Citing Wash. Post op-ed, Fox News report asks in on-screen text: "Lowering the Minimum Wage: Is It Better for Workers?"
December 14, 2009 11:45 am ET
From the December 14 edition of Fox News' America's Newsroom:
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
















The only way lowering minimum wage would be better, is if you lowered all of the costs of living.
I really don't need an answer, I have a pretty good idea why things are like this.
limiting the pay of bankers bailed out with my tax$ = socialism/fascism/communism
hmmmm . . .
Why does the republican party hate the vast majority of Americans?
Of course, in reality it should not be a question but a statement
"Doubling the minimum wage: it WILL be better for workers!"
I have a sign in my backyard that says "Elephants and Bears KEEP OUT."
I have not seen any elephants or bears in my yard, ergo, my sign is successful.
Heres another good one:
Left uses "social justice" arguments and the right uses "macro-economic" terms . . . WHAT BS THIS IS!!!!! Especially when Glenn Blecch has said the social justice is lefty-code-talk for sicalism, etc . . .
I am having difficulty understanding what these fools are saying because that corporate schlong is all up in their mouth!!
Yep, that about says it all.
I remember a co-worker, a part-timer and not highly paid, giving me her two cents a few years back on raising the minimum wage. She was really against it, informing me that it would force small businesses to shut down.
I think if you hire somebody to help your business, and they can't cover the cost of employing them at minimum wage (what, doing 100 bucks worth of work in eight hours?) then you really didn't need the help.
I'm not comforted by the Fox Fact that only half of MW employees are over 25 years old. That doesn't sound like America to me.
No business hires extra employees these days that they can just get rid of...
The minimum wage works out to $14,500 a year. If only 20% is taken for state and federal taxes, that's less than $1000 a month to live on. Food, rent, utilities, car payment, clothing and other expendables. Oh yeah. That's the high life, right there.
Perhaps those at FOX Propaganda should read more than one book, before they leap to any economic conclusions. Oh, I know. The one book they read happened to coincide with what they wanted to believe, so why search further? For the rest of us, though...
Only thing more contemptible is believing their BS.
Fox News is a crime.
The war on the poor never will go away with these retards will it? Well lets see.... First, eliminate the minimum wage for the poor, eliminate welfare help for the poor, elderly, and unemployment. Second, eliminate the 40hr work wk and have people slave working like the late 18th century to early 20th century. Third, eliminate the age limit to work as well, so you can have kids as soon as they could walk and talk working only to make a small clubhouse few rich!
A Genuine Monarchy!
*Facepalm*
Second, he notes that the Teen Unemployment Rate is at its highest since WW2, and says that has something to do with the minimum wage? It's lower because there are no more jobs that allow younger people to work, and a larger portion of the teens today are lazy.
It's better for business owners and the unemployed (since it would promote hiring at low costs).
It's worse for the currently employed.
Poor guy -- that'd put a severe dent in his oxycontin purchases . . .
Stay in school, kids!