About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Palin: We'd be wise to seek "some divine intervention again" to be safe, secure and prosperous

February 06, 2010 11:22 pm ET

From Fox News' coverage of Sarah Palin's February 6 address to the National Tea Party Convention:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by k1dork (February 06, 2010 11:26 pm ET)
      1 20
      I can't wait to hear what's so bad about her opinion about seeking guidance through religious faith.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by leftofwhat (February 06, 2010 11:47 pm ET)
        9  
        "Then I get on my knees and pray,just like yesterday,we won't get fooled again."
        Report Abuse
      • Author by cugagcmu805031 (February 07, 2010 12:34 am ET)
        16 1
        Just because one seeks guidance through one's religious faith does not mean God will answer you when He knows what you are asking for is wrong. God doesn't answer just anyone's prayers. One of the things that Jesus commanded was to look out for the poor, widows, and orphans, and I don't think privatizing Social Security and medicare and eliminating/cutting programs like S-CHIP is what he had in mind. Neither do I think He had in mind enriching the poor at the expense of the rich. Palin would be wise to take the words of the Bible and act on them instead of using them for her own political purposes. I have never read anywhere in the Bible where Jesus advocated for the rich over the poor, and I read it everyday.

        Good News Bible Today's English Version -Proverbs 14:31
        If you oppress poor people, you insult the God who made them; but kindness shown to the poor is an act of worship.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by cugagcmu805031 (February 07, 2010 1:00 pm ET)
          5  
          I meant that I don't think Jesus meant to enrich the rich at the expense of the poor. It was in the wee hours of the morning when I posted.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Refresh (February 07, 2010 3:10 pm ET)
             
          Well said. That's what the religious conservatives financial policies would resemble if they stopped to genuinely consider WWJD instead of using religion to manipulate and justify their own agendas.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (February 07, 2010 5:09 pm ET)
            11
          What the left is trying to do with the "re-distribution of wealth" is antithetical to the verse you quote. It is impossible for a person to show kindness to the poor through the forced 'liberation' of his/her resources. Even if he is in agreement with the idea, it is not his action that is being taken - thus no worship occurs. Likewise, if he disagrees with the idea of forced 'liberation' of his goods, no worship occurs.
          As a matter of fact, the nannyocracy of the US makes the care of widows and the orphans more difficult for the pious. The government is an evil. A sometimes necessary evil, but an evil none the less.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (February 08, 2010 9:44 am ET)
            2  
            Obviously, you haven't read the Bible recently, have you?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by foghornleghorn (February 08, 2010 2:11 pm ET)
               
            It is impossible for a person to show kindness to the poor through the forced 'liberation' of his/her resources

            It is also impossible for a person to show kindness to the rich through the forced tax cuts for the top 1%. That's REAL redistribution of wealth.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Johaely (February 08, 2010 8:50 pm ET)
               
            "Forced 'liberation'" is what we have had to come up to. We can no longer depend on people doing the right thing without some incentive or benefit.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by snewkirk (February 07, 2010 1:19 am ET)
        10  
        Well, as an American atheist, I slap my forehead everytime I hear a politician say they're going to ask advice from a non-existent source.

        The thought that our elected officials make decisions that affect MY life & they do so because some "man in the sky" told them to, is a very scary thought.

        Decisions that affect the whole of the country should be based on facts & data, not on religion.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by neon desert (February 07, 2010 1:54 am ET)
          4  
          Awww, come on...

          Aren't you at least curious what sort of guidance Allah will give us?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by leftofwhat (February 07, 2010 1:59 am ET)
          1  
          I don't think she outgrew her childhood invisible friend."Can't you see her mommy."..."Yes Sarah.Will she be staying for grace?"
          Report Abuse
        • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (February 07, 2010 5:16 pm ET)
            10
          What facts and data are you able to utilize without some sort of a religious base? None. You must have a presuppositional base with which to interpret data, or it is useless. The question is not if we will use religion to direct policy, but whose religion will we use?
          The United States was founded on the presuppositional base of the Christian religion. It has operated on that base throughout its history (with increasing apostasy in the last 45 years or so). If you want to see what public policy without God looks like, look at the regimes of Hitler, Stalin and Mao.
          Your 'thought' that we should try to make policy devoid of rteligion is rather thoughtless.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Johaely (February 07, 2010 11:04 pm ET)
            1  
            That can be played both ways. If you want to see what does strict aderence to religion cause look at Iran, look at Uganda. And even thought they were "Atheist countries" Nazi Germany, Stalinist Russia and Maoist China did have a religion: Cult of personality.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (February 08, 2010 9:46 am ET)
            6  
            Have you been reading David Barton's slop? This country was NOT founded on the presuppositional base of the Christian religion. Read REAL history.

            I'm a Southern Baptist, and we believe that church and state should be completely separate. That's the only way to preserve both.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by foghornleghorn (February 08, 2010 2:12 pm ET)
            3  
            The United States was founded on the presuppositional base of the Christian religion

            Uh, no, it wasn't. I recommend reading the constitution.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Jaap357 (February 08, 2010 5:50 pm ET)
            2  
            Well lets see, who should I believe... Ed or I dunno George Washington...

            ""As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion..." -Treaty of Tripoli

            Its a toss-up...
            Report Abuse
      • Author by John Paradox (February 07, 2010 2:02 am ET)
        6  
        I can't wait to hear what's so bad about her opinion about seeking guidance through religious faith.

        I thought one of the RW Talking Points was 'self-reliance'. Not asking for help from the Nanny State or the Invisible Stepdaddy.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by digdirt357 (February 07, 2010 11:32 am ET)
           
        YOU CANNOT PETITION THE LORD WITH PRAYER!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by victorvallejo (February 07, 2010 12:10 pm ET)
           
        Let's pray that her God would give her good advice: go and check yourself into a sanitorium, Sarah. I don't know how so many people can take someone like her (or any other politician who pray to God for advice) seriously. Is God some kind of being or voice inhabiting within some people's brain? If it were not a belief shared by so many loonies, all of them would have been put in madhouses. Unfortunately, there is not enough money for that.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by JSM1963 (February 07, 2010 12:46 pm ET)
        2  
        Nothing. Sounds like a classic "straw man." The implication being that there is no one who is a christian in the current administration, or that God is on the side of the conservatives. If this christian woman had any interest in being truthful (a good christian value) and actually did some research, I'm confident she wouldn't have to search very far to find people of faith in this administration - starting with the president. In fact, if she were a true christian, she would probably defend Obama's christian faith to the teabaggers, but she wouldn't get too many $100,000 checks if she did. Our last president paid a lot of lip service to his christian faith, but did a whole lot of very un-christian things. As far as christian values are concerned, this administration and the democratic party are doing a better job. Hoard as money as you can, screw the next guy, but make sure you say your prayers doesn't cut it for me.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by spanone (February 07, 2010 1:21 pm ET)
        2  
        i can't wait to hear why we should care about her opinion at all.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by ProgLib (February 07, 2010 4:20 pm ET)
        1  
        Um, how about because not every single person in this country would need to turn to religious faith to guide them through hard times. Just like Brit Hume's idiotic advice to Tiger Woods to become a Christian... that's not going to work for everybody. Yet, conservatives thinks it does, which is why they live in the world they do and have that extremely narrow mindset.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by NO2WAR (February 07, 2010 5:02 pm ET)
           
        "God told me to strike at al Qaida and I struck them, and then he instructed me to strike at Saddam," George W. Bush

        How did Bush's Divine Guidance work out for the little Iraqi children who were turned in to red mist?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by dogbreath (February 06, 2010 11:31 pm ET)
         
      I don't care if SHE finds guidance through religious faith, but I don't want goverment officials walking around saying God told them to do this or that. We just had a president who did that and you know, thousands of people are dead because he heard voices in his head. She is free to worship the way she wants but to expect others, the VAST others, to blindly believe the same is a dangerous path to follow.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by christopher howard (February 06, 2010 11:31 pm ET)
      9  
      Ugh. This is why, despite my occasional sympathy with some conservative positions, I would never consider voting for anyone put up by the Republicans or the right. Democrats are guilty of this to some degree, but the never ending pandering of the right to religion, and their dedicated hatchet work on the separation of church and state, is despicable and dangerous.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by k1dork (February 06, 2010 11:35 pm ET)
          17
        What "hatchet work on the separation of church and state" does she suggest here?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by IRONY 101 (February 06, 2010 11:43 pm ET)
          10  
          Okay, Einstein, put your thinking cap on...

          What is stopping Bible Sarah and her holy rollers from praying to God to make us "safe, secure and prosperous"? Nothing is stopping them. In fact, don't they already do that?

          However, what Sister Sarah appears to be suggesting is the introduction of some form of worship to God into the political/government arena. What else can her comments mean since nothing is stopping her and friends from praying to God at Church and at home?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by k1dork (February 06, 2010 11:46 pm ET)
            2 18
            Uh, those sound like nothing more than assumptions on my part.

            All it sounded like to me is that she was suggesting that we turn to God for guidance. Was is that such a horrible thing? The black civil rights movements said the same kinds of things. Big deal.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by IRONY 101 (February 06, 2010 11:54 pm ET)
              14  
              The civil rights movement did not suggest teaching the Biblical account of creation as science...just for starters.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by k1dork (February 07, 2010 12:06 am ET)
                2 15
                Thinking that we should look to God for guidance is not the same as caling for the Bible to be taught in schools.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by IRONY 101 (February 07, 2010 12:12 am ET)
                  13  
                  Look for divine intervention all you want...just don't do it on government time.

                  And, BTW if you don't appreciate how intrusive Evangelicals want the Bible to be in government then you must be living under a rock.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by k1dork (February 07, 2010 12:14 am ET)
                    2 13
                    Some evangelicals, you mean. My only problem with people like you is that you lump people into categories. That's partisan hackery at its finest.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by IRONY 101 (February 07, 2010 12:16 am ET)
                      8 1
                      Apparently you're not listening to what Sarah Palin says. Or do you suffer from some cognitive deficit?
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by IRONY 101 (February 07, 2010 12:17 am ET)
                      8 1
                      Dude, you're not just a troll...you're a lightweight troll.

                      Goodnight...
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by christopher howard (February 07, 2010 12:22 am ET)
                        14  
                        She has sited god's design in decisions she made as governor, including building a pipeline. She has stated that all the things she does in government don't matter to her constituents unless "their heart is right with God."

                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3oUht68wTQ8&feature=related

                        She was joined at the hip with a group called the Master's Commission, who believe very much in end times prophecy, and the state of Alaska as a "refuge state" in the end times. Frankly, I don't want one of them with their fingers on the button.

                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJnhRhJW35o

                        Core beliefs...

                        WE BELIEVE...in The Blessed Hope. When Jesus Raptures His Church Prior to His Return to Earth (the second coming). At this future moment in time all believers who have died will rise from their graves and will meet the Lord in the air, and Christians who are alive will be caught up with them, to be with the Lord forever. [1 of 4 cardinal doctrines of the A/G]

                        WE BELIEVE...in The Millennial Reign of Christ when Jesus returns with His saints at His second coming and begins His benevolent rule over earth for 1,000 years. At that time many in the nation of Israel will recognize and accept Him as the Messiah, the Savior who died for them and all mankind.

                        WE BELIEVE...A Final Judgment Will Take Place for those who have rejected Christ. They will be judged for their sin and consigned to eternal punishment in a punishing lake of fire.

                        I don't particularly want a president who believes that me, or the other 2/3s of the non-Christian world, deserve to be tortured forever. If a president believes a just God can torture a group forever, I don't trust her to administer the laws in a way that would be fair to all Americans, even us "Hellbound" ones.

                        "Thinking that we should look to God for guidance is not the same as caling for the Bible to be taught in schools."

                        Maybe. Too bad a large portion of the political right don't think that way. I'm familiar enough with the ID movement to know that, even when they soft-pedal how they are not trying to get around the Establishment Clause of the First Ammendment, they really are.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by cugagcmu805031 (February 07, 2010 12:42 am ET)
                          9  
                          You're right. She is on the record saying it. I would like to know why, if she is so right, did she leave her position of governor in Alaska, and why didn't she and McCain win in 2008?
                          Report Abuse
                        • Author by bintx (February 08, 2010 9:51 am ET)
                          2  
                          She's also involved with Windwalkers, led by Mary Glazier. Palin believes that she was chosen by God to lead the US into the end times and that, as part of that calling, she is to hasten said end times and take any survivors to Alaska, which she and her loony leaders believes is a "refuge" state.

                          For research on Ms. Palin's "beliefs," look up Mary Glazier, Windwalkers, New Apostolic Reformation and Latter Rain. I think most evangelical Christians would be appalled if they found out what this woman really believes. It's way out of mainstream, almost cultish.
                          Report Abuse
                    • Author by Quicksilver M.S (February 07, 2010 1:36 am ET)
                      4  
                      Thinking that we should look to God for guidance is not the same as caling for the Bible to be taugh--
                      AS IN -
                      with people like you!
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by worrierking (February 07, 2010 9:08 am ET)
                      4  
                      Most of the right wing talking heads on Fox News and the radio are proponents of Intelligent Design being taught in science classes in public schools. Most are also in favor of prayer in public schools.

                      They've lumped themselves into categories. Is that partisan hackery at it worst?
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by New Frontier (February 07, 2010 9:58 am ET)
                      4  
                      My only problem with people like you is that you lump people into categories.
                      You see, Dork's problem with you & your category of people is that you lump people into categories.

                      That is rich.
                      Report Abuse
            • Author by IRONY 101 (February 07, 2010 12:03 am ET)
              9  
              And BTW why didn't God make the country prosperous under George W. Bush? He and his Evangelical friends weren't praying hard enough? Or did God insist that prayers for divine intervention had to come from a governmental agaency?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by temphandle tearfully55timetable (February 07, 2010 8:41 am ET)
                5  
                Those evangelical friends of Bush, they are frothing at the mouth to get back into the White House...just ask focus on the family. It's really very disturbing to witness the rise of what these ppl call a revolution stating a religious belief as a reason to be the leader of the free world. We had 8 years of not so divine intervention under Bush, and now they want back in only more conservative this time. And one other thing, why does Palin seem to think Alaska is a beacon of hope? That Woman is appalling.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by christopher howard (February 07, 2010 8:53 am ET)
                  6  
                  "And one other thing, why does Palin seem to think Alaska is a beacon of hope?"

                  See my post above. Her church believes that the end times are coming and that Alaska will be a "refuge state" during the Tribulation. It's pretty scary stuff.
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by Quicksilver M.S (February 07, 2010 12:48 am ET)
            3  
            The same hatchet - used by Washinton to cut down a Cherry Tree!
            Report Abuse
        • Author by Quicksilver M.S (February 07, 2010 12:47 am ET)
             
          The same hatchet - used by Washinton to cut down a Cherry Tree!
          Report Abuse
      • Author by jose2 (February 08, 2010 9:03 pm ET)
           
        Obama pandered to religious leaders just as much as any other politician did.

        You have a double standard.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (February 06, 2010 11:34 pm ET)
      6  
      How about some faith healing instead of all that health care reform?

      And maybe we can exorcise all those evil spirits that have been deviling the country?

      And how can we have bipartisanship in Congress if everyone is speaking in tongues?

      Just f-ing shoot me now...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by leftofwhat (February 07, 2010 12:40 am ET)
        5  
        Tim Tebow thinks his invisible friend wins football games for him.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by For.America.2600 (February 07, 2010 1:52 am ET)
          3  
          Do you think Mr. Tebow can't take a snap from under center because he would be brushing against another mans genitals? ^^
          Report Abuse
          • Author by soze169880 (February 07, 2010 8:26 am ET)
            4  
            I'm sure he's found some way to willfully block out the ridiculous level of homoeroticism in football, much like proponents of DADT have found some way to ignore the ridiculous level of homoeroticism in military life.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (February 07, 2010 3:08 pm ET)
          2  
          Tim Tebow thinks his invisible friend wins football games for him.

          Then apparently God is an Alabama fan. Maybe having the Tide roll over him like a tsunami is God's way of telling little Timmy to knock off the holier-than-thou attitude...
          Report Abuse
      • Author by jose2 (February 08, 2010 9:05 pm ET)
          1
        Considering placebos are effective at treating many ailments, what's wrong with faith healing?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Johaely (February 09, 2010 10:16 pm ET)
             
          Some people actually think it works and don't go to a real doctor and get medicine/treatment.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by MeanMrSpicyMustard (February 06, 2010 11:35 pm ET)
         
      Where did she get a chair?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by legacy1 (February 06, 2010 11:42 pm ET)
         
      Ha...Think Progress is reporting that she is reading her talking points from her LEFT HAND!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by AB-001 (February 06, 2010 11:43 pm ET)
      8  
      She's right. I say we consult the Buddhists, Wiccans, Hindus and other faiths in helping guide our country's direction.

      FYI, here's what one of the founding fathers, Thomas Jefferson had to say about religion and government. Sounds like he's a little at odds with Sarah's vision of the US Jefferson's multifaceted views on Religion
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (February 06, 2010 11:46 pm ET)
        6  
        If Thomas Jefferson lived today can you imagine how he would be denounced by the Evangelicals? Jesus not divine...? Wow...those are fighting words for Evangelicals.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by AB-001 (February 06, 2010 11:48 pm ET)
        5  
        Oh, and just a wee bit more on Jefferson and religion. Methinks Sarah and the Tea Partiers would have had a field day demonizing him; Lord knows their predecessors did! More on Jefferson's views of religion
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dogbreath (February 06, 2010 11:56 pm ET)
             
          Jefferson is always good on religion. Another great source is Madison's Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments. It is a clear and direct statement against everything Sister Sarah and he cabal of hundreds in Tennessee say they believe. Every thinking American, who REALLY cares what the Founders thought, should read this document.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by leftofwhat (February 06, 2010 11:50 pm ET)
        4  
        Wht are the Druids always left out of American policies?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jdhobbes (February 06, 2010 11:54 pm ET)
          4  
          You mean you think they'd be able to organize themselves enough to set a position on anything? Have you herded any cats lately?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by jdhobbes (February 06, 2010 11:52 pm ET)
      4  
      I'd give her some credibility on the divine intervention thing if she'd admit to getting guidance from Allah.

      Oooooh... wouldn't that be delicious?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by captain_mike (February 07, 2010 12:02 am ET)
        9  
        She's welcome to her beliefs in the privacy of her home or chosen house of worship. However, as this country has a fundamental precept of separation of church and state, she and the rest of her ilk need to leave their imaginary friends out of it when it comes to things like the economy and national security.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by IRONY 101 (February 07, 2010 12:10 am ET)
          5  
          Isn't it astounding that we're even having this discussion...? Sometimes I feel like we're surrounded by people who would slaughter a scrificial bull so their crops will grow tall.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by jose2 (February 08, 2010 9:09 pm ET)
          1
        You obviously have a very narrow vision of how things work in the real world.

        The Muslims will bomb a Christian church is they incorporate the word Allah. Here is an excerpt from a news report easily searched on google.

        There were protests in Malaysia yesterday and four arson attacks on Christian churches, apparently provoked by a court decision to allow Christians to use the word Allah.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Far Left but Always Right (February 06, 2010 11:57 pm ET)
         
      Well their divine intervention is drill baby drill. I guess that could be considered defying the laws of nature.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jose2 (February 08, 2010 9:15 pm ET)
          1
        Divine intervention would be for a major earthquake to cause millions of barrels of oil to be released from the ground about 25 miles out to sea and wash up on California's shoreline.

        Then maybe the drilling will resume to release the pressure of oil that is trying to make its way to the surface.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Johaely (February 09, 2010 10:19 pm ET)
             
          So, enviromental, economic and human damage would be God's divine intervention?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Far Left but Always Right (February 07, 2010 12:12 am ET)
         
      I love how these "christians, like sarah palin, talk about how great god is but we should fear him. That is like saying "My father used to beat the cr@p out of me whenever i did something wrong but he's a great guy."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by cugagcmu805031 (February 07, 2010 12:21 am ET)
      7  
      Yes, yes, yes. Seek divine intervention in determining: which country to bomb, North Korea or Iran; how much more money is needed to reward the banks that wrecked our economy; how much more doubling down is needed to oppress/imprison gays and people of color; how soon can undocumented immigrants and their children who are U.S. citizens be rounded up and shipped back to their homelands; how many abortion clinics can be closed immediately; how many abortion doctors can be killed in x amount of time; how much time will it take to add an amendment to the constitution making America a Christian nation; how much time is needed to make sure that all curricula in public education reflects Christian values; how soon can we repeal Roe vs. Wade, etc.

      What I'm really requesting divine intervention into is a way to relieve the rest of us of the hate and divisiveness that people like Palin push on a daily basis, and I'm not joking.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (February 07, 2010 12:26 am ET)
      2  
      This is too easy...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Quicksilver M.S (February 07, 2010 12:33 am ET)
      3  
      Palin Sez :
      "divine intervention --
      מָשִׁיחַ-
      -In Jesus's name!-
      الله أكبر-
      -Allahu Akbar!-
      -God is Great!-
      My GOD or Your GOD how is KING on the court !
      D@MN they are the same GOD!!
      ................NOT in MY BOOK"
      Palin :
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Quicksilver M.S (February 07, 2010 12:37 am ET)
        1  
        Palin Sez :
        "divine intervention --

        -In Jesus's name!-

        -Allahu Akbar!-
        -God is Great!-
        My GOD or Your GOD how is KING on the court !
        D@MN they are the same GOD!!
        ................NOT in MY BOOK"
        Palin :
        Report Abuse
    • Author by everettbme (February 07, 2010 12:52 am ET)
      3  
      I can't believe I'm saying this. I agree with Sarah Palin on this. We do need "some divine intervention again to be safe, secure and prosperous". And the way we make that possible is to never never never allow Simple Sarah to be President or Vice-President.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pilotx (February 07, 2010 1:14 am ET)
      3  
      Not only did people shell out $500 to see this windowlicker they asked her questions? Dear God, if I ever have the need to get advice from anyone on the Palin family someone please just shoot me.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Quicksilver M.S (February 07, 2010 1:17 am ET)
      2  

      Palin-
      "My GOD is Better than your GOD!
      My GOD is Better than yours!
      My GOD is Better than your GOD!!
      My GOD is Better , Becouse HE is AMERICAN!
      My GOD is Better than your GOD!"
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pilotx (February 07, 2010 1:34 am ET)
        6  
        Yep, more evidence of conservative hypocrisy. If she thinks politicians who profess their faith are persecuted try admitting you are an atheist. Nowadays one has to carry a cross to win an election. Hell, in some states it's illegal to be an atheist and run for office. Can anyone say projection?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by zamfir273114 (February 07, 2010 1:30 am ET)
      1 8
      God Bless Palin. Hope she isn't a zionist like the rest of the GOP. Ofcourse I bet she is, otherwise, she wouldn't even be speaking on television now would she.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by soze169880 (February 07, 2010 8:28 am ET)
        7  
        Shorter zamfir: This chick hates all the same stuff I do, but I'm concerned she may not hate some of them sufficiently.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jeffro (February 07, 2010 5:44 pm ET)
        1  
        Well, She has Two lapel pins. A U.S. Flag and an Isreal flag. What's that tell Ya? (Wink,Wink)
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (February 08, 2010 9:55 am ET)
           
        She is a Zionist only because it's part of her end times belief system. The Jews have to be in their country and be converted in order for the end times to begin. She cares nothing for the Jews.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by oscar the grouch (February 07, 2010 2:08 am ET)
      1 4
      Six clips, that's more like it. Lots of fodder for the masses.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bluestate69 (February 07, 2010 2:28 am ET)
      7  
      it shouldn't have come to this. the tea partiers should be a bigger joke now than they ever were. obama conceded way to many arguments to them. obama's spending freeze was almost an admission of guilt on his part. he needs to re-enforce the "fact" that we HAD to spend money. he should have been out there from day one, arguing against the philosophy of conservative tea party members. that doesn't mean attacking them personally, just philosophically. i feel there was way to much of a conciliatory tone toward the tea party movement. these people are obama's political opponents. hopefully he gets that now. i hope it's not too late. they have made a lot of ground while the administration has been asleep at the wheel.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by usappa00 (February 07, 2010 3:28 am ET)
      8  
      Blah, Blah, Blah, Jesus Christ, Blah, Blah, Blah, 9-11. Blah, Blah, Blah Obama Socialist. Blah Blah Blah....
      Report Abuse
    • Author by clearstate (February 07, 2010 4:00 am ET)
      5  
      The problem with believing in God is that there are people that use this to their own advantage. They say that they're doing everything that God wants them or has told them to do. And then if you don't follow them, then you're on the wrong side of God.

      She's been invoking "God's Law" since day one. When will it stop? You can believe whatever you want but don't push it in my face or make me feel bad for not believing what you do.

      How wants to bet how long it will take her say to "God wants Obama out of the White House"?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by clearstate (February 07, 2010 4:03 am ET)
      7  
      If you can afford to shell out $500+ to hear her speak and eat steak and lobster, then you're an elitist. Isn't she supposed to hate those kinds of people?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by retiredinsf (February 07, 2010 6:57 am ET)
      3 14
      All these leftist posts confirm my contention you are all a really sick and deranged group.

      Sara Palin has more integrity, intelligence, and morals in her little pinky than every single one of you sickos combined!

      Thank GOD there are only 50 or so of you pathetic elitist jerks.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MickD (February 07, 2010 8:28 am ET)
        7  
        Easy retired, I assume you're old and your blood pressure is all angried up. Sister Sarah is a simpleton, quit her governorship, lost an election...that's all morality?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by soze169880 (February 07, 2010 8:45 am ET)
          5  
          The Republican version. Especially since it led to some of that sweet, sweet wingnut welfare flowing her way.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by soze169880 (February 07, 2010 8:34 am ET)
        7  
        Sara Palin has more integrity,

        "I said 'thanks but no thanks' on that bridge to no-wheyurr. Oops, turned out the opposite happened."
        intelligence

        "I read all the magazines in the world, doncha know."
        and morals

        "Okay, you ladies are gonna have to pay for your own rape kits, you betcha. This ain't no welfare state."
        Thank GOD there are only 50 or so of you pathetic elitist jerks.

        Hey, cool, we can have a rumble with every member of the Tea Party whose parents aren't related, since we're evenly matched.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by cst (February 07, 2010 8:51 am ET)
        1  
        Sarah has more INTEGRITY? You mean the tax-cheat who quit halfway through her term to cash in by becoming a tv star?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jeffro (February 07, 2010 5:49 pm ET)
        5  
        SF ,There is WAY more of us than there are of You. Millions More. Thank God.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (February 08, 2010 9:59 am ET)
        3  
        Integrity??? She built two very nice "cabins" on property in Alaska and conveniently "forgot" to report those improvements for 3 years. That's tax evasion. Intelligence??? She had to write her three word answer to a pre-screened question ON HER HAND to remember it. She had to get her husband to make important decisions for her when she was governor [really mayor for about 3 cities] in Alaska. Morals? Lying is immoral as is hypocrisy. She attacked Rahm Emanuel for his one comment while blowing off Rush Limbaugh's REPEATED use of the same word.

        She's an incompetent, unintelligent, hate-filled woman who uses her sex appeal to convince idiots like you that she's something she's not.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by retiredinsf (February 08, 2010 9:26 pm ET)
            1
          Here is bintx being civil: "She's an incompetent, unintelligent, hate-filled woman who uses her sex appeal to convince idiots like you that she's something she's not."
          Report Abuse
          • Author by political_left-religious_right (February 09, 2010 1:52 pm ET)
               
            Here is reviledinsf actually responding to bintx' points:

            Report Abuse
    • Author by OldCon (February 07, 2010 7:52 am ET)
      2 12
      WOW! It's great to see all of you mmfa faithful get all riled up and spew hate. They cue you and you all jump!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by soze169880 (February 07, 2010 8:29 am ET)
        8  
        Because Bible Spice implying that God should remove (presumably by killing) our duly-elected president ISN'T spewing hate.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by cugagcmu805031 (February 07, 2010 1:39 pm ET)
        6  
        Like the wingnuts do when Obama's birth certificate is mentioned, or the ACORN stole the 2008 election meme?

        There's a major difference, and it is that liberals are able to support their comments with fully documented facts. We tend to not buy into emotionalism, constant lying, and ongoing propaganda campaigns absent of facts to win elections
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jeffro (February 07, 2010 5:55 pm ET)
        1  
        What's the matter? You got nuthin' till Mon. afternoon when ya get yer cue on the Talkin' points? You don't even think fer yerself.Sad.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jeffro (February 07, 2010 5:55 pm ET)
        2  
        What's the matter? You got nuthin' till Mon. afternoon when ya get yer cue on the Talkin' points? You don't even think fer yerself.Sad.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (February 08, 2010 10:00 am ET)
        2  
        One more time. Disagreement isn't hate. The lies and nastiness spewed by this woman? That's hate.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by paganlefty (February 07, 2010 7:57 am ET)
         
      Bible Spice strikes again!

      It is not "politicaly correct" to respect ahteists, agnostics, or people of a faith that dont "fear" their god. However, I do think the answers to our problems are spiritual; but from the Dalai Lamma's perspective. It would include EVERYONE and have a god stronger than any one could mythologise or define. It would come from within. Palin's OT angry god would vaporise under the weight of it's own hypocracy and contridictions.

      Either way, who cares if these leaders pray? It's none of my business. Like her own bible says: DO IT IN PRIVATE!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by soze169880 (February 07, 2010 8:40 am ET)
      5  
      Well, at least she don't use no telly-prompter.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by manofmystique (February 07, 2010 9:01 am ET)
      4 1
      This Tea-bag speech by failed 2008 vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin was nothing more than hate cloak in rhetoric, pure and simple. Tea baggers only proved a very important distinction, they are willing to go straight to hell as long as they are led by their leader. It isn't enough that Sarah Palin was willing to continue Bush failed policies, but she and John McCain offered no real vision (solutions) for the future, AND she quit her job as governor of the state of Alaska in order to pursuit more fame and fortune.
      Despite betraying the American people and her oath of office, misguided tea-baggers and conservative media hail this lying president hater as some viable leader of a legitimate political Party.
      Sarah Palin shamelessly took her hood off before spending most of her speech attacking and criticizing the President of the united state, which is apparently all the qualifications needed to be a Tea-bagger or Tea-bagger speaker.
      This convention was nothing more than a lynch mob meeting, aimed at Barack Obama, a black man.
      The attack on the president was mostly Republicans talking points, talking points that already been dispelled by Obama during a conference with the GOP last month.
      This was lost on Sarah Palin and the media, whose only ticket to political success is to disparage the president and criticize his policies.
      It is obvious that tea-bagers are not too bright because they are willing to go to hell as long as someone lead them there.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by retiredinsf (February 07, 2010 10:36 am ET)
        1 13
        mano: "This convention was nothing more than a lynch mob meeting, aimed at Barack Obama, a black man."

        Time to play the racecard already mano? Only problem is, it don't work like it used to - it has been played way to many times.

        mano: "It is obvious that tea-bagers are not too bright because they are willing to go to hell as long as someone lead them there."

        Yep. The Party who agrees with abortions (even up to full term) with over 42 million babies killed so far in the U.S., yet is against the death penalty for people who kill little kids, is certainly the Party going not to hell! See why I think liberalism is a mental disorder?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by retiredinsf (February 07, 2010 10:53 am ET)
            11
          Oh yeah. I forgot to add it is the leftists on this Board who are filled with hate. Just read all your disgusting posts against Palin on this page alone! You people are always bashing her while showing your true hateful colors - and of course displaying your elitism time and again. Last I checked, God really doesn't like folks who hate other folks. You can look it up in the bible.

          The irony is Palin has done nothing wrong which could ever deserve all the continual hate from the Left - except being a conservative.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by worrierking (February 07, 2010 11:30 am ET)
            8  
            The irony is that you and her followers fail to see that she uses her "god" as a club, to beat anyone who doesn't believe in her twisted world view.

            Her belief that she is doing the work of god is the same as the people who hate us.



            Report Abuse
          • Author by eweston8542983 (February 07, 2010 11:47 am ET)
            7  
            Like to see a comparison with one of those oh so respectful wingnut blog comment sections on the subject of Al Gore.

            Your comment shows no evidence that you've read any of this thread.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by retiredinsf (February 07, 2010 11:15 pm ET)
              1 7
              ewe: "Like to see a comparison with one of those oh so respectful wingnut blog comment sections on the subject of Al Gore."

              Big difference between Al Gore and Sara Palin. Al Gore is a con man making millions off of AGW from fools who still think GW is caused by man while Sara Palin is a very honest person who is vilified by the Left because they are terrified of her honesty. In other words, Al Gore deserves to be bashed. Rememeber his late 90's tax return when he gave to charity a big $800 or so on an AGI well into six figures? What a nice man!
              Report Abuse
              • Author by soze169880 (February 07, 2010 11:53 pm ET)
                6  
                Sooooo hate is okay if it's applied to someone you, personally, are against. What a winner.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by retiredinsf (February 08, 2010 9:33 am ET)
                    4
                  soze: "Sooooo hate is okay if it's applied to someone you, personally, are against. What a winner."

                  Leftists are always so condescending and snobbish as exhibited so often when talking about Sara Palin, yet soze doesn't even know the difference between bashing and hating. What a winner.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by bintx (February 08, 2010 10:06 am ET)
                    4  
                    You aren't a conservative, old man. You just hate people who disagree with you. You are a very, very sad individual.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by retiredinsf (February 08, 2010 11:18 am ET)
                        1
                      Thanks for your opinion Loser Leftist. You know what they say about opinions, don't you? Everybody has one - along with something else all people have one of - and especially losers like you who have a very big one!
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by benjr (February 08, 2010 1:25 pm ET)
                        2  
                        I forgot to add it is the leftists on this Board who are filled with hate


                        Thanks for your opinion Loser Leftist. You know what they say about opinions, don't you? Everybody has one - along with something else all people have one of - and especially losers like you who have a very big one!


                        Hypocritical, huh, retired? You b!tch and moan about "leftists" being hateful, but almost all of your posts have some sort of insult in them.

                        Also, while I know that you call progressives "elitist" because you heard it from Rush and Beck, do you have any idea what that actually means? I'm guessing that you just think that we're elitist because we disagree with you.
                        Report Abuse
                  • Author by soze169880 (February 08, 2010 11:16 am ET)
                       
                    I don't have any difficulty at all believing you think it's possible to bash someone you love. Your first few wives will probably vouch for you.
                    Report Abuse
              • Author by eweston8542983 (February 08, 2010 4:26 pm ET)
                   
                How much has Al Made on GW in the last few years? Industry money spent attacking GW in those same years, how much do you figure? Some links to support your...opinions, would be good

                Evidence that Ms. Palin is a very honest woman. What does the 1st Dude have to say about it?

                Report Abuse
          • Author by New Frontier (February 07, 2010 1:08 pm ET)
            6  
            You people are always bashing her
            Palin: "Barack Obama is palling around with terrorists" and is "not part of Real America".

            Poor wittle Sarah Palin would never bash anyone.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by jose2 (February 07, 2010 5:16 pm ET)
              1 6
              I have noticed that the quality of debate on the lib/progressive side has taken a sudden dive.

              There used to be some thought provoking arguments between the whining and name calling.

              Did the funding dry up for this site?





              Report Abuse
              • Author by New Frontier (February 07, 2010 5:31 pm ET)
                4  
                There used to be some thought provoking arguments
                Now there are arguments like, "There was a little girl who got very sick because she was holding in her flatulence".
                Report Abuse
                • Author by soze169880 (February 07, 2010 6:31 pm ET)
                  2  
                  Whoops, didn't mean to steal that from you. Maybe Tom the Butcher should give me a literacy test.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by soze169880 (February 07, 2010 6:22 pm ET)
                3  
                We can't ALL make fart jokes and pretend they disprove global warming. You're just ahead of the curve.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by jose2 (February 07, 2010 6:46 pm ET)
                    5
                  It wasn't joke. I was saying your liberal scare tactics are affect the health of children.

                  A little divine intervention may be a good weapon against the enemies of freedom.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by soze169880 (February 07, 2010 9:12 pm ET)
                    2  

                    A little divine intervention may be a good weapon against the enemies of freedom.

                    You sound like either a member of al-Qaeda or a "300" extra. And yes, I know all right-wingers already believe themselves to be the latter, but even so.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by jose2 (February 07, 2010 9:52 pm ET)
                        5
                      No argument from you, only name calling.

                      It makes you irrelevant.

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by soze169880 (February 07, 2010 11:55 pm ET)
                        3  
                        No argument from you, only name calling.

                        About seventy percent of everything you've ever posted is the word "libs". And that's the most substantial part, too.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by jose2 (February 08, 2010 7:51 am ET)
                             
                          If someone makes a post giving you the derogatory label of a lib and then there is nothing else in the post, then you are correct.

                          Otherwise, check to see if there is anything else besides lib in the post.


                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by bintx (February 08, 2010 10:10 am ET)
                            1  
                            speaking of "name calling." Labeling anyone who disagrees with you with the pejorative use of the terms "lib," "leftist," "lefty,", etc., is childish and incorrect.

                            I disagree with you and I'm none of those things. I would seriously doubt that you are actually a "conservative."

                            BTW, there is nothing inherently wrong or right with either liberalism or conservatism. And, you will find that most people are a combination of BOTH. Also, most people do not apply these RIDICULOUS political ideologies to their every day life. Most people just live.
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by jose2 (February 08, 2010 11:02 am ET)
                                1
                              You have almost succeeded in completely changing the topic.

                              Regarding divine intervention, I will say again that it was divine intervention that rescued the climategate emails and gave the children some hope that they don't have to hold in their flatulence to save the world.

                              Now your obvious response will be to change the subject, name call, ignore the facts, and make fun of a serious situation.



                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by benjr (February 08, 2010 1:27 pm ET)
                                1  
                                "Rescued"? Really?? Since when did stolen become rescued? That's okay in your world?
                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by jose2 (February 08, 2010 2:02 pm ET)
                                    1
                                  Rescued as in preserved for freedom of information requests, both in the US and the UK.

                                  It would have been a crime not to rescue them.

                                  It was divine intervention that revealed climategate.
                                  Report Abuse
                                  • Author by benjr (February 08, 2010 4:30 pm ET)
                                    1  
                                    Wow. . . divine intervention? As in, 'it was divine intervention that the e-mails really don't show much of anything, and especially don't disprove the underlying science'? That kind of divine intervention?

                                    It would have been a crime not to rescue them.


                                    No, it would be a crime to steal them, and that's what happened. While it looks like the UEA did not comply with pertinent FOI requests, that still does not justify theft. Whoever requested that data could have gone through legal channels to obtain it.

                                    Nice to see you condone illegal activities if they fit your ideology.
                                    Report Abuse
                                    • Author by jose2 (February 08, 2010 4:51 pm ET)
                                      1 1
                                      It would have been illegal to allow the destruction of the documents. That is what certainly what would have happened if not for divine intervention.

                                      I see in the news that climategate professor Phil Jones wants to use the Adolf Hitler easy out suicide method to escape accounting for his atrocity to mankind.

                                      I hope he does not get off so easily.





                                      Report Abuse
                                      • Author by benjr (February 08, 2010 5:12 pm ET)
                                        1  
                                        It would have been illegal to allow the destruction of the documents. That is what certainly what would have happened if not for divine intervention.

                                        Proof please? You cannot possibly have any factual proof for your claim. If the CRU was going to destroy the data, why hadn't they done it before. The issues they had with FOI requests happened months before the emails were hacked and stolen. Nice try, but fail.
                                        Report Abuse
                                        • Author by jose2 (February 08, 2010 6:13 pm ET)
                                          1 2
                                          It is not difficult to find evidence within the leaked emails. Try a search on:

                                          climate gate delete emails

                                          and you will find stuff like this:

                                          Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4?

                                          Keith will do likewise. He’s not in at the moment – minor family crisis.

                                          Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same? I don’t have his new email address.

                                          We will be getting Caspar to do likewise.
                                          Report Abuse
                                        • Author by jose2 (February 08, 2010 6:30 pm ET)
                                          1 2
                                          Also prepare to watch your global warming heroes go to trial and then to prison.

                                          The government must make examples out of those who use fraud to solicit and obtain public funding.

                                          That is the real reason I believe Phil Jones has become suicidal. He is trying to get sympathy.

                                          It reminds me of the song Sympathy for the Devil - the result of divine intervention.
                                          Report Abuse
                                          • Author by benjr (February 08, 2010 7:27 pm ET)
                                            1 1
                                            Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4?


                                            You undermine your whole point right there. He asked for the emails to be deleted. Not the data. The data was (and still is) available at the research posts it was obtained from. Nice try, but no data would be lost. Also, do you have conclusive proof that the CRU used "fraud" to obtain funding? I mean rock-solid, incontravertible proof that fraud, willfull fraud, was used? I doubt it.
                                            Report Abuse
                                            • Author by jose2 (February 08, 2010 8:51 pm ET)
                                              1 2
                                              Nothing undermined, the emails were requested in the FOI, nice try.

                                              I don't think a jury will have much trouble finding willful fraud. Why else would Jones be threatening suicide? My guess is he's trying to strike a deal and the suicide threats give him a reason to become a traitor to his peers.

                                              This is divine intervention at its best.

                                              Report Abuse
                                              • Author by benjr (February 08, 2010 9:32 pm ET)
                                                   
                                                You are really projecting here. Do you know Jones' motivations? Do you have insider knowledge? Where are you getting these ideas? If you have proof I'd love to see a link. Otherwise I think you're just making stuff up.

                                                So I'd like to see two things: 1 - where is your info about the motivation for Mr. Jones' attempted suicide, and 2 - which FOI request asked about the emails.

                                                Also, even if the emails were asked for, why does it matter? Assuming you are right,if the original data is still around, wouldn't that prove you anti-global warming people right anyway?
                                                Report Abuse
                                                • Author by jose2 (February 08, 2010 9:41 pm ET)
                                                    1
                                                  Put the bong down for a moment or two.

                                                  Go back and read my post ten times. Then see if you can find the word "guess" in it!

                                                  Report Abuse
                                                • Author by jose2 (February 08, 2010 9:49 pm ET)
                                                    1
                                                  And on the rest of your discovery requests, you will have plenty of time to defend yourself in court if you are involved.

                                                  Better get a good lawyer.
                                                  Report Abuse
                                                  • Author by benjr (February 09, 2010 2:33 pm ET)
                                                       
                                                    Thanks for answering my questions. You actually don't really have any idea what you are talking about. Why do you post here?
                                                    Report Abuse
                                                    • Author by benjr (February 09, 2010 2:43 pm ET)
                                                         
                                                      I tried to be respectful during this exchange, but when it got to the point when you couldn't answer my questions, you brought out the insults. While I generally stay away from personal comments I will say that you are certainly one of the most ignorant, dogmatic posters on this site.
                                                      Report Abuse
                                                      • Author by jose2 (February 09, 2010 3:44 pm ET)
                                                           
                                                        I am not going to spoon feed you as the baby you truly are.

                                                        Report Abuse
                                                        • Author by jose2 (February 09, 2010 4:04 pm ET)
                                                             
                                                          Here is a typical request:

                                                          all records, documents, internal communications, and other relevant covered material created by, provided to and/or sent by NASA/GISS citing, referencing, discussing, or otherwise related to the August 2007 correction by NASA/GISS of online temperature data for over 1200 U.S.

                                                          Report Abuse
                                                          • Author by benjr (February 09, 2010 4:08 pm ET)
                                                               
                                                            Again, where did you get that from? Where ever you c&p'ed that from, you didn't even take the whole request!

                                                            I will repeat my question to you:

                                                            Also, even if the emails were asked for, why does it matter? Assuming you are right,if the original data is still around, wouldn't that prove you anti-global warming people right anyway?

                                                            Since you don't know the science, don't read anything by people who do know the science, and have no interest in an actual debate or conversation, I will not hold my breath for a rational answer. I will, however, suggest an education and maybe some independent thought.
                                                            Report Abuse
                                                      • Author by jose2 (February 09, 2010 4:06 pm ET)
                                                           
                                                        And your nitpicking with me is not going to save any of the climate fraudsters.

                                                        Report Abuse
                                                        • Author by benjr (February 09, 2010 4:11 pm ET)
                                                             
                                                          I like when you have no answers for my questions you say I'm "nitpicking". You are only showcasing your own ignorance.
                                                          Report Abuse
                                                          • Author by jose2 (February 09, 2010 4:22 pm ET)
                                                               
                                                            Interesting how you seem to think that by casting a cloud over how the emails were obtained you can somehow escape what they reveal.

                                                            The proof is in the actual emails. All you have to do is take your head out of the sand.

                                                            If you want the physical proof, do a search on FOIA.zip and download the 61.93 MB file - I am not going to read them for you.

                                                            From the epoch times:

                                                            The emails also appeared to show the CRU researchers urging each other to delete emails, conniving to prevent other scientists from publishing of dissenting views, and debating how to avoid complying with Freedom of Information requests.

                                                            Report Abuse
                                          • Author by Johaely (February 08, 2010 8:59 pm ET)
                                               
                                            To prison for what?
                                            Report Abuse
                                      • Author by Johaely (February 08, 2010 8:58 pm ET)
                                           
                                        From whose a-hole did you get that BS? And i should give you a thumbs up for succesfully using (and proving) Godwin's Law.
                                        Report Abuse
                  • Author by Johaely (February 08, 2010 8:56 pm ET)
                       
                    Wait, the enemies of free? The little red people running around your head?
                    Report Abuse
            • Author by retiredinsf (February 07, 2010 11:18 pm ET)
                5
              NF: "Palin: "Barack Obama is palling around with terrorists" and is "not part of Real America".

              "Poor wittle Sarah Palin would never bash anyone."

              Where is the bashing? What she said is true!
              Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (February 08, 2010 10:05 am ET)
               
            Have you ever listened to the hate that Palin spews, retiredinsf? Since you apparently don't, then you are just as full of hate as she. I've never seen you post anything civil here. Never.

            As for Palin, I'm not sure if you noticed this, but CONSERVATIVES don't like Palin. In 2004, 80% of the voters in my city voted for GWB. In 2008, 75% of the voters voted for McCain. You know why there was a drop? Sarah Palin. She is not a "conservative," she's an opportunistic, incompetent, cultist who folks like you believe is the second coming . . . so does she.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by retiredinsf (February 08, 2010 9:23 pm ET)
                 
              bintx: "Have you ever listened to the hate that Palin spews, retiredinsf? Since you apparently don't, then you are just as full of hate as she. I've never seen you post anything civil here. Never."

              Civil? You can not be serious! Read your past posts bintx to see just how uncivil you are! In fact, you are one of the most hate-filled posters this Board. Typical though, for a libbie to not see their own hypocricy. And no, I have not heard "the hate that Palin spews" and I listen to her all the time. Maybe you can give all of us a few examples (opinions do not count).
              Report Abuse
              • Author by retiredinsf (February 08, 2010 9:30 pm ET)
                   
                Here is bintx being civil: "She's an incompetent, unintelligent, hate-filled woman who uses her sex appeal to convince idiots like you that she's something she's not."
                Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (February 08, 2010 10:02 am ET)
             
          Actually, a Republican strategist said that about half of the folks there were there because they felt that there were too many taxes, government spending, etc. The other half, he said, were there because a black man was in the WHITE house and they don't like it.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by retiredinsf (February 08, 2010 9:33 pm ET)
               
            bintx: "Actually, a Republican strategist said that about half of the folks there were there because they felt that there were too many taxes, government spending, etc. The other half, he said, were there because a black man was in the WHITE house and they don't like it."

            BS bintx. Name the "Republican strategist" or apologize.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by mikelartist (February 07, 2010 9:30 am ET)
      3  
      Exactly what the "terrorist" do Sarah. They pray for divine intervention and guidance.

      So is this how YOU pal around with terrorists?

      You are either with us or against us Sarah. Now we know. You are with the terrorists.

      See how that works.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (February 07, 2010 9:53 am ET)
      3  
      God Fearin' nation?

      Where the hell did this fear of God come from?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (February 07, 2010 12:11 pm ET)
        4 1
        WTF?

        Again, WTF?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by cugagcmu805031 (February 07, 2010 1:32 pm ET)
          2  
          Sometimes it's best not to address ignorance buttressed by simplistic stupidity. It saves brain cells.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jose2 (February 07, 2010 2:10 pm ET)
            2 9
            OK, it went over your head.

            I think some divine intervention is needed to undo the hysteria of the progressives who paint a bleak picture of America and make people sick with their dire predictions.

            A few lightning bolts now and then in the right place can do wonders. One example is the leak that exposed the climategate email.






            Report Abuse
            • Author by raddave43 (February 07, 2010 2:40 pm ET)
              5 1
              You mean the illegal hacking that got a hold of private emails that in no way disproved anything?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by jose2 (February 07, 2010 2:43 pm ET)
                2 7
                No, I mean rescue to prevent the illegal destruction of the email that the public had a right to view under the Freedom of Information act.

                Call it what you want, to me it was divine intervention.


                Report Abuse
                • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (February 07, 2010 3:14 pm ET)
                  4  
                  No, I mean rescue to prevent the illegal destruction of the email that the public had a right to view under the Freedom of Information act.

                  Cute, josepadilla2--you think that FOIA applies to foreign entities. Now what was that Herr Tancredo was saying about cultural literacy tests?...
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by jose2 (February 08, 2010 11:39 am ET)
                      1
                    The UK enacted their freedom of information act on January 1,2005. This is much later than the US but nevertheless there is one.

                    Report Abuse
            • Author by eweston8542983 (February 07, 2010 2:44 pm ET)
              2  
              By leak you mean, the hacking of information that someone(s) then cheerfully missinformed about?

              Now tell us what the word trick means to you, with regard to scientific research.

              Then tell us how hard you've checked any of Inhofe's sources
              Report Abuse
            • Author by New Frontier (February 07, 2010 2:54 pm ET)
                 
              progressives who paint a bleak picture of America and make people sick with their dire predictions.
              [People seeking] "freedom from oppressive regimes wonder if Alaska is still that beacon of hope for their cause."

              ---spoken by Sarah Palin, "progressive", 2/6/09
              Report Abuse
            • Author by soze169880 (February 07, 2010 5:02 pm ET)
              3  
              "A few lightning bolts now and then in the right place can do wonders. One example is something that doesn't mean what a moran like me thinks it means."
              Report Abuse
      • Author by raddave43 (February 07, 2010 2:41 pm ET)
        2  
        People are incapapable of "holding in their flatulence" Because it is released when we go to the batroom, when we sleep we can't control it either.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jose2 (February 07, 2010 2:46 pm ET)
          1 6
          They are capable of holding it in long enough to make them sick, both physically and psychologically.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (February 07, 2010 3:16 pm ET)
            2 1
            Which might go a long way toward explaining you, josepadilla2...
            Report Abuse
              • Author by New Frontier (February 07, 2010 5:35 pm ET)
                1  
                No, I have no problem defecating and passing gas over the global warming scare
                I have noticed that the quality of debate on the lib/progressive side has taken a sudden dive. ---the very self-aware jose2, just 90 minutes later.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by soze169880 (February 07, 2010 6:29 pm ET)
                     
                  If you could just be as much of an insufferable narcissist as the troll is, it would make perfect sense.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by jose2 (February 07, 2010 10:13 pm ET)
                    1 5
                    All you can do is call names.

                    You are on the fast track to total break down.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by soze169880 (February 07, 2010 11:57 pm ET)
                      1  
                      You are on the way to destruction
                      You have no chance to survive make your time.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by jose2 (February 08, 2010 12:17 pm ET)
                          1
                        Divine intervention killed climate legislation for now. We can now poop and gas in peace.

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by soze169880 (February 08, 2010 7:34 pm ET)
                          1  
                          So, if we go by number of posts, the two things you're most passionate about are farting and how gross gay people are. For your sake, I hope you're eleven.
                          Report Abuse
    • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (February 07, 2010 5:23 pm ET)
        6
      A fool has said in his heart, "There is no God."
      There are some obvious fools on this thread.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by soze169880 (February 07, 2010 6:23 pm ET)
        5  
        A fool has said in her interview, "All of them."
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (February 08, 2010 10:13 am ET)
        2  
        I believe in God and I'm a Christian. You are a fool if you believe that Sarah Palin's "beliefs" are representative of Biblical principles. I've been a Christian all my life and I can guarantee you that I've never seen a "witch doctor" pray over a political candidate in any church I've attended.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Boxer1979 (February 08, 2010 7:13 am ET)
      1  
      Palin: We'd be wise to seek "some divine intervention again" to be safe, secure and prosperous

      Oh boy! Here we go again! Pushing her so-called christian values to make everyone be more religious in this country.

      Not everyone believes in religion SARAH! We already know your religious values and want no suggesttions from you.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by oldbob (February 08, 2010 10:45 am ET)
         
      What was that red glow on the wall behind her, the open gate into hell? The devil takes on many forms. Political correctness, does not our laws prevent/allow seperation from church and state? Was that pilgrams who could not get along with their government who moved away to start a new country. Perhaps it is time they again got on the bus and moved to a new country.
      Report Abuse