About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Beck: the "end of the progressive road" is "Nazis or communists" or white supremacists

March 01, 2010 6:14 pm ET

From the March 1 edition of Fox News' Glenn Beck:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (March 01, 2010 6:19 pm ET)
      14  
      that does not make any sense. A panel below he states the end result of progressiveness is a nazi regime so how can that be the end of progressiveness. His sentence building belies his limited education. In my younger days, if it don't go, chrome it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by RKAllen (March 01, 2010 6:19 pm ET)
      17 1
      You mean these guys, Glenn?

      [http://en.wikivisual.com/images/1/15/Declaration_independence.jpg]
      Report Abuse
      • Author by epkklk851 (March 01, 2010 6:54 pm ET)
        8 1
        Really, they were white supremacists in the truest sense. They didn't believe that Blacks should be slaves, but they didn't believe they were equal, either, and Whites should be on top.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by MR Jensee (March 01, 2010 9:29 pm ET)
             
          So, you'd rather follow the founders of Communism and Marxism? What were they? They didn't free anyone, they just murdered the opposition. Is that the founding fathers you support?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by seahawks123 (March 01, 2010 6:58 pm ET)
          18
        Oh yes the founders, such right wing extremeists. You know with the whole life, liberty and the persuit of happiness thing. Unlike Hitler the leader of the Nazi's (National Socialist) party.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by RKAllen (March 01, 2010 7:02 pm ET)
          22  
          Actully, I was pointing out that every man in that room was a progressive. Conservatives sided with the Crown.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by epkklk851 (March 01, 2010 7:24 pm ET)
            13  
            They were that, too. I just hadn't looked at them as White supremacists before. We do their memory and our understanding a great disservice when we turn them into plastic saints like so many of these "patriots" do.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by aj.physics (March 01, 2010 8:04 pm ET)
                 
              He seems to look at that time through rose colored glasses. He ignores all the arguments between the founding fathers and seems to think that they all thought a like.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by RKAllen (March 01, 2010 10:49 pm ET)
              8  
              Little known fact. Many slave owners believed they were civilizing a group of people that would have otherwise been savages.

              Ironic, isn't it?
              Report Abuse
            • Author by RKAllen (March 01, 2010 10:56 pm ET)
              4  
              P.S.

              If you haven't seen it, I HIGHLY recommend the movie Amazing Grace.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by caseye (March 02, 2010 7:54 am ET)
            1 5
            Wow, you really don't understand what a Progressive is do you! A Progressive believes in more govt. control of things, they "progress" into more govt. programs and believe in redistribution of wealth. The founders were against this completely and that is why they wrote the Constitution the way they did, with limited govt. control! I am really surprised you don't know the difference! The progressives believe the Constitution should change with the times, evolve as in evolution. Conservatives want to preserve the rights of individuals and states as written in the Constitution. Personally, I side with Conservatives on this, because of the Constitution the USA has become the most successful nation that has ever been. The further away from our founding principles we go, the more freedoms we give up, the less successful this nation is and the more like Europe we are.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by epkklk851 (March 02, 2010 8:05 am ET)
              4  
              Well, you've swallowed all of Glennie's talking points! The Founding Fathers lived in a time when the entire population of the United States was less than modern day New York City. It was a rural, agrarian, homogenious culture with limited mobility. Clearly, the Constitution had to evolve, or we would not have been able to evolve as a country. Also, remember that Alexander Hamilton believed in the Elastic Clause and loose construction. It was mostly Southern slave owners who wanted a limited government. One of the rights that is specific to the Constitution is the right to own slaves. Would you like to go back to that?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by caseye (March 02, 2010 9:57 am ET)
                  3
                The Constitution could "evolve" with out changing the original idea of it. Absolutely not, would I like to go back to owning slaves, unfortunately that was a time in not only America's history but many parts of the world had slavery, it was wrong but it was a sign of the times. Abolishing slavery fit the Constitution, it didn't work against it. I just don't agree with you that the entire idea of the constitution was to evolve into something completely different from its intention. Taking care of people cradle to grave was not the intention. It was that we all have the God given right to pursue happiness, but there was nothing in the Constitution guaranteeing equal outcomes. That is "Glennie's" point, I agree with it, you don't, I guess we'll see how it turns out.

                And just to throw this out there, I believe abortion is along the same lines as slavery, killing the most defenseless human beings sounds as barbaric as owning slaves to me. I'm sure I'll hear about that opinion. I just get tired of people picking and choosing what is worthy of protection. Unborn babies and African Americans both deserve protection under the Constitution, the "all men are created equal" part!
                Report Abuse
                • Author by jediknight65 (March 02, 2010 11:41 am ET)
                     
                  so then why are you supporting a party and ideology that wants no restrictions against what corporations do in their activities, be it accumulate vast wealth without regard if they involve themselves in unethical actions, or companies that try to mine or deforest the land to make money and damn the environmental impact their actions cause or whatever monuments, like the grand canyon, they destroy all in the name of the almighty dollar, or companies that pollute waterways and lakes and streams without regard for any creature that uses it, be it mamal, animal or human.

                  but sleep well at night knowing that in your endless defense of beck that you somehow hope that if this would come to pass you think you will be a lucky survivor and be saved personally by glen beck. you wont. he doesn't care about you. wake up
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by caseye (March 02, 2010 2:48 pm ET)
                       
                    Well Jed I believe their are laws in place regarding unethical practices of individuals and businesses. I think there are laws in place to protect the environment as well. I never said all laws are bad, I never said I wanted anarchy. I think those corporations and businesses you are talking about create many jobs for Americans without harming the environment and are a benefit to us all. Why is it always about class envy with liberals and hatred for private industry? You have as much opportunity to create your own wealth as anyone else, and if you do, and you create real jobs and provide a product or service for the public at large you should reap the benefits of it. Everyone pays taxes one way or another, but taxing these companies to death only hurts everyone, especially in the present time. These companies need the money to expand, create new products/services, hire new employees and help grow this economy.

                    Our country has some of the most restrictive policies regarding polution and the environment. Some of those policies are necessary, I would argue some are not. NO one is saying destroy the Grand Canyon for cryin out loud, quit being so dramatic. But, for instance, keeping farmers from receiving water they need to take care of their crops all because some smelt may die is rediculous. What about all those people out of work with families to provide for, where is the sympathy for them? I care more about people than a smelt, I'm sorry if that upsets you.


                    And whether Glenn Beck cares about me personally or not makes no difference to me. I never put someone in a "God-like" position the way many of you have put Obama. Glenn has a opinion show on TV, he states his opinions, backs it up with documentation and shares it with the audience. Its as simple as that.

                    And thank you, I will sleep well tonight.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by epkklk851 (March 02, 2010 3:12 pm ET)
                         
                      "But, for instance, keeping farmers from receiving water they need to take care of their crops all because some smelt may die is rediculous."

                      Did it ever occur to you that maybe collapsing the population of a feeder fish could help destroy an environment? There are several fish populations that are near collapse from over fishing. If the fish population dies out, other bigger fish will not be available. The environment is a fragile thing and sometimes it needs to be aggressively protected. I spent ten years living in Korea. I saw the effects of limited regulation and unregulated capitalism. Bridges and department stores collapsed, the subway blew up, hundreds died because a subway driver feld a burning car and took his key with him. The rivers and lakes were polluted and the streets and the air were filthy. I lived in Seoul for 18 months, the atmosphere of the city ate the silverplating off of a kiddish cup that I owned. I knew people who experienced temporary blindness from drinking Soju and a young soldier was sent home because he contracted HIV from getting a tatoo. I came back to the States with a GREAT appreciation for regulation.
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by Ruby (March 02, 2010 3:53 pm ET)
                         
                      Right because if the smelt dies, then the larger game fish have nothing to eat and then they die and then the fishermen who are also blue collar workers trying to provide for their families will lose their livelihood. So yeah, fock those fishermen! They don't deserve to make a living!
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by caseye (March 02, 2010 8:01 pm ET)
                           
                        I've heard no argument from those that are concerned about the smelts' wellbeing that it is a feeder fish that will kill additional populations. This is just in one area, surely with todays cracker jack environmental technology they can reposition it if it is necessary, but that argument has not been made. They are strickly worried about its extinction.
                        Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (March 02, 2010 9:09 am ET)
              2  
              Progressive, n.,favoring, working for, or characterized by progress or improvement, as through political or social reform.

              The Founding Fathers were PROGRESSIVES. The crap that Glenn Beck shovels has NO BASIS in reality, caseye. NONE. He is an uneducated, semi-illiterate Zoo Radio DJ with a good gig.

              Try reading and turn this man OFF. He's lying to you for ratings.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by caseye (March 02, 2010 9:23 am ET)
                  6
                I have spent many hours reading history and it is you who does not understand what progressives are. In one breath you all (and I mean others besides you) push for bigger govt. and in the next breath you claim the founding fathers were progressives. They were not. The Constitution is clear on wanting limited govt. You slam Glenn Beck but show me in the constitution where the founding fathers wanted a big govt. and wealth redistribution. These are the goals of progressivism. If that is what you are, own it! I am not, neither is Glenn Beck. Your hate and fear of Glenn Beck is interesting, all he does is read historical events, documents them, shows them to his audience and shares his opinion. Sometimes I agree, sometimes I question. Where is his lack of reality, he shows where he has gotten his information. REally, the intolarance of other people's opinions is incredible on this web site! And when has it been so terrible to be self-educated? Very judgemental of you.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by jediknight65 (March 02, 2010 9:40 am ET)
                  1  
                  what books? anythign pushed by human events, wnd, hot air, or townhall.com is not reputable. no reputable historian would read any of that garbage.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by caseye (March 02, 2010 10:12 am ET)
                      4
                    One of the best books I've read on the Constitution The 5000 Year Leap. Also, I have even resorted to reading my children's history books. I used to work in an elementary school and had to correct papers so I had to read, reread and read again the history of the founding fathers and our early American history. I also did attend college and had American History, although it was just one required class, and my daughter is in college and I have been reading her American History book recently. I have also read other actual "books", I don't generally get my information on the internet through blogs like many people do, including many here on this site!
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by epkklk851 (March 02, 2010 11:30 am ET)
                      1  
                      One of the best books you've read on the Constitution is "The 5000 Year Leap"? Do you realize that piece of trash was written by a lying Mormon crackpot? If you've been taking your reading list from Glennie, you have been indoctrinated by crackpots and nutjobs. Sorry, your education is lacking.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by caseye (March 02, 2010 8:06 pm ET)
                           
                        This morman crackpot as you say was the founder of the National Center for Constitutional Studies, has a doctorate from George Washington Univ. in law. Had 16 years with the FBI, 4 yrs. chief of Police in Salt Lake City and 17 years as editorial director of the nations leading police magazine. He also served 13 years as a university professor, wrote 6 college texts and is a National best seller for his book "Naked Communist". So, Morman or not he may know just a little bit more about the Constitution than you.

                        And I'd say your education is "lacking"!
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by epkklk851 (March 03, 2010 11:30 am ET)
                             
                          I know all about Skousen's credentials. Yes, all those things are true, but it is also true that he was considered a dangerous crackpot by people who knew him and worked with him. The FBI had a huge file on him, and Hoover repeatedly corrected the lies he spread about his FBI career. The Mayor of Salt Lake City said he had never met anyone who lied as much as Skousen. His textbooks actually used words like "pickianinny" and he said slaves willingly walked onto the slave ships. And "The Naked Communist" is a screed. Sorry, you have been completedly deluded by a couple of lying frauds.
                          Report Abuse
                    • Author by jediknight65 (March 02, 2010 11:42 am ET)
                         
                      yes a book written by one of the nuts at the john birch society and a big time mormon......yeah thats real reputible. moron.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by bintx (March 02, 2010 11:56 am ET)
                        1  
                        The Mormon Church considered Skousen to be a part of the lunatic fringe as did the FBI. He was a very sick man with galloping paranoia.
                        Report Abuse
                    • Author by jediknight65 (March 02, 2010 11:43 am ET)
                      1  
                      hey genius......i went to college and have a degree in history. you wanna try and take me on with history be my guest. i been itching to school someone on history. so come on if you got the stones.
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by bintx (March 02, 2010 11:55 am ET)
                      1  
                      The 5000 Year Leap?????? No WONDER you have no clue what you are talking about. You do know that Cleon Skousen was a documented liar, was considered a dangerous threat to our country by the FBI and several of his former co-workers and employers, and was considered a lunatic by his own church, right?

                      That's not history, caseye, that's the lunatic rantings of a man who had a very, very tenuous grasp on reality. You truly are uneducated.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by caseye (March 02, 2010 3:07 pm ET)
                           
                        Did you all go on the closest liberal blog or review to get your information? I thought liberals were suppose to be tolerant of other "points of view" but obviously only as long as it is your point of view. Very interesting.
                        You are the nastiest bunch of people I have ever seen with all the personal attacks. But I quess this website brings it out in you.

                        All I have to say to you and especially to jed up there is grow up and quit acting like a bunch of spoilded bullies on the playground. Honestly, what a sad display by the liberals of this country. If you have another point of view provide it with respect to the other person, I have done that each time I've commented. You call names and insult me.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by Ruby (March 02, 2010 4:00 pm ET)
                             
                          Cleon Skousen is not a reputable source to get your history from. You should seek out other, more non-biased sources.

                          One book I'd recommend is "The Miracle at Philadelphia" (I'm blanking on the author's name right now). But it's about the constitutional convention. It can be dense at times, but at times it almost reads as a novel. It gives you a good sense of how diverse the founders were. They were not monolithic. They were incredibly free thinking and impossible to pin down. No one can say the founding fathers were conservative or liberal or anything like that because they did not fit a mold, and they certainly didn't force themselves to conform to labels.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by caseye (March 02, 2010 8:10 pm ET)
                               
                            I'll take a look at that book Ruby, thank you for being respectful to me! And yes, I know the founders were a diverse group but they all wanted limited govt.
                            Report Abuse
                • Author by bintx (March 02, 2010 10:08 am ET)
                  3  
                  You could have fooled me. I have seen you post absolutely nothing whatsoever which would indicate that you have ever picked up a single history book. Read the definition I posted above, caseye. Had the Founders not been "progressives," this country would not have come to be. You are using Beck's FALSE definition of progressive. Beck is a documented LIAR, caseye. He is a Zoo Radio DJ who makes his money getting unquestioning people like you to BELIEVE his crap.

                  I slam Glenn Beck because his dishonest, uneducated rantings fuel the stupidity [deliberate ignorance] of people like you.

                  Being self-educated is fine as long as you have the intelligence to understand the difference between reality and fantasy. It appears that you and Beck don't have that.

                  [for the record, my father has an 8th grade education. Even in his current state of mild dementia, he's better educated, more intelligent and more informed than Beck OR you.]
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by caseye (March 02, 2010 11:09 am ET)
                      4
                    OK blintx, you can insult me all you want, it doesn't matter to me, it just shows you have to attack people personnally to make you point instead of sticking to the facts. If you actually read about progressivism, not just the defininition of it you'd understand that the early progressives of the Wilson, T Roosevelt, era believed in govt. regulation, progressive income tax, prohibition, the list goes on and on. I'm not saying it is wrong to be progressive, my argument with you is that our founders were not progressives, they believed in individual freedom, indiv. responsibility, small govt. Even by your definition, the "social reform" part says govt. involvement. I'm not saying some of the reform they wanted was bad either, I just feel it is going too far from what the founders intended for this country.

                    So, if you must attack me with personal slams, its your freedom to do so, but provide me with real debate, not a definition!
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by jediknight65 (March 02, 2010 11:47 am ET)
                         
                      yeah and how well did small government and taxes and such work for thomas jefferson and his presidency? oh thats right he was crashing the country into the ground and had to about face.
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by bintx (March 02, 2010 11:49 am ET)
                      1  
                      I'm not a progressive or even a liberal, caseye. I'm a REAL conservative, not one of these Fox/hate talk radio FAUX conservatives. That's how ridiculous you are. You BELIEVE the crap that Glenn Beck says WITHOUT QUESTION. You will NOT listen to anything anyone says which counter what you have heard from your uneducated, mostly illiterate hero, Glenn Beck.

                      Again, read the definition of "progressive," caseye. The Founders WERE progressives. If they were not, they would have accepted the status quo, and we would still be under British rule. I gave you debate, caseye, you just don't understand. That's not my problem, it's yours. You are believing Beck's made up definition of "progressivism". Contrary to Beck's lies, progressivism is about reform, about making life BETTER. One can be a conservative and still have a progressive spirit. Turn off Fox.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by caseye (March 02, 2010 8:17 pm ET)
                           
                        The founders were Revolutionaries not progressives by today's definition. At least go to the encyclopedia's information about it. You will see progressives want more govt control, bigger govt. I can't help the facts! They just are what they are! The founders wanted limited govt.
                        Report Abuse
                    • Author by bintx (March 02, 2010 11:59 am ET)
                         
                      Okay, I just read that you consider The 5000 Year Leap to be one of the best books you've read on The Constitution. That book is a crock of crap written by a man considered to be a threat to our country by the FBI [his former employer], a liar and a "dictator" by one of his former employers AND a member of the lunatic fringe by his own church. It's not history and it's not fact, caseye. Try reading the Constitution itself.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by caseye (March 02, 2010 8:14 pm ET)
                           
                        You should actually read the book before you throw out judgements, the book is well written, provides many insights via quotes from our founders and I enjoyed it. You need to maybe judge for yourself or stop reading the opinions of liberal progressives.
                        Report Abuse
            • Author by jediknight65 (March 02, 2010 9:39 am ET)
              1  
              progressives wanted to progress the country into something better and more fair for EVERYONE. not just a handful of rich white people.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by jediknight65 (March 02, 2010 9:38 am ET)
            1  
            google John Dickinson
            Report Abuse
        • Author by cugagcmu805031 (March 01, 2010 7:27 pm ET)
          10  
          If the Founders had been rw extremists, the American Revolution would never have happened, and America would still be a British colony. RW extremists believe in preserving "tradition," and would have never rebelled against George III.

          Why do you keep listening to and following people who have you saying things that are not true about your own country's history?

          Do you know the origin of the word National Socialist Workers Party? If you did, you'd stop calling Hitler and progressives socialists.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by DAWUSS (March 01, 2010 8:16 pm ET)
            4  
            Unless King George III was a socialist. Then secession would have been a legitimate claim according to them.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by magnolialover (March 01, 2010 8:16 pm ET)
            8  
            Nah, these guys just know that socialist, is in the Nazi title, so therefore, progressives must be Nazis.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by caseye (March 02, 2010 11:26 am ET)
                3
              Taking the progressive agenda (republican or democrat) too far can result in eihter Communism or Fascism. Its about the govt. knowing what is best for you and taking what you have and distributing it as they see fit. Unions have roots in Communism and Fascism (Nazism), the Nazi party was originally called the National Socialist German Workers' Party. It started out claiming to look out for the worker but given too much power, or taking too much power, resulted in disaster. Progressive is not just a Democrat term, it applies to both Republicans and Democrats through history, it is just now primarily and Liberal(Democrat) term. The founders were not Progressives as we know the term now (since T.Roosevelt/Wilson til now). They were against big Fed. govt.
              That's the facts!
              Report Abuse
              • Author by jediknight65 (March 02, 2010 11:48 am ET)
                1  
                who says taking progressive agenda too far can lead to that? your buddy Cleon Skousen? YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOUR TALKING ABOUT. you don't know history, you don't know anything.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (March 02, 2010 11:51 am ET)
                   
                You aren't reading history, you are reading the revisionist BS of a man who the FBI and even his own CHURCH thought was a lunatic.

                That's why it is impossible to do anything but insult you, caseye. You are quoting lunacy, not fact.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by Bongo Fury (March 01, 2010 10:34 pm ET)
            4  
            Indeed cugagcmu.Orwell's "memory hole" is something I had forgotten about that.Thanx
            Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (March 02, 2010 9:06 am ET)
          3  
          The Founders were progressives, seahawks. If they hadn't been progressives, we would be South Canada instead of the United States.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by donwelty (March 01, 2010 7:33 pm ET)
        8  
        These people can't be progressives, they're "FOUNDERS." These are people Glenn likes. We should be conservative and follow the writings of these people and forget anything that happened later.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Boxer1979 (March 01, 2010 8:05 pm ET)
        6  
        He meant progressivism brought these guys!

        [http://scrapetv.com/News/News%20Pages/Everyone%20Else/images-3/kkk-rally.jpg]

        He is a nutjob!

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Bongo Fury (March 01, 2010 9:07 pm ET)
          3  
          To me it looks like the dood in the left of center in the picture has his head on fire...just hopin'
          Report Abuse
          • Author by christopher howard (March 01, 2010 9:22 pm ET)
            5  
            Ha! Poetic justice. Still, it doesn't beat this truly bizarre klan photo from 1926.

            http://www.neatorama.com/2007/02/15/strange-kkk-on-a-ferris-wheel-photo/

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Bongo Fury (March 01, 2010 9:44 pm ET)
              3  
              That is truly bizarre ch.They can't even have some fun without their hoods on.Rush does.
              Report Abuse
    • Author by soze169880 (March 01, 2010 6:19 pm ET)
      13  
      The end result of an ideology fueled by progress... is people who think the country was at its ideal state pre-Reconstruction.
      Whatever you say, Father Kooklin.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MickD (March 01, 2010 6:22 pm ET)
        11  
        Father Kooklin, funniest obscure historical reference I've heard in awhile.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by christopher howard (March 01, 2010 6:37 pm ET)
          14  
          Given his penchant for propaganda and babyish features, you could also call him Joseph Gerbers. (The thread is about Nazis so the Godwin rule is null & void.)
          Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (March 01, 2010 6:20 pm ET)
      15  
      Bet CNN misses him.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (March 01, 2010 6:22 pm ET)
      14  
      Someone PLEASE call 911 and have this guy put away...because if he was spouting the exact same stuff on a street corner instead of a national TV show he indeed would be put away.

      FOX News is taking advantage of a mentally unbalanced person.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by txthinker (March 01, 2010 6:51 pm ET)
        12  
        FOX News is taking advantage of a mentally unbalanced person.

        Faux News is OWNED by a mentally unbalanced person.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Canadian Observer (March 01, 2010 6:55 pm ET)
        12  
        It amazes me that so many people actually watch and believe this nutcase. I've watched little bits of his show, can only handle a couple of minutes at a time, and he truly is bat-poop crazy.

        Whatever happened to ethics in journalism? Not that Blech is a journalist, but still. I'm all for freedom of speech but these yahoos should be held accountable for the misdirected hatred that they spew.

        Maybe it's comedy and no one knows the punchline?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by carlileb5935 (March 01, 2010 7:23 pm ET)
          7  
          Modern TV Journalism = health care commercials 24/7.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by eweston8542983 (March 01, 2010 10:05 pm ET)
          4  
          Its the pits for many reasons besides the misdirected anger. Any administration move to even comment on on the missimformation brings forth shrieks that have the phrase 1ST AMENDMENT inserted any old where.
          Still there are a few bright spots.
          For all of his volume, his audience represents maybe 1% of the population.
          It's been reported that the majority of usums is getting their news off the internet these days.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by dogbreath (March 01, 2010 7:03 pm ET)
        11  
        He reminds me of a guy who used to speak at the Commons in college. Everyone just listened and argued with him for entertainment. That guy, however, had a limited audience and no one agreed with him because they knew better. The same can't be said for Becky's audience, I'm afraid.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by AB-001 (March 01, 2010 7:26 pm ET)
          12  
          And that's what makes him so dangerous. People are taking this nonsense seriously.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by dirtylittlereligion (March 01, 2010 6:23 pm ET)
      14  
      Like any rational human, I've never understood Beck's rants. Who exactly on the left is arguing for personal rights to be taken away?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by soze169880 (March 01, 2010 6:26 pm ET)
        11  
        Didn't you know? They want there to be LAWS governing how people can make money, rather than just accepting on faith that anyone who makes obscene amounts of money would never do anything morally questionable!
        Why do I feel like Beck was a big Pablo Escobar fan? I mean besides the obvious.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by IRONY 101 (March 01, 2010 6:30 pm ET)
          12  
          Yea...like the way the government put me out of business. I made good money in the burger business until they said I couldn't stretch the meat with ground asbestos... How do they expect a small businessman to make a profit? ;>)
          Report Abuse
        • Author by dirtylittlereligion (March 01, 2010 7:11 pm ET)
          10  
          That's what I've always seen from the American left. More social freedoms, but also hold corporations accountable for their actions(which they demonstratively don't do if left on their own).

          Talking about "attacks on democracy" why doesn't Beck rant and rave about Citizens United v. FEC? I could invent 100 webs of conspiracy right off the top of my head...and I'd be willing to bet that mine would be closer to the truth than Beck's.

          But no. It's progressives, and diversity, and multiculturalism, and Unions, and ACORN, and "illegals", and Nazism, and Communism, and Socialism, and Van Jones, and Mao, and Hitler, and Stalin, and ESPECIALLY OBAMA!

          Everyone's just picking on the poor wittle corwpewations.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (March 01, 2010 6:25 pm ET)
      11  
      What? White Supremacy? Is David Duke a "progressive" now? He and Weiner need to get on the same page because Mikie says diversity is a code word for Communist Revolution.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by christopher howard (March 01, 2010 6:28 pm ET)
        9  
        Well, yeah, but that's because Savage is a dirty commie progressive too.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by temphandle tearfully55timetable (March 01, 2010 6:27 pm ET)
      13  
      Does Glenn understand that white supremacists that follow him!? Communism and Nazism don't and/or can't coexist. WOW
      Report Abuse
      • Author by epkklk851 (March 01, 2010 6:52 pm ET)
        10  
        A lot of Glennie's audience doesn't see itself as racist. They just want the different people to stay away from them because, you know, they feel more comfortable with their own. But they don't hate minorities, not in the least.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (March 01, 2010 6:31 pm ET)
      14  
      Like any dedicated chimp, Beck throws as much fecal matter as he can churn out in the hope that one of his fists full of crapola will stick.

      Trouble is that Glenn doesn't comprehend that he's flinging it into a whirling fan aimed at him.

      Randy
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Bongo Fury (March 01, 2010 6:38 pm ET)
      12  
      Nazi progressives?This I gotta see.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Rasta Farian (March 01, 2010 6:39 pm ET)
      10  
      Where's Susan Powter when you need her?

      "Stop the Insanity!"
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Porkeater (March 01, 2010 6:45 pm ET)
      9  
      Progress evil! No progress! Keep things same as now. Progress only bad! Arf-arf, bow-wow, woof-woof-woof!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (March 01, 2010 6:46 pm ET)
      9  
      As Dave Neiwert points out, at one point in the progressive road, we got long overdue civil rights.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Marker (March 01, 2010 6:52 pm ET)
      9  
      Beck flunked history for sure, would he even know what a Nazi believes, a communist, or a repug. This guy wouldn't have a clue.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by cugagcmu805031 (March 01, 2010 6:55 pm ET)
      12  
      Is Beckie Boy capable of understanding that after Hitler violated the Ribbentrop Agreement, Stalin hated his guts, turned on him, joined the allies, invaded Germany, and took Berlin as his personal trophy?

      Nevermind. We're dealing with Beckie Boy here.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (March 01, 2010 6:58 pm ET)
      15  
      This guy is a lying sack of crap.

      Propaganda like this, coming from the Right, is poisoning our politics. And please... don't tell me that "both sides do it"; there is no comparison.

      Sure, the Left has its haters and extremists, but they don't have anything approaching the prominence that Beck, Limbaugh and Hannity have. The leading voices on the Left tend to be wonks, like Rachel Maddow and Thom Hartmann. Keith Olbermann's tone may be harsh, but he just points out the nonsense coming from the other side... he doesn't make up sh*t like the Troglodytes do.

      On the flip side, who are the "wonkish" prominent conservatives on FOX or Talk Radio? Rush Limbaugh? Glenn Beck? Sean Hannity? Are you kidding? Karl Rove, maybe... but he has no credibility.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jonesjax2374 (March 01, 2010 7:11 pm ET)
        9  
        Becks the worst. He just makes shyte up! He's not remotely accurate regarding history. The others may revise Ronald Reagan but Beck is preaching an alternate reality warped hatemongering INACCURATE RANT.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jonesjax2374 (March 01, 2010 7:09 pm ET)
      9  
      Its that idiot repetition thing again. Progressive Progressive Communist Nazi Progressive Progressive Communist Nazi Progressive Progressive Communist Nazi. It doesn't have to make sense. I'm waiting to hear NOVEMBER CRIMINALS come flying out of his Goebbels pie hole. Bets?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by arkange1 (March 01, 2010 7:09 pm ET)
         
      Or commienazis!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (March 01, 2010 7:12 pm ET)
      12  
      For people like Glenda and her listeners, Nazis and communists are hollywood stereotypes. They're cartoon characters to be feared and paraded out to compare to anyone who disagrees with their philosophy.

      They don't understand what they're talking about. They love to talk about the "subtle" progressive indoctrination going on in society.

      And how do they discuss it? With overt indoctrination using black boards, pompous a$$hats writing with chalk and making ridiculous links between cartoons of commies and cartoons of liberals.



      Report Abuse
      • Author by temphandle tearfully55timetable (March 01, 2010 7:43 pm ET)
        6  
        Wait, Indian Jones wasn't real?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Bongo Fury (March 01, 2010 7:53 pm ET)
        3  
        I think the general in the movie "The Postman" pretty much sums Beck up and the left is Harrison Ford.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Bongo Fury (March 02, 2010 12:41 am ET)
          1  
          Finally remembered the general's name in "The Postman."It was general "Bethlehem".The mind wobbles.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jediknight65 (March 02, 2010 9:43 am ET)
               
            yeah will patton was pretty decent in that. even though the movie itself wasn't the greatest. gotta love tom petty's cameo though
            Report Abuse
    • Author by Boxer1979 (March 01, 2010 8:08 pm ET)
      6  
      Beck: the "end of the progressive road" is "Nazis or communists" or white supremacists

      This country still has to be progressive, to make better for all people. Since the beginning of this country, progressive beliefs have strived to make this country better, but to have the elite fight back. We still have a lot to do people! Nutjobs like Becky are puppets for the elite!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by williamsn517 (March 01, 2010 8:10 pm ET)
      7  
      I wish beckkk would come up with a new shtick, cause this anti-progressive thing is getting old.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by 4teepee (March 01, 2010 8:48 pm ET)
      6  
      Nazis? Progressives are not responsible for bringing us Glenn Beck.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by papa bear3 (March 01, 2010 8:56 pm ET)
      6  
      I bet the powers that be at FOX must be sitting back and laughing and slapping their knees at this one. That someone (millions of someones) actually believes this cr@p, and pays for the privilege to do so.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by inbow (March 02, 2010 1:07 am ET)
        2  
        That's right, Cable, or Sat. TV is not free. If you pay for TV, Faux gets a share of the loot.

        By the way, Hitler hated the commies. He thought and hoped that the west would see the truth, and help him fight the commies. Commies are far left, the Facist are the far right. That's how I perceive it.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Bongo Fury (March 02, 2010 1:35 am ET)
          2  
          The really funked up thing about this shirt is that faux is extending the cold war against it's own citizens.This is stuff that the 50s and 60s had.The time after these decades was the goodle days of the cons and they want our country to be in some sort of conservative utopia.Pardon the oxymoron.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by jediknight65 (March 02, 2010 9:44 am ET)
             
          precisly, hitler thought that with the fall of france britain would make peace and join him against stalin.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (March 02, 2010 10:10 am ET)
        1  
        See caseye above.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by emmag1919 (March 01, 2010 10:45 pm ET)
         
      OK, TR and early 20th century progressives were taking 'baby steps' to becoming Nazis, Mssr. Beck reminds us the "Nazis" were "National Socialists". WWI then Depression = no more progressives.

      Did the Germans save us from becoming Nazi's?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by hooboy (March 02, 2010 12:28 am ET)
         
      Recently some lefty clown tried to compare Beck with some Nazi.

      Learn your history: This doesn't sound like Beck was a friend of Hitler.
      ====
      Ludwig Beck , 1880-1944, German general, leader of resistance to Hitler.

      A highly cultivated career soldier, he served on the general staff during World War I and by 1933 had become in effect head of the army general staff. He opposed Hitler's plans for aggression and his attempts to destroy the independence of the army.

      In 1938 he resigned in protest against the planned attack on Czechoslovakia. With Carl F. Goerdeler he thereafter conspired to overthrow the regime. Their efforts were repeatedly frustrated until July 20, 1944, when a bomb was placed in Hitler's conference room. Hitler escaped. Beck was arrested and shot.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by spinny (March 02, 2010 1:14 am ET)
      1  
      Why do these guys insist on using fascism and communism synonymously? Are they the same thing? My polisci professor owes me an appology.

      Isn't it weird how you never see glenn beck and a minority in the same picture... maybe they're the same person. Really Beck how vinegary were those words connoting white supremacy as bad?

      How do the rest of you all deal with the anger envoked by this man? All I do anymore is shake my head and grind my teeth...kinda hurts after a while.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rjackson1500@yahoo.com (March 02, 2010 8:58 am ET)
      3 1
      the g.o.p is a white power movement and the tea baggers are the base of this white power movement...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jediknight65 (March 02, 2010 9:37 am ET)
      1  
      scratch the white supremacists they already are there over at fox news
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Superchick2 (March 02, 2010 2:03 pm ET)
      1  
      I rather think Glenn skipped down the yellow brick road and partook of too many poppies.
      Report Abuse