About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Quinn's "truth" about Islam: "duplicitous and violent men" and those who "wir[e] Down syndrome children with explosives"

March 05, 2010 6:34 pm ET

From the March 4 edition of Clear Channel's The War Room with Quinn & Rose:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Quinn: Islam is a "Neanderthal religion" that "enslave[s] black people"

Quinn defended suggestion that military response to India attacks is warranted regardless of whether "a lot of peaceful Muslims" are harmed or killed

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by raddave43 (March 05, 2010 6:46 pm ET)
      1  
      Quinn's "truth" about Islam: "duplicitous and violent men" and those who "wir[e] Down syndrome children with explosives"


      That was debunked a long time ago. It was not a child with down syndrome, it was a woman who suffered from depression and I don't believe anyone forced her to do it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by BreezyBelle (March 05, 2010 6:47 pm ET)
         
      Yes. Absolutely. Someone should give Palin a "heads up"... that baby could be recruited at any moment...

      Sigh.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (March 05, 2010 6:49 pm ET)
      5 1
      You can't smear a whole religion based on the actions of a bunch of zealots. But I do have a problem understanding the young people who are talked into being suicide bombers by old men. If it's so great and glorious to blow yourself up in the name of Allah how did Osama bin Laden and all those mullahs make it to their 60's and 70's? If I was a young Muslim that's what I would be thinking. "If it's such a great thing to do why haven't you done it?"
      Report Abuse
      • Author by raddave43 (March 05, 2010 6:55 pm ET)
        1  
        Well that is why they usually target the extremely poor uneducated people for their human bombs.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by TheAncients (March 05, 2010 7:27 pm ET)
        5 2
        Suicide bombing is NOT part of Islam. In the time of the Prophet Muhammad PBUH a man was fighting in the jihad against oppressors who were trying to stop Islam's progression amongst people. The man became severely wounded and could not take the pain anymore so he took his own life by committing suicide. When the Prophet heard of this he said "surely this man's place is in hell" Why? Because in the Quran Allah commands Muslims to take their lives as a gift from God and NOT throw it away be it suicide bombing in his own name. The man was even doing JIHAD! The conservatives like to say that whoever commits suicide bombings will get 72 virgins blah blah blah. The how come this man who was doing REAL jihad against OPPRESSORS is going to hell? See what I mean? Plus, if jihad is meant to protect MUSLIMS then why are Muslims mostly the ones caught in the blast and die?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Snicker (March 05, 2010 10:22 pm ET)
          2 3
          Just a couple problems with your post:

          1: Trying to stop Muslims from forcing your people into slavery and dhimmitude is OPPRESSING Islam? Really? That's the logic that has led to the spread of radical Islam.

          2: The man took his own life, he committed suicide. This same man if he had run into a crowd of his "oppressors" and killed as many of them as he could before being killed would have been hailed as a hero of Islam. In the story you related he killed himself because he couldn't stand the pain therefore he was a coward and condemned by Muhammad.

          3: Conservatives don't say suicide bombers get 72 virgins etc. Conservatives (and others) repeat what has been preached by the imams.

          4: Jihad isn't meant to protect Muslims it's meant to advance the spread of Islam. If some Muslims are blown up in the process they should have been happy to sacrifice their lives for Islam. If they weren't happy to be blown up then they weren't true Muslims and deserved to be blown up anyway.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by raddave43 (March 05, 2010 11:49 pm ET)
            3 1
            I have issue with what you post. Spreading a religion is not enslaving anyone. The man in the story was not condemned for being a coward, but for committing suicide, an unforgiveable sin in Islam and other religions. Suicide bombers would go to hell and not be given the honors of a martyr. Jihad is not used to spread Islam. Jihad means to strive or strugle.

            You need to really learn about a subject before you try to argue about it.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Snicker (March 06, 2010 3:04 am ET)
              4 3
              1. Do you even know what dhimmitude is? If not I suggest you look it up, it might open your eyes to how Islam is spread. Basically, after a nation is conquered through jihad Muslims heavily "tax" all the non-Muslims simply for not being Muslims. Essentially this is slavery because the non-Muslims get nothing out of the relationship, they are simply forced to work and hand over their pay. Throughout history this has been the way Islam has spread. They would conquer a nation and subject the inhabitants to slavery. To get out of slavery the inhabitants would convert to Islam. This is not OPINION, this is FACT. Ironically enough dhimmi literally means "protected".

              2. Suicide bombers are not considered suicides under Muslim law. Let's examine what a martyr is. A martyr is someone who dies while fighting for a cause (engaged in jihad). The man in your story wasn't a martyr, he wasn't engaged in jihad when he died. He was in so much pain he abandoned the struggle (jihad) and killed himself. Rather than facing his pain and continuing to kill the infidel he wimped out. Under Muslim law that makes him a suicide, not a martyr. If you die while still fighting (like a suicide bomber does) you're a martyr, not a suicide.

              3. Yes, jihad literally means to strive or struggle. It means everything from struggling to control your over-eating to striving to blow up the infidels with a bomb strapped to yourself. Pretending that it doesn't won't make the facts go away. All you have to do is listen to what Muslims say when they talk about jihad. Some imams will talk up the nonviolent aspect of jihad but how about those people blowing up buses? Do they claim to be engaged in jihad? Sure they do, just because you don't want to accept the violent aspect of jihad doesn't make it any less real. Who are you to say that blowing up buses isn't jihad? Are you Allah himself to make such determinations?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by raddave43 (March 06, 2010 2:48 pm ET)
                2 1
                Again you show your ignorance in your post. A dhimmi was mostly Christians and Jews under a Muslim control. They did pay a tax, but nothing ever says it was "heavy" and forced them into slavery. They were allowed to practice their religion and pretty much go on with their lives, there were some restrictions applied to them, but again they were not enslaved. There were examples of forced conversion invovling Islam, mostly under the Turks, but this was also done by Christians as well. My wife is Bulgarian and I fully understand the history of their occupation under the Turks.

                Suicide bobmers ARE considered suicide under Muslim law and in the Koran. It is one's actions that determines suicide. If you do something actively to kill yourself, it is suicide, and that includes strapping a bomb on yourself and blowing yourself up.

                Do you even know who Islam consideres to be "infidels?" Yes, people who blow up buses consider themselves to be engaged in Jihad. I never said there was no violent parts to a jihad. But, from your original post, you indicated that it was the ONLY part of jihad.

                I suggest you stop reading books written by Christian evangelicals and really study Islam before passing judgement on it.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Snicker (March 07, 2010 1:19 am ET)
                    1
                  Ah, so dhimmitude is all right because it was mostly foisted upon Christians and Jews right? Slavery is by definition being forced to work for someone else for no benefit to yourself. Dhimmitude = slavery.

                  I have heard many imams say suicide bombers are martyrs, why would I not believe them? These are self-proclaimed Muslims espousing these beliefs. They even quote passages from the Koran to support their views.

                  Yes, I know who Muslims consider to be infidels. My original post did not indicate that violent jihad was the ONLY pat of jihad. It simply stated that jihad (in reference to the post I was responding to) is meant to spread Islam.

                  Please if you're going to discuss an issue bring something more to the table than your blind assertions. For your information I don't read books by Christian evangelicals, I find them to be boring and full of hypocrisy. I get my information about Muslims from Muslims, you can't get more accurate than that.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by raddave43 (March 07, 2010 10:06 am ET)
                    1  
                    Dhimmitude does not equal slavery and for you to say so, is disingenuous, dhimmi was not forced to work for someone else.

                    You may have heard radical Imams say that, but according to the Koran, it is suicide and the person would not be a martyr. You can quote things from the Bible to support radical views, like segregation.

                    Again, Jihad is not meant to spread Islam, that may be one aspect of it, but it is not the only one.

                    No you don't get your information about Muslims from Muslims. Otherwise, you would not think the way you do.
                    Report Abuse
              • Author by TheAncients (March 06, 2010 4:26 pm ET)
                2  
                You're really delusional Mr. Snickers. You ever heard of the Church's doctrine on Perpetual Servitude? Well I suggest you to look it up for it's no better. Dhimmi means protect. Ahlul Dhimmah means protected one. Get your facts straight. Islam being spread produced the greatest intellectuals AND centers of knowledge. Islamic scholars preserved the heritage of Greek science and philosophy. Not only that, they added commentary and glosses which in turn added to what eventually became the western intellectual tradition. Your bs does not work.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Snicker (March 07, 2010 1:43 am ET)
                    2
                  You ever heard of the Church's doctrine on Perpetual Servitude?
                  Why would I care? I was discussing characteristics of the Muslim faith, not anything "the Church" did.
                  Dhimmi means protect.
                  Ah, my bad. Sorry I didn't translate it according to your specification. I don't speak Arabic myself so I had to rely on what definitions I could find on the 'net. Still the irony remains intact in either translation.
                  Islam being spread produced the greatest intellectuals AND centers of knowledge.
                  I know of many historians that would disagree with you. Everywhere Islam has spread there has been a vast destruction of culture and knowledge. For example the evidence can be seen today in Afghanistan where the Taliban destroyed irreplaceable cultural treasures. But the greatest rebuttal to this argument lies in the fact that Muslim nations are STILL considered third world countries. If the Muslim faith is so conducive to intellectual advancement shouldn't they at least be the equivalent of Europe? I mean it's not like they don't have the resources, they've been sucking the rest of the world dry with their near monopoly on oil. Instead they have a few cities that are relatively prosperous while the rest of the population lives in squalor.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by raddave43 (March 07, 2010 10:10 am ET)
                    3 1
                    Again you are wrong about the spread of Islam. While Europe was stuck in the Middle Ages, Islamic countries were advancing and spreading philosophy and mathmatics.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by John Paradox (March 07, 2010 12:45 pm ET)
                      1  
                      Looks like snickers (well, sometime you act like a nut...) has been reading some pretty inaccurate history. We would not have the Ancient Greek writings if not for Islam, among other things. In fact, the majority of stars (you, know those lights in the sky) have Arabic names because of Islamic and Arabic astronomers.
                      As soon as I saw Everywhere Islam has spread there has been a vast destruction of culture and knowledge I knew that we're dealing with a Glenn Beck University graduate.
                      Report Abuse
    • Author by rtejon (March 05, 2010 7:24 pm ET)
      5  
      I read Gulf News every day and I never hear of this sort of thing happening in the UAE.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rtejon (March 05, 2010 7:24 pm ET)
         
      I read Gulf News every day and I never hear of this sort of thing happening in the UAE.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by rtejon (March 05, 2010 7:24 pm ET)
        1  
        Didn't mean to double-post, but maybe it's not a bad thing to repeat for emphasis.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (March 06, 2010 12:28 am ET)
         
      Quinn is just about a year behind in talking points and his listeners are Republicans left over from the George Wallace days.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pilotx (March 06, 2010 2:23 pm ET)
         
      Where are you Sarah?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Porkeater (March 06, 2010 3:47 pm ET)
      2  
      It's one thing to complain about extremists within religion - God knows i complain my tail off about fundamentalist Christians - but trying to smear an entire faith, and from such an ignorant standpoint, is one of the sickest, most dysfunctional things you can do.

      All religions proselytize. Most have done it by force, and Christianity is one of the worst offenders. But just about all religions contain validity. Or, at worst, contain some good recipe for civilized living.

      Talk like this is just not constructive. There is absolutely nothing positive to be derived. Quinn thinks he wants a religious war, but lest he forget...

      Hosea 8:7 - ...they sow the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind".
      Report Abuse