Ben Stein on Fox: Obama admin. about "social control," hoaxes, and making country a "socialist paradise"
November 29, 2009 1:06 pm ET
From the November 28 edition of Fox News' Cavuto on Business:
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
















And where were they all when Bush frittered away a budget surplus by giving away $2.48 trillion dollars in tax cuts?
Is this entire country afflicted with short-term memory loss?
I still don't have Ben Stein figured out. I used to consider him a reasonable guy, just one who had bought into the right wing economic philosophy, i.e. convincing the average American that if they cut taxes for those making hundreds of times what they earn (like Stein), it will trickle back to them through some sort of pyramid scheme.
Then I watched his film Expelled a while back and Stein seems to be a full blown ,Kool Aid drinking wingnut propagandist. If he's not a True Believer, then he's a very committed businessman.
I have DirecTV and wanted to add a new DVR. I couldn't add one unless I extended my contract with them. I looked into Comcast cable. I weighed the +'s and -'s of each system and what swayed me into staying with DirecTV was the Comcast ads featuring Ben Stein.
My hostility twoards Ben Stein outweighed any News Corpse connection with DirecTV.
That's how much I detest this man.
That and hawking for one of the "free" credit report sites.
I have to give him credit. The ad he is in has to be the dumbest one yet that I have seen for these rip off sites.
Well first of all let's clear up this little (big) left wing slight of hand.
A full one-third of the 47mil are people who are eligible for existing government programs (Medicare, Medicaid, S-CHIP) but haven't or wont apply. Nearly half are transitioning between jobs and a fourth are Illegal Immigrants. Now that number isn't as onerous.
Where is your onerous tripline on unisured americans? Medical expense related foreclosure and bankrupties? How many are you willing to say have no excuses and/or deserve their fate?
. . . his arse.
Of course, if you subtract non-citizens, it's possible that it's only a paltry, miniscule 36 million. Not onerous at all!...
Ask and ye shall receive
Even Barry changed his tune on the 47 mil number. You girls didn't get the memo I take it?
Hey, I'm going to let you in on a little secret...shhhhhh...don't tell anyone or the word will get out.....there is this new fangled thing call "The Google". It makes debunking liberal hogwash a breeze.
Maybe you should let the Senator in on your secret about "The Google".
Thanks for the link, as I see "Barry" in one case was referring to those who "cannot get" insurance---and in the other case, the "uninsured".
Tone deafness seems to be a common wingnut ailment.
I also like the condescending advice to "use The Google" from the wingnut who, within the past week or so, was suckered into posting Dan Quayle quotes attributed to Al Gore on some right wing propaganda site. Priceless.
Trust me, Marker -- T-boned indeed pulled it from somewhere, but the air in the place was considerably mustier . . .
It is impossible to "opt out" of the medical system for the simple reason that we do not allow people to die simply because they have no health insurance. It's the same reason we make it illegal to drive without liability insurance. One can "choose" not to drive a car, but one cannot "choose" to have a heart attack in a restaurant or an accident on the street and not have an ambulance come pick them up and take them to an emergency room where they will be taken care of.
The freedom to lose your house to bankruptcy trying to keep up with medical bills, the freedom to make obscene profits denying coverage, etc.
God Bless America.
In addition, a good majority of the 47 million figure are illegal aliens (maybe half?). Of the remaining ACTUAL Americans, there is an even greater majority of Americans who do not have health care coverage, due to their own choice. 100% of them have insurance plans available to them for purchase. Many, if not most of them have made the conscious choice to NOT purchase insurance coverage, and rather purchase things that are not necessary (i.e. entertainment, travel, simple luxuries, not to mention cigarettes, alcohol, or, in some cases, illegal drugs)
I contend that if people did not ignore health care coverage, and see it as one of life's "optionals", and give up life's true "optionals", they would certainly have enough money to purchase their own insurance coverage.
After all, why would anyone sacrifice anything if someone is going to give them a "no strings attached" handout? (sarcasm intended...)
Be quiet until you have something to say.
(The only smart thing Ben stein has ever said... and even that was written for him.)
SD & STFU. You've already proven three things about yourself: you're greedy, dishonest, and have no principles.
Aren't you the one who broke your contract with a major newspaper by making misleading ads for a free credit report advertisement?
Now, tell me again why anyone should listen to anything you have to say?
Hey its the Visine commercial guy! Remember his other claim to fame besides being a nutjob on FOX Snooze? Bueller? Bueller? I liked that 80's movie! Who knew his later life would consist of negative talking points. SMH!
Ben Stein claiming the Obama Admin about "hoaxes"??
This IS the same Ben Stein who was a NIXON SPEECHWRITER, right??
Ben, you're an OK kinda guy when you;re hawking eye drops, hosting a cable tv game show, or writing a column for Playboy. You should stick to those instead of trying to masquerade as a serious pundit . . .
I await a reasoned response - other then it’s convenient for Obama to be re-elected in 2012 before the rest of the population (only 40% or so are for it) realize how inept and costly government healthcare turns out to be.
I assume you mean by "implemented in 2013" that it will be at full capacity and functioning as was intended. There are a few steps that need to be taken to reach that goal including the conversion of all medical related documents to a national digital format system. I don't think this will happen overnight and will probably take years to complete.
Then there is also the formation of co-op's if that bears fruit and is included in the final bill. This will undoubtably take a considerable amount of time since private industry will be the providers in the co-op.
Then there is the revising of the existing Medicare System to eliminate some of the redundancy that is currently happening. Formulation of procedures, etc. which will take some major effort.
There is a long list of steps that will need to be taken before the Health Care System is fully reformed and operational. However, before any steps can be taken the bill must be passed, that's step #1.
If you don't understand that the rightwing talking point that this initiative hasn't been talked about enough is a total fraud, then that's your failing.
If you don't understand that private healthcare insurance is inept and too costly, and that getting the govt involved to help insure most of the uninsured and get discounts from healthcare providers, as Obama has done, then that's another one of your failures.
I have yet to see you make one lucid and relevant point. And no, I don't believe you when you say you're simply asking a question.
Do you know how long 'simple' bills are? Do you have any idea how complex it is to change healthcare? Are you aware of how many different programs will be affected by these changes, and therefore how much legal language has to be included to protect Americans?
Carping about the length of this bill is a fraudulent rightwing talking point.
You're right, Dolly -- but you gotta remember, for rightwingnuts, if it takes longer to read than a bumper sticker, it's too long {and probably "socialist"} . . .
No need I will answer you quick. I am not a public option fan. I am for single-payer.
If it is public option like I knew it would be. It needs to be strong and not watered-downed.