About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Wallace on Brown's looks:  A female Fox anchor said, "you guys have all had Sarah Palin, now we've got Scott Brown"

January 21, 2010 10:48 am ET

From the January 21 edition of Fox Business' Imus in the Morning:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by DAWUSS (January 21, 2010 10:51 am ET)
      1  
      If you = Republicans, then Wallace is dead on.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by christopher howard (January 21, 2010 10:52 am ET)
      3  
      Eye-candy for wingnuts of both sexes? Who says conservatives don't believe in inclusion?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by The_Cat (January 21, 2010 10:58 am ET)
        3  
        Republicans: The final triumph of appearance over substance.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by DAWUSS (January 21, 2010 11:00 am ET)
          1  
          Now the Democrats should be able to include both in a beautiful combination: substance and appearance. Great on the outside, and great on the inside...
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (January 21, 2010 11:00 am ET)
        1  
        Maybe Palin could do a nude spread exclusively for Fake News,

        They could flash in shots of her butt and boobs throughout the day. Might go over well with their "audience," and should be a ratings success.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by bintx (January 21, 2010 11:01 am ET)
      2 1
      He POSED NUDE for a centerfold in Cosmo. He agreed [and then later denied he agreed] with one of his supporters call to sodomize his opponent with a curling iron. ["We can do that" with a smile] Tell me how that fits into the "conservative" mindset? Give me a BREAK!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (January 21, 2010 11:20 am ET)
        1  
        He won an election. That's all they care about. Grabbing and holding power is the end-all for the Republican Party. Implementing beneficial public policy appears nowhere on their radar screen.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (January 21, 2010 11:27 am ET)
          1  
          Oh, I know. I have two dear friends who are political club wonks. They were THRILLED because the GOP won one for "their side." The fact that this man represents NONE of the values that they espouse is irrelevant. It's all about the "team" mentality. The only "team" I care about is Team USA. As for the GOP and the DNC . . . they can take a flying leap . . . both of 'em. Money-grubbing machines who only care about self-preservation.

          I HATE POLITICAL PARTIES! LOL!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (January 21, 2010 12:49 pm ET)
            1  
            The big problem is they think Team USA and Team GOP are the same thing. It's like suggesting that the Bengals and the Browns both can't represent Ohio even though both reside in Ohio.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by nerzog (January 21, 2010 12:51 pm ET)
            1  
            [http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/pic/153/988278~Team-America-World-Police-Posters.jpg]
            Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (January 21, 2010 12:39 pm ET)
        1  
        I teased it out there earlier, but I had read about a female democrat from out west who was forced to step down after a major conservative hubub about her racy myspace photo's. I'm trying to look for that now, but it's clear to me this is just another in a long line of double standards they practice.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by foghornleghorn (January 21, 2010 11:09 am ET)
      2  
      Fox News reminds me of my high school cafeteria.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mustardman (January 21, 2010 11:24 am ET)
      1  
      Oh god, shoot me now.

      What the hell is wrong with these people. The only thing they seem to care about is if their elected officials look good and carry a bible!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (January 21, 2010 11:33 am ET)
      1  
      The official publication of the Republican Party will soon be In Touch magazine.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (January 21, 2010 12:02 pm ET)
         
      Congratulations for the people of Massachussets, sincerely.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (January 21, 2010 12:22 pm ET)
      2 1
      First thing is first, Sarah Palin = NOT HOT.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (January 21, 2010 12:25 pm ET)
        1  
        as her beach photo in Hawaii proved. Darn,it is allabout looks.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (January 21, 2010 12:30 pm ET)
          1  
          Yeah, see, I don't find her physically attractive at all. If that's what we're talking about. she's a little too "trailer trashy" for me. And then, she opens her mouth, and gets less attractive by the second.

          For me, I'm more of a fan of say, Elizabeth Kucinich.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by riverdog (January 21, 2010 12:40 pm ET)
          1
        wow you are either blind, gay or it is opposite day in your house (moms house/basement). shes a duffass but a hot one.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (January 21, 2010 12:43 pm ET)
        1  
        Celebrity has a way of making people appear more attractive than they really are. Palin is an attractive middle-aged woman but she's not exactly the super model the right make her out to be.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (January 21, 2010 12:41 pm ET)
      1  
      I remember reading an interview Johnny Ramone did with some conservative website in which he talks about how people talking about JFK's good looks turned him off of Kennedy. He thought people supported Kennedy because of his looks so he turned against him (which is equally stupid but whatever.) These days the cons seem to think that's the only thing they need.
      Report Abuse