About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Beck: "We are sitting around and we are watching the systematic destruction of everything we hold dear by thugs"

March 08, 2010 10:49 am ET

From the March 8 broadcast of Premiere Radio Networks The Glenn Beck Program:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by carlh (March 08, 2010 10:53 am ET)
      10  
      Talking to himself about himself again, I see.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Old55 (March 08, 2010 11:00 am ET)
      3 8
      As I keep saying, this guy is first and foremost an entertainer. His job is to entertain his audience and generate ratings, not to provide rational debate. I don't know how anybody can tkae him seriously -- he shouldn't be. He's just performing.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by carlh (March 08, 2010 11:03 am ET)
        10  
        He's about as "entertaining" as heart attack. You can't realistically think there aren't tens of thousands of people out there who take him deadly serious, can you? You don't think there aren't people out there nodding, getting all worked up going "he's right, he's RIGHT!"?

        I know there are because I know a few of them myself.

        He's no performer. He's an inciter. Oh yeah, he's just some rodeo clown. Right. Come on.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (March 08, 2010 11:07 am ET)
        10  
        What's "entertaining" about hearing Beck call the President a "white-hating racist"?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by internet soldier (March 08, 2010 11:17 am ET)
        8  
        I find it really bizarre that you think Beck is merely an entertainer. First of all, Beck himself would almost certainly disagree with that assessment. Secondly, Glenn Beck has a very serious, however incoherent, message. In what way is it entertainment? Do you think he's just acting? Would it matter if he was? Whether he is an "entertainer", whatever that means, seems completely irrelevent.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (March 08, 2010 11:19 am ET)
        3 1
        These people take him seriously and they are dangerous and they aren't conservatives.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by friedbergboy1422 (March 08, 2010 8:22 pm ET)
        1  
        Why are there performers on my "news" radio stations and "news" television channels?

        If he's an entertainer, he should be somewhere else, right?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (March 08, 2010 11:04 am ET)
      6  
      They've had all they can stand from you, Glenn. Obama and his union thugs are coming to take your dollhouse and your Barbies away.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Bongo Fury (March 08, 2010 11:06 am ET)
      5  
      And the circle it goes round and round.And the painted pony goes up and down...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by epkklk851 (March 08, 2010 11:08 am ET)
      8  
      So when Beckie hounds someone relentlessly, making up lies, smearing them, and floating their name before his audience, getting the audience to hate the person, too he isn't being a thug. Glennie is just a regular dad who wants to protect the people. When the Democrats want an office holder to step aside so a more popular candidate might win for the party, they are trying to destroy the office holder. When the Teabaggers launch a candidate of their own, even at the last minute, they are just proving how free and patriotic they are. I will grant you that we are watching the attempted destruction of everything we hold dear....by Glennie and his angry, white Teabaggers.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (March 08, 2010 2:08 pm ET)
        2  
        The only thing new about what Beck is doing is that he's being supported, at a significant financial loss, I would guess, by one of the largest corporations in the world, which gives him a much greater reach and significance than he deserves, or would otherwise have.

        Bintx, your links to studies of the authoritarian mindset are spot-on.

        William Butler Yeats might have predicting Beck, Limbaugh and their ilk when, almost a century ago, he wrote this:

        The Leaders Of The Crowd

        THEY must to keep their certainty accuse
        All that are different of a base intent;
        Pull down established honour; hawk for news
        Whatever their loose fantasy invent
        And murmur it with bated breath, as though
        The abounding gutter had been Helicon
        Or calumny a song. How can they know
        Truth flourishes where the student's lamp has shone,
        And there alone, that have no Solitude?
        So the crowd come they care not what may come.
        They have loud music, hope every day renewed
        And heartier loves; that lamp is from the tomb.

        William Butler Yeats



        Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (March 08, 2010 11:13 am ET)
      13  
      What is thuggish about a democratically elected President and Congress trying to enact the policies they were elected to enact?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jeter2 (March 08, 2010 11:31 am ET)
        8 1
        Well Shag in this particular Beck rant he's talking mostly about NY Gov Patterson being pushed out, allegedly by his own party "thugs". I haven't been following the Patterson issue real closely, but I think the guy[Patterson] has some real legal/ethical problems that have more to do with him not running again than his own party not wanting him to. Though I don't blame the Dems for wanting him to step aside.

        What's really stupid here though is Beck needing to resort to using "thugs" to describe his political foes. I'm just sick of the name-calling.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by shaggles (March 08, 2010 11:52 am ET)
          6  
          Thanks Jeter. I can't hear the audio (firewall) so I was just going by the headline. It's weird that he's calling the Patterson thing a systematic destruction of all he holds dear. That's just one office in one state. I have no idea you got a thumbs down.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jeter2 (March 08, 2010 12:03 pm ET)
            8 2
            Too bad you can't hear the clips Shag...that s#cks.

            Beck uses Patterson as his prime example then kind of generalizes. Typical Beck.

            I get thumbs down from Libs & Cons both. I can't win ;-)

            But I don't take it too personally.

            Just noticed the time...lunch calls!!
            Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (March 08, 2010 12:36 pm ET)
              4  
              Yeah, essentially, Paterson needs to go. He's damaged goods really in NY as far as I can tell, although, it matters less to me, since I don't live there and all.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by shaggles (March 08, 2010 1:18 pm ET)
              3 2
              Well you must be doing something right if you're p!ssing off both sides.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by jeter2 (March 08, 2010 2:09 pm ET)
                2  
                Or wrong ;-)

                Shag, I like to say I'm the fairest & most reasonable poster here...but I know many would disagree ;-)

                Hey that might earn me a few thumbs downs as a matter of fact. Ha!
                Report Abuse
    • Author by mikelartist (March 08, 2010 11:15 am ET)
      7  
      Good grief.

      I have been gone in the outback for 10 days. First day back and Beck is STILL pedaling this doomsday crap.

      He is just like the mentally ill drunkards on street corners with "THE END IS NEAR" placards.

      He is mentally ill genetically, he is a self-admitted drunk, and he really does think the end is near.

      What a sad sack.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by dogbreath (March 08, 2010 11:34 am ET)
        5  
        You could be gone for a year and you wouldn't have missed anything. This guy makes a fortune dishing out crap to his listeners who simply don't know any better. He'll continue to do so until someone on the right decides to call him out - and that will take a small miracle.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by So Fain (March 08, 2010 11:17 am ET)
      4  
      He just picks up where he left off.

      BORING!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bintx (March 08, 2010 11:17 am ET)
      6  
      I know, I've been watching and listening to "thugs" like you, Rush and the rest of the Fox/hate talk radio folks tear down our country for over a year. I'll be so glad when your idiot followers wake up, but I'm not holding my breath. These RWA's do not listen to any sort of reason at all.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 11:25 am ET)
          15
        Not tearing down the country, open your ears and pay attention, Just tearing a new one into Progressives who are anything but...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Bongo Fury (March 08, 2010 11:33 am ET)
          6  
          Open your eyes,you can fly.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (March 08, 2010 11:34 am ET)
          4 1
          Please read this . . . and get help. You aren't a conservative and neither is Beck. You and others like you ARE the problem. You really need help.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 12:35 pm ET)
              11
            It's time you define your "version of conservative Bintx. You scream a lot like a little girl, you call me names which shows your level of intellect. I'll gladly match my conservative values against your mad hatter ravings any time. You need the help pal. And you need to grip on your emotions.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Ruby (March 08, 2010 12:47 pm ET)
              7  
              You tell Bintx that she "screams like a little girl" and then turn around in the same breath and attack HER for name-calling.

              Breathtakingly hypocritical.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 1:03 pm ET)
                  7
                Ruby, replying and questioning is not attacking. Take a breath here.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by soze169880 (March 08, 2010 1:04 pm ET)
                  6  
                  "Your mad hatter ravings"=personal attack. Sorry, DeJenseerate.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by bintx (March 08, 2010 1:22 pm ET)
                  5  
                  Exactly . . . so what was your point? I replied and questioned your lack of information. You posted pure bilge. If you were truly a conservative, you would have been INCENSED at the out of control spending done by Bush through his rubber stamp Congress for 8 years. Well, the last two . . . not so much, he just vetoes or the Republicans filibustered to keep things from getting passed. I was screaming, but the faux conservatives like you were telling me that the budget surplus wasn't actually being turned into the largest deficit in our country's history.

                  So, read the article and seek help. You aren't a conservative, just an RWA.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by Ruby (March 08, 2010 1:47 pm ET)
                  5  
                  So I geuss it's only name-calling if someone says it to you. But when you tell someone they're "screaming like a little girl" all you're doing is "replying and questioning".

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by LKL (March 08, 2010 2:20 pm ET)
                    1  
                    But when you tell someone they're "screaming like a little girl" all you're doing is "replying and questioning".


                    Right!! Can you believe how utterly shameless this guy (jensee) is???
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 3:49 pm ET)
                      4
                    Well, Ruby, she was. Should I have NOT called her on it? She was calling me everything but the kitchen sink, was it better to have just ignored it? Probably, but if you accuse me of that you then have to accuse every other poster on here of the same rhetoric, wouldn't you?
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by mjh (March 08, 2010 7:03 pm ET)
                      2  
                      "Well, Ruby, she was. Should I have NOT called her on it? She was calling me everything but the kitchen sink . . ."



                      "Calling you everything but the kitchen sink"??

                      This was bintx's reply to your first post, verbatim:

                      "Please read this [link] . . . and get help. You aren't a conservative and neither is Beck. You and others like you ARE the problem. You really need help."

                      What names did she call you?

                      Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (March 08, 2010 12:54 pm ET)
              3  
              I have on many occasions, Jansee. Conservatism is adherence to traditional values. It is believing in the Constitutional rights which are afforded to ALL Americans. It is believing that the Constitution prevents the government from entering my home without a warrant/reasonable cause. It is believing that the government should stay out of my home, my bedroom, my bathroom, my life. It is the belief that I should live within my means and work hard for what I want.

              Read the article. It's you and it's not conservatism. Oh, and I didn't write the article . . . nor did I create the psychological profile. I just posted one of many, many links to this psychological phenomenon. Must have hit you pretty hard to see yourself in an article about a psychological anomaly. Calling someone "stupid" who exhibits the attributes of a "stupid" person [being deliberately ignorant (unread, unlearned, uninformed)] is not name calling. It's stating fact.

              Oh, I am a girl, I rarely scream, and my intellect is far superior to that which you have exhibited here. I'm also extremely sane.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by mikelartist (March 08, 2010 1:07 pm ET)
                4  
                Game. Set. Match to bintx. Jensee thoroughly owned.

                Jensee McDensee.

                How is that for name calling?
                Report Abuse
              • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 1:09 pm ET)
                  10
                You are partly right but Conservatism is much more than that. Rights come from God not the Government. Rights granted in the Constitution are the guarantee of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. It doesn't guarantee equality, It says we all start off equal not that we all are intended to end up that way. There is no right to healthcare, no right to education, no right to property. No right to a house, a job, or any other things the Liberal establishment wants to guarantee and make us pay for. If the government can grant you rights then that same government has the right to take it away which makes them not rights at all. I guess I should have known by the hysteria in your words that you were a "girl". I raised two of them, though it's been a while since I've had to deal with the hormone thing.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by bintx (March 08, 2010 1:16 pm ET)
                  3  
                  You are not describing conservatism, Jensee.

                  Also, the only person I'm seeing who is exhibiting hysteria is you.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 1:29 pm ET)
                      6
                    Yes ma'am I am. What you do in your bathroom I will leave to your imagination.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by soze169880 (March 08, 2010 1:32 pm ET)
                      5  
                      Not a big fan of women, I see.
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by bintx (March 08, 2010 1:32 pm ET)
                      5  
                      As I said, uninformed and deliberately so. You have proven it on other parts of the thread also. You essentially called Nancy Reagan a progressive and Jimmy Carter a conservative, which, in religious terms, he is. But I digress. You might want to look up things before you post them.
                      Report Abuse
                • Author by soze169880 (March 08, 2010 1:18 pm ET)
                  6  
                  Rights come from God not the Government.

                  Rights don't come from ANYWHERE, meathead. That's why they're RIGHTS.
                  Rights granted in the Constitution

                  Whoop, so much for "rights come from God, not the government"
                  There is no right to healthcare, no right to education, no right to property

                  Here's the thing: you ever notice the only people who make this argument are the people who already have all of these things? Well, except "education" obviously.
                  [quote]No right to a house, a job, or any other things the Liberal establishment wants to guarantee and make us pay for. If[/quote
                  You get all this from a healthcare bill that doesn't even include a public option?
                  If the government can grant you rights then that same government has the right to take it away which makes them not rights at all

                  Sooooo freedom of speech is a myth?
                  I guess I should have known by the hysteria in
                  your words that you were a "girl".

                  Who, as we all know, are icky and have cooties.
                  I raised two of them, though it's been a while since I've had to deal with the hormone thing.

                  Why, because they escaped from your basement and went home to their actual families? Ah, well, there's always Teh Internets.
                  And thank you for accusing everyone else of name-calling and immaturity and then going straight to "Ah bet you're on yer period" in lieu of an actual argument.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 1:39 pm ET)
                      8
                    Where do I begin without increasing the hysteria? Freedom of speech comes with the right to liberty. The right to not have the government shut you down or imprision you for your right to speak against the government, like we CAN do here. You have the right to pursue "stuff" if that is what you want. Nobody is going to give you the right to a house. If they did they'd have to decide what size house do you deserve? Two story? 4 bathrooms? what? Education should be considered a privilidge not a right. People take rights for granted. Kids who saw education as a privilige worked harder at it than those who sat there expecting to get that education. Get it? You have the freedom to work though it is NOT the governments job or anyone else's to employ you. You have to decide to work or not. And why if I have an opposing opinion did I have to escape from a basement to express it? Are responses NOT allowed here?
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by soze169880 (March 08, 2010 1:40 pm ET)
                      6  
                      Responses by misogynists are discouraged. Sorry, but there's also no constitutional right not to get treated like a moron if you're gonna act like one.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 3:55 pm ET)
                          3
                        Have I acted like a moron? Why is opposition to your point of view discouraged here. This is not China yet. This unnecessary hostility you have towards me is starting to sound pychotic. All I want is rational answers from you and you come back with name calling, sarcasm and belittlement. Does this make YOU look the more intelligent poster? I think otherwise.
                        Report Abuse
                    • Author by soze169880 (March 08, 2010 1:42 pm ET)
                      4  
                      Oh, and speaking of education, please pick one misspelling of "privilege" and stick with it.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 5:49 pm ET)
                          1
                        Hey the business computer doesn't have spell checker and it has been over 40 years since I was graded on spelling. Give an old guy a break! LOL
                        Report Abuse
                    • Author by foghornleghorn (March 08, 2010 3:02 pm ET)
                      3  
                      There's a poliltical utopia for you out there. It's called Somalia. I suggest look into moving there.
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by aj.physics (March 08, 2010 4:18 pm ET)
                      1  
                      You say that people take rights for granted, but will work harder and respect a privilege more than a right. I wonder, if we follow that logic, if that would work if we took away the freedom of speech and made it a privilege, maybe then people would be more careful and thoughtful about what they say.

                      I don't agree with this idea, I think the kids who naturally like school, and those whom have parents who make education a priority are those who work harder no matter if education is classified as a right or a privilege.
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by mjh (March 08, 2010 7:21 pm ET)
                      1  
                      "Where do I begin without increasing the hysteria?"



                      By going back to the moment you pressed the power button on your computer -- and doing something else instead.


                      Report Abuse
                • Author by dirtylittlereligion (March 08, 2010 2:16 pm ET)
                  3  
                  I guess I should have known by the hysteria in your words that you were a "girl"


                  Wow. We're just learning more and more about you everyday! It's not like you needed to give us another reason to not take you seriously...but that's certainly what misogyny does.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by mjh (March 08, 2010 7:17 pm ET)
                  1  
                  "Rights granted in the Constitution are the guarantee of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. It doesn't guarantee equality, It says we all start off equal not that we all are intended to end up that way."



                  That's right -- bring back those Jim Crow laws!! /snark/


                  " . . . no right to education . . ."


                  Well, its evident you didn't avail yourself of any . . .

                  Report Abuse
                • Author by Johaely (March 08, 2010 7:55 pm ET)
                  1  
                  Rights granted in the Constitution are the guarantee of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.


                  I stoped paying attention after this. The Declaration of Independence and the constitution, despite what you may think, are not the same document!
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by John Paradox (March 08, 2010 1:53 pm ET)
                3  
                I'm also extremely sane.
                * I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice!

                ;)
                Report Abuse
            • Author by soze169880 (March 08, 2010 12:55 pm ET)
              2  
              How about you define your version of "progressive", troll?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 1:22 pm ET)
                  7
                Progressive started out as liberals though the term means they are always trying to progress the constitution. They dont believe the constitution is static. It must evolve. The problem with that is it is that slow march to socialism that would seek to destroy the constitution and what it has stood for for the last 225 years or so. Progressivism believes that government, not individuals, can fix all the ills of man. However as I've seen in my 60 years, progressivism has cured little in the way of social ills. The war on poverty has not solved poverty, the government takeover of education has not cured bad teachers, bad schools, massive drop outs. Welfare has not turned the poor into the middle class, not turned the middle class into the rich and not stopped the rich from protecting their assets. The war on drugs have not stopped drug abuse, reduced crime or cured the abusers. In short Progressivism as not done anything it set out to do but create gigantic government beauracracies that waste money, employ more and more workers that require more and more tax dollars and manage to do less constructive work. It has made more people feel entitled to government services and money with less accountability for it. This is the troll version.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by soze169880 (March 08, 2010 1:27 pm ET)
                  5  
                  Okay, a couple things:
                  -If you think the War on Drugs is a "progressive" idea, you are, in the words of Ed Helms, literally too stupid to insult.
                  -I notice you left out the success of child labor laws, the women's suffrage movement, improvement of workplace conditions, regulation of meat production, the civil rights movement, and the push to end destruction of the ozone layer, either because you don't know about them or because you wish they hadn't happened.
                  Lastly, you say "Progressivism as[sic] not done anything it set out to do". Whew! That's a relief, since your god Glenn Beck tells me they've set out to put white Christians in concentration camps. I think you may have misread the talking points, Densee.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by bintx (March 08, 2010 1:29 pm ET)
                  3  
                  So, you're saying Ronald and Nancy Reagan were "progressives"?? Seriously? Nancy Reagan's pet project was the "just say no" campaign.

                  Jimmy Carter campaigned on the decriminalization of marijuana and ending federal criminal penalties of up to 1 oz.

                  Which one are you calling "progressive"?



                  Public schools have always been run by the government.


                  You're posting talking points, Jensee.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by bintx (March 08, 2010 1:45 pm ET)
                  3  
                  I might add that the term "war on drugs" was coined by that noted progressive, Richard Milhous Nixon, in 1969. I was a progressive back then, too, because Nixon was the first president I ever voted for . . . I know, I know, he was a crook!
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by aj.physics (March 08, 2010 5:56 pm ET)
                  2  
                  If I remember my civics classes correctly the founding fathers wanted the constitution be versatile enough to adapt to unforeseen challenges and issues that they knew would arise, and which they could not predict. I believe that is why they started the bill of rights.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by New Frontier (March 08, 2010 12:56 pm ET)
              3  
              And you need to grip on your emotions.
              But Glenn Beck doesn't. Right.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by epkklk851 (March 08, 2010 12:48 pm ET)
            5  
            Interesting article, bintx. The article references the Milgram Experiment of the 1960's, where 65% of the people taking part were willing to give an electric shock to someone at the "fatal" level. The knowledge of that experiment has haunted me since high school. It is one of the reasons why I fear people like Beckie.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by New Frontier (March 08, 2010 11:42 am ET)
          7  
          Just tearing a new one into Progressives
          One minute Beck's "just an entertainer". The next he's "tearing a new one". I wish Beck's defenders would make up their minds.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by dogbreath (March 08, 2010 11:48 am ET)
          10  
          No, he tears down the country everyday. He attacks the educational system, the judicial system, the electoral system and the government itself. He claims to be a great American, but Beck wouldn't know a great American if he got bit in the ass by one. He leaches off the Founding Fathers, manipulating their ideas and to suit his message. He is the the lower information voter magnified. He reads some tome, written by someone 30 years ago and read by no one, and believes it is somehow influencing the way the educational system is currently functioning or where Obama gets his political philosophy. He sees the world in black and white, where in reality, it is just shades of grey. Beck is a complete hack and the sooner that people realize that fact the better off we will all be.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (March 08, 2010 11:55 am ET)
            4  
            Amen.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 12:31 pm ET)
              8
            You wanna show me all the great Americans that have bit you on the ass? Obama and Harry Reid for example?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (March 08, 2010 12:38 pm ET)
              6  
              What have they done that has affected you? Nothing probably, except enact maybe one of largest tax cuts for normal every day US citizens.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 4:31 pm ET)
                  3
                I hardly call $18 a month more in my paycheck a monumental tax cut. That is 1 and a half take out pizzas around here.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by shaggles (March 08, 2010 5:39 pm ET)
                  2  
                  Would you feel it was insignificant if it was an $18 a month tax increase?
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by mescal (March 08, 2010 11:00 pm ET)
                  1  
                  If you don't want the $18, I'll send you my address and you can send me a monthly check for that amount.

                  Or, better yet, you can donate it to MMFA.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (March 08, 2010 12:39 pm ET)
              3  
              Huh?

              Did you read the articles, Jensee? If not, you should. You need help.

              As for great Americans, I know many. You wouldn't recognize their names, though. One of the greatest Americans and greatest men I ever knew died a couple of weeks ago. He was kind, gentle and soft-spoken. He was a teacher, a humorist, a Christian, a father, a husband, a grandfather, a singer, a preacher and a friend. He would have told you to get help for your unfounded paranoia and hatred of those you deem "different."

              Great Americans don't have to be known to all and they sure as heck don't have to be hate talk radio/Fox personalities or politicians.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 12:45 pm ET)
                  9
                Hmmm, obviously to you he wasn't a role model. Had he been one he'd slap your hand for putting out all this trash through your keyboard. Again, define "your version" of conservatism because I've been one since 1979 and I've never met a conservative that talks the trash you talk.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by epkklk851 (March 08, 2010 12:54 pm ET)
                  4  
                  These so-called Conservatives that came out of the woodwork after ST. Ronnie Raygun's rise talk hate and trash all the time, it isn't trash to you, because you agree with it. What you adhere to is the idea that angry white guys have been disenfranchised because they don't control everything, and they have to accept the presence of women and minorities in the work environment, and there is a conspiracy to take what they have from them and give it to the women and minorities and that scares them.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by bintx (March 08, 2010 1:10 pm ET)
                  1  
                  I did and not, he wouldn't slap my hand at all, but he would offer you help for your affliction.

                  You aren't a conservative if you believe that Beck is.
                  Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (March 08, 2010 11:18 am ET)
      3  
      Nostradumbass has an assignment from the GOP; get as many Republitoads elected to Congress as possible... whatever it takes. That's what he's doing here... no way he believes this nonsense. He's a paid liar... a very-well-paid liar.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Bongo Fury (March 08, 2010 11:25 am ET)
        2  
        I hope the feds are watching him.If so,it's just a matter of time until he is hauled off to the puzzle factory.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 11:24 am ET)
        18
      Yep, Beck pretty much nails it. Telling it like it is while most everyone else sticks their heads in the sand. You go Glenn!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (March 08, 2010 11:28 am ET)
        9  
        Glenn is a mentally unstable shock jock with a profound lack of education. You are unintentionally revealing a great deal about yourself by supporting such an intentionally divisive character.

        Meanwhile...Glenn Beck is accumulating more money than you will likely see in 20 lifetimes.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Quicksilver M.S (March 08, 2010 11:52 am ET)
          5  
          Glenn said just the other day that his children will not get his money!
          Glenn's 4 children will have to earn their own way! This could only mean that Glenn has found away to take it with him!

          P.S.
          The President is at a Town Hall-- CNN and MSNBC are covering him. Fox has the President streaming on their WEB site.. not on the Tube..
          Another fine example of FAIR AND BALANCE Mews when it comes to coverage of President Obama!
          Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (March 08, 2010 11:31 am ET)
        5 1
        Please read the links above. They describe you to a TEE. You are not a conservative, Beck is not a conservative . . . you are RWAs.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Ruby (March 08, 2010 12:53 pm ET)
        3  
        You know h ow Beck always hollers about evil progressives who are destroying the country?

        Then remember that time that Beck shared how he was able to get his education? And he said he got educated through use of the public library?

        Remember how public libraries are a product of the progressive movement in America?

        I think that pretty much sums up Glenn Beck--his entire existence is opposition. He claims to have values and beliefe. He doesn't--all he has is opposition. He claims to have respect for the ideas of the founding fathers, then makes it his cause to "tear down" the separation of church and state--a separation the founders worked hard to secure. He claims that progressives are evil and destroying the country, and then reveals that he was only able to educate himself through the use of a progressive institution--the public library.

        The great irony is that Barack Obama is really and truly the greatest thing to ever happen to Glenn Beck. Beck wouldn't be the atr he is without Obama. Because Beck doesn't have ideals or principles. He has opposition, and that is all.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 4:29 pm ET)
            4
          You are stretching things a bit Ruby. Where was he supposed to learn anything, off the side of a soup can? Do you think only liberals and independents use the public library? Find something to substantially complain about will ya?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by aj.physics (March 08, 2010 6:05 pm ET)
            2  
            Beck could have stayed in school if he wanted to "learn anything". The public library is much more socialist the the health care bills he rails against. The library goes against capitalism, one person buys the book and any one can read it for free. If he was truly for capitalism, this should be one of his first targets.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Ruby (March 08, 2010 7:34 pm ET)
            2  
            My point just totally went over your head.

            Public libraries are a PRODUCT of the progressive movement in America. Public libraries would not have come into existence without progressives. Thus, Beck wouldn't have been allowed the opportunity to educate himself without the existence of [gasp] progressives!
            Report Abuse
      • Author by soze169880 (March 08, 2010 12:56 pm ET)
        3  
        Glenn's not too fond of gay people. Sorry to burst your bubble.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 5:51 pm ET)
            1
          Again, can you quote something Glenn said because I watch every single show (DVR) and haven't heard him say anything derogatory towards gays?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by friedbergboy1422 (March 08, 2010 8:31 pm ET)
            1  
            Sure,

            Beck:

            Gay marriage will make the universe collapse:

            http://www.alternet.org/blogs/sex/139988/glenn_beck:_'gay_marriage_will_make_the_universe_collapse'/

            Conspiracy theory about gay marriage:

            http://foxattacks.com/blog/?p=1264

            Want more?
            Report Abuse
    • Author by GBU-15 (March 08, 2010 11:41 am ET)
      8  
      So the size of government was perfectly O.K. during the G.W.B years? What has changed Becky to make you so frantic about the size and shape of government? Enquiring minds want to know!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by dogbreath (March 08, 2010 11:51 am ET)
        5  
        Although many may not want to admit it, it was that there was a white guy in the White House.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by shaggles (March 08, 2010 11:54 am ET)
          3 1
          I think Beck would be OK with an African American in the White House if he was a Rep.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by dogbreath (March 08, 2010 12:00 pm ET)
            5  
            I don't think so. I think he is very intimidated by Obama's racial background, referring to him as a racist, a thug, etc. You might be right though. Race might not be as big of an issue with Beck as it is with Limpy.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by shaggles (March 08, 2010 1:16 pm ET)
              2 1
              Maybe personally but he wouldn't publically bash a Rep the way he does Obama.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by shaggles (March 08, 2010 4:12 pm ET)
                1  
                Thumbs down? Seriously? Has Beck ever smeared Michael Steele or Condi Rice the way he does Obama? I really don't think Beck or Rush are as racist as we on the left like to think. Sure they use racism to further their agenda and stir up the base but if they had a viable black candidate I think they'd stand by him. I mean look at Sarah Palin. As much of a sexist pig as Limpy is when it comes to almost anyone else he supports her.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (March 08, 2010 12:06 pm ET)
            2  
            I don't.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 4:32 pm ET)
            4
          That sounds a wee bit racial there dogbreath.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 12:39 pm ET)
          11
        No it wasn't. Bush and the Republicans spent like madmen. The only difference between them and Democrats is that they didn't raise taxes. Democrats are spending like there is no tomorrow but not afraid to tax us into submission to "quote" pay for it.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (March 08, 2010 12:45 pm ET)
          5  
          You are undoubtedly one of the most uninformed trolls I've seen post here. Bush and the Republicans DID spend like madmen. The last Bush budget which funded spending through September 30, 2009, added another 1.4 trillion dollars to the deficit and that didn't include all of the costs of Iraq and Afghanistan. He carried those expenses off budget . . . they were funded by "emergency supplementals." Obama is carrying those costs as budget items. Obama's not raising taxes [couldn't if he wanted to, not his Constitutionally-dictated duty], he is simply requesting that Congress allow the Bush tax cuts, which were temporary and which were passed by reconciliation by the Republicans, to expire on those making over $250,000. No taxes are being raised . . . they are just reverting back to where they were before the temporary cuts.

          Inform yourself, Jansee. Oh, and a hint . . . you're not going to get correct information from Beck. He is an uneducated clod who is using your paranoia and fear to fill his pockets.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 12:52 pm ET)
              9
            Again you prefer to name call instead of answer MY questions. I am informed. Are there any other names you wish to put out there to intimidate me because paranoia, troll, idiot and all the rest are really getting boring. It is obvious you don't intend to carry on a sensable conversation, you want to demean and devalue my postings. That is liberal ploy. BTW, "Sir" it is obvious that I am not going to get any correct information from you. You'd make a lousy teacher and an even worse salesman.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (March 08, 2010 1:12 pm ET)
              1  
              I'm not a sir.

              I'm not trying to intimidate you, I simply stated fact. You are uninformed. I addressed your false statement with facts.

              It appears that you are paranoid.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Johaely (March 08, 2010 8:08 pm ET)
              2  
              Answer what questions? you are just shreeking and repeating paranoid conspiracy theories.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 1:01 pm ET)
              9
            bintx, you are totally niave if you think that taxes won't HAVE to be raised to pay for this ridiculous spending. The healthcare bills contain quite a few tax increases to pay for them. Cap and Trade, should it be passed will have huge tax increases on them. Where do you get this idea that only the so called rich are going to be soaked? Already we are asking them to pick up most of the bill for paying for the cost of running government and the bottom 50% aren't paying any income taxes. You don't believe in equity? What is equitable about taxing most of your earnings to pay for "entitlements" for those who don't pay for any of it? Ok, insert troll, crazy, uneducated, or whatever slur you want for me here.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by soze169880 (March 08, 2010 1:03 pm ET)
              4  
              How about "wealth-worshiping"?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 1:12 pm ET)
                  10
                What about it? At least it is possible under capitalism. Not so under socialism or communism.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by soze169880 (March 08, 2010 1:20 pm ET)
                  4  
                  Which is why we're kicking China's ass market-wise, right?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 1:27 pm ET)
                      9
                    Blame that on government regulation, high taxes and a union enviroment that makes manufacturing unprofitable in the United States. Blame big corporations for lobbying Congress to pass restrictive laws that make small companies impossible to compete fairly in the market place. Blame the American public who would rather buy cheap foreign goods over more expensive American goods. Do you have a better answer? I'd like to hear it. And I won't call you names for stating your side.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by soze169880 (March 08, 2010 1:30 pm ET)
                      5  
                      Thanks, but no thanks; I'll just blame the orgy of tax cuts for the very richest and Gordon Gekko-level deregulation that your neocon Messiahs have been engaging in since the Reagan administration, instead of relying on vague, amorphous boogeymen like unions and taxes (you just got a tax cut, by the way, genius).
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 1:43 pm ET)
                          9
                        You know, I hear this all the time. The rich already pay MOST of the tax burden. the bottom half of the country have a free ride income tax wise. Heck if you don't even earn any money the Government gives you back other people's money to support you. Did I miss something in the definition of the word fair?
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by soze169880 (March 08, 2010 1:44 pm ET)
                          5  
                          You certainly missed SOMETHING if you think the poor have it easy and the rich have it tough.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 1:50 pm ET)
                              9
                            The poor have never had it easy, regardless of what country they are in. At least in America they have a chance to better their situation. But they have to want to do it. You can't make somebody work themselves out of poverty. Don't tell me it isn't possible because that has been proven to be possible time after time. Government cannot and has not leveled any playing field by elevating the poor. It has sought to do so by taking away from the successfull and that is a very backwards way of attaining achievement.
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by foghornleghorn (March 08, 2010 3:09 pm ET)
                              3  
                              I'm guessing you're less than 20 years old. Because back in the Clinton years the poor did better, and because of that, they had more money to spend so the rich did better in our consumer-driven economy.

                              Where do you think the tax cuts for the top 1% went? They sure didn't go toward creating jobs. Why did they deserve such a reduction?

                              Are you aware that the top 1% in this country own 90+% of the wealth, the highest divide since the robber baron days in the early 1900's?
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 4:23 pm ET)
                                  4
                                Actually I am 60. There have been periods in history where everyone did better at all classes. Do you honestly believe with the top 10% of wage earners carrying 80% of the financial burden that a 1% tax cut is going to destroy the poor and ruin the middle class? Dude, there has never been a problem in this country with revenue. The problem has been that congress and the last two presidents have spent like drunken sailors with no reqard to how to pay for it. I love tax cuts as much as any conservative but money coming into the government is not the problem here. Your wonderful representatives have found more ways to waste tax revenue than any time in recent history. When are you going to decide that enough money out of your pocket is enough? 25%, 30%,50%? Remember one thing my friend, the rich no matter how much you tax them, they will find a way to keep their money away from the Gov't. That's how they stay rich. Politicians are like vampires and their insatiable desire for your money is not going to keep them out of your pockets. Eventually they will come after you too. The only way to stop a vampire is drive a stake through their hearts, in this case keep them fiscally honest and force them to decrease the cost and size of Gov't.
                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by foghornleghorn (March 08, 2010 4:49 pm ET)
                                  4  
                                  Nobody your age or older has ever called me dude.

                                  Ever.

                                  Clinton left office with a projected surplus. Obama's been in office for 1 year.

                                  Bush's tax cuts and two wars were OFF BUDGET. You know what that means? They weren't even paid for. They were borrowed.

                                  So your grand-children are going to be paying for years and years just so Bush's rich buddies and Cheney's war profiteer cronies could get richer. Obama and Clinton have NOTHING to do with it.

                                  Report Abuse
                                  • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 6:04 pm ET)
                                      4
                                    So, Obama is going to level the playing field for you? Dude, I ride motorcycles, still do, been riding since the early 60's when the only bikes on the roads were BSAs, Harleys and little Hondas. I was calling people dude when most of these poster weren't even an idea in somebody's pants. Anyway, I digress. You want Obama to take away the rich folks money eh? distribute it among the masses eh? Make all of America so commie Utopia? I don't think so. Obama is also doing EXACTLY what Bush did only on a far grander scale. By the time he leaves office your grandchildren, my great grandchildren won't be able to count high enought to pay down just the interest in what they and WE will be stuck with. We'd have to have an economy that makes the Price is Right look like poverty row to come close to feeding that monster. The dollar is about worth squat right now on the world market. Even China is telling us they won't support anymore of our wreckless debt. And why on earth would we want to be holding to Communist China for anything much less our country's entire future?
                                    Report Abuse
                                    • Author by foghornleghorn (March 08, 2010 6:15 pm ET)
                                      4  
                                      You want Obama to take away the rich folks money eh?

                                      Exagerrate much? Nope, I just go back to Clinton's policies that resulted in economic success. And Obama isn't even going that far.

                                      For the last time, Obama is NOT turning this country into a "commie utopia". He's really not. Believe me.

                                      Your hatred for the debt should be directed at Bush and his cronies, not Obama, who's only trying to fix the mess left on his doorstep.
                                      Report Abuse
                                • Author by mescal (March 08, 2010 11:09 pm ET)
                                     
                                  When you say that you're 60, are you referring to your age, or your IQ?
                                  Report Abuse
      • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 4:26 pm ET)
          4
        Beck has been complaining about the size of govt, including GWB since 2006, when I started watching him. Have you been paying attention before last month?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (March 08, 2010 12:10 pm ET)
      4  
      No GLENNIE, that happened from 2001 to 2009 under your heros BOY GEORGE and DEAD EYE DICK.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by cugagcmu805031 (March 08, 2010 12:24 pm ET)
      4  
      Glennie, that happened during the last administration, and you were one of its' head cheerleaders. Your party lost, so, stop whining.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 12:42 pm ET)
          12
        Your party won and now we are all losers.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by soze169880 (March 08, 2010 12:57 pm ET)
          4  
          What have you lost under this administration? Other than several good pairs of underwear?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (March 08, 2010 1:13 pm ET)
          2  
          See, you are assuming that people here have a "party." Me, personally, I don't believe in political clubs. They have no Constitutional basis and are divisive and destructive.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 1:47 pm ET)
              7
            Well, that's nice in concept but without those parties you get no representation in that big cesspool they call Washington DC. and without representation of at least some portion of what you as a taxpayer want done with your money (and it is YOUR money) then all you can do is get on blogs and complain. I am NOT in love with the Republican party and I don't subscribe to anything the Democrats want but I do go out and vote, hopefully for the most qualified person to represent me. Sometimes it has to be a Democrat. But I vote. Until they come out with a better way to get represented I will continue to do so.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by soze169880 (March 08, 2010 1:49 pm ET)
              3  
              Sometimes it has to be a Democrat.

              Bull. The last Democrat you supported was George Wallace.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 1:56 pm ET)
                  6
                I don't live in Mississippi and you are assuming an awful lot not having met me. I have supported Democrats in the past. I was from 1969 till 1972. I cannot understand you hostility toward someone who only wants to communicate why I believe what I do. You haven't said why you believe the way you do, you prefer to call me names in hopes I will just leave and let you rant. If it is all you want to do then I can go. But I won't hate you for believing what you do about politics. People don't usually come to their way of thinking over night, there is a process by which the evolve into that understanding.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by soze169880 (March 08, 2010 1:58 pm ET)
                  3  
                  It's so cute when trolls do this. They make post after post of vicious attacks, and when someone actually responds, they accuse THEM of resorting to name-calling and ad hominems. You can set your clock by it.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 2:07 pm ET)
                      5
                    Please point out to me where I made a "vicious" attack on anyone? Bintx has been pursuing me over several threads regarding Glenn Beck. Fine, she has the right to do so. Have I viciously attacked you? I tried to answer questions you posed me. Are answers to you vicious attacks? Who has referred to who here as a Troll? Me or you? Do you want answers are do you just want to derogatorily slur people? What are your intentions for blogging here, to educate or to harrass?
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by bintx (March 08, 2010 2:12 pm ET)
                      1  
                      Pursuing???? LOL!

                      I told you those two articles described you to a TEE. Paranoia, thy name is Jensee.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 2:34 pm ET)
                          3
                        I am on a business computer at work. Links, videos are all blocked here. If you could wait until I get home Wednesday I will look at those links when I can. I am in the medical profession. I would be curious to see your version of paranoia. I have always enjoyed discussions on mental diseases. Who knows, you might be on to something! LOL!
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by arkange1 (March 08, 2010 3:56 pm ET)
                          2  
                          You obviously aren't getting much done if you are at work and have this much time on your hands!
                          Report Abuse
                • Author by foghornleghorn (March 08, 2010 3:11 pm ET)
                  3  
                  I don't live in Mississippi - MR Jensee

                  FYI Wallace wasn't from Mississippi. He was fron Alabama.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 4:37 pm ET)
                      3
                    Ah, so right. I remember him from my childhood standing at the doors of some school swearing that innocent black children trying to get an education would not pass though those doors. He was later shot but some nut when he campaigned for President did he not? Alabama, a nice state but I don't know much about it. But you are correct, somehow I recollected it was Mississippi. Thanks for correcting me.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by soze169880 (March 08, 2010 6:12 pm ET)
                    2  
                    Densee thinks all Southern states are interchangeable, on accounta it's a PROGRESSIVE ELITIST!!!!!
                    Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (March 08, 2010 2:11 pm ET)
              1  
              Sure you would have representation.

              Right now all you have is a bunch of folks who are beholden to and give loyalty to their political club. These folks are not representing me at the moment, they are representing their clubs. I don't vote for parties at all. In the past, I've voted exclusively for Republicans for president, but then, in 2000, they nominated someone I knew to be incompetent and non-conservative. I couldn't vote for him then or after he had begun to destroy our economy with his cuts in revenue which were made at the same time as he was requesting and receiving [in several cases by the dread reconciliation process] outrageous spending. I held my nose and voted for someone I really didn't care for in both years. In 2008, I had no candidate. I would have supported a unity ticket, but I really felt as if none of the candidates who were running were what we needed. When the Republicans nominated McCain, my choice in 2000, I thought I could possibly vote for him if he chose a competent running mate, like Romney or someone. He didn't. He chose an airhead who he had talked with for only 10 minutes before choosing her. Did I like Obama? Not particularly, but, again, given the option, I voted for what I deemed to be the lesser of two evils. So far, Obama has proven himself to be very moderate. You wouldn't know that because the only information you hear is stuff like Beck, which is NOT TRUE. Beck is telling Christians to stop going to churches which teach social justice. I have been a Christian all my life and I'm not sure I know of a real Christian church which does NOT teach social justice. It's kind of a given . . . Christ taught social justice.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 2:26 pm ET)
                  4
                Beck has not told Christians to stop going to church. At least NOT on his TV show. I don't catch his radio programs in my area but he is devote Mormon and from Mormons I know, they are very devoute people. Many time Beck talks about his Christian values. It would not serve him to tell his audience NOT to follow those values. I totally agree with your statements regarding Bush. I voted Bush in 200O but to be honest I was voting against Al Gore. Again in 2004 I voted against Kerry. I did not vote for either McCain or Obama in 2008 because in good conscience I couldn't support either of them. I really am growing tired of voting against people and not having someone I can actually through my support behind. I find this more than a little frustrating.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by foghornleghorn (March 08, 2010 3:13 pm ET)
                  2  
                  Why were you against Gore and Kerry? You didn't think that they were more qualified/competent than Bush?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 3:46 pm ET)
                      5
                    No I didn't. Gore has only proved that with his global warming madness. Also he had less personality than Bush did. Kerry just looked bafoonish to me at the time, more like Herman Munster than Presidential. Shallow reasons? probably but for sure MY vote never made the difference in whether they were elected or not. Bush's legacy pretty much speaks for itself in the qualified/confidence area, don't you think?
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by foghornleghorn (March 08, 2010 4:13 pm ET)
                      4  
                      So, you're saying that a former senator with 8 years of experience at VP was less qualified than Bush, whose only experience was as Texas governor, a mainly ceremonial position where the most significant idea he had was Every Child Left Behind along with signing death warrants, usually without reading them and sometimes cracking jokes about them?

                      Herman Munster? Kerry is a war hero. Bush went AWOL.

                      The problem is your vote DOES make a difference, especially when there are untold masses of ignorant people out there who think like you.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 4:45 pm ET)
                          5
                        Wait. Lets be at least factual here. Senators are less likely to make better Presidents than Governors are. After all Governors do run a state, and it is an executive position similar to the President. Senators don't even pay their own staff. They make no executive positions. They are considered heroes if they show up for a vote.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by foghornleghorn (March 08, 2010 4:52 pm ET)
                          3  
                          Likewise, governors have zippo experience in foreign affairs.

                          To allude that Bush was any kind of executive is laughable. His position in Texas was more like the Queen of England. Ribbon cuttings, baseball games, cocktail parties, signing death warrants. That's about it.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 5:48 pm ET)
                              5
                            In all honesty Obama hasn't exactly wowed them over across the pond either. He as managed to insult the British, anger the Israelis and Kiss up to Arabs. He's bowed to everyone including city mayors. He has shown a lack of understanding with diplomatic protocols most everywhere he's gone. And when he doesn't read off a teleprompter he can't complete an intelligent sentence. Unless you come from the State Dept. it isn't likely anyone is going to be great on foreign affairs. Obama did learn (hopefully) that you don't play around with the likes of Ahmadinejad and expect to get respect. Quite frankly I am really tired of Obama campaigning. I'd like to see him actually govern something by now.
                            Report Abuse
                    • Author by mjh (March 08, 2010 7:32 pm ET)
                      2  
                      "Bush's legacy pretty much speaks for itself in the qualified/confidence area, don't you think?"



                      Sure does:

                      [http://doyoueverwonderblog.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/bush-booker-classroom-9-11.jpg]

                      Report Abuse
                • Author by friedbergboy1422 (March 08, 2010 8:28 pm ET)
                  2  
                  Yes, he has, he told everyone whose church advocates for social or economic justice to leave their churches.
                  Report Abuse
    • Author by Sharpe (March 08, 2010 2:00 pm ET)
      1  
      politics of destruction? is he talking about the gop? Patterson destroyed himself - governors should not try to cover up domestic violence no matter what the circumstance.

      They aren;t anti-government - i know. They are just anti-government when there is a democrat in the oval office. The GOP was all about spending trillions and expanding government and breaking constitutional law infringing on our rights when bush was in the office.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MR Jensee (March 08, 2010 2:20 pm ET)
          3
        I lost confidence in the GOP enough during the last 4 years enough that I did not vote for John McCain for President. Frankly I didn't vote for Obama either. But George Bush neither acted like a conservative nor governed like one. In McCain I saw more Progressivism that I was comfortable with. I will be anti government until the day comes when they all come to their senses and start actually cutting government. It has shrink if the economy is to survive. Government is growing greater than the private sector can support it and that can only end up with a collapse of the total economy. If you don't believe me look at California and look at Greece. This is our future if we continue on this path. Government cannot spend us out of this, You can't spend yourselves out of debt, the state you live in can't and neither can the Feds.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by progressiveright (March 08, 2010 3:19 pm ET)
      1  
      Finlay telling us what you are Glenn.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by SLRTX (March 08, 2010 5:07 pm ET)
      1  
      Beck: "We are sitting around and we are watching the systematic destruction of everything we hold dear by thugs"

      Well, when you're sitting there looking around the studios at Fox, I'm sure that's what comes to mind.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Porkeater (March 08, 2010 5:34 pm ET)
      1  
      What d'you mean "we", white man? :)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mjh (March 08, 2010 7:37 pm ET)
      1  
      Beck: "We are sitting around and we are watching the systematic destruction of everything we hold dear by thugs"



      Good gracious, Glenda -- an intelligent, well-educated black man got elected president, is all.

      OK, well, to a wingnut neoKKKon like you, I suppose that IS the "destruction of everything you hold dear" . . .


      Report Abuse