About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Limbaugh criticizes health care reform as "a civil rights bill" and "reparations"

February 22, 2010 1:21 pm ET

From the February 22 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by pilotx (February 22, 2010 1:27 pm ET)
      6 2
      More racial overtones huh Rush? How do people not get sick of your act?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by SMTDL (February 22, 2010 1:30 pm ET)
      5 1
      And people still claim they never heard Limbaugh say anything racist!!!!Anything helping people is reparations because the President is black.Forget they they have to get sick to get it!!..How stupid ..How racist!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by blueline99 (February 22, 2010 1:32 pm ET)
      4 1
      Rush, you are such a liar and you demonstrate your lack of knowledge. Of course the caller misquoted the Senate Health Bill.

      Under the Senate proposal, insured group health plans must comply with the nondiscrimination requirements for self-funded plans (IRC Sec. 105(h)(2)), including rules that the plan does not discriminate in favor of highly compensated individuals as to eligibility to participate or to benefits provided under the plan.

      Since the discrimination rules for self-funded plans were issued in 1980, employers have adopted fully insured plans to provide executives and key employees with tax-free reimbursements for out-of-pocket medical, dental, and vision expenses. These new prohibitions against discrimination in fully insured plans will compel employers to use other methods to reward executives.


      Basically it's saying that you can't provide extra incentives to the executives that you don't provide to everyone. In what way is that wealth redistribution?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by fantagor (February 22, 2010 1:49 pm ET)
        6 1
        It's health equality. Nothing ticks off Rush more than average people getting what rich people have for doing the same if not more and harder work.

        Randy
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Brutus (February 22, 2010 2:59 pm ET)
        2  
        Basically it's saying that you can't provide extra incentives to the executives that you don't provide to everyone. In what way is that wealth redistribution?


        Good point. It's not wealth redistribution. As an HR professional, I never did like these executive medical plans because I always felt that they were discriminatory despite what the law indicated. These executive medical plans pick up the slack and cover everything the regular plans do not. In addition, both the base medical plan and the executive medical plan are often times offered at no charge to the executives, while the regular workers have to contribute anywhere from 20%-25% on average towards the cost of their medical plan out of their paycheck. Those contributions are separate from the copays and deductibles employees have to meet should they utilize the plan (Gasp)!

        I find it ridiculous that the rich executives financially need these plans and pay nothing for them while making millions of dollars. Why can't they pay for their own medical costs out of their own pocket just like their hero Rush?

        If the average employee knew the amount of money their company pays towards these executive plans (both in contributions and in claim expenses), they would be appalled.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by vysotsky (February 22, 2010 1:32 pm ET)
      5 1
      "I'm interested in people's hearts and their souls, because that's what animates us as human beings. Not our skin color. I'm colorblind."

      -Rush Limbaugh,12 October, 2009
      Report Abuse
    • Author by whatIthink (February 22, 2010 1:33 pm ET)
      3 1
      It's not racism, right Breitbart?

      And so it goes, round and round. One stooge says something racist, another stooger defends it as not being racist, then another stooge says something racist....

      Good lord, don't these clowns (yes Beck, y'all are a bunch of clowns) ever get together and compare notes?

      --My apologies to the Three Stooges.

      Annnndddddd, here comes MagCynic in three...two...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by raddave43 (February 22, 2010 1:36 pm ET)
        2  
        You also forgot that if someone calls it racism, both stooges call that person racist.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by raddave43 (February 22, 2010 1:34 pm ET)
      3 1
      I guess maybe it could be considered a "civil rights bill" because it does give the poor access to health insurance. But, I have no idea how it would reparations.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jjamele2880 (February 22, 2010 1:53 pm ET)
        2  
        I think the real question is "Why does Rush think that calling it a Civil Rights Bill means it's a BAD thing?"

        I have no problem calling strong health care reform (which we are not likely to see, in my opinion) a Civil Rights Bill. Because I happen to believe that Health Care is a Civil Right. But I can understand why someone who loathes the idea of Civil Rights would attack Health Care reform this way.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by raddave43 (February 22, 2010 1:54 pm ET)
          3 1
          Because he knows labeling something a civil rights bill doesn't play well to the average teabagger.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Space-Pedestrian (February 22, 2010 2:28 pm ET)
        1  
        The poor are disproportionately represented in which ethnic groups? Therein lies the answer.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by soze169880 (February 22, 2010 1:35 pm ET)
      5 1
      Well, it's nice to see that for once, Rush admits that his entire rationale for opposing something is that it might improve the lives of black people.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mjh (February 22, 2010 1:49 pm ET)
      4 1
      Paging K1Dork . . . paging K1Dork . . . you are needed for immediate passionate defense of a rightwingnut racial comment . . . paging K1Dork . . . paging K1Dork . . .



      Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (February 22, 2010 2:25 pm ET)
        4 2
        So, what part of what Rush said was "racist"? I'm a black man with a white wife and relatives in the ghetto, bro', and I don't see racism in what Rush said. What's wrong with you, bro', does everything have to be partisan bull with you? {just doing my k1dork impersonation}
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mjh (February 22, 2010 5:43 pm ET)
          1 1
          Pretty good -- but, don't forget to

          - claim you're only here for a discussion
          - ask a poster to explain why THEY think its racist
          - after they explain, continually insist that it isn't
          - tell everyone they're stupid for thinking it's racist
          - when someone responds in kind, castigate them for being an "internet coward"
          - claim this site is filled with "white liberals" who THINK they speak for all blacks
          - say that you just wanted a discussion, but are sick of people who don't tolerate a different opinion, and are done posting here {until next time}
          - invite everyone to visit your Facebook page

          Report Abuse
        • Author by sanderson73 (February 23, 2010 5:54 pm ET)
             
          Do you really not get it? Civil Rights amendments and the possibility of reparations are all related to reversing the effects of slavery. When Rush coorelates the Civil Rights movement with Health Care, he is essentially saying that the Health Care bill will only help the poor - aka Black People- in Rush's mind. Make the connection, its very clear.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by canaanxing9025 (February 22, 2010 1:56 pm ET)
      4  
      I feel like I'm tripping. This is off topic, but I am listening to Limbaugh now, and he keeps playing clips from his speech at CPAC last year.

      Poor Becky, he has his moment in the sun, and it is eclipsed by Limbaugh's massive ego.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (February 22, 2010 2:13 pm ET)
      1  
      What is his point?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by cugagcmu805031 (February 22, 2010 4:38 pm ET)
        2  
        That if it brings any amount of equal access to anything and benefits poor people/people of color/the middle class/small business owners, it automatically involves civil rights and reparations and is bad for the country. This is another wedge Limpballs is creating and trying to use as a political/social/cultural/economic tool to appeal to his weak-minded listeners.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by coachslife3331 (February 22, 2010 11:06 pm ET)
      1  
      When we allowed the Fairness Doctrine to go by the wayside...we urshered in this kind of vile, inaccurate, racist speech! This drug addict gets to go on the radio daily and make all kinds of wild accusations without impunity! There was a time that a station was forced to have a balanced and equal response to idiots like this...not anymore...and people of low intelligence eat this kind of chatter up...HOOK, LINE, AND SINKER! Fair and Balanced my Gluteus Maximus!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rtdavis11200 (February 23, 2010 8:44 am ET)
         
      Why are the American people allowing this hate speech to continue?

      Freedom of Speech does mean that people like Beck and Limbaugh should on a daily basis fill our airwaves with lies and racist rants.

      Comparing healthcare for millions of Americans of all colors with something to do with slavery is crazy.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rtdavis11200 (February 23, 2010 8:46 am ET)
         
      Why are the American people allowing this hate speech to continue?

      Freedom of Speech does mean that people like Beck and Limbaugh should on a daily basis fill our airwaves with lies and racist rants.

      Comparing healthcare for millions of Americans of all colors with something to do with slavery is crazy.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rajihammr (February 23, 2010 2:02 pm ET)
      1  
      The Limpman seems so angry...but he says he is the most upbeat, compassionate, happy soul. I'm a little confused.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by pguard5150 (February 23, 2010 9:28 pm ET)
         
      Healthcare is not a right. If you cant afford it there is already county facilities that you can go to without paying. There should not be anyone telling you or I what we can of should provide for anyone, especially the goverment.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by little poncho (February 23, 2010 9:32 pm ET)
         
      LET LIMPBALLS, RANT AND RAVE ABOUT ANYTHING HE WANTS..... WE SHOULD ALL AGREE WITH "IT"........ REMEMBER THE HART, CAN ONLY TAKE SOO MUCH AT 58!!!!!!!!!!!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Thereforiam (February 24, 2010 9:19 am ET)
         
      Karl Rove, the Goebbels of the Bush administration, was a genius at propaganda. His best skill was in successfully redefining words to suit his agenda. Examples: the words "liberal", "progressive", "war", "patriot" and the phrase "redistribution of wealth". In historical fact, the eight years of the George W. Bush administration accomplished the largest redistribution of wealth in our history; from the poor and middle class to the wealthy.

      Redistribution of wealth is not inherently a bad thing. But it does depend on your perspective. If you are poor or middle class and the money taken from you is being returned from the super-rich who have been hoarding it, it looks like a good idea. If, on the other hand, you are wealthy and have stock piled more than you could ever spend, it looks terrible.

      I'm just amazed that Christians linked up with that latter group considering what Jesus said consistently on the issue.
      Report Abuse