Limbaugh says Obama is a "wimpy little man-child who has no spine," equates him with Hugo Chavez
November 30, 2009 3:13 pm ET
From the November 30 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
















And they project these intellectual failings onto me for my liberalism, despite my ability to defeat their arguments (which inevitably results in a holiday-ruining temper tantrum on their part).
It's at the point where family gatherings are like walking on eggshells. It's completely forbidden to talk politics. And if we try to talk politics, it gets so bogged down in things that don't matter, because all they can do is change the subject (you did the same thing to Bush, why are liberals stifling dissent, socialism!)...
It's reached the point where you can't have a reasoned, intelligent, fact-based discussion with any right-winger, no matter his intelligence or education. I can't start with a basis of things we can agree on, because the basic facts are now a matter of dispute in the fantasy world of the right wing. I usually get about as far as the question: do you believe CO2 is a greenhouse gas? (These people are scientists, hit them with quantum physics they can't dispute and the fingers go into the ears.)
I still get emails from my rightwing pals telling me that Obama was banning guns or banning ammo or any number of things.
On the fact-checking sites, the most egregious lies and distortions come from the right, and despite the fact that they're easily debunked, too many on the right fail to ever even try to debunk them or learn more. It's their desire to have their preconceived notions confirmed that blinds them, and it's also what makes them tune into Rush and FoxNews.
That's cool to see them do that.
One would think liberals would be just as likely to lie--we are all human beings sometimes prone to the basest acts. I guess the difference is that liberals don't pass along information they know is false, even if it supports their preferences or beliefs. I don't know that this is true--I offer it only as a theory to explain the difference.
It's one thing to say garbage like that from a hidden losation. It's quite another for his to say stuff like that where he's not protected.
Or his life? Never! Those darn pilodial cysts can be such a pain in the ... and so easily used to wimp out on fighting in America's wars which he so handily approves of, so long as it is someone else doing the fighting and dying!
They post it because it poisons our national debate, and the only way to remedy that it to expose it every time it happens. We can't stop him from spouting nonsense, but we can try to insure it doesn't get credibility it doesn't deserve by exposing it over and over again.
It's a complex problem I suppose, but I think it's a waste of time listening to Limbaugh call him a man-child, which he does every single day. Of course listening to Limbaugh at all, no matter what he is saying, is a waste of time, so I probably shouldn't show prejudice to one time wasting utterance over another similar time wasting utterance if the point is to just capture them all.
Ignoring Rush for a decade didn't work out too well for our nation's debate.
You're wrong about this. The point is to capture them all.
And I don't think attention from MMFA affects what he says at all. He is aiming toward his audience, and not towards making us irate.
Special list of draftees: malkin, rush, hannity, beck, all of fox and friends, carlson and drones, o’reilly, no exemptions for murdoch and ailes; put coulter right up front with all the chickenhawks that got out of the Vietnam War, the cheneys… the whole damn family, junior bush and his brothers, rommey and his boys bring their mom along to cook. Also, any jackass that thinks war is cool and will not change you.
PS…Put General Palin in charge….
epkkklk851-
I think he is just showing Barrack the same respect you and your ilk gave President Bush.
Its TOO easy to show lefty hypocrisy.
2) Are you equating an internet poster to Rush? How does that comparison make sense to you?
It does amaze me how they can accuse Obama of one thing, and then totally destroy their own argument in the next sentence.
It's sort of like, how they keep saying how Obama hasn't done anything, and yet, everything he's done is destroying our country. So what is it? Has he done anything, or hasn't he?
The left had the courage to toss out its crazies. Why won't the right do the same?
Randy
. . . and it's front-runner for 2012 is an unemployed hockey mom . . .
People who believed this far-fetched comparison are as simple-minded as the one who yells it.
*Facepalm*
C'mon, Limpy -- why don't you just call Obama a "boy" and get it over with?