Beck suggests Obama is "a radical revolutionary" who is trying "to intentionally collapse the financial system"
January 21, 2010 9:52 am ET
From the January 21 broadcast of Premiere Radio Networks' The Glenn Beck Program:
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
















Fox News: We report, you believe. No questions asked, no answers give.
"radical revolutionaries"
Our Founding Fathers? I will not believe it untill I hear it on FOX NEWS!
Hey Becky Obama is not a radical revolutionary! Anyone who gets elected to government office will be a puppet of the corporate influience. THE SAME CORPORATE INFLUIENCE WHO PAYS YOU TO SPIT NONSENSE OUT YOUR MOUTH! Until someone get BALLS to tell corporations to F off corporate influience will continue in this country of preadatory capitalism. Opps can I say Global Preadatory Capitalism.
Bascially, the Right wants to do away with ALL entitlements. Privatize EVERYTHING. Shrink the gov't down to almost nothing. Now... They know they could never win running hard against Social Security, Public Education, (etc...) and pretty much everything else the gov't provides. They know that they could never get the votes to just eliminate these things outright. BUT... if they ran up deficits so large that the gov't could barely afford it's own financing costs - it would be their proposal to eliminate all these things, versus the Democrats (assumed) proposal to raise taxes. At THAT point, the public might finally come around to eliminating all these "expensive programs that we can no longer afford" (thanks to the RIght and their huge deficits!) And that's really why the Republicans have done nothing for the last 30 years but run up huge deficits and huge increases to the national debt every chance they get: THEY'RE ACTIVELY TRYING TO BANKRUPT THE GOVERNMENT SO THEY CAN FINALLY GET THE SUPPORT TO ELIMIANTE ALL THESE OTHERWISE POPULAR PROGRAMS, OUT OF [FAUX / CONTIVED] NECESSITY!
And the more you think about THAT, and the more you compare it to their actions and their rhetoric since 1980, taking into account their history of both hypocrisy and projection... the more sense it makes.
------------------------------------------------------
Not that I'm paranoid or anything. Tea?