About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Beck suggests Obama is a "slavemaster"

January 11, 2010 5:25 pm ET

From the January 11 edition of Fox News' Glenn Beck:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by fishgirl26 (January 11, 2010 5:29 pm ET)
      2  
      Oy again!! Wow, the chalkboard and charts and all this stuff to try to make it out like the big bad government is going to enslave you. Just a note to Glenn..we're not Venezuela!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by k1dork (January 11, 2010 5:31 pm ET)
      1 8
      I think this is a reach, MMs. He did not SUGGEST that Obama IS a slavemaster. He said what he thinks is the BEST WAY to become a slavemaster.

      Just my opinion. Let's see how long it takes for the first string of insults.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by vysotsky (January 11, 2010 5:38 pm ET)
        5  
        You'll get no insult from me, k1dork. Do you think a more accurate headline would have been, "Beck suggests Obama taking steps strategically to become slavemaster"?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by k1dork (January 11, 2010 5:42 pm ET)
          1 9
          I would hope that no headline would be needed, because it's a non-story. I think this topic plays on racial fears.

          Unless slavemaster is a term that can no longer be used to describe people who want power.

          I suspect that MMs is trying to tie this together with his comment that Obama is racist. Still, I think it's a stretch.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by k1dork (January 11, 2010 5:43 pm ET)
              7
            As a side note, Beck just mentioned slaves, and how they were kept ignorant by not letting them read. Any bets on whether it will become a topic? Any takers?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by nerzog (January 11, 2010 5:49 pm ET)
              5  
              Maybe it should, since the apparent purpose of his show is to steep his audience in ignorance.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by IRONY 101 (January 11, 2010 5:52 pm ET)
              5  
              Yea...I just found it ironic that such an ignorant man was pushing for greater education of the American people. By whom? Glenn Beck? Hahahahahahahahahahaha...!

              Beck is an uneducated boob who thinks way too much of himself.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by nerzog (January 11, 2010 5:48 pm ET)
            5  
            Actually, I think MMFA is just highlighting the absurdity of Glenda's comments.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by vysotsky (January 11, 2010 6:40 pm ET)
            1  
            "I would hope that no headline would be needed, because it's a non-story. I think this topic plays on racial fears."

            Wait a second -- MMFA never mentioned race in this post, and MMFA didn't "tie this" to anything in this posting. Suggesting that the President of the United States aspires and plots to be a slavemaster is plenty controversial on its own. What makes you think there's anything racial about this beyond Beck's own use of the word "slavemaster" and the history of slavery in the United States?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Marker (January 11, 2010 7:07 pm ET)
            2  
            k1dork/Tommy,

            It is a story and Beck is a racist.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by mjh (January 12, 2010 4:14 am ET)
          1  
          "Do you think a more accurate headline would have been, 'Beck suggests Obama taking steps strategically to become slavemaster'?"




          I think a more accurate headline would be: "Beck suggests Obama is a 'slavemaster'; A1dork relays what he thinks Beck meant [again]"

          Report Abuse
      • Author by Max Credits (January 11, 2010 5:41 pm ET)
        4  
        OK everyone, it's now permissible for a white man to evoke slavery when ridiculing a black man. K1dork says so.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by k1dork (January 11, 2010 5:45 pm ET)
          1 6
          Oh, come on, Vic. He didn't invoke slavery. A tough boss at Wendy's can be called a "slave master."

          It's not that big of a deal.


          Report Abuse
          • Author by nerzog (January 11, 2010 5:55 pm ET)
            3  
            So, to what does "slavemaster" allude, if not slavery?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by k1dork (January 11, 2010 5:58 pm ET)
                7
              But, so what? Does that make it racial or wrong to ever bring up someone being a slavemaster?



              Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (January 11, 2010 5:59 pm ET)
                4  
                Bork, give it up. You are defending the indefensible.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by k1dork (January 11, 2010 6:02 pm ET)
                    3
                  Bintx, this isn't even a big deal. I'm sorry, but it's just not. Why is it, because MMs says so?

                  He didn't even say OABAMA specifically is a slave master. He was talking about the best way to BECOME or BE a slave master.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by nerzog (January 11, 2010 6:01 pm ET)
                2  
                Not necessarily racial or wrong, just nonsense.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by k1dork (January 11, 2010 6:03 pm ET)
                    8
                  I don't think it's nonsense.

                  Could not communist regimes who control what jobs people get be likened to slave masters?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by vysotsky (January 11, 2010 6:48 pm ET)
                    1  
                    What does communism have to do with anything when you just argued that a boss at Wendy's could be likened to a slavemaster as well? If you maintain that the term is so loose that can be applied fairly to any position with a subordinate -- that is, if it doesn't allude to the actual and specific history of slavery -- then what's its value in the context of Beck's monologue?
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by k1dork (January 11, 2010 9:52 pm ET)
                         
                      Well why argue? If we know that people can be slave masters and that the comparison is not necessarily racist, then what's the damn point of this whole topic?
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by vysotsky (January 11, 2010 10:26 pm ET)
                           
                        "If we know that people can be slave masters and that the comparison is not necessarily racist, then what's the damn point of this whole topic?"


                        You're the one who first raised the subject of race and racism in the discussion of this post, k1dork. I'm only asking you what you think the value of Beck's reference to the word "slavemaster" is if you truly believe that the word has no implications beyond "superior".

                        Truly, yours is a fascinating view, k1dork: you seem to think that the significant difference between a Wendy's manager and the President of the United States is one of location, and that there's no meaningful distinction between the words "slavemaster" and "superior".
                        Report Abuse
              • Author by zamfir273114 (January 11, 2010 6:03 pm ET)
                1 12
                Only Democrats and liberals are allowed to talk about slavery or to degrade black people. See Harry Reid for proof. The topic is completely off-topic for Republicans or conservatives unless they want to be imputed as "racist".
                Report Abuse
                • Author by bintx (January 11, 2010 6:06 pm ET)
                  5  
                  Harry Reid didn't degrade anyone. He spoke about a factual, cultural phenomenon. He used insensitive language, but he was not being racist. Try again.

                  Oh, and I don't care a flip about the political clubs. You want to owe allegiance to a political club which cares about nothing but money in its pocket, fine with me. I care more about my country.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by Marker (January 11, 2010 7:10 pm ET)
                  2 1
                  It's because repugs are racists, it's the white peoples party. Take a look at the racial makeup of the repug party.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by vysotsky (January 11, 2010 7:22 pm ET)
                     
                  "Only Democrats and liberals are allowed to talk about slavery or to degrade black people."

                  Who's not allowing anyone to talk about slavery? By all means, talk away.
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by shaggles (January 11, 2010 6:06 pm ET)
            2  
            I've never heard slave master used that way. I have heard slave driver.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by k1dork (January 11, 2010 6:17 pm ET)
                5
              They are interchangeable. My high school wrestling coach could be accurately described as a slave master or slave driver.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (January 11, 2010 6:34 pm ET)
                4  
                No, they aren't "interchangeable." A slave "master" OWNED the slaves. A slave driver was an employee of the slave "master" who worked the slaves. History isn't your strong suite, either.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Bongo Fury (January 11, 2010 7:40 pm ET)
                     
                  Indeed!
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by k1dork (January 11, 2010 9:54 pm ET)
                     
                  Not that big of a deal. Why is all of the discussion here about proving somebody wrong? Slave master/slave driver. Not that big of a difference to me. Sure, they're semantically different, but not by much, so big damn deal.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by vysotsky (January 11, 2010 11:17 pm ET)
                    1  
                    "Not that big of a deal."

                    Yeah, bintx: the difference between owning slaves, employing employees under cpaitalism, and serving as the democratically elected chief executive of a country isn't a big deal. I had no idea k1dork was such a critic of capitalism and democracy
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by vysotsky (January 11, 2010 11:17 pm ET)
                       
                    "Not that big of a deal."

                    Yeah, bintx: the difference between owning slaves, employing employees under cpaitalism, and serving as the democratically elected chief executive of a country isn't a big deal. I had no idea k1dork was such a critic of capitalism and democracy
                    Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (January 11, 2010 6:35 pm ET)
            1  
            Seriously? I've never heard any employee who thought their boss OWNED them. A slave MASTER owned slaves. He employed a slave DRIVER to work them.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by vysotsky (January 11, 2010 6:43 pm ET)
            2  
            There's a significant distinction between calling a tough boss at Wendy's a slavemaster among friends or coworkers and suggesting that the President of the United States aspires and plots to be a slavemaster on a national television news network, no?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by k1dork (January 11, 2010 9:55 pm ET)
                1
              Yeah, one works at Wendy's and the other works in Washington.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by vysotsky (January 11, 2010 10:13 pm ET)
                   
                I just want to make sure I understand your position thoroughly. I asked you if there was a significant distinction between calling a boss at Wendy's among coworkers and friend a slavemaster and the President of the United States a slavemaster on a national television news network. It is interesting to me that you didn't note any significant distinction between the democratically elected chief executive of the government of the United States of America and a manager of a fast food restaurant franchise.
                Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (January 11, 2010 5:58 pm ET)
        3  
        Suggests: propose, convey thoughts by indirection, calling something to mind as the result of association.

        Yeah, he pretty much SUGGESTED that Obama is a slavemaster.

        For an "English major," you're not very good with synonyms and definitions.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by k1dork (January 11, 2010 6:05 pm ET)
            7
          Then he suggested that Bush is a slave master too, because he said "President Obama and the previous administration..."
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (January 11, 2010 6:08 pm ET)
            3  
            Not arguing the point except to say that you were incorrect in your first statement. Look up words before you use them.

            BTW, George W. Bush was a non-conservative tool. Never voted for him for anything because of his incompetence and lack of intellectual curiosity. All it took was a quick look into his business record to see that he should never have held ANY political office of ANY kind.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by christopher howard (January 11, 2010 6:45 pm ET)
              4  
              "Then he suggested that Bush is a slave master too, because he said 'President Obama and the previous administration...'"

              What of it? After years of defending Bush, Beck decided it was okay to bash him a little near the end of his second term, and now on into the Obama years. Bush is wildly unpopular with much of the right for crashing the conservative movement (and the country) into a tree, so it's pretty safe territory for Beck. Plus, it gives him the added bonus of pretending to be a straight talking "independent."
              Report Abuse
          • Author by vysotsky (January 11, 2010 10:43 pm ET)
               
            "Then he suggested that Bush is a slave master too, because he said 'President Obama and the previous administration...'"

            Yes, he did. And I take issue with his characterization of Bush as a slavemaster as well. Don't you?
            Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (January 11, 2010 5:31 pm ET)
      3  
      The Right Wing Crap Avalanche is easily much worse now than it ever was during the 90s. I guess they perfected their lying skills during the 8 years of defending President Numbnuts.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Boxer1979 (January 11, 2010 5:50 pm ET)
      9  
      Beck suggests Obama is a "slavemaster"

      Chavez wants to nationalize Venezuela. The same thing other countries tried to do, but were shut down by the free market preadatory type style of capitalism. Obama is not the slavemaster. Corporations and the runaway child called Capitalism is. Everyone else is the slave!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Billos (January 11, 2010 8:21 pm ET)
         
      He understands very clearly how to control people. He did mention the news and what you watch as one of the ways of controlling the minds of the people. His constincuency is very adapt to this concept. Yet when I see clips like this it really throws the viewer for a loop with this style of delivery. Jumping around with incomplete thoughts and heightened tone is not persuading people with anything but blithering idiocity. Yet now he claims he was screaming about the devaluation of the dollar by bush when bush was in office. Oh give me a break, once again what an absolute load of crock and bull**** story.
      Report Abuse