About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Bolling: Snow "breaking Al Gore's heart because" it's "burying his global warming theory"

February 10, 2010 4:24 pm ET

From the February 10 edition of Fox News' Your World with Neil Cavuto:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Brain Freeze: Conservative Media Still Using Winter Weather To Attack Global Warming

Politico serves up some Al Gore/global warming Drudge bait

Limbaugh calls winter snowstorms climate change "nail in the coffin," asks "Where is Al Gore?"

Beck on winter snowstorm: "If we don't find Al Gore by 5 o'clock, I'm starting an Amber Alert"

Fox Nation: "Sen. Inhofe's Family Builds Igloo for Gore"

In successive tweets, Fox News' Bolling begs McCaskill to "VOTE NO" on health care, mocks global warming

Quick Fact: Bolling revives debunked climate email claim in attack on Mann

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (February 10, 2010 4:29 pm ET)
      4 3
      Nope. All it's doing is providing illegitimate political cover for those who want to continue doing nothing...

      -------------------------------------------------------------
      ...A course of action which will eventuall result in disaster.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jarossiter (February 10, 2010 4:31 pm ET)
      4  
      CLIMATE CHANGE

      NOT weather change.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by progressivevoicedaily (February 10, 2010 4:35 pm ET)
      6 2
      These people have absolutely no idea what their talking about. In fact, the opposite could be argued with much more clarity. I would argue just like most climate scientists that it's the volatility in the weather patterns that point to a real disruption in climate. The fact that there using a record setting snowfall to claim nothing has changed can only be characterized as 'laughable'.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by seahawks123 (February 10, 2010 5:23 pm ET)
        2 10
        Wow. Never has a record setting snowfall until man. Huh. Nor violent weather patterns either I guess. Was nice and peacefull.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by New Frontier (February 10, 2010 5:25 pm ET)
          5  
          Sumday me lern Englitch reel gud.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by christopher howard (February 10, 2010 5:40 pm ET)
            6  
            "Wow. Never has a record setting snowfall until man. Huh. Nor violent weather patterns either I guess. Was nice and peacefull."

            Who is saying that weather was peaceful, predictable or stable before man? No one on this thread. Another strawman, I see.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (February 10, 2010 5:41 pm ET)
            4  
            Looks like it's 5:00 somewhere.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by usp (February 11, 2010 2:26 am ET)
               
            yea, don't drink and type.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by rms (February 10, 2010 6:27 pm ET)
          2  
          Big Bird:

          In a number of links over the last few days people - including me - have taken the time to explain to you why your hypothesis about lots of snow meaning no Climate Change was flawed. They didn't even use big words.

          Do you just not read them? You certainly haven't offered any scientific, thoughtful, credible rebuttal.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by usappa00 (February 11, 2010 1:21 am ET)
          1  
          Huh.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (February 10, 2010 4:36 pm ET)
      4 2
      You might be wondering?

      Are conservatives really this stupid?

      The answer, I'm afraid, is a resounding: YES!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (February 10, 2010 4:36 pm ET)
      3 2
      Bolling, the Olympics committee are the ones crying. Please explain the lack of snow for the Olympics? I think we have a stale mate on your excitement.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by New Frontier (February 10, 2010 4:38 pm ET)
      6  
      Yes, it's sad, isn't it? Because we all remember Al Gore declaring, "We will never, ever get a lot of snow anywhere ever again."
      Report Abuse
      • Author by progressivevoicedaily (February 10, 2010 4:41 pm ET)
        4  
        And I would argue New Fronteir...check the records dating back 50 years on average snowfalls just in the Midwest alone, and you will see a dramatic decrease in annual snowfall rates. ITS JUST A FACT. I KNOW YOUR ILK HAS TROUBLE WITH FACTS, BUT PLEASE....JUST ONCE!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by New Frontier (February 10, 2010 4:58 pm ET)
          5  
          I'm sure you're right. I'm not sure you got my sarcasm tho. Unless you're being sarcastic. Hard to tell around here sometimes! :)
          Report Abuse
    • Author by mmfa.fan (February 10, 2010 4:41 pm ET)
      6  
      I wonder how many times they'll tell the same joke. OMG it's snowing and Al Gore said it would never snow again ROFL! stfu.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jjamele2880 (February 10, 2010 5:08 pm ET)
        4  
        I've heard it at least five times just TODAY.

        Again- the theory is that if you repeat something often enough, no matter how absurd, it becomes fact. Or at least, it becomes fact to Seahawks, Right On, Jose2 and the other drooling idiots who pop in here every so often to repeat what they heard on Fox.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dogbreath (February 10, 2010 5:42 pm ET)
             
          Yea, the media is all over this one like a wet blanket. Honestly, I realize the storm systems moving through the area are strong and are dumping huge amounts of snow, but the way the press is acting you would think that none of them had seen a snowflake before. I heard an interview yesterday with some guy on the street and the journalist asked, "What are you going to do? (Now that more snow is coming)?" Like had should run and break into tears, and scream about how it was just so unfair. He said, "Deal with it." And then looked at the journalist like she was something at the bottom of his shoe.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (February 10, 2010 6:01 pm ET)
          1 2
          I'd leave RightOn out of that list of fools.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by NoNothing (February 10, 2010 8:02 pm ET)
             
          "The theory is that if you repeat something often enough, no matter how absurd, it becomes fact." Yes, man-made Global Waarming comes to mind.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by mmfa.fan (February 10, 2010 4:41 pm ET)
      2  
      I wonder how many times they'll tell the same joke. OMG it's snowing and Al Gore said it would never snow again ROFL! stfu.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (February 10, 2010 6:33 pm ET)
        3  
        They apparently haven't heard that global warming tends to trap more moisture in the atmosphere, thus more "water" events like heavy snow, flooding, etc.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by worthyfoe (February 10, 2010 4:57 pm ET)
      4  
      "63% of the country now covered in snow - RPT" - can anyone verify this "fact?" What is RPT?

      And putting Al Gore's book in the snow - to quote Andy Samberg doing Rahm Emmanuel - what are you, 14?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (February 10, 2010 5:09 pm ET)
      5  
      Al Gore's global warming theory? So he just made the whole thing up?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fishgirl26 (February 10, 2010 5:12 pm ET)
      4  
      Ok, so we are below our normal snow pack in Montana so what does that say geniuses over at Fox??? It's not about weather it's about CLIMATE! The climate is changing causing massive snow storms and violent hurricane and heat waves. OY!!!!! (sorry, that's all I can muster at the stupidity!!!)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Far Left but Always Right (February 10, 2010 5:16 pm ET)
      3 1
      These people.... "there can't be global warming, it's cold out"
      No, this is a weather pattern, also known as el nino. Global warming is a widely agreed on theory(aka fact) that uses decades of data, not just from a cople weeks. This greater than normal precipitation is caused by el nino and yes, global warming.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by foghornleghorn (February 10, 2010 5:24 pm ET)
      4 1
      How global warming makes blizzrds worse:

      http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/20100210/hl_time/08599196229400
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (February 10, 2010 5:31 pm ET)
      4 1
      So, I wonder... if we have record heat waves in various locations this summer, will that melt FOX's theory that there's no Global Warming?

      Yeah, that's what I thought...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (February 10, 2010 5:40 pm ET)
           
        No. Global heat waves are evidence of cooling. Just wait, the wingnuts will tell you that, if they ever acknowledge the heat at all, that is.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (February 10, 2010 5:44 pm ET)
        5  
        Fox doesn't do any climate-related reporting from about April through September. It's just time constraints.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (February 10, 2010 6:04 pm ET)
          2  
          Nor will they mention the weather in Australia or Africa, or the melting glaciers.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jjamele2880 (February 10, 2010 6:31 pm ET)
            2  
            That's not Amerikuh, so it doesn't count. All that matters is what's happening outside my window, because that's the entire planet.

            And as the Colonel says, don't expect to hear anything about global climate change when it's 85 degrees in April in NYC.

            Report Abuse
        • Author by New Frontier (February 10, 2010 8:18 pm ET)
          1  
          Undoubtedly, that's the reason...
          Report Abuse
      • Author by SLRTX (February 11, 2010 10:13 am ET)
           
        nerzog --

        Interesting how one of the denialists champions is wrestling with trying to explain how things got so warm last January.

        He's content with blaming it all on El Nino.

        http://www.drroyspencer.com/

        But, denialists using their typical "arguments", switch positions back & forth, deflect, and throw ideological rants into the mix.

        From Spencer's own posts, it almost looks like he's beginning to re-think his position, and his association with these nutcases.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Sharpe (February 10, 2010 7:33 pm ET)
      2  
      "An increase in global temperature will cause sea levels to rise and will CHANGE the AMOUNT and PATTERN of PRECIPITATION, probably including expansion of subtropical deserts. Warming is expected to be strongest in the Arctic and would be associated with continuing retreat of glaciers, permafrost and sea ice. Other likely effects include INCREASES in the INTENSITY of EXTREME WEATHER EVENTS, species extinctions, and changes in agricultural yields. Warming and related changes will VARY from region to region around the globe, though the nature of these regional variations are UNCERTAIN."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pilotx (February 10, 2010 7:47 pm ET)
      2  
      So stupid is the new black huh?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Boxer1979 (February 10, 2010 9:21 pm ET)
      2  
      Bolling: snow "breaking Al Gore's heart because" it's "burying his global warming theory"

      [http://okazu.blogspot.com/uploaded_images/nonsense-752771.jpg]

      Report Abuse
    • Author by zippy22 (February 10, 2010 9:44 pm ET)
         
      "RFK, Jr. 15 months ago: Global warming means no snow or cold in DC"

      http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/RFK-79834057.html

      In Virginia, the weather also has changed dramatically. Recently arrived residents in the northern suburbs, accustomed to today's anemic winters, might find it astonishing to learn that there were once ski runs on Ballantrae Hill in McLean, with a rope tow and local ski club. Snow is so scarce today that most Virginia children probably don't own a sled. But neighbors came to our home at Hickory Hill nearly every winter weekend to ride saucers and Flexible Flyers.

      In those days, I recall my uncle, President Kennedy, standing erect as he rode a toboggan in his top coat, never faltering until he slid into the boxwood at the bottom of the hill. Once, my father, Atty. Gen. Robert Kennedy, brought a delegation of visiting Eskimos home from the Justice Department for lunch at our house. They spent the afternoon building a great igloo in the deep snow in our backyard. My brothers and sisters played in the structure for several weeks before it began to melt. On weekend afternoons, we commonly joined hundreds of Georgetown residents for ice skating on Washington's C&O Canal, which these days rarely freezes enough to safely skate.

      Meanwhile, Exxon Mobil and its carbon cronies continue to pour money into think tanks whose purpose is to deceive the American public into believing that global warming is a fantasy.

      Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/RFK-79834057.html#ixzz0fBw3M6yQ





      Report Abuse
    • Author by At_odds (February 11, 2010 12:03 am ET)
      1  
      The problem here is that nobody has dumbed down a counter point to these people. It snows when it is cold so, many conservatives (as well as many 4 year olds) think that the more it snows, the colder it is. They don't know anything about meteorology basics, they don't realize that it can snow and stick at 32 deg F. They don't realize that the snow is a result of warm humid air, cooling and that the air has to be warm enough to hold a significant amount of moisture. So, yes it needs to be cold for it to snow, but not too cold. In fact, although this might be a bit simplistic, ideal temperatures for snow are close to 32 deg. And as we all know February sees temperatures much lower than that.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by At_odds (February 11, 2010 12:05 am ET)
         
      My apologies, I unfairly generalized conservatives. Lets go with anti-warming folk instead.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by SLRTX (February 11, 2010 10:07 am ET)
        1  
        At_odds --

        "I unfairly generalized conservatives"

        I disagree. FOX has unfairly generalized conservatives.

        You're just reacting to that unfair generalization. ;-)
        Report Abuse
    • Author by plissken.macready (February 11, 2010 2:41 am ET)
         
      Two snow storms. Within less than a week of each other. In early February. In the Northeast. Following after one of the warmest recorded January's on record worldwide.

      What... how... why would this debunk or even prove anything concerning climate change? Really? Its a snow storm in winter. When did anyone say that all snow storms would cease to exist this quickly with climate change?

      Its just so sad how this is supposed to be journalism, when it all just sounds like school yard bickering and play ground name calling. I'm just out of college, and I feel more mature than these "newscasters". If you disagree, at last through up facts. You know, those things that journalists are supposed to use to make their point. Don't just point to a snow storm in one small section of a continent in the dead of winter as proof of anything.

      Did they even touch on the fact that Vancouver is warm enough that there's no snow on the ground for the Winter Olympics, and that they have to ship it in? If a single snow storm can disprove global warming, what does the situation in Vancouver mean?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by applepie44 (February 11, 2010 6:20 am ET)
         
      "CLIMATE CHANGE

      NOT weather change."

      Cold...Hot, Warm...Cold
      Record breaking temperatures predicted.......Record breaking snowfalls and deaths due to cold
      Himalayas snow disappearing shortly...not disappearing shortly
      Scientists agree on climate change...Scientists pressure to agree
      Scienctific data supporting report....Scientific data destroyed
      Scientific data peer reviewed.....Scientific data from magazine
      World warming since '98'.....World actualy cooling....

      Semantics.....
      Report Abuse
      • Author by At_odds (February 11, 2010 10:26 pm ET)
           
        This is either a good point made in sarcasm or a list of bad talking points that have been that don't hold up in debate
        Report Abuse
    • Author by SLRTX (February 11, 2010 10:05 am ET)
         
      I posted this on another page, but it will work here too. I also added Al Gore's age at each step to clarify how old he was when he developed the global warming theory.

      The following is from: http://www.livescience.com/environment/070131_climate_change_history.html

      1896 (Al Gore is -62)
      Arrhenius publishes first calculation of global warming from human emissions of CO2.

      1897 (Al Gore is -61)
      Chamberlin produces a model for global carbon exchange including feedbacks.

      1930s (Al Gore is about -20 to -25)
      Global warming trend since late 19th century reported.

      1938 (Al Gore is -20)
      Callendar argues that CO2 greenhouse global warming is underway, reviving interest in the question.

      1945 (Al Gore is -3)
      U.S. Office of Naval Research begins generous funding of many fields of science, some of which happen to be useful for understanding climate change.

      >>> Al Gore born in 1948 <<< (I added this - not from site)

      1956 (Al Gore is 8)
      Phillips produces a somewhat realistic computer model of the global atmosphere.
      Plass calculates that adding CO2 to the atmosphere will have a significant effect on the radiation balance.

      1960 (Al Gore is 12)
      Downturn of global temperatures since the early 1940s is reported.
      Keeling accurately measures CO2 in the Earth’s atmosphere and detects an annual rise. The level is 315 ppm.

      1963 (Al Gore is 15)
      Calculations suggest that feedback with water vapor could
      make the climate acutely sensitive to changes in CO2 level.

      1967 (Al Gore is 19)
      International Global Atmospheric Research Program established, mainly to gather data for better short-range weather prediction but including climate.
      Manabe and Wetherald make a convincing calculation that doubling CO2 would raise world temperatures a couple of degrees.

      1968 (Al Gore is 20)
      Studies suggest a possibility of collapse of Antarctic ice sheets, which would sea levels catastrophically.

      And so on...

      So by 1968, when Gore as a mere 20 yrs old, he'd have to cultivate this quite a bit. That's a lot for a kid to do. Looks like he accomplished a lot, even before he was born. He should get another Nobel Prize for accomplishing something that has never been done before!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (February 11, 2010 12:33 pm ET)
           
        Wow, is there an additional Nobel LIfetime Achievement Award that they could give Gore ? He's really been working on this.

        Nice timeline, SLRTX. I think it would be in the Denial Cultists best interest (not that I feel the need to give them advice on improving their propaganda campaign) to try to rein in the Al Gore references every time they come up with a new angle.

        Mentioning Gore might be effective at keeping the most ignorant and partisan on the Denier trolley, but if they're trying to get fence-sitters into the Cult, I think the Gore obsession probably hurts them by making it more obvious that the cult is more about politics and Ad Hominem attacks than it is about science.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by SLRTX (February 11, 2010 4:49 pm ET)
          1  
          Col -

          Denialists just keep ignoring the science, in favor of ideological arguments. No matter the ideology, science has proven climate change.

          How we deal with the scientific evidence, is a matter of policy. Science and policy are connected, but separate. We hope the sane, rational policy makers are driven by the scientific evidence, and not the rantings of the conservatard denialists cranks.

          Denialists can't separate science from ideology. Seems like every time I "debate" this issue with a denialist, they end up going after Al Gore, the IPCC, or Obama. Big deal. That's not scientific evidence. That's ideology, based on irrational fears. (They call US alarmists, but they act like alarmists when they scream about higher taxes, killing jobs, etc.)

          Climate change marches on, whether the denialists wish to "believe" in it, or not. After all, climate science is based on evidence - which proves ACC is real. Believing ACC isn't real (like any belief system) doesn't require evidence.

          Now, how long will it take for Galatardo to respond? (It has a thing for me.) Wait for it... Wait for it...
          Report Abuse
          • Author by CircusMaximus (February 13, 2010 10:27 am ET)
               
            You got it.
            I know people in Australia, and many other parts of the world, are extremely concerned with the politics of climate change in the US. It's comforting to know that all Americans aren't represented by the Big Brother Fox.

            Apologies to you all for exporting Rupert Murdoch.
            Report Abuse