Savage: "The radical Left and the radical Muslims are natural blood brothers ... they all want to bring down America"
March 01, 2010 11:49 am ET
From the February 26 edition of Talk Radio Networks' The Savage Nation:
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
These two groups aren't "natural blood brothers," because their whole outlook on life are opposite each others. And the American radical Left has no desire to "destroy America." I don't always agree with them, but at least I know that is true.
Remember when he said that Van Jones was a convicted felon who spent six months in prison? Yeah, both of those things were outright lies. Two among thousands.
If Glenn Beck said that 2 plus 2 equals 5, would you believe that as well, Bobby Jindal fan?
Yeah, I know, too easy.
Yeah, I'm sure the feminist arm of the "radical left" would be all over that!
------------------------------------------------------
Savage is such an Idiot.
Once the Neocons outlaw birth control and womens' shoes, we'll be back to that 'ideal society'.
This has nothing to do with his race and everything to do with his ideology.
You seem very certain that Obama's ideology will bring down America. Can you give one specific example please?
GWB was an irresponsible profilagate spender, and he was dead wrong. However, BHO is bringing this to a whole new level. In his first eighteen months he will amass more debt that GWB's irresponsible spending did in eight years.
Think of it as speeding. GWB was doing 80 in a 55 and was dead wrong to do so. BHO on the other hand is doing 200 - it is a matter of degree.
We will never be able to pay off this debt. Our currency will crash and we will have Weimar level inflation. Amidst this, he proposes a brand new $2 trillion entitlement program - it just blows my mind. He flushed $787 billion (which became $862 billion) - NOT COUNTING INTEREST. This is generational theft. It is immoral to put this on future generations.
These bills will come due. How will he pay them? I believe he is doing this intentionally. I do not believe he is incompetent as much as I believe he is malfeasant. His policies are attacking the dollar. Why else would he sign an agreement at the G20 in London allowing the IMF to draw alternative currencies from his infamous "baskets"? If you can explain this, I would love to hear it. The only explanation that makes any sense to me is that he is targeting the dollar.
If the dollar collapses (which it eventually will with this level of debt), BHO can rebuild the economy in his socialist model. In my opinion, that is the plan all along. As Rahm Emmanuel said, why let a crisis go to waste? He is exacerbating the situation. I think BHO has always had a chip on his shoulder toward this country , and now has the power to act upon it.
When the economy is shrinking instead of growing, and nobody is buying and nobody is hiring, government is responsible to get the ball rolling again. You do that by spending, by building your infrastructure. I have small kids in school, and we could use some new schools. I have relatives who teach public school, and they say the same. It is a nationwide problem, much like roads, bridges, rail lines, etc. etc. So, the government puts people to work building that stuff.
In turn, those jobs create other jobs, whether it be support jobs, such as the retail sector, or ancillary jobs such as supplying the concrete and other raw materials to do the building. Those jobs, in turn, will create still further jobs as employers hire to keep up with demand. This raises revenue, and gets the economy growing again rather than shrinking. With a larger economy, you can collect fewer taxes per person, and still have more taxes collected in sum overall. This is stuff we need to build anyway. Most of it is stuff that Reagan should've built, but he was too busy blowing his wad on things like the Star Wars Missile Defense System. Brilliant. That produced almost no jobs, but a good many millionaires.
What we really need to grow, in this country, is the middle class. That's where most taxes get paid, and that's where most jobs are created, and that's what grows the economy. The Republicans have always hated the middle class. They claim they don't, but they act like they do. They give tax cuts to the wealthy, passing that burden to the middle class. They make it ever more simple to ship middle class jobs overseas, because it is to the wealthy that they truly pander.
George W. Bush was an epic failure as a President. Yet, you seem to be advocating the very same economic policies that got us into this mess: less regulation, lowering the taxes on the top 5%. Didn't work before. Why do you think it will suddenly work now?
You obviously are a Keynesian - you just briefly summarized it. I would ask you to point to one historical example in which Keynesian principles have lead us out of a recession.
Please do not tell me that the New Deal ended the Great Depression. You know it was WW2. It you claim otherwise, I will bury you in an avalanche of historical and economic evidence to the contrary.
BTW, it is not possible to "give" a tax cut. Taking away less is not "giving" me anything. It is my money - it is not the government's, ergo it can not "give" me anything.
If I seize your wallet and remove a $20 bill and then return $10 to you, am I GIVING you $10. I am TAKING $10 less than I otherwise would.
No government has ever GIVEN a tax cut - it has only TAKEN less than it otherwise would have.
That awful Reagan helped create a lot of millionaires - I'm sure none of those millionaires bought things, built businesses or hired people: They hid their dirty money in their mattress and papered the walls with it. It is well known that wealth causes poverty, just as trees cause forest fires!
It's time to banish the evil rich and their dirty money forever. Then we will have a true People's Republic where all will be equal and where we can attain a living standard comparable to Cuba.
VIVA LA REVOLUCION!
If you do not support Col. West, you are a racist. If you oppose Clarence Thomas, you are a racist. THe only reason you do not support Sarah Palin is because you are a misogynist.
See how stupid you sound. Don't play these silly games. I oppose Obama because he is a socialist....period.
You're a freakin' Dbag.
If race is not a problem you have with President Obama, why go out of your way to mention it? Liar.
I would point you to Hong Kong or Singapore as a model which proves this.
If you go to the 'right' far enough, you're on the 'left'.. yup.
------------------------------------------------------
Savage wants a world for him and like-minded people who are just like him. He is perhaps the ONLY person in the American media - Limbaugh, Beck & Coulter included - to whom the word "Nazi" can truly be reasonalbly applied.
The problem is that they've pulled the perception of the Center so far to the right, much farther than is treally is, that Liberals are basicaly the True Center and Center Left, the RINO's and disaffected / disillusioned Republicans are the Right-Center and the Right IS the radical right. And there's just no equivalent to these clowns on the FAR left. America doesn't really HAVE a Far-Left, and never really has.
But they can't win a logical, reasonable argument so they have to paint the Center/Center-Left as if it's somekind of Radical Fringe Element. Nope, sorry, it's not our problem that the Fringe Elements have taken over the RIGHT. Just because you got nut-jobs in your camp doesn't mean WE do. (Well, we might, but we don't give them Talk Shows!) And anyone who thinks Olbermann or Maddow are even close to the level of Venom, Absurdity and RADICALISM that Limbaugh, Savage and some of these other clowns are have either NEVER WATCHED THEM, or are so blinded by their own radical views that they've lost all perspective.
--------------------------------------------------------
All you have to do is ask: What to the FAR-LEFT of someone as FAR-RIGHT as Savage. Answer? The CENTER.