About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Hannity: Obama is weak. He's an appeaser. ... Obama is making this country and every citizen vulnerable to attack"

March 03, 2010 10:38 pm ET

From the March 3 edition of Fox News' Hannity:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by soze169880 (March 03, 2010 10:42 pm ET)
      14  
      *GASP!* Criticizing a wartime president, Sean?! WHY DO YOU LOVE TURRISTS?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (March 03, 2010 10:46 pm ET)
      8  
      It's all an act...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (March 03, 2010 10:49 pm ET)
        7  
        ...and not even a very convincing act anymore.

        They should change their name to FOX Theatre...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by John Paradox (March 03, 2010 10:59 pm ET)
          2  
          Maybe someone should get Joel, Mike, Kevin, Trace and the rest of the old Best Brains crew to do a job on these....
          Report Abuse
        • Author by whatIthink (March 04, 2010 12:44 am ET)
          4  
          And now, for a very exciting, exclusive engagement, brought to you exclusively by Fox's Masterpieceosh--t Theatre, the Hannity Chronicles.
          .
          .
          .
          .
          .
          .
          .
          This program is made possible by the RNC, Roger Ailes and generous contributions from viewers like you (if you are black, yellow, jewish, muslim, gay, atheist, female, or an asian/black gay female atheist who was brought up jewish in or around and country ending in -stan, please send your contribution to PBS...)
          Report Abuse
        • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (March 04, 2010 9:59 am ET)
          3  
          or FOX TERROR.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by dirtylittlereligion (March 03, 2010 11:00 pm ET)
      13  
      A wimpy, weak, brutal, tyrant that's "ramming" health care at us...

      ...what?


      I have a sudden urge to see Juan Williams beat the sh!t out of Sean Hannity.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Bongo Fury (March 03, 2010 11:22 pm ET)
        4  
        dlr I'd be happy to see Juan go totally ballistic on that whole chain of fools.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dirtylittlereligion (March 03, 2010 11:35 pm ET)
          5  
          Just watching the clip gets me boiling. I wouldn't make it if I was there, I would be jumping across the table to choke Sean. Yes, I do have a bit of an anger problem, and there are tons of other ways that I fail to meet perfection, but I can't stand that smug a$$hole grin, and how he says everything like his sh!t doesn't stink. If I was there, I would end up in court later.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by scanlontodd9871 (March 04, 2010 10:32 am ET)
        1  
        I was just watching and I would have loved to have seen Juan get out of his chair and take him down. What a complete and utter fool Hannity has become since our president has been in office.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by blk-in-alabam (March 03, 2010 11:00 pm ET)
      7  
      The has been the theme of republican party media this week."President Obama is weak,and effeminate."....What does that make the republicans who have been out smarted and whipped by President Obama.With more whippings to come.Look at what the republicans claim,and have claimed as victory.We did not give President Obama nothing but 70%...80%....90%...of what he wanted.DUH!!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by raddave43 (March 03, 2010 11:16 pm ET)
      8  
      If the president is guilty of appeasing to anyone, it is to the publikuns in Congress.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ojnabieoot (March 04, 2010 12:10 am ET)
        6  
        Nah, President Obama just works patiently. He gave the Republicans a year to try to work with him, and now he's made it clear that he'll move forward without them - and will almost certainly succeed.

        Look at his long-term strategy. He knows that the public will support the health care bill when it passes, as the news media will be flooded with the changes to US health care (near-uniformly positive), and that it'll be viewed as a massive political victory. On the other hand, the Republicans - who on the whole didn't lift a darn finger to try to actually improve health care - will have absolutely nothing to show for the entire year.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by angels4light (March 04, 2010 11:04 am ET)
             
          And yet they will claim that it is only the amendments they proposed that were included in the bill that made the difference.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by christopher howard (March 03, 2010 11:18 pm ET)
      7  
      Right, Sean. Obama is a weak appeaser until he crushes you with his steel glove of Stalinist oppression.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Brutus (March 03, 2010 11:30 pm ET)
      4  
      Hannity has so much hatred for the President that it can't be healthy. In every broadcast he addresses the President as the Anointed One, and every broadcast is a hate filled attack on the President. Out of all the right wing professional hacks on the air, Hannity is the worst one of them all. His hypocrisy is beyond belief and for a Catholic, Hannity has no shame bearing false witness against the President.

      Hannity and his ilk just can't wait for the next attack on America in order to score political points against our President. He wants to see Americans suffer to forward his propaganda and hatred towards President Obama.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Porkeater (March 03, 2010 11:53 pm ET)
        3  
        Sean is one of those who are ensuring Obama's reelection.

        Proverbs 26:26 - Though his hatred cover itself with guile, his wickedness shall be openly shewed before the congregation.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by smarshall1432997 (March 04, 2010 7:42 am ET)
        3  
        These right-winged Republicans know that Republicans will forever be the party that made America less safe in the FIRST year, and maybe this is why they ALL are in need of "re-writing" Pres. Obama's first year as "weak"? Hmmm, but those stupid facts just keep messing with their "lies" and "smears". Uh, oh. LOL.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (March 03, 2010 11:34 pm ET)
      2  
      It appears Sean got the memo.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Porkeater (March 04, 2010 12:01 am ET)
        1  
        pete592, i think shrunken-head Sean is ahead of the curve. But he's only practising for now; he forgot to mention the danger to our cats and dogs, the poisoning of wells, and the coming distribution of 40 acres and a mule, to be financed thru medicare cuts.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by ojnabieoot (March 04, 2010 12:16 am ET)
        3  
        Slightly off-topic, but can you believe that freaking crap?! This isn't some wacko PAC - this is the Republican party. While some individual Republicans and Democrats have been particularly odious throughout American history, I don't think the opposition party has ever attacked a sitting President so viciously.

        It's particularly despicably that they do it after the last president, who nearly (or totally) ruined the country and will certainly go down as the worst president since Buchanan, if not the worst in all of American history.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by ojnabieoot (March 04, 2010 12:12 am ET)
      2  
      Sean seems to have missed the memo about how the US and Pakistan are working together to do massive damage to the Taliban and al-Qaeda, having done so far more vigorously in 2009 than Bush/Cheney did in 2001-2008.

      I'm sure it's an honest mistake. Surely Hannity wouldn't deliberately lie to his viewers in order to push a pro-Republican political narrative.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by TheAncients (March 04, 2010 1:04 am ET)
      3  
      Alright Hannity how 'bout this. We invade Yemen, Somalia, and Nigeria, send Blackwater there to kill, mame, torture, burn etc. all the Muslims like good 'ol radical Christian crusaders and call it a day? Would that make Republicans happy? I mean of course you guys would in an INSTANT invade EVERY Muslim country and get the job done. Right? Does anybody but me think Republicans are using psychological tactics by using words like "attack" "vulnerable" and "terrorist"? All praise Ronald Reagan.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mjh (March 04, 2010 2:46 am ET)
      2  
      Hannity: Obama is weak. He's an appeaser. ... Obama is making this country and every citizen vulnerable to attack"


      Earth to Sean Hannity:

      Obama has NOT -- repeat, has NOT -- ignored a PDB entitled BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO STRIKE IN US

      Report Abuse
    • Author by OGFrostbite (March 04, 2010 5:52 am ET)
      3  
      they call him a bully , a tyrant a dictatior now he's weak???
      Report Abuse
      • Author by afriend (March 04, 2010 7:00 am ET)
        2  
        Hannity used to make me angry, until I started to remind myself that he is just an uneducated pitchman. Why does he hate America and the troops? Because, like his ignorant bretheran Beck and Limbaugh, its all about the money they make, Country be damned. They are what is wrong with today's political discourse.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mmharris438182 (March 04, 2010 7:40 am ET)
      2  
      Hannity is easily driven nuts. Just present him with the truth.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Boxer1979 (March 04, 2010 8:06 am ET)
      2 1
      Hannity: Obama is weak. He's an appeaser. ... Obama is making this country and every citizen vulnerable to attack"

      White Surpremacy at its finest right here!

      SMH!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jeter2 (March 04, 2010 9:31 am ET)
        3 1
        Boxer, I don't think this has anything to do with race. Hannity is a blind partisan...he's an equal opportunity hater of all Dem/Libs.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by blk-in-alabam (March 04, 2010 10:11 am ET)
          1 1
          What do you think are the reasons for the level,and intensity of the hatred towards President Obama?The fact that things people like hannity and the republicans say and do is accepted and not called out is because of race.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jeter2 (March 04, 2010 10:54 am ET)
            2  
            As far as Hannity is concerned I gave you reasons...he's a blind partisan with hatred for Dem/Libs. Maybe you've forgotten his intense hatred of President Clinton? Hillary? Gore?And just about every Dem/Lib on the planet.

            No doubt some hatred for Obama is based on race, but I just don't think generalizing that all Rep/Cons hate Obama because he's AA is fair, or factual.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by blk-in-alabam (March 04, 2010 11:30 am ET)
              1  
              It is a contributing factor to each piece of hate they hold in their hearts.They do not have little section of hate for the President where they leave race out.The theme of Hannity and the rest of republican party for the past year has been do not let them get reparations.What us this but race.Hannity and the rest of republican party media do not attact white members of congress with the level of hate they attack black members.This is nothing I assume.I listen to them.Why do I listen to them?There have been many KuKluxKlan meetings through history where somebody listened who they did not think had reason to.Somebody listened to the grand wizzard and his crew plans,that the lower ones did know about.The result was that many plans did not go as planned.A lot of people listen to Hannity because of history.In a way I thank Hannity for being as stupid and hatefull as he is.He has made many people listen for reasons other than agreeing with them.The theme of republican party is do not let THEM get control.This requires that they put racism in everything they say.This will be the case until they come up with plans that have merit,honor,and truth.If they come without these it is racism.Everything the republicans and so-called conservatives do is either big business,or race.Big business seems to be in agreement with President Obama.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by jeter2 (March 04, 2010 11:55 am ET)
                1  
                Again, I agree some folks hatred of President Obama is based on race, but to include all Rep/Cons in your blanket statement is simply a false charge..

                I certainly don't hate him. I disagree with some of his policies. Wouldn't matter what the color of his skin is.

                And I think many Rep/Cons feel the same way.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by mjh (March 04, 2010 2:19 pm ET)
                 
              "As far as Hannity is concerned I gave you reasons...he's a blind partisan with hatred for Dem/Libs. Maybe you've forgotten his intense hatred of President Clinton? Hillary? Gore?And just about every Dem/Lib on the planet."


              True, Jeter -- but IMHO, the difference between Hannity and, say, Limpballs, is only that Hannity is not quite as blatant in his hatred of Obama due to Obama's race than Limpy.

              Limpballs, as we have seen, seldom misses an opportunity to refer to President Obama as a "boy" or "man-child" {code words for what he really wants to say}. . .

              While Hannity may not be as overt, just remember: Hannity and Limpballs -- and of course Beck -- are all white males with little formal education who've gotten to where they are by spreading lies to the gullible.

              The fact that they wake up every day in a country being run by a BLACK man of far superior intellect to them has got to be KILLING them -- and any "criticism" they make is going to be based, at least partly, with that in mind . . .

              Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (March 04, 2010 10:46 am ET)
          1  
          I used to think so, but I've heard it reported that Hannity would not be opposed to playing for the other team if the money was right. I just think Hannity is out for Hannity. He will say and do whatever he thinks will line his pockets.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jeter2 (March 04, 2010 10:57 am ET)
               
            Where did you hear that Bintx? I can't see it, the guy is so far Right. But then again $$ can change things I guess ;-)
            Report Abuse
            • Author by neon desert (March 04, 2010 11:27 am ET)
              1  
              Jeter, you say he's "so far Right", but all I see is him repeating the seminar talking points over and over. Sometimes a little louder, sometimes he switches the words around a little, but it's always the same old thing. Nothing original there, and I sure haven't seen any indication that he has any personal affinity toward the right outside of a healthy paycheck.

              If "lemmingism" worked as well for the left and could match or better his current income, I could see him easily and without shame flopping sides.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by jeter2 (March 04, 2010 11:49 am ET)
                   
                Really? Wow I guess I'm missing something? I don't watch him anymore, haven't for awhile, so I only know what I read here, but from everything I've heard the guy is Mr. Far Right. I mean no middle ground.

                I doubt he could jump ship & get away with it. But hey I suppose he could be bought. I don't think the Dem/Libs would exactly welcome him though...do you?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by neon desert (March 04, 2010 3:57 pm ET)
                     
                  I agree that he couldn't jump ship with any validity, and it's doubtful that he could get much audience with the left, considering his incompatibility with the level of intellect to which we've become accustomed, such as with Maddow, Hartman, Rhodes, etc.

                  But speaking exclusively of his fidelity to conservative ideology, I really don't think it comes anywhere near approaching his greed.
                  Report Abuse
        • Author by Boxer1979 (March 04, 2010 7:11 pm ET)
             
          Not to start a debate with you Jeter, but Hannity is just a nicer version of Rush Limbaugh. So I look at his attack against Obama as a form of racism. Now if Hillary would have won he would have been sexist. I could get into the depths of his fearmongering about terrorism, but why. What I said above pretty much some it up about him.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by time2change (March 04, 2010 8:25 am ET)
         
      We have a first Amendment right that allows us to speak our mind, however since Obama has became president the attacks and out right lies being spread by the right, is hurting us as a nation and as human beings. When it becomes crystal clear that someones remarks are out right lies and innuendo they should be held accountable for those remarks, in some way. Just ask Martha Stewart or anybody else that spent time in prison for lying if some lies are ok and some arent.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (March 04, 2010 9:31 am ET)
      2  
      His record is better than Bush's. Just sayin'...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (March 04, 2010 9:58 am ET)
         
      As usual HANNITY, is full of cr@p. He and his minions are getting desperate because HCR will likely pass.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by manofmystique (March 04, 2010 10:19 am ET)
      1  
      Sean and these Republicans idiots have convinced, in their diluted minds, that all the lies and nonsense they repeated over and over has some basis in truth. This is why Hannity says so many things that are not backed up with facts, logic or common sense.
      Juan William was able to point out how ridiculous and offensive Sean's claims are asking him do the troops in afhganistan feel Obama is an appeaser.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by manofmystique (March 04, 2010 10:54 am ET)
      1  
      This is the very reason why President Obama will NEVER sit down with Sean Hannity. Sean is a complete illogical idiot who avoid truth and facts at every turn (when it comes to this president). These racist idiots have absolutely no respect for this president even during war time.
      Sean gives no reason why the president should engage him in a discussion or interview. The president has better things to do then talk with an infidel incapable of holding an intelligent conversation.
      Sean is very immature and childish and he has no regard for the truth.
      It's obvious he is offended that a black man is in the oval office. Sean will not rest until Obama is no longer president of the United States and he will do everything in his power to personally make this a reality.
      It is only one reason how Sean and other high profile white personalities get away with this un-patriotic, uncivilized and dangerous behavior; the president is a black man.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Old55 (March 04, 2010 11:10 am ET)
      2  
      Remember (lest we forget): Hannity, Beck, O'Reilly, Limbaugh, etc. are all first and foremost entertainers, not journalists. As such, they have to come out with statements that get people's attention. They're there for the ratings, not to provide any rational, dispassionate analysis.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by 4teepee (March 04, 2010 11:32 am ET)
      1  
      The Newsweek cover is a stupid one. The U.S. opposed Iraqi democracy. It wanted to choose the ruler of Iraq. The Shiite clerical leadership insisted on elections. That's how a pro-Iran government got into office, what the U.S. did not want.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tman418 (March 05, 2010 11:50 am ET)
         
      I guess Hannity is right on this one.

      Obama and the Dems have appeased Republicans more than anyone could possibly imagine. And what do they get in return? More costly bills and no votes from that side of the isle.

      You're right on this one Hannity, Obama is appeasing. Not on the "vulnerable to attack" part though.
      Report Abuse