About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Cavuto refers to his guest, Climate Progress editor Joe Romm, as a "warmist"

February 23, 2010 4:38 pm ET

From the February 23 broadcast of Fox News' Your World with Neil Cavuto:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by MickD (February 23, 2010 4:46 pm ET)
      2  
      It took 500 guys in a room at the Heritage Foundation to come up with that? Gold stars from Cheney's man size safe for all!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dogbreath (February 23, 2010 4:47 pm ET)
      2  
      Is there a bigger idiot in the Senate than Inhofe? We have and continue to experience major economic devastation in this country, much of it attributed to bank fraud and failures - things that really should be investigated, and he honestly tell us that THIS is a major issue.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by JohnnyAppleseed (February 23, 2010 5:08 pm ET)
        1 5
        I guess proposed policies of spending and redistributing trillions and trillions of dollars worldwide are such a minor issue.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by vhw28672478 (February 23, 2010 5:10 pm ET)
          1 3
          You are wrong
          Report Abuse
        • Author by dogbreath (February 23, 2010 5:58 pm ET)
          1 1
          Where is your source for this? Inhofe is suggesting the because it has snowed a great deal that climate changed is a hoax, brought on by evil scientists who make up and create false information. Has some of the information regarding climate change been wrong, probably so. I am certainly not privy to that information and nor or you, I can only assume. However, whether or not mankind is responsible for climate change is only a part of the issue. The fact is that the climate is changing - ocean levels are rising, some areas are experiencing drought, some more precipitation. We have to deal with this situation whether we are driving force behind it or not. Inhofe rather just play politician. No solutions, no answers, only the status quo.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by dmhack (February 23, 2010 4:50 pm ET)
      2 1
      Okay, fine. As clunky as it sounds, I can live with warmist.
      As for the two guys pictured above...guess I'd have to refer to them as moronists.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by The New Pilgrims (February 23, 2010 4:52 pm ET)
      7 1
      More definitions from the Official Fox News Dictionary

      Americans: the good folks who agree with Bill O'Reilly

      channel surfer: anyone stupid enough to watch any channel other than Fox News

      conservative: the smart people who always agree with Fox News

      sciencer: one who believes in the thoroughly discredited scientific process

      socialist: stupid people who disagree with Fox News

      thinkist: freaks who believe that thinking for oneself is a good thing
      Report Abuse
    • Author by John Paradox (February 23, 2010 5:02 pm ET)
      1  
      Is the chyron a definition of Inhofe?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by neon desert (February 23, 2010 5:41 pm ET)
           
        Yeah, I was wondering the same thing. Granted, he's a putz, but I do believe we've had some bigger scandals than him. Probably just more self-aggrandizement from the old coot.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by time to fight back (February 23, 2010 5:07 pm ET)
      2  
      BinLadenhofe and Bag o donuts Cavuto. Why bother listening to these teabagged pinheads? The only scandal here is that Cavuto is still on the air and that Binladenhofe still hasn't been tarred and feathered.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pilotx (February 23, 2010 5:07 pm ET)
      1  
      How can anyone take the GOP seriously when this guy is the head of their environmental committee? This is a guy who is on the record saying "God is in charge" of the climate. Why are journalists asking non-scientists questions about science? This is absurd. He is claiming the case is closed when it will take decades to find out what effects our current activities will have on the atmosphere. Dear god, will someone please stop the insanity??????
      Report Abuse
      • Author by neon desert (February 23, 2010 7:22 pm ET)
           
        That's been my complaint about ALL the news networks for some time now. Seems that a REAL news operation would be interviewing economists about the economy, climatologists about climate, computer scientists about the internet, etc.

        The day that I hear Ann Coulter or Dick Morris narrating a NOVA episode about plate tectonics is the day I might change my attitude.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by nullbull (February 23, 2010 5:39 pm ET)
      2 2
      Inhofe is the gift that keeps giving. This guy will go to his grave with the assertion that Climate Change is a giant conspiracy. The more evidence piles up, the more ridiculous he looks, the more ridiculous he looks, the more stubborn he becomes. And he's dragging an entire wing of his party down with him.

      It's in keeping with the old Republican tradition - not ADMITTING your wrong is the same thing as being right.

      Unfortunately, it will take decades for these people to get out of the way and stop protecting obsolete business models that are only clinging to existence thanks to massive government subsidy - I'm talking about the oil and coal industries, of course.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by seven (February 23, 2010 7:18 pm ET)
         
      Is this the Mr Romm that declared in January 2009 that dust bowls are permanent in the southwest? LA floods and Texas blizzards. The facts show the permanent claim is false
      Report Abuse