At CPAC, Climate Depot's Morano says climate change is "subprime science, subprime economics, subprime politics"

~

Inhofe was one of the very first people to call out "global warming" for the hoax that it is.

An editorial full of lies puts an end to the debate? I guess if you're that easily fooled, it might.

(I'll just post the response I posted on your other posting of this nonsense.)

Nah, but keep telling yourself that, BJ fan.

Oh, and next time, if you are going to cite something that "puts an end' to ANYTHING, you might a) get a less biased source and b) get a more reliable source. After all, IBD is the source who claimed that if Stephen Hawking had depended upon National Health Services in the UK, he wouldn't be alive today. Sephen Hawking, a English citizen, has received ALL of his care from the British National Health Services.

Try again and with better sources, please.

I think this puts an end to the debate about "global warming"

In other words:

I've weighed decades of scientific research and data against this Gore-bashing editorial in a pro-corporate publication.

Verdict: I win.

Bobby Jindal fan? Thanks for the laugh. I gotta put Home Depot on my list of places not to shop at.

I'm not sure that it puts an end to the debate. If you look at some of the projects he has grad students working on (here is one example I'm also not convinced that this is the same guy since he has a PhD and in most articles about him (including yours) they call him Mr. and not Dr. or Prof. Many of his papers he does talk about global climate change, but pushes more for the inclusion of historic data (from ice cores and other such proxies) instead of just the in situ data from the last 200 years or so. In fact from one of their papers from last year states

Our results imply
that even stabilization at today’s CO2 levels may cause sealevel
rise over several millennia that by far exceeds existing
long-term projections3.

You might also want to take a look at his bio on the university website.

Mark Siddall is interested in the use of past climate data to asses the risks associated with future climate change and particularly sea level rise. The past is a benchmark to the future in terms of assessing the significance of human-induced climate change against a background of natural variability and also as a source of natural analogues for human-induced change. The past indicates the extent of sea level change that we might expect in the future and the thresholds which might take us into new regimes of more rapid sea-level rise.