About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Ingraham mocks the "ridiculous" "sob stories" Democrats mentioned at health summit

February 25, 2010 8:26 pm ET

From the February 25 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by shaggles (February 25, 2010 8:38 pm ET)
      7 1
      3 words: Joe The Plumber.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jjamele2880 (February 25, 2010 8:40 pm ET)
      13 1
      Did Ingraham have a problem with that Republican congressman bringing a baby on the floor of the House of Representatives to make a "point" about the debt? I believe it went something like "Maggie wants us to protect her future...Maggie doesn't want us to spend money we don't have..." etc. etc.

      My guess is that the answer is "no."
      Report Abuse
      • Author by blk-in-alabam (February 25, 2010 11:15 pm ET)
        5 1
        The sick garbarge she admits to teaching her children.Laura Ingarham would consider that lightweight
        Report Abuse
      • Author by John Paradox (February 26, 2010 12:24 am ET)
        7 1
        John Shaddeg from Arizona:

        [http://i.azcentral.com/commphotos/view/318367.jpg]
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (February 26, 2010 8:35 am ET)
        11 2
        Ingraham has taught her adopted daughter to run around spewing the same invectives that she does. I heard her one afternoon on her radio program bragging on her then toddler running around the house saying things like "liberals are stupid," etc.

        The woman is far to invested in the hate war for her own health.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by txthinker (February 26, 2010 12:07 pm ET)
          11 1
          IMHO, that constitutes Child Abuse.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by epkklk851 (February 26, 2010 3:49 pm ET)
          5 1
          My daughter who is the Environmental Policy/Government major knew who George H.W. Bush and Michael Dukakis were in the Fall of 1988. She was 2 1/2 at the time, but she didn't have any negative adjectives associated with their faces. She knew who Lincoln was, too. Alas, doomed to be a government bureaucrat while still in diapers.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by mmfa.fan (February 25, 2010 8:41 pm ET)
      17 1
      Ridiculous indeed, that those kinds of stories happen in a wealthy, developed country in the 21st century.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by BISHAMON (February 26, 2010 2:31 pm ET)
        11 2
        Mocking the misfortunes of others is the essence of Republican politics today. Their lack of sympathy is why they do not get Obama.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by coldteablues19577325 (February 27, 2010 3:16 pm ET)
        4  
        "Ridiculous indeed, that those kinds of stories happen in a wealthy, developed country in the 21st century." --mmfa.fan

        "Ridiculous indeed, that those kinds of stories happen in a wealthy, developed, PRIVELEGED country in the 21st century."

        There, now I've fixed it for you. Seems it's mostly about priveledge as well now days. 'Priveledge' or lack of will get you all or nothing.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by gg (February 25, 2010 8:43 pm ET)
      20 1
      Another "compassionate conservative" speaks her mind>
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jjamele2880 (February 25, 2010 8:45 pm ET)
      14  
      I'm waiting for Dave to show up and tell us that if a six-year old with diabetes needs health care, he should go out and get a job and pay for it, dammit.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jlw7717595 (February 25, 2010 8:47 pm ET)
      17 4
      I wonder if this b*itch would be mocking sob stories if she had not been wealthy enough to treat her breast cancer.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by blk-in-alabam (February 25, 2010 11:17 pm ET)
        6 1
        I wonder if she is like Bob Beckle and can't get fox news health coverage because of pre-existing conditions?My guess is yes.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by btrue10280 (February 25, 2010 8:47 pm ET)
      7 1
      Is that a man or a woman?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Bongo Fury (February 25, 2010 8:49 pm ET)
      6  
      GOP.The big pup tent party.Faux Nous.Bare and phalynxed.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by donwelty (February 25, 2010 9:05 pm ET)
      11 3
      So Imgraham is saying that we should not consider the needs of the people who need healthcare when we consider a healthcare bill. Is this a catch 22 situation? If you need healthcare, then you can't get it because obviously you don't have enough money to contribute to the republicans in congress so that you can get a bill that would help you. Therefore, you don't need healthcare.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by aj.physics (February 25, 2010 9:24 pm ET)
        8  
        Don't forget, once you need health care, you become a drain on profits for the insurance companies and thus you are not being a good capitalist. Why should an insurance company put your well being ahead of their profits?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (February 25, 2010 9:30 pm ET)
      7 1
      suprise,suprise,Far RIGHT WING NUT JOBS don't care about the concerns of the average American when those concerns don't meet their prefixed ideology.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Porkeater (February 25, 2010 9:45 pm ET)
      8 1
      Note the gold cross glittering on her well-maintained neck as she sneers at the misfortunes of others... wonder if she knows this one:

      1John 3:17 - But whoso hath the world’s goods, and beholdeth his brother in need, and shutteth up his compassion from him, how doth the love of God abide in him?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by charlye5 (February 25, 2010 10:06 pm ET)
        5  
        Thank you. This was so well put.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Quixote (February 26, 2010 1:42 am ET)
        9 2
        Wow. That's quite a lot of hypocrisy to take in. I'm actually amazed. Jesus is one of history's most exemplary progressives. He wanted reform of just about everything, and He didn't want it in little bits at a time.

        Imagine what the pundits on Fox News in 1 B.C. would have been saying, had these hypocrites been around back then. They would have demonized Him beyond belief. Radical, socialist, communist, intellectual elitist, self-righteous, hater of the wealthy, anti-materialist (which is very un-American), etc. etc.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Porkeater (February 26, 2010 9:54 am ET)
          7 2
          ...set himself up against the established religion, hung out with hookers and sick people, welcomed foreigners, and never ever advocated tax breaks!

          Luke 20:25 - And he said unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which be Caesar's, and unto God the things which be God's.

          But that didn't stop the Rushbecks of the day...

          Luke 23:2 - And they began to accuse him, saying, We found this fellow perverting the nation, and forbidding to give tribute to Caesar.

          Same sh!t, different millenium.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by CatsRBigLuv (February 26, 2010 1:15 pm ET)
            13 3
            I think your Biblical reference brings up a very good point. The religious right calls itself "Christian", but attacks with vehemence ANY humanitarian expression that more properly resembles the overall message of the Gospels.

            I think the recent tragedy in Haiti offers a clear example. After the terrible earthquake, people like Pat Robertson (and those who think like him) openly bashed Haiti, its people, religion and culture. They did so by quoting Biblical passages which condemned idolotry, and accused Haiti of arousing God's anger. (I actually had a fierce argument with an old college school-mate about that very issue.)

            As John Stewart rightly pointed out, these people had volumes of Biblical references to cite in relation to the actual event, and most of those references highlight compassion or neighborly love. It's very telling that Robertson and the rest of the right chose themes dealing with vengeance or righteous anger as their departure points.

            They happily traded the sublime humanity of the Sermon on the Mount for the deranged hallucinations of the Witch Hammer... that totally shows what their "theology" is truly based in.

            I am not a Christian, but I have worked with, and volunteered for Church groups in efforts where I feel we have common cause (eg, urban relief... many Churches have a very well-developed infrastructure for dealing with that problem.) About 10 years back, I was participating in an ecumenical forum aimed at reconciling gays and the Church. The meeting took place in a Lutheran Church in Ann Arbor, Michigan. It was a great discussion, but was interupted by some angry wierd, right-wing, youth group (one whose style, methods and rhetoric were astoundingly a lot like those of the modern TeaBag movement.)

            I didnt know much about that youth group, nor do i remember their name. All I know is that it was bankrolled by Tom Monaghan, and was active in buttressing the institutional prejudices which seem so important to the religious right.

            Now, mind you, we were in a Church, and these kids were harassing participants in the discussion with an obscene, cuss-laden harangue against all things liberal.

            The pastor who i had accompanied made a point that these young people, though calling themselves Christian, were screaming and shouting the most obscene things in a house or worship. A rebuttal was made that Christ drove out the money-changers. Rev Gloria (the pastor who I accompanied) had deftly pointed out that Christ threw out Money changers (who she called "the archaic equivalent of the modern capitalist"), while Christ's message arose in the fine rabbinical tradition of open debate... which was precisely what the reconciliation forum was encouraging.

            But for people like Igraham, the Monagham group, Pat Robertson etc... the Gospel isnt about being a good person, its about thinking that one is better than everyone else. Rather than a humble deferment to the sacred, the religious right has twisted the Gospel into nothing more than a prop in a drama where the story is nothing more than their own superiority complex.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by retiredinsf (February 27, 2010 2:24 pm ET)
              2 6
              Oh, like the gays did with the Morman Churches a year or so ago, when they disrupted SEVERAL churches simply because the Church published a memo saying they believed marriage is between one man and one woman?
              Report Abuse
    • Author by jstolz (February 26, 2010 7:39 am ET)
      6  
      If she speaks for anyone on the right, I look forward to clips of Miss Ingraham being used in campaign ads - for democrats.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by BreezyBelle (February 26, 2010 11:10 am ET)
      7  
      I guess is we continue to cut off the poor and lower-class income levels from all access to health care we could eventually eliminate poverty... because all those inconvenient poor would just die off, and we wouldn't have to deal with them, or talk about them, anymore... because those low income folks are just way too needy and demanding and depressing...

      ...I just keep getting so confused - who are the elitists again???

      Report Abuse
    • Author by raynfala (February 26, 2010 11:48 am ET)
      6  
      Ya know, Laura, it's only a "sob story" until it happens to you...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by CatsRBigLuv (February 26, 2010 12:36 pm ET)
      9 2
      After her insanely ridiculous and completely disrespectful mangling of the Niemoller poem, I dont think Ingraham should really be consulted about anything. That whole affair certainly rose the bar of lunacy that Fox is so famous for... even Beck and Palin would be jealous.

      She complains about "sob stories", while at the same time representing a community that excites itself into homicidal hysteria over fabrications about "death panels".

      What a tool... Ingraham has actually outdone her loony colleagues at Fox on this one. What a shmuck.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ProgLib (February 26, 2010 4:20 pm ET)
      6  
      The funny thing is that Republicans constantly tout their own stories that are actually real stories of Americans who are suffering... so when they say them, it's all good to use but when Democrats do it, they are sob stories.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by GreatMonkMiroku (February 26, 2010 6:06 pm ET)
         
      I've known since I was eight: Laura Ingraham = Yucky Republican Such-and-such.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Paisano (February 27, 2010 8:47 am ET)
      6 2
      You can take this down... But Laura Ingram is a C*#t!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by hooboy (February 27, 2010 12:52 pm ET)
      1  
      Every comment I read on this site is negative.

      If you don't agree with the person, can't you at least give some positive response, of what you think should be done?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by retiredinsf (February 27, 2010 2:18 pm ET)
      3 7
      Oh the horror! Then again, how many of you have sympathey for the way Sara Palin's down syndrome kid is treated by leftists such as the BS they said on "The Family Guy" sit-com about her poor kid with down. I suspect none. In fact a poll was done on it and the demons had hardly any symathey. You people are indeed a pathetic group.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by coldteablues19577325 (February 27, 2010 3:36 pm ET)
        5  
        "Then again, how many of you have sympathey for the way Sara Palin's down syndrome kid is treated by leftists such as the BS they said on "The Family Guy" sit-com about her poor kid with down." --retiredinsf

        I thought the dig was toward "the governor of Alaska," not the child himself.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by coldteablues19577325 (February 27, 2010 3:42 pm ET)
        4  
        Here's a link to a video clip of that episode of "Family Guy," you be the judge. Was Trip the butt of the joke, or his mom? How does a TV show differ from a psuedo-journalist spouting her opinion as journalism?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by retiredinsf (February 27, 2010 4:26 pm ET)
          2 6
          Both were the butt of the jokes. And to me there is a big difference between making fun of an infant born with down versus an old lady who "must" use her sisters dentures. Let me know if I need to explain the differences to you.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by congero6189599 (February 28, 2010 6:07 am ET)
            3 2
            It was sarcasm,and the voice of the character with "downs syndrome" has it herself. It was a dig at Sarah Palin and her hyprocrisy. While we are on the subject you must have really been upset by this:

            "... a Republican legislator named Bob Marshal, as Josh at RightWingWatch reported -- declared that God punished women who've had abortions by giving them disabled children later:

            “The number of children who are born subsequent to a first abortion with handicaps has increased dramatically. Why? Because when you abort the first born of any, nature takes its vengeance on the subsequent children,” said Marshall, a Republican.

            “In the Old Testament, the first born of every being, animal and man, was dedicated to the Lord. There’s a special punishment Christians would suggest.” ---Crooks and Liars

            Report Abuse
            • Author by retiredinsf (February 28, 2010 9:52 am ET)
              2 4
              conger: "...as Josh at RightWingWatch reported ......."

              You fools always believe your leftist sites.

              "Marshall himself insists that what he said was misunderstood. The delegate said he was simply trying to point out statistics that indicate women who get abortions have “significant problems in their subsequent pregnancies.”

              http://www2.starexponent.com/cse/news/opinion/article/perspective_mixed_feelings_on_del._marshalls_abortion_speech/53025/

              And sarcasism or not, what was said on the filthy Family Guy about Sara Palin's down baby was really hurtful and disgusting. The fact so many of you pathetic liberals are OK with it speaks volumes about your supposed "compassion". Face it, most of you are hypocrites to the core. Your only salvation is you can't help it. You have mental issues!
              Report Abuse
    • Author by mountaingal (February 27, 2010 3:19 pm ET)
        1
      I felt sorry for Laura when she was battling breast cancer and I thought she would become more "human" as a result for experiencing a health issue but apparently that was a futile wish. Laura has always been mean and disparraging of other people's suffering. The fact that the stories related by the Dems were true only made her laugh harder. What a poor excuse for a human! Do people have to get special training to be so hard-hearted or is it a gift from Satan? Certainly, a loving God would not approve of such venon but He gave her free will to be mean and uncaring. She and her Fox cohorts are not interested in knowing what happens to real people--they don't care. The suffering of others is merely a target for their humor and venom. Laura should be taken on a reality tour to see how many Americans have to live. She isn't stupid, she is just a bitch who needs to cling to her version of reality or she would become compassionate and, therefore, useless to Fox.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by bostonrichard (February 28, 2010 12:47 pm ET)
      5 1
      this d-bag has no credibility about anything what-so-ever. she got booted off boston radio, and/or is on at 2:00 am or something, because no one was listening to her. she lost it when she went to iraq to prove a point about the success of the mission and claimed that most journalists weren't in the war zone covering the soldiers and then dowd of the nytimes, pointed out her hypocracy when the abc journalist who got critically wounded in the war zone was all over the news. she never came out and said she was wrong and still will not admit that iraq was a huge mistake. she's a right wingnut and no christian either. that cross on her neck should be burning a mark in her neck by now.
      Report Abuse