About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Beck sidekicks mock letters Obama receives from the uninsured

February 25, 2010 4:25 pm ET

From the February 25 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Glenn Beck Program:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Invent a Scandal (February 25, 2010 4:29 pm ET)
      5  
      Wow,
      sometimes it's hard to even fathom the underlying viciousness of conservatives.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Turk72 (February 25, 2010 4:31 pm ET)
      20 1
      It's refreshing to see the honesty in this segment. Glenn and his buddies clearly don't give a damn about the uninsured and they are not afraid to show it in this bit.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pabobfin (February 27, 2010 1:02 pm ET)
          1
        Limbaugh's "heart attack" (whatever he had) would have cost into high 6 figures at a minimum. Think how many humans could have been treated for the same amount.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by christopher howard (February 25, 2010 4:31 pm ET)
      19  
      There you have it in a nutshell, the party of: "I've Got Mine, Everyone Else Can Drop Dead."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bintx (February 25, 2010 4:32 pm ET)
      19  
      Well, I have no health care insurance because my office doesn't provide it and I'm "one of the pariahs" of the health insurance world. I have two autoimmune conditions which I developed after my divorce which make me "uninsurable". One, thank God, is the result of a worker's compensation injury and I have lifetime medical coverage for it. The other is not and can cause blindness. So, if either of these autoimmune disorders rears its ugly little head [the other can cause severe disability in the extremities], I'm screwed. Too young for Medicare and unable to obtain insurance.

      Really funny, Beck, really, really funny.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by christopher howard (February 25, 2010 4:39 pm ET)
        14  
        My sympathies on that, bintx. Too bad we know that the insurance industry is best served by raking in money from the young and healthy, and then finding excuses not to pay when you really need them. Remember Beck whining about how terrible the US medical system was in early 2008, and then doing a 180 and proclaiming it the "best in the world" once Obama showed an interest in reforming it? No, don't look to the likes of Beck for sympathy. People losing everything because of one major illness is a matter of derision for him.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (February 25, 2010 4:53 pm ET)
          8  
          The care for my original comp injury was about $30,000.00 7 years ago. Following my second surgery, I developed bizarre symptoms which were later diagnosed as a problem with my sympathetic nervous system which had been triggered by the initial nerve injury. The treatment for that disorder ended up costing about $200,000.00 in just over a year. My meds alone were costing over $1,000.00/month and that didn't include the nerve blocks I was getting twice a month at $450 each. If it hadn't been covered by comp, I would have been in constant, intractable pain with no recourse for relief. Two surgeries and a bit of WONDERFUL medical technology later, I'm MUCH better.

          Beck and his clone, Mag, would tell me to suck it up and work harder. [I continued to work as best I could for the 2 years prior to my last surgery and rarely missed any time except to go to the doctor and for my surgeries.] That's not a true conservative mindset which would support the tradition of caring for your neighbors as you care for yourself. It's just plain old lack of compassion and lack of humanity.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (February 25, 2010 5:07 pm ET)
            4  
            CONSERVATIVES don't have any compassion.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (February 25, 2010 5:13 pm ET)
              8  
              Real ones do, but the Fox/hate talk radio crew and their groupies aren't conservatives.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by Midnight Kevin (February 25, 2010 6:02 pm ET)
            5  
            I have book, called "The Handbook For The Disabled", dating about 30 years ago. It discusses medical treatments and philosophies for numerous ailments, must of which are outdated, like one in particular that discussed chronic joint pain which would most likely be corrected by a knee replacement surgery today. The handbook's solution was for the surrounding people to essentially ignore the injured person and force the injured person to walk normally, for acknowledging any change in gait would only be an encouragement of allowing the situation to worsen...

            It seems to me that the conservative response to everything nowadays is to be a man and walk it off, of course, if you are wealthy then you get to get the help you require.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by John Paradox (February 25, 2010 6:55 pm ET)
            1  
            I developed bizarre symptoms which were later diagnosed as a problem with my sympathetic nervous system

            You should have that removed, and become a Neocon!!

            (Seriously, good luck. I have an immune system that resembles "Wolverine/Logan" from the X-Men... was released from hospital the only time I was admitted after three days, instead of having surgery!!)
            Report Abuse
          • Author by aj.physics (February 25, 2010 8:11 pm ET)
            1  
            I'm so sorry to hear about your conditions, good luck! According to the conservatives, the insurance companies shouldn't have to cover you knowing that you are going to cost them their profits. When did we decide it was okay to put a price on life? My mother was in a similar situation, she had congestive heart failure in the early 80's and breast cancer after that and then was told that she might have kidney disease. They needed to run some more test, but told her that they could wait 6 months until she was on medicare, I'm not sure what we would have done if she had been younger, or if she had been sick in the 90's or 00's. I hate the idea of a company looking at me, my health, and my life or my family and friends as an investment and a commodity that when we no longer are profitable are thrown to the way side. I thought they were pro-life, or is that only for unborn children?
            Report Abuse
      • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (February 25, 2010 5:05 pm ET)
        7  
        bintex, it is absolutely pathetic that BECK , LMBAUGH and the rest of the RIGHT WINGERS don't really give a dam- about the average citizen. Their rich so they don't have to worry about paying for their health care. It's the "I got mine so screw you" mentality. I hope that things work out for you.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (February 25, 2010 5:12 pm ET)
          4  
          Hey, I'm good. I have friends, I have family, and I have a job. Life is good.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by MagCynic (February 25, 2010 4:37 pm ET)
      3 23
      Remember that lady during the campaign who said this about if Obama was President:
      I never thought this day would ever happen. I won't have to work out how to put gas in my car, I won't have work out how to pay my mortgage. If I help him, he's gonna help me.
      That mentality is what I think they are mocking. I don't think they're seriously mocking people who don't have insurance. It's the mentality that deserves mocking.

      Conservatives get made fun of for having a "I've Got Mine, Everyone Else Can Drop Dead" sort of attitude. But what about the "You Have Yours So Give Me Some" attitude?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by vhw28672478 (February 25, 2010 4:42 pm ET)
        15  
        Beck is a joke
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Invent a Scandal (February 25, 2010 4:43 pm ET)
           
        I think that's what's called "compassion." Try reading the Bible?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (February 25, 2010 4:44 pm ET)
        18  
        As I told you on another one of your ridiculously obtuse posts . . . try using less one dimensional and more critical thinking.

        Beck is mocking the letters written by people in severe situations and in need. He's a nasty, uncaring, non-conservative POS. Nice guy you try to emulate there.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by dirtylittlereligion (February 25, 2010 4:50 pm ET)
        15  
        Cue Becks mind reader and personal sh!t polisher. Just smooth the edges out.

        He couldn't possibly be mocking the uninsured for being denied coverage. It's all about "welfare queens". Cause we know Beck CARES. He's a COMMON MAN. He would NEVER, EVER, EVER mock those worse off than him. If he did, surely my conservative binary brain would EXPLODE.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by soze169880 (February 25, 2010 4:56 pm ET)
        12  
        Was Beck mocking "that mentality" when he called that woman up to make fun of her for miscarrying? Because I think that indicates that maybe he's just an a-hole who thinks other people's misfortunes are funny. But then, I clearly don't have the touching, romantic, "Misery"-esque rapport with him that you do.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pecst1 (February 25, 2010 5:15 pm ET)
        9  
        It's interesting that you immediately go to that quote from that woman during the campaign. You lump all the letter writers together as people who share the, "You Have Yours So Give Me Some" attitude. As if, just because they are pleading for help from someone in power, that they are lazy cheats and hustlers. None of them were conservative either, right? Couldn't be.

        There's a difference between looking for a hand out cause you suck, and not wanting to bankrupt over a medical bill or not being able to get insurance because the for-profit insurer just doesn't see how they are going to make a buck from your illness. Every other industrialized nation in the world has a health care system for their citizens. We're doing American Exceptionalism wrong. It's not supposed to mean, "...at the expense of it's own citizens."

        Report Abuse
        • Author by MagCynic (February 25, 2010 5:46 pm ET)
          1 13
          Every other industrialized nation in the world has a health care system for their citizens
          Fair enough. Then create a health care system that is Constitutional. The presence of even a single, unconstitutional item in this HCR bill makes the whole thing unconstitutional. For example, Congress wishes to mandate health insurance. What power of Congress does this even fall under? It's not providing for the General Welfare. It's not regulating interstate commerce. You could use the Elastic Clause but then that still has to be tied back to one of the enumerated powers.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by raddave43 (February 25, 2010 6:02 pm ET)
            9  
            Well if and when it passes, file a lawsuit and see if it passes the constitutional mustard.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by soze169880 (February 25, 2010 6:06 pm ET)
              8  
              Ah, but any and all decisions the troll doesn't like were made by "activist judges".
              Report Abuse
              • Author by MiG (February 25, 2010 6:45 pm ET)
                  1
                If the Constitution is what keeps 30 million people from access to healthcare... Hey, hand me a match, and let me take care of that little problem. (Note: This is NOT satire!)
                Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (February 25, 2010 6:11 pm ET)
            4 1
            Talking points, Mag. That's all you've got . . . talking points.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by MagCynic (February 25, 2010 6:15 pm ET)
                12
              You might as well stop responding to my posts because you rarely post anything worthwhile. You claim I'm a dummy who can't think in more than one dimension yet you can't answer a simple question.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by cugagcmu805031 (February 25, 2010 6:30 pm ET)
                3  
                What would really help would be if you stop posting here since you have the b@lls to tell bintx that she rarely posts anything worthwhile. If you're not here you won't know what she's posting.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by MagCynic (February 25, 2010 6:34 pm ET)
                    6
                  I meant she rarely posts anything worthwhile when responding to me. Most of the time it's basic insults and various personal attacks. Needless to say I've never reciprocated.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (February 25, 2010 6:31 pm ET)
                1 1
                You posted talking points, Mag. If you thought in more than one dimension, you'd know that. Why answer a talking point?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by MagCynic (February 25, 2010 6:33 pm ET)
                    5
                  What talking points did I post? Where do I look these talking points up so I know not to bother with them next time?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by bintx (February 25, 2010 6:35 pm ET)
                    1 2
                    Everything you said, Mag. Everything you said. Maybe if you'd quit reveling in your "common man" status and educate yourself, you wouldn't keep posting the same crap over and over and over again and keep asking people why they aren't answering your same questions over and over and over again.

                    Have a good one, Mag. And do some research on what you posted. You'll get your answers.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by bintx (February 25, 2010 6:39 pm ET)
                    2 1
                    This legal opinion by the Dean of The UC Irvine School of Law is a start

                    You will note that he is refuting the talking points that you posted. See, that's how I know they are talking points. When I see the same crap over and over and over again by folks like you, especially on the same day, it's a pretty good bet that you and the other got the "e-mail" of the day.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by MagCynic (February 25, 2010 6:51 pm ET)
                        4
                      That Dean is an idiot. He bases none of his opinion on the ideas of the Founders that went into the Constitution. For example...
                      Congress has broad power to tax and spend for the general welfare.
                      And here's Thomas Jefferson:
                      Congress has not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but only those specifically enumerated
                      Another basis for the power of Congress to impose a health insurance mandate is that the legislature is charged with regulating commerce among the states
                      Which shouldn't even apply here as there are laws in place to specifically prevent interstate commerce from happening with regards to health insurance.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by soze169880 (February 25, 2010 6:56 pm ET)
                           
                        I hate to tell you this, Mags, but Thomas Jefferson was a rapist. Maybe think about finding a different infallible moral standard.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by MagCynic (February 25, 2010 6:59 pm ET)
                            2
                          And I heard Glenn Beck raped and murdered a little girl in the 90s. Get real and educate yourself.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by soze169880 (February 25, 2010 7:01 pm ET)
                               
                            Educate myself like Beck did, right? That's... that's not the same thing as actually educating yourself.
                            Report Abuse
                      • Author by raddave43 (February 25, 2010 7:57 pm ET)
                        3  
                        I love how you dismiss a dean of a law school as an idiot. You get one quote from one of the founding fathers and claim it shows what they all believed. Well guess what, the founding fathers are not around anymore to tell us what they thought when writing the Constitution, but legal opinions since then are there to set a precedence that shows that it is constitutional.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by MagCynic (February 25, 2010 8:25 pm ET)
                            3
                          but legal opinions since then are there to set a precedence that shows that it is constitutional.
                          But given the choice between a legal opinion and the writings of the Founders, which one would you go with?
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by raddave43 (February 25, 2010 9:17 pm ET)
                            2  
                            First you posted the opinion of ONE of the founding fathers, not all of them. Second the quote you cited above doesn't contridict what the dean said, he did not say there was unlimited power under the general welfare clause, but rather there is broad powers under it. And there is. Laws are based on both the Constitution AND legal opinion and precedent.
                            Report Abuse
                          • Author by dirtylittlereligion (February 25, 2010 9:31 pm ET)
                            3  
                            The legal opinion, if it was recent. Considering that if you brought the Thomas Jefferson from the 16th century into ours, he would think it was some fcuked up acid trip. The complexity of modern issues would most likely confound him. Most Conservatives don't stop blabbering to contemplate how much the world has actually changed in 200 years.

                            The technological gains, and the social and financial changes we've made to adapt to those gains, happened for a reason. And I think we've adapted fairly well. But now we've got those that have sticky dreams about sending us back to that unregulated "paradise" without actually contemplating how people lived.

                            You forget the technological advancements and the new opportunities for exploitation they presented. So, I'm only gonna say this once, and you figure out how to take it :

                            If conservatives REALLY stood on their principles they would all be Luddites.

                            Also, A note about Beck...
                            If I only heard ONE specific phrase from Beck, I would still know that I oppose what he stands for and that he is a phony. (as it is MMFA has pages and pages on Beck...that you disregard)

                            That phrase was: "Progressives have built up this wall of separation church and state, and it's nonsense"

                            Insane. If you agree with Beck on that, I'm afraid you are too. I can no longer take anything Beck says seriously after hearing that.

                            Beck is not a libertarian. Beck is not an independent. Beck is another disguised neocon who is trying to get some of the "independent" vote.
                            Report Abuse
                          • Author by mjh (February 26, 2010 3:32 am ET)
                            1  
                            "But given the choice between a legal opinion and the writings of the Founders, which one would you go with?"


                            Yeah, Mag -- let's go with Constitution EXACTLY as written 221 years ago.

                            That way, we can have

                            - slavery
                            - prohibition
                            - non-direct election of US Senators
                            - women not allowed to vote
                            - unlimited presidential terms

                            GREAT idea . . . /snark/
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by MagCynic (February 26, 2010 9:42 am ET)
                              1  
                              "slavery"
                              - They had to compromise on slavery in order to bring the country together after the Revolution. To say the Founders excepted and condoned slavery is a gross overstatement. John Jay summed it up well:
                              It is much to be wished that slavery may be abolished. The honour of the States, as well as justice and humanity, in my opinion, loudly call upon them to emancipate these unhappy people. To contend for our own liberty, and to deny that blessing to others, involves an inconsistency not to be excused.

                              "prohibition"
                              - Prohibition wasn't in the original Constitution. Our Founders loved the ale.
                              "non-direct election of US Senators"
                              - The non-direct election of Senators served as one of the many checks and balances built into the Constitution. It was a good thing.
                              "women not allowed to vote"
                              - Were women expressly banned from voting in the Constitution? Or was it just the way things were done back then?
                              "unlimited presidential terms"
                              - Oh, no. You got me there. Things were going fine until FDR screwed it up.

                              Report Abuse
                      • Author by LKL (February 25, 2010 9:27 pm ET)
                        1  
                        Mag, that's not what the interstate commerce clause means -it's not just about stuff that is, in itself, sold in interstate commerce, but things that affect interstate commerce. Courts have said so for a very, very long time now.

                        And there's nothing contradictory between the dean's general welfare statment and Jefferson's. Read them again.
                        Report Abuse
          • Author by foghornleghorn (February 25, 2010 6:46 pm ET)
            3  
            It's not providing for the General Welfare - mag

            Well, there's where your argument falls to pieces. It is the general welfare to try to prevent thousands of deaths and bankruptcies due to a lack of affordable health insurance.

            My question to you (from Rep. Weiner/NY): What do the insurance companies bring to the table in regards to health care?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by soze169880 (February 25, 2010 7:06 pm ET)
              4  
              No, see, that only refers to providing for MagCynic's general welfare. A constitutional scholar from Beck's alma mater told me so.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by LKL (February 25, 2010 9:20 pm ET)
               
            No, sorry, healthcare is clearly providing for the general welfare, and if you think health insurance doesn't affect interstate commerce, you're crazy. Also, what's your support for your claim that a single unconstituional item makes the whole thing unconstitutional? Do you have any idea how constitutional review works at all? The courts are supposed to try to uphold the will of the people, i.e., legislation. If some part were to be found unconstitutional (highly doubtful), but it could be severed, the rest should be upheld.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (February 25, 2010 5:28 pm ET)
        9  
        I don't think they're seriously mocking people who don't have insurance.
        Sure, Mr. Apologist. That's why Beck and his sidekick mock a person (a child, no less) who has no insurance.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by soze169880 (February 25, 2010 5:50 pm ET)
          9  
          Hey, that's what the child gets for being someone other than Glenn Beck.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by reanna-mator (February 25, 2010 5:46 pm ET)
        7  
        It's really not so much a "You Have Yours So Give Me Some" attitude as a "Help Us We're Dying While You Drive Your Hummer To Starbucks" attitude.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Midnight Kevin (February 25, 2010 6:08 pm ET)
        5  
        I hear conservatives constantly mocking that woman. While her comments are ignorant, it definitely shows something. How many people do you hear saying that regarding McCain or others? How many people believe that passing the GOP purity test is going to help the individual?

        I don't believe for a minute that the GOP naysayers have any interest in helping the average person, because instead of constantly refusing to work on anything, like calling the summit a trap, they should be actively voicing opinions. Rarely do I see a show where a Republican offers their take on policy. Instead it is how the Democrats are screwing up...

        I don't believe for a minute that Beck is mocking the mentality of the woman mentioned. Beck and his cohorts are mocking the America in need, which includes some of the ignorant tea party adherents, but they have been fooled into believing in a continuation of corporate takeover of our Republic.
        -----------------------
        The Midnight Review
        Report Abuse
      • Author by usappa00 (February 25, 2010 10:21 pm ET)
        1 1
        You are an idiot. They are mocking exactly what they said they are mocking, individuals that send letters to Obama that don't have health insurance. It couldn't be any clearer.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by pecst1 (February 25, 2010 4:46 pm ET)
      13  
      Jerks. These guys are oh so tired and jaded to people's stories of fear for themselves and their families. It's just so boring and trite that they mock all of it. Where are the boot straps for these wimps, amirite Glenn?! Bunch of welfare cheats probably too, huh?

      Hey Glenn, way to live up to those Christian values you claim to live by. You're using "turn the other cheek" in the wrong context here, you fake. You fraud.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jjamele2880 (February 25, 2010 5:01 pm ET)
      4  
      Where is Dave to give his thumbs up to Glenn's philosophy? Just the other day he was expressing his contempt for Everyone Who Is Not Dave on this very site.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (February 25, 2010 5:01 pm ET)
      7  
      The Troglodytes must mock these people. If enough American Health Insurance Horror Stories get into the public sphere, that elusive entity known as "middle America" would realize that the Republitoads have been lying to them... that there really is a HealthCare crisis.

      The Troglodytes can't allow that to happen, so they make fun of the victims, hoping to portray them as losers and parasites (See Maggie Moo's post above).
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mikelartist (February 25, 2010 5:06 pm ET)
      1  
      Too bad your Mom didn't have health care when she had her problems Beckdreck. But it didn't matter, she took care of all that when she went "naked fishing" with the town drunk. hehehehehe.

      We can all play the hateful game Glenda.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Dradeeus (February 25, 2010 5:19 pm ET)
      3  
      Stay classy, San Diego.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by TURK 63 (February 25, 2010 5:36 pm ET)
      2  
      It’s hard not to wish him ill, lose his fortune and be needy for health care.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by goshzilla (February 25, 2010 5:52 pm ET)
      2  
      Beck, representing the common man minus their ability to make $100k yearly, pay off home debt, and afford numerous medical expenses.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mjh (February 25, 2010 6:05 pm ET)
      5  
      Beck sidekicks mock letters Obama receives from the uninsured


      I find it funny {funny strange, not funny ha-ha} that Beck and his cronies mock the troubles of REAL people -- while putting a fake plumber up on a pedestal . . .

      Report Abuse
    • Author by liberalXtian (February 25, 2010 6:09 pm ET)
      4  
      An estimated 17,000 children have died in the past 20 years due to the lack of health insurance. Google it, Mr. Beck and have another good laugh!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (February 25, 2010 6:48 pm ET)
        4  
        The nutjobs can always have a good laugh at someone else's misfortune. Just like Bush did when as governor he mocked the woman asking for clemency.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by kingd (February 25, 2010 6:16 pm ET)
         
      Beck is a "whore for ratings". People tune in just to hear/see how moronic he will be today.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by blue553 (February 25, 2010 6:32 pm ET)
      3  
      People need to start calling him what he is--Beck is a sociopath. He is not a clown, he a threat and a menace.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by RUpplReallyThisStupid (February 25, 2010 9:08 pm ET)
      1  
      Why did you guys only play the first 40 seconds? This delightfully hilarious bit goes on for at least 3 more minutes!
      Report Abuse