About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Doocy says poll showing most believe recession is Bush's fault means people "bought into" Obama's argument

February 09, 2010 6:24 am ET

From the February 9 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Old55 (February 09, 2010 6:31 am ET)
      7  
      No, what it means is that it's "an inconvenient truth" (pardon the pun). The recession (now being touted as the 'Great Recession') started in Dec. 2007, and reached critical mass in the fall of '08. This show, along with Hannity et. al., is trying to label this as 'the Obama recession'. Sorry guys, the American people know.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by christopher howard (February 09, 2010 6:42 am ET)
        6  
        Yes, I remember liar Limbaugh labeling it as the "Obama Recession" months before Obama even took office.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (February 09, 2010 9:25 am ET)
          6  
          The same people who were calling it the Obama recession before his inauguration were also calling the slight improvement in the economy during his first year in office the Bush recovery.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by dogbreath (February 09, 2010 9:57 am ET)
           
        Spin, spin, spin.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by blueline99 (February 09, 2010 11:54 am ET)
        2  
        Whenever President Obama talks about cards that he was dealt, it's usually in response to allegations made by the GOP that he was the cause of this recession.

        The notion that anyone has "bought in" to President Obama's argument just means that they have the ability to observe the facts of the situation and can make a logical conclusion.

        Here's a simple one that even a Fox and Friends host could understand.

        President clinton as handed a $290 Billion deficit, at its time, the largest in history.
        The deficit was reduced each year President Clinton was in office.
        His last three budgets were surplusses ($69B, $129B, $236B).

        President Bush took the 8 years of President Clinton's record deficit reduction and then turned over a $1.2 Trillion deficit to President Obama.

        If that's too complicated... here's a graph... although it only goes through 2006 (you should get the idea), there's pictures of the Presidents to help you out.

        [http://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/business/files/2008/11/us-budget-deficits.JPG]

        And oh, btw... for those GOP Reagan lovers, the 2010 budget is the higest deficit spending since Reagan (as a percentage of GDP)

        [http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2009/01/08/GR2009010800841.gif]
        Report Abuse
    • Author by liberalXtian (February 09, 2010 6:40 am ET)
      1  
      I thought you people at Fox were good at making people not believe the truth?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (February 09, 2010 7:22 am ET)
      5  
      Come on folks, everyone knows its that socialist/nazi/commie Obama that caused this recession that started in 2008, before he was elected by those people at Acorn.

      Thank goodness for those good folks at Fox for bringing this out in the sunshine. I was beginning to think that no one saw this dastardly socialist/nazi/commie plot.



      Report Abuse
    • Author by achrispage6992 (February 09, 2010 7:30 am ET)
      2  
      So I guess it is then Doocy's assertion that the economy was just humming along and then came Obama to claim that it was in recession and furthermore it wasn't his fault???? Is Doocy actually trying to insinuate that the economy was not in fact in recession during most of not all of 2008? What a bufoon!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by eb (February 09, 2010 7:41 am ET)
      2  
      Its all about associating Obama with everything bad. The basic mental image of, Obama=recession needs to be hit and hit again. Anything contrary to this idea will be instantly dismissed.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Boxer1979 (February 09, 2010 7:57 am ET)
      2  
      Doocy says poll showing most believe recession is Bush's fault means people "bought into" Obama's argument

      Nope it means you failed in opening your mouth!

      SMH!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (February 09, 2010 7:57 am ET)
      4  
      Why would we miss George W. Bush when we have Sarah Palin around to entertain us with her unbelievable stupidity?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (February 09, 2010 7:59 am ET)
      4  
      No, it means that people are smarter than you Doocy.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Refresh (February 09, 2010 8:09 am ET)
         
      I guess she means like a third of Republican citizens bought into Fox's propaganda that Obama is a foreign racist socialist who stole the election in 2008.

      Oh, even Bush's own party doesn't miss him. How can they miss him when they are working so hard to prove that he never existed and that his dismal financial policies never existed either.

      Republican party and Fox news, no matter how hard you try, we are not going to forget that the recession was cemented long before Obama took office. Democrats, it is imperative that, no matter how many insults they hurl and no matter how much whining they do about BIOB (Blame It On Bush), you continue to let everyone in this great country know who is responsible for the economic collapse. Do not let them spin it on you. Do not let them place the blame for our sad economic state on Obama's administration.

      They're going to be repetitive, so you be repetitive. They're going to say it louder, so you say it louder. Do not try to play it cool. Do not sit back and wait for them to bring the fight to you. Take it to their face.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jjamele2880 (February 09, 2010 8:13 am ET)
      7  
      Bush's Presidency gets shorter all the time. For years, I've been told that it started on September 12, 2001. Now I'm being told it ended in November, 2007.

      Strange- it sure SEEMED like at LEAST eight years.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by princeofwheels (February 09, 2010 10:53 am ET)
           
        I think I'll use this as my own somewhere else. Thanks jj
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (February 09, 2010 12:50 pm ET)
           
        Yep -- and the good thing is, the shorter it gets, the less the apologists can talk about his "legacy" . . .

        Report Abuse
    • Author by rtdavis11200 (February 09, 2010 8:24 am ET)
      7  
      It was bad enough watching Bush blow thru billions of dollars in surplus.

      The blue dogs voted with Bush on everything but will not help the new president get his legislation passed.

      The blue dogs are destroying the democratic party.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (February 09, 2010 8:59 am ET)
        5  
        It's almost as if both political parties are in a race to the bottom, to see which one can destroy itself first. In the process, they are rendering our representative government useless.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by rjackson1500@yahoo.com (February 09, 2010 8:58 am ET)
      5  
      so the problem that faux news has is that most american know what the facts are......
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (February 09, 2010 9:00 am ET)
        4  
        And FOX considers that a failure of its Prime Directive.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by princeofwheels (February 09, 2010 10:57 am ET)
             
          And their mouthpieces have lost some crd along the line.

          People are getting tired of hearing the trash of Limbaugh, the lies of Hannity, the disgust of Savage and the nonsense of BillO.
          When the Democratic Party decides to unite for the election of 2010, the Repubs and the Tea Party gang will switch to something much stronger to sip. I am going into the alcohol business.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (February 09, 2010 9:37 am ET)
        2  
        That's because most Americans aren't watching Fox.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Far Left but Always Right (February 09, 2010 9:11 am ET)
         
      Miss what? We are still trying to dig ourselves out of his mess.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jflz201884 (February 09, 2010 9:14 am ET)
      5  
      A huge majority of poll respondents blame Bush for economic woes because of September 15, 2008. They remember where they were and what they were doing when the Wall Street debacle hit and GOP presidential candidate John McCain blooped, "The fundamentals of the economy are strong." They remember because it was then they saw their investments, already in the tank, were about to take another bath. They remember because it was then they began fearing for their jobs.

      Republican strategists knew the deluge was coming. Imagine how desperately they wanted it to wait until early March 2009 (when, as it happened, the Dow hit its low) or at least until Inauguration Day. But Sept. 8, 2008 (Black Monday) was six weeks before the presidential election. And, as others have noted here, the economy had been slumping for nearly a year.

      All of which left Fox News analysts with egg all over their faces. For months the Fred Barneses and Brit Humes had seized upon a laughable technicality, claiming no recession was under way because the GDP had not declined two months in a row. Which I guess is why McCain saw such strength in the economy's fundamentals.

      Nobody could forget such a turning point in early 21st-century history. It was personal.

      Jerry Elsea
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (February 09, 2010 1:18 pm ET)
           
        "Republican strategists knew the deluge was coming. Imagine how desperately they wanted it to wait until early March 2009 (when, as it happened, the Dow hit its low) or at least until Inauguration Day. But Sept. 8, 2008 (Black Monday) was six weeks before the presidential election. And, as others have noted here, the economy had been slumping for nearly a year.

        All of which left Fox News analysts with egg all over their faces."


        And not just the Fox News analysts.

        You'd think a president with an MBA would know that you can only spend $12 billion/month on two preemptive wars without paying for them for so long before the bubble bursts . . . they were just HOPING it would occur AFTER the inauguration.

        Poor guys -- they ALMOST made it . . .

        Report Abuse
    • Author by New Frontier (February 09, 2010 9:16 am ET)
      3  
      Hey Fox & Friends? Any future dips in Obama's approval ratings will mean Fox News viewers "bought into" your lies and deceptions.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bintx (February 09, 2010 9:36 am ET)
      2  
      No, it means that most people are smarter than you, Doocy. And, of course, MOST people aren't watching Fox's false reporting that shows otherwise.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Sks1 (February 09, 2010 10:01 am ET)
      2  
      bought into it?,,,why do they conveniently dismiss the fact that Obama walked into a 1.3 billion dollar deficit when he took office....yet want to now blame him for something Bush did, if they want to claim to be fair n balanced then why not just tell the plain truth and stop misleading their viewers?,,
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (February 09, 2010 10:21 am ET)
      1  
      Or maybe they "bought into" the fact that the recession started months before Obama took office.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by sauldawg (February 09, 2010 10:56 am ET)
         
      What is it with Fox and their poll preferences. They constantly tout Rasmussen as the best in the polling business, yet when one of the Rasmussen polls shows the GOP/Bush unfavorably there is of course something wrong with it. The same thing with O'Reilly and Rove going berzerk over the Kos/R2000 polls, dismissing then as frauds, then citing the same poll as fact the next night. This stuff has become so irritating that it's comical.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mjh (February 09, 2010 1:19 pm ET)
         
      Doocy says poll showing most believe recession is Bush's fault means people "bought into" Obama's argument


      I.e., they're grounded in reality . . .

      Report Abuse
    • Author by ProgLib (February 10, 2010 3:34 am ET)
         
      Last time I checked, that was called using facts.
      Report Abuse