About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Limbaugh: Report that Woods patronized prostitutes means he "completed a resume requirement for election to high office as a Democrat," calls it "Clintonesque"

December 11, 2009 1:22 pm ET

From the December 11 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Limbaugh on "stories" about how "the black frame of mind is terrible": "Tiger Woods' choice of females not helping 'em out"

Limbaugh reads article comparing Obama to Tiger Woods

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (December 11, 2009 1:23 pm ET)
      1  
      Took you all night ?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (December 11, 2009 1:24 pm ET)
      1  
      el Fathead,
      This is beyond stupid. Even for you.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Leftym0m79 (December 11, 2009 1:25 pm ET)
      9  
      I would think it would be more Vitteresque. Clinton never had to pay for it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ReasonAndResolve (December 11, 2009 1:27 pm ET)
      4  
      maybe he should run as a Republican in Louisiana.

      Rush sure has a problem with Selective Attention Disorder (SAD).
      Report Abuse
    • Author by progressiveright (December 11, 2009 1:32 pm ET)
      2  
      I think more members of the GOP have been caught with prostitutes than Dems Rush. Like all ways the truth and facts are foreign to you.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (December 11, 2009 1:37 pm ET)
      2  
      Just becuase I feel like bating RightOn a little more...

      I supposed if he'd solicted men in public restrooms, this would be "Craigesque"?

      Of he was soliciting underaged, same-sexed, employees, would this have been "Foleyesque"?

      If only he'd shot one in the face, he'd be "Cheneyesque." (Apologies for the disturbing imagery that goes with that one! Don't think a bout it too much! It burns!)

      And actually, unless the other woman was an intern (or equivalent), he would not be "Clintonesque." Clinton never paid for sex. (Well... OK, he PAID, but not with CASH...)

      Seeing prostitutes would be more accurately described as "Vitteresque." (Or "Spitzeresque" if you want to be fair and balanced.)

      --------------------------------------------------------------
      But at least [Rush] acknowledges one thing: Democrats tend to cheat of their wives with women of legal age. (Paid or not.) When Republicans cheat, as often as not lately it's been with MEN or underaged boys.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (December 11, 2009 1:49 pm ET)
        1  
        Eddie, you put it in your last line/link. The absence of any underage boys coming forward to reveal relationships with Woods, only adult women, definitely aligns him more with Democrats' scandals than GOPpers.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (December 11, 2009 3:29 pm ET)
        1  

        I supposed if he'd solicted men in public restrooms, this would be "Craigesque"?

        Of he was soliciting underaged, same-sexed, employees, would this have been "Foleyesque"?

        If only he'd shot one in the face, he'd be "Cheneyesque."


        You are correct, Eddie.

        Additionally:

        Had Woods carried on an affair while his wife was on her sickbed, it would be "Gingrichesque."

        And, had Tiger patronized prostitutes while playing "dress-up", it would be "Giulianiesque."


        Report Abuse
        • Author by NiceguyEddie (December 11, 2009 9:36 pm ET)
             
          Had Woods carried on an affair while his wife was on her sickbed, it would be "Gingrichesque."

          Well, to be fair and balanced, it could be also both "McCainesque" AND "Edwardsesque."

          Great examples though! At what point do these conservative gain the self-awareness needed to realize that they shoudl REALLY stay the heck out of people's personal lives, and stop with the BS moralizing crap?!

          --------------------------------------------------------------------
          Sheesh!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Lizinbklyn (December 11, 2009 1:41 pm ET)
      1  
      Appears this nonsense is exactly what the DITTOHEADS want to hear . .

      What's the saying: IGNORANCE IS BLISS


      Report Abuse
      • Author by John Paradox (December 11, 2009 4:56 pm ET)
        1  
        If the saying were true, Neocons would be the most blissful people in the world.

        Though, it does remind me of Joseph Campbell's "Follow Your Bliss".

        Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (December 11, 2009 1:43 pm ET)
      1  
      Gov Sanford also completed his resume, suma cum laue.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MickD (December 11, 2009 1:51 pm ET)
      1  
      I wonder if any dittos went, "wait a minute, wasn't that Louisiana guy a Repub?" And then they turned on Fox and saw a "D" and all was well in their widdle lives.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by sdlnkicker4551 (December 11, 2009 2:01 pm ET)
      1  
      What a butt head this guy is!!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (December 11, 2009 2:13 pm ET)
      2  
      David Vitter is a Democrat?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ScienceBuff (December 11, 2009 2:50 pm ET)
      1  
      A little while ago, before the scandals broke, I stumbled across a little online discussion as to where Woods' political affiliations lay. While the fact is that he has never stated his politics, the republicans were trying very hard to find reasons to call him a republican. Most had to do with money and taxes, some others were more imaginative.

      I wonder if those posters would all be singing the same tune now.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (December 11, 2009 2:54 pm ET)
        3  
        And they're off. Here's one right wing cartoonist trying to do a metaphor (very advanced for wingnut humor), but it obviously takes care of an ulterior motive at the same time.

        [http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/12-10-09tigertapsthattarpRGB20091210041650.jpg]
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mjh (December 11, 2009 3:31 pm ET)
          4  
          Proof once again that wingnuts lack the humor, irony, and metaphor genes . . .
          Report Abuse
    • Author by mattcable250650 (December 11, 2009 3:06 pm ET)
      1  
      Actually, as prostitutes pride themselves on maintaining professional standards of client confidentiality (Not that they always manage to do that, of course), I think Clinton wishes he had observed "Clintonesque" standards.
      Report Abuse