Kevin Phillips and a few others call them "Theocons." By the way, Sarah fits into this group, too. Keith talked about her religious beliefs on last night's show. Pretty scary.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by j238 (November 25, 2009 8:58 pm ET)
        10 3
        Nope. It's the evangelicals who want a Christian theocracy. The neocons have a large Jewish segment.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by 000l (November 27, 2009 3:52 pm ET)
           
        Ever read the book The Handmaid's Tale? That's the world that neoconchristofacists dream of.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (November 25, 2009 6:02 pm ET)
      19 2
      Oh, boy... here we go again. The Troglodytes are really getting desperate for attention when they drag out this old saw.

      Some "conservative" will join us shortly and explain that Thomas Jefferson pulled "Separation of Church and State" out of his arse while on a drunk, and nobody ever used it before or since.

      The truth is that James Madison (aka "Father of the Constitution") used that phrase (or minor variations) several times in his writings.

      It is not a concept "made up" by Progrssives.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by epkklk851 (November 25, 2009 6:32 pm ET)
        11 2
        Yes, and I understand that Madison was not buried with the benefit of clergy at his own request. He was never Confirmed in a church, neither was Washington, who used to skip out on Communion services until the Preacher commented, then he just skipped the whole Sunday service that Communion was offered. Washington, Madison, and Jefferson were Deists.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (November 25, 2009 6:05 pm ET)
      14  
      Yeah, read the Founders sometime.

      "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States."

      "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (November 25, 2009 6:06 pm ET)
      18 1
      Do the Troglodytes really want the Government running their Churches? Haven't they been telling us that the Government can't do anything right?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by kfraz43 (November 25, 2009 6:11 pm ET)
        20  
        No - they want their churches running the Government.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Demotruk (November 25, 2009 6:15 pm ET)
        14  
        No, they want it one way, and only one brand of religion (I don't think they've fully thought through the consequences of removing the wall with the existence of a variety of popular versions of Christianity that do not support the same views). And isn't it ironic that conservatives criticize liberals for supposedly trying to undermine religious freedom, who was it that was attacking the religious freedom of Muslim Americans recently?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (November 25, 2009 6:13 pm ET)
      14  
      I'll have some more fun with this. What does "principles embedded everywhere" mean? And the Washington Monument was built in the 1880's. It's hardly a comment on our original legal system.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by clearstate (November 25, 2009 6:13 pm ET)
      16  
      Is Beck calling our founders progressives? Cause they're the ones who put the separation of church and state in the constitution. According to Wiki, Beck's friend Thomas Jefferson supported this.

      So wait mjh, one minute Beck says that the constitution is "just a g-d piece of paper" and then he says we need to go back to the roots of where the it was founded on? How does that make sense? But then again nothing that Beck says ever makes sense.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by dirtylittlereligion (November 25, 2009 7:21 pm ET)
        1  
        BUSH said the constitution is "just a g-d piece of paper".
        Report Abuse
      • Author by SoloPocono (November 25, 2009 11:36 pm ET)
           
        Actually, it was BUSH who said it was just a "piece of paper". Whether Beck repeated it,..wouldn't exactly shock me at this point. So, WHERE is Beck's first re-education...I mean, Education course? He's having 7 next year-beginning in March. History, Economics, Civics--a la Beck.
        I wonder if he'll offer any art courses...seeing he's such an "expert" and all.. ;)
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Ruby (November 25, 2009 6:15 pm ET)
      15 1
      Glenn Beck hates the founding fathers.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by epkklk851 (November 25, 2009 6:29 pm ET)
        14 1
        Yes, he really does, because if he really paid attention to them, he wouldn't agree with them and they sure as shootin' wouldn't like him.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by caels (November 25, 2009 6:18 pm ET)
      16  
      As Beck always quotes Thomas Jefferson's "question with boldness" I always think it's interesting he forgot the continuation of the phrase:

      "Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear."

      Not to mention, his favorite TJ said "Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State"

      Apparently, Thomas Jefferson whom he constantly quotes is a progressive. Does that make Glenn Beck a progressive?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mescal (November 26, 2009 1:43 am ET)
        12  
        No, it just makes doughboy a hypocritical a-hole.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by RKAllen (November 26, 2009 2:34 am ET)
        10  
        One of my favorite misquotings that fundamentalists and evangelicals love throwing out is Albert Einstein's
        Science without religion is lame...
        They always seem to miss the second part...
        ...religion without science is blind.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (November 25, 2009 6:23 pm ET)
      13 1
      Ah, the first Seal of the United States...Franklin and Jefferson wanted it to show the Exodus. Well, Ben also wanted the National Bird to be a Turkey. By the way, John Adams was on that committee, and he suggested a scene depicting the "Judgement of Hercules". How Pagan of him.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by epkklk851 (November 25, 2009 6:30 pm ET)
        12  
        Yeah, and that pagan took his oath of office on a law book, not the Bible! Commie!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dobber316 (November 28, 2009 4:33 pm ET)
             
          There's an interesting thing about John Adams and John Quincy Adams -- they were both very religious men, and John Quincy Adams were so religious that he is one of probably only one or two American presidents who did not take the Oath of Allegiance on a Bible. Now, it's kind of ironic that John Quincy Adams, being such a religious man, would not have used the Bible, but he said that he thought the Bible should be reserved for strictly religious purposes. So he took the Oath of Office on a book of laws, the Constitution and American laws. That's really what he was swearing allegiance to was the Constitution, so he didn't use the Bible
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Ruby (November 25, 2009 6:26 pm ET)
      14  

      Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between church and State.

      --Thomas Jefferson

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 25, 2009 9:49 pm ET)
        12  
        Ruby, one of my favorite parts of that is "... actions only, and not opinions...". I know people read it different ways, but I always enjoy mentioning that all religions are just opinions, when a member of any of those religions starts to throw their faith into an argument as if it were a fact.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by fawltylogic (November 26, 2009 3:44 am ET)
        7  
        I was just about to post that quote. Amazing (well, not really) that Beck who is constantly bringing up the founding fathers apparently has NO IDEA where the very phrase he is talking about was coined.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by PhuckPHOX (November 25, 2009 6:32 pm ET)
      12 1
      Wow. He's really relying on his viewers not knowing anything about this country's origins here. lol
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mfinley (November 26, 2009 11:01 pm ET)
           
        It's perfect for him that his viewers don't know anything about the country's origins (or anything else for that matter) and they definitely wouldn't doubt anything that the modern authority on accurate and unbiased journalism that is Fox News says in any way. Beck IS the truth. Duh everybody.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by draftedin68 (November 25, 2009 6:37 pm ET)
      12  
      No we didn't...

      I'd certainly like to take credit for that Glenn, but then, unlike you, I try to be honest.

      Yeah Glenn, just what the world needs right now: Madrassas with Crosses.


      Report Abuse
    • Author by Handyman (November 25, 2009 6:45 pm ET)
      14  
      One must remember that Glenn Beck is a Mormom, more commonly refered to as Later Day Saints now days. They were banned and persecuted because of their religious beliefs and had to move from state to state starting in 1830 - In 1844 due to a Termination Order issued by then Illinois Governor Lilburn Boggs their Prophet Joseph Smith was murdered.

      Their new Prophet Brigham Young was said to have been directed by God to move West in 1847 where they decided to settle in what is now Salt Lake City Utah.

      I don't know if you can say this was the fault of progressives or if their religious beliefs were to far out of the main stream. Many of the Mormom Founders had multiple wives and some still do. Warren Jepps who now is in Prison serving time because of arranging marriages of young underage women with older men.

      I have known many, many LDS in my life and none of them even come close to what Glenn Beck represents. He cherry picks from all religious beliefs if he thinks it will benefit his cause.

      Do you ever hear the Amish speak out about their country? They practice what they preach.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by blesscurse (November 25, 2009 9:48 pm ET)
        13  
        What year did the LDS begin to generally allow the ordination of Black people?

        Must have been in the 19th century, right?

        Try 1978.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jeff191 (November 26, 2009 4:12 pm ET)
             
          no nned to pick on any one particular faith for their idiocies, they all contain them. in the 70's blacks could not even attend Bob Jones university
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Publius39 (November 25, 2009 6:56 pm ET)
      11  
      Is Beck confusing the founding fathers with Joe Smith and the other idiotic mormon church founders?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by brusselscov (November 25, 2009 7:03 pm ET)
      13  
      Why do we let people like this tell us what they think the founding fathers meant? As if they would know. All cultures' foundation documents are written from ancient, maybe primitive, contexts that have very little to do with today or the future. The 10 commands were tips for a wandering people, the dictates are merely common sense aphorisms and we don't need a bible or beck to lead us where our rational minds do.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by draftedin68 (November 25, 2009 7:51 pm ET)
        8  
        Speaking of "rational minds"...

        I highly recommend Thomas Jefferson - In His Own Words.

        While Jefferson's style is no easy read, this book contains no interpretation, no selective editing, just what he thought and wrote, including The Jeffersonian Bible.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by overmars jr. (November 25, 2009 7:13 pm ET)
      12  
      Okay... this tears it. The camel back is now broken.

      Anyone who buys a word of what this gold shill says is stupid beyond the point of sanity. They are a danger to themselves and anyone unfortunate enough to come across them. It's time to send them to the private sector mental wards and see how much they like their insurance.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jjamele2880 (November 25, 2009 7:15 pm ET)
      13 1
      I'll never understand the theory that the religious leanings of people who lived 220 years ago should have relevance toward how we function as a society today. Especially when you realize that the founding fathers certainly didn't take what people thought in the 1550s as their guide when they created the Constitution.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (November 25, 2009 10:02 pm ET)
        9  
        That amuses me too, JJamelle ( as does the random thumbs down troll who singled you out).

        As progressive as those people may have been for their time, they lived in an entirely different world than we do.With the always accelerating pace of knowledge, science and technology, we're more different from the founders than they were from those in the 16th century.

        I got an email from one of my regular wingnut sites this morning. It was written by Newt Gingrich, and basically an order to all Americans to thank God on Thanksgiving. As support for his point, he mentioned a painting of some Pilgrims on their way to the New World who were praying on the ship.

        It's fine with me if others want to run their lives as if they were getting on a sailboat to cross an uncharted ocean, and lacking the last 3 or 4 hundred years of human knowledge.Knock yourselves out, but please don't be offended if I'm not getting in on that. I don't believe in demons, I do believe in antibiotics, I have a lot of differences of opinion with people from several hundred years ago.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by donwelty (November 25, 2009 8:31 pm ET)
      8  
      Constitutional scholar Beck must have missed the first amendment. Oh, wait, since Beck does not consider the first amendment important, it must not be, since he's the scholar.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by blesscurse (November 25, 2009 9:46 pm ET)
      8  
      This whole Ten Commandments thing means that we should be stoned or smote (smited?) for working or shopping at Walmart on Sunday.
      And Fox News should not even be broadcasting on Sundays.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by fawltylogic (November 26, 2009 3:52 am ET)
        6 1
        That's the part I wish we did more like Christians. I like that Chick-Fil-A is closed on Sundays for this reason. I think we could all use a day of the week when stores were closed. But in the world today, it's not the Almighty that rules, it's Mammon.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by tbone (November 26, 2009 9:43 am ET)
          7  
          Slowly but surely the ridiculous rules built up around the sky fairy myth fade into obscurity.

          I still can't buy liquor until after noon on Sunday. This is an infringement on my religious practice - the consumption of sacramental beer during NFL football.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by pilotx (November 27, 2009 3:09 am ET)
            6  
            In GA they can't buy at all. Funny how others' religious beliefs infringe on my beer drinking. That's downright un American.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by Boxer1979 (November 25, 2009 10:00 pm ET)
      6 1
      In the United States the "Separation of Church and State" is generally discussed as a political and legal principle derived from the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, which reads, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . . ." The concept of separation is commonly credited to the combination of the two clauses: the establishment clause, generally interpreted as preventing the government from establishing a national religion, providing tax money in support of religion, or otherwise favoring any single religion or religion generally; and the free exercise clause, ensuring that private religious practices are not restricted by the government. The effect of prohibiting direct connections between religious and governmental institutions while protecting private religious freedom and autonomy has been termed the "separation of church and state."

      Ratified in 1791! LET IT GO BECKY! SMH!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by dwendt44 (November 26, 2009 4:13 am ET)
        6  
        the idea of 'Separation of Church and State' is generally creditedto John Lock. But Roger Williams a theologen used the phrase way back in the 1600s.
        During the colonial period, Baptists, among others were, strong supporters of such separation. Now, many of them pretend that the wall doesn't exist, or shouldn't exist.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Onyxcat (November 26, 2009 7:26 am ET)
             
          Were they not also persecuted by other religions for their beliefs in that time?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Boxer1979 (November 26, 2009 9:37 am ET)
          5  
          You can bet as soon as the wrong people repeal that 1st Ammendment and change it around. That will open doors to a crazy influx of people putting their religious beliefs on everybody or having only one religion practiced in this country. I feel better with that kept in place and US progressives like Becky claims continue keeping that wall up.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by pilotx (November 27, 2009 3:15 am ET)
            5  
            I read something scary when I read the 2008 TX GOP's party platform and part of their foreign affairs policy was support for Israel because the bible says the nations that support Israel will be rewarded and those that oppose Israel will be destroyed. This is the party's official platform. Republicans are dangerous, they want to base foreign policy on the bible. That's scary.I've linked this before but you can go to www.ragingelephants.org and click on the education link to see it.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by New Frontier (November 25, 2009 10:15 pm ET)
      5  
      I looked but I don't see Glenn's all-important, "Ten Little Safety Tips" anywhere in that TV studio, and it's not a public building. All I can see written everywhere is "GLENN BECK" or "GB" in huge letters.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jkoots (November 25, 2009 10:16 pm ET)
         
      "Advertisements contain the only truth to be relied upon in a newspaper" - Thomas Jefferson
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Anthony (November 25, 2009 11:16 pm ET)
         
      Would someone please ask Beck and his talibangelic - or in his case mormobangelic- constitutionalists, what 'elected' position 'g-d' will have to hold in the American political society and who will have to represent "god" in congress? him?
      That guy is living in lala land!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (November 26, 2009 2:38 am ET)
      9 1
      The wall between church and state needs to stay there Lookwhat's happened since the REPUBLICAN PARTY crawled into bed with the RELIGIOUS RIGHT.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fawltylogic (November 26, 2009 3:48 am ET)
      7  
      Here's a quote by another of Beck's supposed idols, Thomas Paine, a staunch Deist who despised organized religion: "Of all the systems of religion that ever were invented, there is none more derogatory to the Almighty, more unedifying to man, more repugnant to reason, and more contradictory in itself, than this thing called Christianity."

      Yeah, Beck, why don't you talk more about what the founding fathers had to say about religion?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pilotx (November 27, 2009 3:10 am ET)
        2  
        Thomas Paine was an atheist.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by wzwriter (November 27, 2009 11:22 am ET)
          2  
          And many of the Founding Fathers (those who crafted and signed the Constitution) were deists - not Christians. Anyone who says this country was founded on Christian principles is either an idiot, a liar, or an ignorant dittohead.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by John Paradox (November 27, 2009 11:44 am ET)
          6  
          Technically, he was a Deist. I'd like to find the wonderful series Meeting of Minds, created/written/starring Steve Allen. Paine was one of the 'guests', and immediately on his (actor portraying him) arrival at the table, he noted that he was not an Atheist. Very interesting and informative series.

          IOW, it's way beyond the Neocon level.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Onyxcat (November 26, 2009 7:09 am ET)
         
      then let all government invade your religion. See if we don't get a war.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ptluzzi (November 26, 2009 8:45 am ET)
         
      really who can watch this moron? seperation between church and state was to protect the chuches? we need to tare down the way becuase this nation was built on the 10 commandments? he just contradicted himself in 2 mins. why would anyone listen to this guy? he just makes this stuff up as he goes.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by TripleD30 (November 26, 2009 11:13 am ET)
      1  
      To messers Nehemiah Dodge, Ephraim Robbins, & Stephen S. Nelson a committee of the Danbury Baptist association in the state of Connecticut.

      Gentlemen

      The affectionate sentiments of esteem & approbation which you are so good as to express towards me, on behalf of the Danbury Baptist association, give me the highest satisfaction. my duties dictate a faithful & zealous pursuit of the interests of my constituents, and in proportion as they are persuaded of my fidelity to those duties, the discharge of them becomes more & more pleasing.

      Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man & his god, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of separation between church and state. [Congress thus inhibited from acts respecting religion, and the Executive authorised only to execute their acts, I have refrained from presenting even occasional performances of devotion presented indeed legally where an Executive is the legal head of a national church, but subject here, as religious exercises only to the voluntary regulations and discipline of each respective sect.] Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.

      I reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection and blessing of the common Father and creator of man, and tender you for yourselves and your religious association, assurances of my high respect & esteem.

      (signed) Thomas Jefferson
      Jan.1.1802.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by am19228 (November 26, 2009 1:16 pm ET)
         
      If our country were really founded upon the 10 Commandments, wouldn't we have laws for them? Wouldn't they be in the Constitution? Wouldn't the First Amendment say "Thou shalt have no other gods before me?"

      Nope, the First Amendment grants freedom of religion. There's your imaginary wall, Beck.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by broketheinterweb (November 26, 2009 3:41 pm ET)
         
      Ten little safety tips, like who to pray to.

      Our founders came to this country for religious freedom, not this.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Midnight Kevin (November 26, 2009 3:50 pm ET)
      5  
      Beck fails to mention that this was not designed by our founding fathers, and the capstone only has Laus Deo written on only one side of the capstone, while the other sides have the names of those involved and the dates of it's creation... guess nobody was meat to see the other inscriptions...

      I wonder if the mysterious Welsh inscription on the steps of the monument hold some secret meaning too... can somebody borrow Beck's secret decoder ring?
      ----------------------------------------
      The Midnight Review
      Mum Is The Word
      Report Abuse
      • Author by btrue10280 (November 26, 2009 9:25 pm ET)
        3  
        Here's the Welsh translation I found on wiki. (My language, my land, my nation of Wales. Wales forever.) Reason & author unknown.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mikehuck1976 (November 27, 2009 11:58 am ET)
      6  
      I notice kdork and the other Beckers did not come to this thread to defend Beck's overwhelming knowledge of the Constitution. Interesting....
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rtejon (November 27, 2009 3:48 pm ET)
      5  
      I guess Beck is unaware that the concept of religious tolerance in civil society dates back to the Persian Empire.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ReasonAndResolve (November 27, 2009 7:34 pm ET)
        6  
        Perhaps he does, but prefers not to acknowledge anything Iranian.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Night Jaguar (November 27, 2009 7:29 pm ET)
      1  
      BREAKING NEWS

      Area Man Passionate Defender Of What He Imagines Constitution To Be

      http://www.theonion.com/content/news/area_man_passionate_defender_of
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mjh (November 27, 2009 9:23 pm ET)
      6  
      Beck: "Progressives have built up this wall of separation between church and state, and it's nonsense"


      Dear Glenn Beck:

      If you find the separation of Church and State so nonsensical, please leave the USA and go to a country where it is nonexistent.

      Like the Vatican.

      Signed,

      The Sane World

      Report Abuse
      • Author by ReasonAndResolve (November 27, 2009 10:44 pm ET)
        3  
        Or Iran.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mjh (November 28, 2009 5:15 pm ET)
          1  
          Yes -- I would love to see how long a Mormon like Beck would last in either an Orthodox Catholic nation like The Vatican or a fundamentalist Islamic republic like Iran.

          I give him about a day. Maybe a day and a half if he gets a running start . . .



          Report Abuse
    • Author by rockfish (November 28, 2009 5:44 am ET)
         
      Wow,I don't know where to begin.Thomas Jefferson was a deist,and did NOT believe in Christianity.Googole it.Nest the mere mention of God does not donate religion as many agnostics wilkl tell you.Lastly what about the Jewish.This man is an out right liar.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Alone in Texas (November 28, 2009 11:06 am ET)
         
      Separation of church and stage can be seen with the rise of the modern state - one could say that this is the basis of many modern western countries, including the USA. Life did not begin with the founding fathers as important as they were. Beck should read his history to understand that the movement is almost 1,000 years old (one thousand years, not a typo) and that in turn had much of its basis on even older writings such as those of Aristotle. Maybe Beck should also read his history to find out who preserved the surviving writings of Aristotle, he might find it quite a revelation.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Squevis McGillicutty (November 28, 2009 1:08 pm ET)
         
      James Madison was in France when the establishment clause was written, so there is no pinning this one on him. Jefferson made his own Bible without any "magic" in it. So it is fair to say he did not agree with the religious mainstream. The intentions of the Founding Fathers is immediately apparent if you just review the notes from the different sessions at which things were written. Beck would probably freak out if he knew that references to "Jesus" or a "Christian God" were specifically struck from the Declaration of Independence. I long for the day when Christians in this country are outnumbered and they are clamoring for the very protections that they are seeking to destroy. If there is no freedom from religion, there will be no freedom of religion.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jdhfish (November 28, 2009 3:50 pm ET)
         
      isn't it just grand when these neocons try and tell us that we are a Christian nation? i think that the constitution tells us that we have the freedom to practice a religion, but we also have the freedom from religion as well. let's not forget before we get too grandiose about the founding fathers. they were men who made mistakes, had skeletons, and some were even slave owners. they did some great work, but romanticizing men from the past can lead to some skewed views for future generations.
      Report Abuse