About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Beck: Progressives, like Satan, are supplanting God and taking away choice

January 12, 2010 11:52 am ET

From the January 12 broadcast of Premiere Radio Networks' The Glenn Beck Program:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Beck asks listeners to pray to stave off Satan-like "perversion" of the country

Beck: "[U]nless Jesus comes down," opens "a clinic and heal[s]" us "himself, there cannot be a right to health care"

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by dexteritas0071418 (January 12, 2010 11:56 am ET)
      7 1
      LOL at Beck decrying the removal of the "Godhead" of government and then saying that freedom is being limited.

      Comparisons:

      Fat people complaining about the taste of the dinner AND the small portions.

      Calling the same person "Hitler" and "Stalin", "Lenin" and "Mussolini".
      Report Abuse
    • Author by scubcap647 (January 12, 2010 11:58 am ET)
      9 2
      Glenn is scared and insane. He knows that Palin is coming to Fox and may even get a radio show soon. So he's going to out-crazy her and cement his place in the wingnut hall of fame.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (January 12, 2010 12:11 pm ET)
        7 2
        It makes me wonder what the average Glennbeckian is thinking when he hears Beck go off on one these bizarre tangents. How many of them can even follow what he's trying to say? Or maybe they believe Beck thinks deep thoughts that are too obscure for lesser minds. It's actually pretty funny...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by wzwriter (January 12, 2010 1:42 pm ET)
          3 1
          It makes me wonder what the average Glennbeckian is thinking...

          That's just it - they're incapable of thinking.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Bongo Fury (January 12, 2010 12:27 pm ET)
        4 1
        Oh boy!Palin's coming.Stock up the barrels with fish and load up.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Reinhard (January 12, 2010 12:04 pm ET)
      4 3
      Doesn't he mean " supplanting my god"?Hmmm. So much for religious freedom.
      I don't believe in your god.

      Reinhard
      I luv Je$U$
      Report Abuse
      • Author by political_left-religious_right (January 12, 2010 12:13 pm ET)
        8 2
        I don't believe in Beck's god, either. The man's a polytheist who believes that Satan and Jesus were "spirit brothers" and that God was once a man who lived on another planet.

        You can take Beck's every religious pronouncement with a pillar of salt.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (January 12, 2010 12:04 pm ET)
      17 2
      If it's progressives who are "taking away choice", then why is it that CONSERVATIVES want to ban abortion and same-sex marriage? And why was it a REPUBLICAN administration (George W. Bush's) that took guns away from Hurricane Katrina victims, while Democratic platforms have always defended the rights of gun owners under the Second Amendment?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MidnightWriter (January 12, 2010 1:49 pm ET)
        3 1
        Same sex marriage, reproductive rights for women, joining a union, and Tiger Woods' religion--and that just been in the last week.

        The only "choice" the NeoCons offer is you're either with them or against them.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by null1fy (January 12, 2010 3:09 pm ET)
        2 9
        Because abortion is murder, and same-sex marriages are selfish.

        The institution of marriage and its benefits are for your children to have a healthy environment, as well as allowing the parents to provide better with the tax breaks. Try thinking about someone other then yourself, it's very rewarding.

        Bush was a progressive. That's why the guns were taken away. Don't think republican=conservative and democrat=liberal. There are both conservative democrats and liberal republicans.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by wzwriter (January 12, 2010 4:11 pm ET)
          4 1
          Because abortion is murder, and same-sex marriages are selfish.

          And you're a spineless idiot who hides behind an alias.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (January 12, 2010 4:56 pm ET)
            1  
            Sure, wz, but you just don't understand the unselfishness involved in passing your tax burden onto somebody else so you can spend more money on your kids.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by null1fy (January 12, 2010 5:30 pm ET)
                2
              Or the unselfishness involved in passing your tax burden onto somebody else because you're gay so you can spend more money on yourself.

              Spending money on kids and supporting kids are 2 different things. It is not as whimsical as you make it sound.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (January 12, 2010 6:29 pm ET)
                1  
                I'm sorry, is there a gay deduction that I'm not aware of in the new tax code ? Was anybody promoting being gay in order to shirk ones taxes? You clearly stated your approval of parents expecting the childless to pick up the slack in taxes to support the lifestyle choice of the reproducers.

                How is taking from others to enrich yourself unselfish? I'd really like to hear your reasoning on this.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by neon desert (January 12, 2010 7:20 pm ET)
                  1  
                  While he's at it, I'd be interested to hear about the studies and evidence that leads him to conclude that children who grow up with gay parents are in an UNhealthy environment.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (January 12, 2010 8:26 pm ET)
                    1  
                    Don't get me wrong, I have no problem with people getting tax breaks for reproducing, I think it's good for society when kids are provided for, and as an American, don't mind helping parents out.

                    I wouldn't mind picking up even more of the slack for adopters, who are taking on a responsibility that they didn't create themselves.

                    I just don't have much patience for those who decide they want to have kids, reach into my pocket to support their kids, then tell me how unselfish they are while letting me pay for their choice.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by null1fy (January 12, 2010 9:39 pm ET)
                        1
                      Married couples get tax breaks. That includes gay marriage (duh?).

                      Yes neon, kids with gay parents are in an unnatural, unhealthy environment.

                      With the way you call parents "reproducers" makes me wonder if I'm talking to a robot. Do you have even the smallest shred of humanity or is your soul completely black? And to correct you about people's "choices", having kids is natural. Not having kids is a "choice".

                      And if you're wary about people dipping into your pockets, that's a whole other issue all-together. The tax credits from married couples are not even the tip of the iceberg on that.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by tman418 (January 12, 2010 10:37 pm ET)
                        1  
                        Maybe its because gay couples see gay marriage as more than just an opportunity for tax breaks. Tax breaks to support children is not the first thing I think of when I think of marriage. They can also provide for children by adopting or a visit to the sperm bank or in vitro...whatever methods there are. Maybe they view it as a civil right and feel it's wrong for the government to forbid them to be officially married to the one they love.

                        Why shouldn't gays experience the same "benefits" that straight married couples get with the ones they love?

                        Do you have any studies that prove that children raised by legally married gay couples turn out horribly?
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by neon desert (January 13, 2010 12:28 pm ET)
                           
                        unknown:
                        "Yes neon, kids with gay parents are in an unnatural, unhealthy environment."

                        That's your studies and evidence? Not very compelling to me, but then again, I'm used to data garnered from reality. Thanks for all your effort, though.
                        Report Abuse
                • Author by null1fy (January 12, 2010 9:42 pm ET)
                    1
                  Where did I state my approval of parents expecting the childless to pick up the slack? I was talking about tax breaks you ignoramus. We get tax refunds because we're not wealthy. Even single people get tax refunds.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (January 12, 2010 10:56 pm ET)
                    1  
                    Where did I state my approval of parents expecting the childless to pick up the slack?(unknown)

                    The institution of marriage and its benefits are for... allowing the parents to provide better with the tax breaks
                    (unknown)

                    You should read your own posts.

                    You do understand that when one person gets a break, somebody else has to make up the difference... don't you ?

                    TRy to get caught up, and I may check back later to see if I can help you get cleared up on some of the other stuff.

                    Oh, and a free tip, it's really inviting responses when somebody as clueless as you throws in "duh" and other insults at people who are not as ignorant as you.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (January 13, 2010 2:19 am ET)
                      1  
                      OK, it's three hours later. I'm assuming you either are busy taking your kids out with my money, or realized that you hadn't really thought out your position before stupidly trying to argue it.

                      Have fun, and once again, I'm more than happy as an American taxpayer, to support your selfish decisions. Just try to show a little gratitude, moran.
                      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (January 12, 2010 12:05 pm ET)
      6 1
      And God knew that failure was important for growth, huh...? And they're taking away our opportunity to fail, huh? I'm so glad we had this enlightening session, Glenn.

      Now, excuse me while I go out and fail so I can get closer to God. Thank you for being there, Glenn.

      BTW, are the New England Patriots closer to God this week...? How about Philly and Green Bay?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by neon desert (January 12, 2010 12:14 pm ET)
        3  
        No, but they're smarter now, and on their way to success. Like Cleveland, or Atlanta, or Tampa Bay...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Reinhard (January 12, 2010 12:17 pm ET)
          3  
          I'll refrain from commenting on the Browns except to say there is always next year.

          Reinhard
          Support the War. Raise taxes!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by pilotx (January 12, 2010 12:56 pm ET)
            4 1
            I'm a Bears fan so I'll stay out of this convo.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (January 12, 2010 1:22 pm ET)
              2  
              I don't have a football team within 100 miles of me, so I'm ok.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by mary59 (January 12, 2010 1:46 pm ET)
                2  
                We have the Seahawks, but I guess we could say the same thing as the Colonel ;-)
                Report Abuse
                • Author by juliajayne1 (January 12, 2010 2:07 pm ET)
                  2  
                  Can I mention that the Cowboys are doing okay? Or will abuse be heaped on my little head? ;-)
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (January 12, 2010 2:11 pm ET)
                  2 1
                  I guess technically The Chargers are within 100 miles of me. I think they're a football team.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by congero6189599 (January 12, 2010 5:00 pm ET)
                    1  
                    "...The Chargers are within 100 miles of me. I think they're a football team."----Col.
                    Hahaha Col. I'am a Giants fan surrounded by fair weather Charger fans. Fans so long as their winning...pity me. hehe!
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (January 12, 2010 5:15 pm ET)
                      2 1
                      I was unaffected by the departure of the Rams and the Raiders. I'm a baseball guy, don't trust any sport with a clock.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by neon desert (January 12, 2010 7:17 pm ET)
                        3  
                        I don't trust any sport where the coach dresses like he'll be ready to take to the field if the need arises, but doesn't even have a glove...
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (January 12, 2010 8:56 pm ET)
                          1  
                          Have you ever seen Mike Scioscia's hands? He doesn't need a glove !
                          Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (January 12, 2010 1:38 pm ET)
             
          I like the Ravens because I liked the book about Michael Oler, now made into the movie called "The Blind Side".
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Ruby (January 12, 2010 2:11 pm ET)
             
          Who Dat?!

          No other Saints fans?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by wookie (January 12, 2010 1:02 pm ET)
        3  
        The Steelers were holier than the Pope for much of the season.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Bongo Fury (January 12, 2010 1:30 pm ET)
          1
        Every failure is an opportunity to agree with Beckenstein.Frand good,fire bad.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (January 12, 2010 12:08 pm ET)
      8 1
      I guess Hitler and Stalin aren't evil enough. Now we're like Satan.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (January 12, 2010 12:29 pm ET)
        3  
        My thoughts exactly. Next, we'll actually be Satan... but he's saving that one for closer to the 2010 elections.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (January 12, 2010 1:14 pm ET)
        3  
        Glenn may have just blown his w**. Satan's at the top of the evil totem pole. He can probably milk Satan for a little while longer, but where is he going to go from here?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by shaggles (January 12, 2010 1:21 pm ET)
          2  
          Yeah. That's what I was thinking too. But then his audience doesn't seem to mind him repeating the same thing over and over.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by neon desert (January 12, 2010 12:10 pm ET)
      3  
      Then again, you can fail repeatedly, re-label it "success", and still be dumb as a post. Can I get an Amen, Glenn? Sean?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Bongo Fury (January 12, 2010 12:13 pm ET)
      3 2
      So separation of chuch and state is just babble by 18th century revolutionists?In todays world,it is kill,kill,kill then stop and pray.Last I heard,their God didn't like killing,except in the old testament.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Reinhard (January 12, 2010 12:15 pm ET)
      3 3
      Satan is a Xian god. One of the better characters as far as literature goes.
      Let's give them what they want, we'll put god back into the public sector, as they wish, however the one stipulation is we call this god Mohammed.
      Still cool?

      Reinhard
      I Luv Je$u$
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Reinhard (January 12, 2010 1:09 pm ET)
        2  
        Thats what I thought. That's the problem with religious folks. It's always their god. My god this. My god that. Well, wait a second what about my god? "There's only one god". Let me guess, yours? Always a caveat.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by clearstate (January 12, 2010 12:18 pm ET)
      2 1
      So is Beck saying that he needs to fail a whole bunch of times in order to be smarter than a 5th grader? Well, Beck's show is losing more sponsors every day so I don't know how long Fox will be willing to pay for it themselves. Maybe he should loose his TV and radio shows so he'll get smarter.

      This must go back to how the progressives started the whole "separation of church and state" thing and not Thomas Jefferson. All those years ago, the nasty progressives locked away God's power.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by epkklk851 (January 12, 2010 12:20 pm ET)
      7 1
      Glenn, it is easy to sit in your position and talk about being free to fail. Yes, you have been fired, and you had an alcohol problem and you ruined your first marriage. But even if you loose your show on Fox, you can still manage to never have to work again in your life and live comfortably. I don't think the freedom to hit bottom is a great freedom. Some of us don't have to hit bottom to see we have problems and some of us see others hit bottom and drown, and they take others with them. What if you hadn't recovered from your failures, you might suffer, but what about what it does to your children? Your failure would put them several rows farther back from the starting line. Did they deserve that? What wrong choices did they make? What about all the people who make wise choices and still fail because of others. For instance, I picked a modest house in a working class neighborhood that was well within our family budget, and yet, that house is now worth $100,000 less than when I signed the mortgage. I have also lost all the downpayment money I had. I can pay my bills, but the loss of all this money isn't my fault, it was lost through the economic meltdown. Believe me, I don't enjoy the freedom of having hit bottom. It didn't teach me much, either. I wonder, are you seeing yourself as a messiah, Glenn?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by juliajayne1 (January 12, 2010 12:37 pm ET)
      6  
      Progressives, like Satan..............I didn't know Satan was a progressive ;-0)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by soze169880 (January 12, 2010 12:38 pm ET)
      4  
      You know, far be it from me to try to out-theologian the Great College Dropout, but doesn't Christianity hold that our problems began with Satan offering us a choice?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (January 12, 2010 12:43 pm ET)
        5 1
        You mean, high school dropout? Beck attended one religion class in college in a special program at Yale for "non-traditional" students. Liebermann got him into the program. He dropped out before the semester was over. Beck's biographical sketches a few months indicated that it was unclear about his graduation from high school . . . that has been changed recently. Beck calls himself a "self-educated" man. His teacher stunk.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by soze169880 (January 12, 2010 1:00 pm ET)
          2  
          And, as I-forget-who said of Disraeli, he's a self-made man who worships his creator.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (January 12, 2010 12:44 pm ET)
        4 2
        Of course it did... God apparently wanted Man to remain ignorant... sort of like a prehistoric FOX viewer.

        According to the Bible:
        "Behold, the man has become like one of *us*, knowing good and evil; and now, lest he put forth his hand and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever"


        So really, God never intended man to have "eternal life"... at least according to the Bible.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by John Paradox (January 12, 2010 7:29 pm ET)
          1  
          But...but...but some itinerant preacher came to my town and said that Adam and Eve were thrown out because they ate the apple!!!1!!one!

          That quote is the most ignored in the history of Christianity...
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Reinhard (January 12, 2010 12:49 pm ET)
        3 2
        Satan had nothing to do with our "fall from grace".
        Adam and Eve were set-up. Their god offered them a deal that was bogus.In order to have the knowledge of good evil they would have to first have to eat the fruit. This is a paradox. They have no why to evaluate the consequences of eating the fruit because, according to the legend, the fruit must be eaten to gain the knowledge. Their god was asking them to do something for which he never equipped them.
        So Satan gets the rap and god looks like a nice guy because he gave them a choice.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (January 12, 2010 12:59 pm ET)
          4 2
          You are exactly right. It is one of the greatest flaws in the popularly accepted Christian fairy tale.

          In essence, God is punishing mankind for disobedience, even though they did not have knowledge of Right and Wrong until after they disobeyed him. Once they knew that disobeying God was wrong, it was too late. It's like sentencing a toddler to life in prison for eating a cookie you placed in front of him.

          It was just a clumsy attempt by the mythmakers to explain the existence of evil in a world under God's control.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by wookie (January 12, 2010 1:16 pm ET)
            4 1
            And God being the creator is responsible for Satan and everything else. Its like Stephen King saying that Cujo just chose to rebel.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by nerzog (January 12, 2010 1:29 pm ET)
              1 2
              In fact, there's a passage in the Bible where God brags about being responsible for all the "calamities" in the world. I don't remember which book and verse, but it's in the Old Testament, before God became a Liberal.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (January 12, 2010 1:25 pm ET)
            3 3
            It was just a clumsy attempt by the mythmakers to explain the existence of evil in a world under God's control


            And to warn us to keep them wimmens in check!
            Report Abuse
            • Author by juliajayne1 (January 12, 2010 1:40 pm ET)
              2  
              And to warn us to keep them wimmens in check!

              We're an evil lot, fer shure.......;-)
              Report Abuse
        • Author by Ruby (January 12, 2010 1:32 pm ET)
          2 2
          Jews believe that Adam and Eve's fall from grace was, of course, planned by God because it was the best thing. Adam and Eve, without the option of choosing sin, would not have a complete life. As in, you can't have good without evil, they are dependent on one another for existence. What's the value or virtue of living a good life, if you never had an option to do anything else? It's just existence.

          Of course, the Bible isn't meant to be taken literally. No great books ever are.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (January 12, 2010 1:44 pm ET)
            2 2
            Of course, the Bible isn't meant to be taken literally.

            What...are you serious? Don't tell me that, man...

            <sarcasm>
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mary59 (January 12, 2010 1:55 pm ET)
              4 1
              yup.

              Something written down after maybe a thousand years of oral tradition, altered, translated & etc by many folks; it's amazing how much good stuff still survives in there (& not surprising how much rotten stuff got inserted!)

              Report Abuse
            • Author by juliajayne1 (January 12, 2010 2:25 pm ET)
              2 1
              I prefer my belief systems taken literally. It's too stressful to move from concrete to abstract thought, and makes oversimplification simpler....;-0)
              Report Abuse
              • Author by mary59 (January 12, 2010 2:59 pm ET)
                3  
                The foul creature Beck presumes to speak for the Almighty.
                Hand me the holy hand grenade....
                Report Abuse
          • Author by nativeofsf (January 12, 2010 5:00 pm ET)
            2  
            Your "Adam and Eve's fall from grace" statement, et al., has a Christian motif running all through it, Ruby. Your words belie your background. Grace is a Christian term, especially in the manner you used it. You are not Jewish. You are not stating a fact, you are merely expressing your opinion...and a Christian one at that.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Ruby (January 12, 2010 5:06 pm ET)
              3 1
              I know...

              I was raised Catholic.

              I wasn't trying to pretend I was Jewish, I was just offering an alternative interpretation of the Adam and Eve story.

              Was that bad? I'm not sure why people are thumbs-downing me.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by eweston8542983 (January 12, 2010 8:04 pm ET)
                2  
                S'ok. Many thumbs down towards thoughts like yours come with no thought attached to them. Nor any bravery to actually reply to you.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by juliajayne1 (January 12, 2010 9:27 pm ET)
                  1 1
                  I gave you a thumbs up. Ruby. I thought where you were headed was righteous.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by nativeofsf (January 14, 2010 4:28 am ET)
                1  
                Mary, if you were “just offering an alternative interpretation” then why state "Jews believe that..." when in actuality it was your own interpretation? When you wrote "Jews believe that...", you were presumed to be stating a fact, a Jewish one. And it was not. Your "Was it bad?" query can only be answered in the affirmative. And it was more than naive. Then you go on to state, "I was just offering an alternative interpretation of the Adam and Eve story.", as a defense. Wouldn’t it have been proper for you to initially state, you [Mary] believe that...? Also, I never stated you were trying to be or pretending to be Jewish.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by nativeofsf (January 14, 2010 4:33 am ET)
                  1  
                  Apologies...those alternate characters are code for alternate punctuation. And they do not appear in the "preview" box, only surfacing after one clicks on the "save" button.

                  Mary, if you were "just offering an alternative interpretation" then why state "Jews believe that..." when in actuality it was your own interpretation? When you wrote "Jews believe that...", you were presumed to be stating a fact, a Jewish one. And it was not. Your "Was it bad?" query can only be answered in the affirmative. And it was more than naive. Then you go on to state, "I was just offering an alternative interpretation of the Adam and Eve story.", as a defense. Wouldn't it have been proper for you to initially state, you [Mary] believe that...? Also, I never stated you were trying to be or pretending to be Jewish.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by nativeofsf (January 14, 2010 4:59 am ET)
                       
                    Ruby, I apologize for incorrectly and repeatedly writing Mary, I meant to write Ruby. I regret my error.
                    Report Abuse
    • Author by bintx (January 12, 2010 12:38 pm ET)
      4 1
      This man is crazy and he's dangerous. Somebody really needs to wake up and see the damage that he is doing to our country.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by soze169880 (January 12, 2010 12:54 pm ET)
        5  
        I can't take you seriously because you don't have a blackboard connecting him to Hitler.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (January 12, 2010 12:39 pm ET)
      4 1
      Thanks, for sharing your fairy tales with us, Glenda. Here's a little secret for you... Human Rights have always been dependent on the power structure within which people live.

      Oh, I know the Founding Fathers used a lot of flowery language and lofty rhetoric about "God-given rights", but those rights don't mean squat if the government or person(s) in power don't recognize them.

      The right to life and liberty are pretty worthless to the man laying face down in a rice paddy with a plastic bag over his head.

      It's a simple, ugly fact of human history.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bjbutterfli (January 12, 2010 1:05 pm ET)
        4  
        -Let's not forget that the Founding Fathers ideas of God where not the same as Beck's either.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (January 12, 2010 2:32 pm ET)
          2 1
          Thomas Paine thought the Bible was pretty much full of crap.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (January 12, 2010 2:32 pm ET)
          2 1
          Thomas Paine thought the Bible was pretty much full of crap.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by edgewaterprog (January 12, 2010 3:35 pm ET)
          2  
          Apparently not....I have never seen a writing of Jefferson or Franklin or Hamilton use such convoluted 12-step talk to explain the existence of the diety and satan.

          Obviously, Beck has has some issues with personal failings and a late conversion to Mormonism that makes it difficult to relate his "theology" to more mainstream deists or Christians. Going off on a theological tangent like this makes him seem a liitle odd.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by raine315 (January 12, 2010 12:39 pm ET)
      2  
      Does this mean Beck is PRO CHOICE?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bintx (January 12, 2010 12:40 pm ET)
      6  
      You know what's really interesting? The majority of the Bible professors at our local Southern Baptist University are progressive Democrats. They believe people like Beck do not exhibit Christ-like [Christian] beliefs.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by only_myschly3567 (January 12, 2010 12:55 pm ET)
      3  
      So the whole "failure is needed before success" is saying that W Bush started off the 21st century as good as we could've possibly started it?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Midnight Kevin (January 12, 2010 1:02 pm ET)
      3 1
      If Beck and his teabaggers really want Christ's second coming, why don't they all organize and write in Jesus for their candidates?

      Also, Beck claims that God will provide the failure and failure is inevitable, then claims that progressives are taking away God, which Beck points as proof that we are starting to fail, but if God planned all this, then really Beck is fighting against God's will...
      ------------------------------
      The Midnight Review
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Max Credits (January 12, 2010 1:02 pm ET)
      2  
      "Shall I tell you the law of God in regard to the African race? If the white man who belongs to the chosen seed mixes his blood with the seed of Cain, the penalty, under the law of God, is death on the spot. This will always be so."

      I guess Brigham Young was a Progressive. Who knew?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pilotx (January 12, 2010 1:03 pm ET)
      2 1
      Funny, he talks about freedom but he gives his life and freewill over to a deity instead of taking responsibility for himself and accepting the complex choices freethinkers make everyday. How is that freedom? I don't get it. Atheists accept the idea that they might be wrong and accept the consequences but a believer in a religion has to accept the terms and conditions of their chosen religion which in effect places limitations on them, so who is really free?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (January 12, 2010 1:07 pm ET)
        2 2
        Their idea of "free will" is basically two choices. Believe in their God and have eternal life, or don't believe and go to Hell. Choice A, you live on a cloud, Choice B, you get tortured for eternity. That's free will?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by pilotx (January 12, 2010 1:13 pm ET)
          1  
          I agree. As a cynic it seems a bit too good to be true to believe that all I have to do is accept a certain doctrine and I get an eternity of bliss for virtually nothing.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (January 12, 2010 1:03 pm ET)
      4 1
      These cretins are flirting around the edges of "prosperity gospel" and other nonsense. Saying that God "wants us to fail" is only a small step away from claiming that poor people are poor because God wills it. The next "logical" conclusion is that those whom God has blessed with great wealth need not pay taxes to help the poor.

      There it is, folks... the Frankenstein marriage of Country Club Republican Social Darwinism and Troglodyte Nutbag Evangelism.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (January 12, 2010 1:59 pm ET)
        2  
        The prosperity gospel is false gospel and has nothing to do with the Bible or Christianity.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (January 12, 2010 1:25 pm ET)
      1 2
      NOBODY takes away your CHOICES the way "GOD" does.

      When it comes to limiting freedom in America, gov't is MINOR LEAGUE next to the CHURCH - ANY church. And when they are successful, it is when they are doing the church's bidding!

      Religion can only further limit the "amount of stuff you can do." (Another way of saying "FREEDOM") and it only evers ADDS prohibitions and taboo's. (IOW - fruther encroaches on you FREEDOM.)

      ----------------------------------------------------------
      To say othewise is to reveal either your ignoracne or your zealotry. And NEITHER is an AMERICAN value.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (January 12, 2010 1:33 pm ET)
        1 1
        There is a bigger flaw in Glenda's feeble-minded rant; No matter how many government safety nets there are, people can still choose to fail. The only choice he's really concerned about is the rich a**hole's choice not to pay taxes.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by MilitantMNMan (January 12, 2010 2:05 pm ET)
        1
      I worked with an old man who said, "Beck knows more than any pundit in the mainstream media." I guess wisdom doesn't always come with age.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MickD (January 12, 2010 2:18 pm ET)
        1  
        Translation: I choose to believe what Beck says because I have no other critical thinking and I'm damned afraid.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Boxer1979 (January 12, 2010 2:10 pm ET)
        1
      Beck: Progressives, like Satan, are supplanting God and taking away choice

      I can only take about a 1:14 of that crap! The woman who called his show was just as lost as Becky is! I really feel bad for people who's brain is just as dense as his and believe his views. I have no other comeback to that loony bin conversation.

      SMH!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fishgirl26 (January 12, 2010 2:37 pm ET)
         
      Doesn't Glenda's choice of church limit his choices?? He's not supposed to drink, gamble, or drink caffine..have tattoos etc? How has this administration or any progressive take away any choices? As far as I'm concerned I don't need any republican telling me that I need to have a baby I don't want, fight a war that is illegal, or not be able to talk on my cell phone without someone listening in...last time I checked all this stuff wasn't happening but for some reason Glenn seems to think that his freedoms are disappearing?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by edgewaterprog (January 12, 2010 3:40 pm ET)
      2 1
      I consider myself to be a progressive Christian and resent having this half-wit and his caller spewing charges of Satanism all over me.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by edgewaterprog (January 12, 2010 3:40 pm ET)
      1 1
      I consider myself to be a progressive Christian and resent having this half-wit and his caller spewing charges of Satanism all over me.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mikehuck1976 (January 12, 2010 4:25 pm ET)
      1  
      Has Glenn Beck become the Church Lady? He is officially a caricature now.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by steelhead3686 (January 12, 2010 5:06 pm ET)
      1  
      I think it was George Carlin that said it best about rights: If God gave us rights then I think he'd give everyone the right to enough food and a home.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Marker (January 12, 2010 5:33 pm ET)
        1
      Beck claims to know what the "Sky Fairy" has in mind. LOL, religion is the biggest con game there is.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by williamsn517 (January 13, 2010 4:54 am ET)
         
      With Beck's logic, the cubs should be grateful that they haven't won a world series for a 100+ yrs.
      Report Abuse