About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

O'Reilly receives "Worst Person" gold for suggesting CIA should kidnap Pelosi and Reid and waterboard Pelosi

January 26, 2010 9:59 pm ET

From the January 26 edition of MSNBC's Countdown with Keith Olbermann:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

EXCLUSIVE AUDIO: O'Reilly suggests the CIA should kidnap Pelosi and Reid and waterboard Pelosi

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Benjamin Kenon (January 26, 2010 11:19 pm ET)
         
      I just want to point out that if anyone had suggested the same for Tom Delay or Dick Cheney or any other one of those guys a couple years ago they would have found themselves on the business end of the FBI.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Bongo Fury (January 26, 2010 11:21 pm ET)
      2  
      Too easy.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (January 26, 2010 11:35 pm ET)
      3 1
      Ted Baxter got in front of a live audience...

      And he got all worked up, and wet himself, and wanted to deliver some real eye-poppin' garbage, to keep up with the Rodeo Clown and Rush.

      O'Reilly is truly pathetic, the very definition of pathetic.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by carlileb5935 (January 27, 2010 4:01 am ET)
        1 1
        Might there not be legal sanctions against BOR about Pelosi, being that she's third in line?

        Where's the Secret Sevice on this little joke?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by RavenRog (January 27, 2010 8:39 am ET)
          2 1
          Legal sanctions on a comedy bit? If that was the case, there'd be a prison overflow of Bush-hating liberals in the media that mocked Bush and co. for eight years.

          In case you forgot, waterboarding Nancy Pelosi would not kill her or even cause any real harm.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (January 27, 2010 10:06 am ET)
            1 1
            In case you forgot, waterboarding is and has ALWAYS been a form of torture which can and DOES cause death and very real harm. People have been tried and CONVICTED of this crime IN THIS COUNTRY . . . in fact, the last time was during the Reagan administration . . . prosecuted by the Reagan DOJ.

            Turn off Fox and hate talk radio. They're lying to you. Try reading.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Bongo Fury (January 27, 2010 11:10 am ET)
                 
              For FailLiberal I would suggest Sartre's "Nausea" and for old con,anything by Kafka.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by ProgLib (January 27, 2010 6:32 am ET)
           
        I love how the audience loved it and indulged the whole thing cheering him on and suggesting Gitmo. His viewers eat this stuff up for breakfast, lunch and dinner. It's basically a daily feeding... like the animals at the zoo get.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by RavenRog (January 27, 2010 9:05 am ET)
          2 2
          His zoo animal followers can understand a joke. You guys can't.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (January 27, 2010 10:07 am ET)
            1  
            Sorry, I don't consider kidnap and torture a joke. I don't care who is telling the alleged "joke." The fact that you do explains why you are such an avid Fox regurgitator.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by riverdog (January 27, 2010 10:36 am ET)
          1 2
          the reason the audiance laughed was because he was joking, you know what that is, yeah, i didn't think so.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (January 27, 2010 10:46 am ET)
            1 2
            I understand "jokes," but I don't find threatening bodily injury to anyone, no matter who the "jokester" is, particularly funny. This wasn't a funny "joke."
            Report Abuse
          • Author by ProgLib (January 28, 2010 4:11 am ET)
               
            Sure, I understand the fact that O'Reilly is a joke... what he says is just hate speech.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by MagCynic (January 27, 2010 12:15 am ET)
      3 11
      Jesus, it was a joke people. I swear that liberals are the most sensitive people I've ever encountered. Remember when Anita Dunn said Mao was one of her favorite political philosophers? Later on she said she was just joking. From the clips though it was clear that she either wasn't joking or had terrible comedic skills. At least you could tell O'Reilly was clearly joking here.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Civic Racecar (January 27, 2010 12:39 am ET)
        4 1
        Liberals are sensitive to the fact that the Right, including Bill O, Hannity and especially Beck, make incendiary comments that could and likely do cause people to commit or at least contemplate acts of violence against the subject of their monologues.

        Personally, I don't think Dunn should have backed down regarding the Mao comment. She was perfectly in the right to say that Mao was one of her favorite philosophers. However, Beck and Hannity started with the personal attacks against her. Calling an individual a commie, socialist, facist, etc. does nothing more than to dehumanize the target of such attacks.

        When you begin to dehumanize an individual, it becomes easier to commit acts of violence against them, especially in mob-like settings. The fact that Bill O, Hannity, and Beck are on tv saying this stuff means that any individual near one of their victims could easily be attacked. It doesn't take much to encourage a mentally unstable person to explode and commit an act of violence, but Beck, Hannity, and Bill O continue to have no problem striking those matches.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by MagCynic (January 27, 2010 12:44 am ET)
          2 5
          That's fine for you to believe that but there has been no evidence presented to verify your opinion.

          You say: "make incendiary comments that could and likely do cause people to commit or at least contemplate acts of violence against the subject of their monologues."

          Who are these people though? The murderer who killed Dr. Tiller? Did he do it because of what O'Reilly said or did he do it because he was insane?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by usp (January 27, 2010 1:58 am ET)
            3  
            the insanity defense doesn't fly. calculating and cold. with a 'god forgive me' burped out at the end for good measure.

            keep churning out the slop babe.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by ProgLib (January 27, 2010 6:36 am ET)
                 
              Who are these people though?


              Umm, did you think about maybe other future abortion doctors that O'Reilly might decide to rail against, like he did to Tiller? He will give them nicknames, too, probably.

              To be fair, he didn't give Tiller that nickname, but he certainly used it more than once or twice.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by Mayer (January 27, 2010 3:41 am ET)
               
            Who are these people? Oh, how about Jim Adkisson, who walked into my church and started killing people, men and women, didn’t get to the children, because he was about to lose his food stamps and because the church was full of liberals and tolerant towards gays, blacks and other types of people he didn’t approve of?

            Knoxville News Sentinel - July 28, 2007
            "Inside [Adkisson’s] house, officers found ‘Liberalism is a Mental Health Disorder’ by radio talk show host Michael Savage, ‘Let Freedom Ring‘ by talk show host Sean Hannity, and ‘The O'Reilly Factor,’ by television talk show host Bill O'Reilly." He brought about 80 shells for his gun and a note that said he was going to keep killing liberals till the cops got him. He only got off three shots – he didn’t expect liberals to fight back – but that was enough to wound eight, killing two. Too bad Adkisson was the only one who went to jail. I hope he meets some gays in prison who can make him more familiar with their lifestyle choices.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by zenphoenix42 (January 27, 2010 7:39 am ET)
               
            How about the idiots toting guns to town hall meetings? How about the crazed no-nothing Fox Kool-Aid drinker that takes a shot at Obama down the road sometime? The other day, a guy told me and a friend that he and his buddies like to take pictures of Obama down to the shooting range. My friend and I told him he should leave before we call the FBI. Why is this garbage acceptable? If I had done that with pics of G.W. 8 years ago (scratch that...probably even NOW), some right-wing line-toe-er would've called the cops.

            Wanna hear a hilarious joke?: We should kidnap and torture Sarah Palin! Get it? Isn't that hilarious? Ha ha ha! Hurt her real bad! Ha ha! Then subject her to things that we've been pretending AREN'T torture but we're definitely ADMITTING ARE in the context of our joke! Ha ha, hypocrisy!
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Civic Racecar (January 27, 2010 9:26 pm ET)
               
            "When you begin to dehumanize an individual, it becomes easier to commit acts of violence against them, especially in mob-like settings. The fact that Bill O, Hannity, and Beck are on tv saying this stuff means that any individual near one of their victims could easily be attacked. It doesn't take much to encourage a mentally unstable person to explode and commit an act of violence, but Beck, Hannity, and Bill O continue to have no problem striking those matches."

            I'm sorry you must have missed this part, so I reposted it because you might have become tired of reading my post after the first paragraph.

            In this case, Scott Roeder is a perfect example. A guy with serious issues that is predisposed to Bill O's and Beck's incendiary remarks. It doesn't take a whole lot of imagination to believe that an individual, in a similar situation, listening to either Bill O's show could and likely would murder another individual that Bill O claimed to be a "baby-killer".
            Report Abuse
        • Author by salg01 (January 27, 2010 9:12 am ET)
          3 3
          Lets see, I remember Randi Rhodes saying someone should take bush out on a boat and give him cement shoes, I remember someone saying "why isnt there assasinations nowadays, all the nazi signs and bush with a hitler mustache and the violent protests. All the horrible things that were said everyday by the left. Quit being such damn hipocrats please.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (January 27, 2010 10:15 am ET)
               
            Randi Rhodes is a left wing O'Reilly, in my opinion. Both say really, really stupid things. Thanks for pointing out the similarities between the two.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Civic Racecar (January 27, 2010 8:54 pm ET)
               
            Just so you are aware, I'm not being a hypocrite. I think there are just as many incendiary individuals on the left as there are on the right. However, this story was about Bill O making a comment about kidnapping and waterboarding Pelosi.

            Personally, I think everyone needs to tone down the remarks so individuals on each side can rationally debate issues. However, when you have members of a "news" organization making incendiary remarks, the real conversation gets drowned out.

            I've said it numerous times, when someone has a broadcast platform (tv, radio, internet, or newspapers), they need to exercise some good judgment. No reasonable person would yell fire in a crowded theater, but that is what Bill O was effectively doing and what Beck does every weekday. I'm not saying that Bill O and Beck should stop talking, but they should at least control what they say and take into consideration the effect that it will have on others. This applies equally to individuals on the Left as well.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by zenphoenix42 (January 28, 2010 4:19 pm ET)
                 
              They understand perfectly well the effect that it will have on others. That's why they're doing it.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by riverdog (January 27, 2010 10:39 am ET)
            2
          "She was perfectly in the right to say that Mao was one of her favorite philosophers."

          wow, a guy murders 80 million but if he has some catchy lines he must be great. idiots
          Report Abuse
          • Author by foghornleghorn (January 27, 2010 12:44 pm ET)
              1
            Can't a person be both a "murderer" and a philosopher?

            Guess you haven't read any Mao. Maybe you should. After all, he did turn a country of peasants repeatedly subjugated by Japan into a world power.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Civic Racecar (January 27, 2010 9:06 pm ET)
               
            You are looking completely beyond the quote and looking at the individual. You also misinterpreted my statement. Mao was a horrible person, but that does not discount his ability to produce an interesting or thought provoking statement. The fact that Mao made the statement completely clouds your judgment. If George W. Bush had said the same thing, would you still think that Dunn had no right to say it?

            I might also mention that you proved my point above, perfectly. You just devolved a rational debate into an attack on me and the people who agree with me. I'm sorry if you disagree with Dunn, myself, or those that agree with me, but calling us idiots does nothing more than marginalize us. Marginalization is the greatest threat here in the US, not people quoting Mao.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (January 27, 2010 3:03 am ET)
        3 1
        Anita Dunn didn't say that he was one of her favorite philosophers.

        She said that he was a favorite ONLY when she wanted to make ONE point - that both he and Mother Teresa had interesting ideas about how to explain that one should follow the path that one feels self-directed to follow!!! Not that he was her favorite philosopher, you dum-dum!

        She said that she was JOKING about another part of her comment.

        You are so far behind you haven't even passed the start line yet!!! You don't KNOW what the clips showed - you only know what you were told to type.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by salg01 (January 27, 2010 9:13 am ET)
          2 4
          spin it the way you want if it helps you sleep at night
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (January 27, 2010 10:14 am ET)
               
            fact is not spin. What you watch on O'Reilly's "No Spin by MY Spin, Da** It" program is spin. If his lies help you sleep, you have my sympathies. Living in a fantasy world is very difficult . . . most folks who have that problem usually require psychological counseling eventually.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by riverdog (January 27, 2010 12:27 pm ET)
              2  
              your interp of her mao comment is opinion not fact. however if by the logic here if she was joking them i guess you find funny the murder and oppression of millions is funny.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by ProgLib (January 27, 2010 6:34 am ET)
        1  
        Yet, when Olbermann makes a supposedly sexist joke about Michelle Malkin being a bag of lipstick (something or other), the right goes crazy with the typical attacks that he gets. But, Billo gets away with all of it, all the time.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by OldCon (January 27, 2010 6:42 am ET)
          3
        Sounded funny to me and for the most part, Bill O is terrible at delivering a joke.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by rkbaz (January 27, 2010 6:54 am ET)
           
        Agreed. Olbermann said he doesn't care if people don't watch. Not to worry, not many are!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Boxer1979 (January 27, 2010 7:23 am ET)
        2  
        I swear that liberals are the most sensitive people I've ever encountered.

        Why do you insist that if someone disagree with what someone says, and you may agree with that person, you consider the other a person a liberal?

        Try reposting your comment again.

        SMH!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by RavenRog (January 27, 2010 9:11 am ET)
          2 3
          They're uber-sensitive when the joke's on them.

          But when it's not....they are VICIOUS.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (January 27, 2010 10:11 am ET)
            2 1
            Nope. I don't approve of any so-called "joke" which refers to bodily injury of anybody. Apparently, you do.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (January 27, 2010 10:44 am ET)
              1 2
              You thought the joke was funny . . . I do not find any joke which refers to bodily injury of anybody funny. I got a thumbs down for that????? Wow, who's uber-sensitive now? LOL!
              Report Abuse
          • Author by raddave43 (January 27, 2010 11:12 am ET)
               
            "Uber" you wignuts really love using that word, do you even know what it means?
            Report Abuse
      • Author by PurpleState (January 27, 2010 8:31 am ET)
        3  
        One problem...

        Bill O'Reilly is not a comedian.

        Bill O'Reilly has terrible comedic skills.

        The right ripped up Anita Dunn for her failed joke (which, might we add, did NOT refer to violence), so Bill O should take his criticism the same way.

        You, MagCynic, are MY Worst Person in the World.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (January 27, 2010 10:10 am ET)
        1  
        I'm not a liberal, but I find "jokes" that refer to the bodily injury of another person repulsive, I don't care who's telling the "joke."

        Question? If this "joke" had been told by Jon Stewart or that DEMON Keith Olbermann about say, John McCain or the new golden boy, Mark Brown, would you be laughing? Probably not.

        It's not about sensitivity, sir, it's about common decency. O'Reilly and his zoo animals in the video have none.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Quicksilver M.S (January 28, 2010 7:44 am ET)
           
        Bill, did you hear the JOKE? About the homeless Haitian child and her puppy?

        Just, joking... HA Ha
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Publius39 (January 27, 2010 1:48 am ET)
      2  
      So the right think that they have won the legislative battle.. Now they think that they can dictate policy to the president as if he would actually listen.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by cugagcmu805031 (January 27, 2010 2:16 am ET)
        6  
        That's one of their problems with him. He ignores them, for the most part. On Huffpo this 'bagger was ranting about President Obama ignoring them on Sept. 12, 2009 in DC, totally ignoring the fact that it was widely known that the president had a previously scheduled event. I could feel his tears dropping on the keys of my laptop because the guy had been so brainwashed by the Beckistans that he thought that if enough of them showed up in DC, the president would cancel everything on his schedule and meet with them without any prior arrangements having been made. It was pitiful. For causing this amount of misinformation and grief among their followers, Fuchs Noose, the far rw radio entertainers, extreme fundamentalists, and far rw bloggers should be condemned to a place where they would have 0 contact with the outside world to avoid the spread of their insanity for profit scheme.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by rcgard13042 (January 27, 2010 6:05 am ET)
         
      Bill O'Reilly the greatest reason to bring back the fairness doctrine in the world
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ProgLib (January 27, 2010 6:30 am ET)
         
      I predicted this one. Clearly, easy to predict, but I gotta take credit for it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by realfactsguy (January 27, 2010 2:51 pm ET)
         
      Waterboarding wouldn't work on Pelosi anyway. Doesn't water kill witches? Wizard of Oz, hello!!! What hypocrites!
      Report Abuse