What Gretchen Carlson thinks is interesting
March 03, 2010 6:54 am ET
From the March 3 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends:
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
















But, Sarah Palin slipping on ice...that would be funny. ;>)
So not only can't Palin answer questions from people like Katie Couric and Charlie Gibson, she can't even give a satisfactory answer about her hair to Fox's top bleach blonde.
You're not the only one happy that you're not VP.
"Curiouser and curiouser"
And people say she's not smart...sheeesh.
Dean Andrews: Is this off the record, Daddy-O?
Fox needs to get some diversity in their female anchors. Greta is the only one that doesn't look like a hair-product and make-up-saturated barbie glam bot.
Conservatives have a pattern of investing a lot in the appearance of their female representatives. They prop up attractive women to represent their movement and then attack liberal women for being "unattractive". They have a vested interest in maintaining the appearance of the women who represent them, since one of their favorite stand-by attacks against liberal women is that they're all ugly, hairy, lesbian feminists.
What I'm pointing out is that the conservative movement has demonstrated a pattern of glamming up the females who represent them in order for them to be taken seriously. They've demonstrated an extreme reluctance to put any woman out there as a conservative media figure who doesn't look perfectly made up, like she's spent 6 hours in hair and make-up before she hits the cameras.
The conservative movement HAVE to make sure their women are glammed up 24/7 because one of their favorite stand-by attacks against liberal women is that they're all ugly, hairy, lesbian feminists who can't get a date.
Really? That's what you've got? After that awe-inspiringly stupid exchange with Palin? I know you habitually try to derail threads, but even for you, that's weak.
That was f**kin pointless!
SMH!
One of the truest things ever said.
Why would this ridiculous woman even want to consider running for office? She's making tons of money appearing before crowds of drooling Troglodytes... is she willing to take a pay cut?
When I see R-AK I think two thoughts:
(1) "AK" is a reasonable sound one might make when considering this woman as a candidate for national office, and
(2) Is there room to fit "R-AK half-term only" in there as well?
Beck, Limbaugh, Hannity, and co. have all made repeated cracks at the appearances of Nancy Pelosi and Hilary Clinton. Beck and Limbaugh famously called Mary Landrieu a prostitute (for securing funds Bobby Jindal asked her to secure). Eric Erickson recently had his little (totally unoriginal, by the way) tirade about how liberals and feminists are all ugly and hairy women that can't get a date.
I missed your outrage their, on these blatant examples of rampant sexism coming from the conservative movement. So I'm less likely to take your efforts to stretch for sexism here seriously.
Shouldn't she be beheaded in a stadium?
Heaven forbid a woman actually dress like.......a woman. I guess they should all dress like Racheal Maddow if they want respect.
You're on here denouncing the horror that is sexism and then turn right around and make a sexist comment about how Rachel Maddow doesn't "dress like a woman"? Seriously, guy? I guess women aren't allowed to wear blazers over tank tops now!
You're full of it. You can't denounce sexism one second and then turn around and engage in it. There's a word for that--HYPOCRISY!