About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Rush on health care passage: "We're three days away from the United States of America being over as we've all known it"

March 17, 2010 2:51 pm ET

From the March 17 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Dradeeus (March 17, 2010 2:53 pm ET)
      5  
      Yes, Rush, we know. "One day our kids will grow up to ask us what it was like to have freedom", right? Batting 1000 on that one, hm?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (March 17, 2010 2:59 pm ET)
          14
        That is accurate. Buy your own damn healthcare liberals, and leave me alone.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by rtejon (March 17, 2010 3:06 pm ET)
          5  
          Worked out great for your mental health, didn't it?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by rkcomments (March 17, 2010 3:13 pm ET)
            6  
            No Rush, that happened the day a woman gave birth to a fat bigoted dopehead and named him Rush.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by Dradeeus (March 17, 2010 3:07 pm ET)
          4  
          That quote is, of course, from Ronald Reagan, about what he suspected would be happening TODAY, if medicare passes.

          ...It did. A while ago.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (March 17, 2010 3:21 pm ET)
              10
            And in hindsight, Medicare was a horrible idea. Reagan was right.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by raddave43 (March 17, 2010 3:26 pm ET)
              3  
              Raygun was not right about it or much of anything else. He said it would force doctors to move to certain locations and to look after certain patients.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (March 17, 2010 5:13 pm ET)
              2  
              BJFOOL,how many lives were saved because of medicare? of course it wouldent matter to you. You know if you hate this GOVT so much then do us a favor and LEAVE,and take your idiot hero RUSH with you.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (March 17, 2010 3:08 pm ET)
          4  
          LEAVE BJ ALOOOOOOOOOONE!

          [http://media1.clipaday.com/embed/m_videos/thumbs/britney_alone_88u3.jpg]
          Report Abuse
        • Author by afriend (March 17, 2010 3:18 pm ET)
          5  
          That is accurate. Buy your own damn healthcare liberals, and leave me alone.

          Why am I getting the sense that we are actually paying for your (mental?) health insurance?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by afriend (March 17, 2010 3:19 pm ET)
          2  
          That is accurate. Buy your own damn healthcare liberals, and leave me alone.

          Why am I getting the sense that we are actually paying for your (mental?) health insurance?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (March 17, 2010 3:22 pm ET)
              10
            I am EXTREMELY happy with my life. It is liberals who seem to be perpetually angry.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by raddave43 (March 17, 2010 3:27 pm ET)
              3  
              We didn't tell you to buy your own damned anything.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (March 17, 2010 3:52 pm ET)
                  6
                But you are. The Democrats are trying to tell me that I must purchase a product (healthcare). There is no authority in the Constitution by which the federal government can mandate that I purchase anything.

                If I don't want healthcare that is my choice.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by bintx (March 17, 2010 3:59 pm ET)
                  4  
                  Yeah, but if you don't have it, and you can't afford to pay your bills, the rest of us still have to pay for it, you big fraud.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (March 17, 2010 4:11 pm ET)
                      8
                    the rest of us still have to pay for it,


                    Why? Why do the rest of us have to pay for it. You pay your bills - I pay mine.

                    If you can't afford your bills, that is not my problem. Work harder - get a second job. My grandfather had 3 jobs when he first came to this country. He didn't come here to whine or look for a handout. If you are unemployed for more than a few weeks chances are you are just plain lazy.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by blueline99 (March 17, 2010 4:15 pm ET)
                      3  
                      You misunderstood the point... you don't pay for your own healthcare... you get sick, you go to the emergency room and we pay for it.

                      unless you won't go to the emergency room if you get sick and you don't have health care.... planning on dying at home.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (March 17, 2010 5:47 pm ET)
                          3
                        That's crap. Blue Cross/Blueshield pays for my medical care. Not you - not the government. I provide for myself and my family and I don't ask anyone else to pay for my bills. I am one of the ones pulling the wagon in which lazy liberals are comfortably resting mooching off the fruits of my labor.
                        Report Abuse
                    • Author by bintx (March 17, 2010 4:16 pm ET)
                      2  
                      See, you just showed your complete lack of intelligence in that post.

                      If you don't pay your doctor bills, those costs are passed on to the rest of us in the way of increased health care costs represented by actual fees and increased insurance premiums. Doctors and hospitals don't just eat those costs . . . they up their fees to cover them.

                      Stupid response, Dr. TA, really childish.

                      I've been gainfully employed longer than you've been alive.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (March 17, 2010 5:48 pm ET)
                          3
                        I have a health insurace policy from my employer. Nobody pays my healthcare costs. I work to earn the health insurance my family and I have.

                        Good work, Scooby Doo!
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by bintx (March 17, 2010 6:10 pm ET)
                             
                          And another stupid response.
                          Report Abuse
                        • Author by jlw7717595 (March 17, 2010 6:42 pm ET)
                             
                          Yeah, but you pay a copay of $20 like I do. The office visit is $110. Somebody is paying the rest of that and it isn't you bud.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (March 17, 2010 11:57 pm ET)
                              1
                            Oh, but I do. My insurance policy is part of my compensation from my employer. I earned the policy in exchange for doing my job.

                            I paid in the form of the labor I give to my employer who purchases an insurance policy for me in return.
                            Report Abuse
                        • Author by jlw7717595 (March 17, 2010 6:45 pm ET)
                             
                          And another thing, if you didn't get your insurance from your employer then you probably would never be able to afford it on the open market. My policy from the State of Texas is at least a $600 a month premium if you bought it outside. You and me both would be in the same boat as some other people if our companies did not have the group bargaining power to get us good insurance.

                          Shut up.
                          Report Abuse
                      • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (March 17, 2010 11:59 pm ET)
                          1
                        I've been gainfully employed longer than you've been alive.


                        I doubt that. How would you know anyway?
                        Report Abuse
                    • Author by jlw7717595 (March 17, 2010 4:28 pm ET)
                      3  
                      This statement just shows how clueless you are. How old are you?

                      "If you can't afford your bills, that is not my problem. Work harder - get a second job. My grandfather had 3 jobs when he first came to this country. He didn't come here to whine or look for a handout. If you are unemployed for more than a few weeks chances are you are just plain lazy"

                      You have got to be my 18 year old, everything handed to me, college student I deal with every day.

                      You cannot save enough money or prepare enough to pay medical expenses. It cost, my Dr. at least and I have insurance, $115 a visit (I pay $20). I have a friend who has no insurance. He had his gallbladder removed and he is 32 and the operation and stay cost $68,000. Get another job? You idiot. You snot nosed stupid fool. I have another person that I know that had thyroid cancer at 28 and is now stuck on an insurance plan with a $10,000 deductible because he is uninsurable and his premiums keep going up. His CT scans every 6 months cost 8,000 which is 2,000 under his deductible. He could have 10 jobs and never pay his medical bills. Another older friend has had 11 hernia operations and is well into the hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt. He is a school teacher and his wife is a counselor and they cannot pay their medical bills.

                      Guess who is going to have to pay these bills. ME AND YOU A**HOLE. That is why if we had a system that everyone paid into and we all used, and eliminated for profit insurance it would keep cost down, we would spend less, and get better outcomes. I am sorry, but people like you push my patience to the max.

                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by TURK 63 (March 17, 2010 5:26 pm ET)
                      2  
                      Spoken like a true “compassionate conservative”.
                      Report Abuse
                • Author by raddave43 (March 17, 2010 6:29 pm ET)
                     
                  No one is forcing you to buy it, no one can force you to do anything you don't want to, as long as you are willing to pay for the consequences of your action.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by progressiveright (March 17, 2010 9:59 pm ET)
                  1  
                  2 things in the Constitution take care of this requirement.
                  Provide for the general welfare (multiple times not including the preamble.)
                  National defense a sick nation is not able to defend itself.

                  Now go back to your little dream world and leave the real people alone.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by phredicles (March 17, 2010 3:42 pm ET)
              1  
              Oh, sure, you come across as such a happy, warm-hearted guy.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (March 17, 2010 5:18 pm ET)
              2  
              iI dont know BJFOOL from what I sen out of most RIGHTIES these days they are the ones that seem angry.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (March 17, 2010 5:51 pm ET)
                  2
                BHO makes us angry. We can't stand him. I am very happy with the state of my personal life, but I am not happy with the direction in which my country is heading. November will be critical - we must massacre the Dems at the ballot box.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by phredicles (March 17, 2010 6:20 pm ET)
                  1  
                  Let me elaborate: People who are happy with the state of their personal lives don't spent hours of every single day trolling on the internet, picking fights by saying stupid, inflammatory stuff, and making an monumental jack@$$ of themselves in the process. People who do that tend to be bitter, lonely losers.
                  Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (March 17, 2010 3:58 pm ET)
          2  
          Hey, Dr. Talking Points. Just wanted to let you know that your research was faulty on the military installations. Please see 7 FAM 1113(c).

          c. Birth on U.S. Military Base Outside of the United States or Birth on
          U.S. Embassy or Consulate Premises Abroad:
          (1) Despite widespread popular belief, U.S. military installations abroad
          and U.S. diplomatic or consular facilities abroad are not part of
          the United States within the meaning of the 14th Amendment. A
          child born on the premises of such a facility is not born in the
          United States and does not acquire U.S. citizenship by reason of
          birth.
          (2) The status of diplomatic and consular premises arises from the
          rules of law relating to immunity from the prescriptive and
          enforcement jurisdiction of the receiving State; the premises are
          not part of the territory of the United States of America.
          (See Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law, Vol. 1, Sec.
          466, Comment a and c (1987). See also, Persinger v. Iran, 729
          F.2d 835 (D.C. Cir. 1984).


          I do legal research for a living . . . nice try, though. You really MUST source your Wiki research better and understand the topics being discussed.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (March 17, 2010 5:54 pm ET)
              3
            I do not use Wikipedia (it is not a credible source as any moron can edit it). I use Lexus/Nexus and Westlaw. If you do legal research, please tell me what Westlaw is. Most of my information comes from the Daily Telegraph (I prefer British papers) in terms of my general commentary on current events.

            YOu never did answer my question about selective incorporation and subsnative due process. Is it because it is well over your head, Scooby?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (March 17, 2010 6:21 pm ET)
              2  
              Liar. I've did a Google search on a couple of your posts . . . always takes me right to Wikipedia. You're a fraud . . . a very laughable one, but a fraud, nonetheless.

              I use Westlaw, we do not use Lexus/Nexus in our office. I was in training yesterday for the new Westlaw Next program which will streamline online legal research. It's impressive . . . sort of a Google for legal researchers. No need for terms and connectors and uses a more precise language search than a natural language search. Works on pretty much the same principle as Google and is more Windows friendly. I still have to do a little library research from time to time, though, because our firm doesn't subscribe to a couple of secondary sources like CJS and Am.Jur. on Westlaw. I actually miss having to Shepardize case law by the book. With Westlaw Next, won't be necessary at all.

              BTW, you still haven't admitted that you were incorrect in your post yesterday. Military installations are NOT considered American soil.

              As far as the rest . . . don't recall you asking me. And, not, it's not "over my head." Keep pretending, BJ, keep pretending. Nobody's buying it.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (March 17, 2010 6:22 pm ET)
                   
                "I did."
                Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (March 17, 2010 6:30 pm ET)
                   
                and "no." Cheesh. Long day.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (March 17, 2010 11:45 pm ET)
                  1
                If I make a claim and you use wikipedia to cross check it that does not mean that I am copying from wikipedia. If I used wikipedia as a source I would cite it. Plagiarism is offensive to me.

                If I were to claim that the Union won the civil war and you search for Civil War on wikipedia and it verifies that the Union did indeed win, that does not mean I used wikipedia as a source.

                You are intellectually lazy and dishonest.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (March 17, 2010 11:50 pm ET)
                  1
                In other words you have no answer to me.

                In college NINETEEN years ago in a question on a final exam for a class in Constitutional History one of the questions was:

                "Discuss the development of substantive due process, selective incorporation and fundamental fairness. To what extent did the Warren Court build on Powell vs. Alabama and Palko vs. Connecticut to incorporate civil rights to apply to the states. Was the Warren Court correct in applying these precedents? Why or why not?"

                As I said I answered this NINETEEN years ago w/o benefit of looking up or researching anything (it was a final exam).

                Since you are such a legal genius you should have no problem answering this without having to look anything up.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by raddave43 (March 17, 2010 6:31 pm ET)
              1  
              Funny you posted something from wikipedia just the other day. What did I tell you about lying?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (March 17, 2010 11:52 pm ET)
                  1
                I directly cited it. I have twice posted something verbatim from wikipedia and I cited it. I have never directly quoted anything without citing it.

                Nice try and grow up.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by raddave43 (March 18, 2010 2:09 pm ET)
                     
                  BJgiver:
                  I do not use Wikipedia (it is not a credible source as any moron can edit it).


                  Now you grow up
                  Report Abuse
        • Author by progressiveright (March 17, 2010 9:54 pm ET)
             
          Tell me how my friend with an artificial hip who has been denied health insurance because of a preexisting condition is supposed to do that.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by angels4light (March 18, 2010 12:01 pm ET)
             
          You do realize that your insurance policy doesn't go into a little trust fund that the insurance company uses only if you need it, don't you? Insurance is a gamble, in which you are gambling that you won't get sick, and that if you do, the insurance company won't cancel your policy just because you did. In other words, you are gambling that the insurance company will pay for a procedure you might need.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by marco21 (March 17, 2010 2:55 pm ET)
      3  
      Shorter Rush/entire Wingnuttia - WAAAAAH!!!!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (March 17, 2010 2:59 pm ET)
        13
      Indeed it would. This is but the latest step down the pathway to socialism. BHO wants the government to run EVERYTHING. This bill must not pass.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jlw7717595 (March 17, 2010 3:06 pm ET)
        3  
        oh great, you're back. Do you enjoy being the a** end of all the jokes on here?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jlw7717595 (March 17, 2010 3:06 pm ET)
        2  
        oh great, you're back. Do you enjoy being the a** end of all the jokes on here?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by afriend (March 17, 2010 3:15 pm ET)
        3  
        Indeed it would. This is but the latest step down the pathway to socialism. BHO wants the government to run EVERYTHING. This bill must not pass.

        You're an idiot. I thought you were just on here trying to rile people up..now I realize you are sincere and, thus, an idiot. The only health care being run by the government is Medicare, Medicaid, and the Veteran's benefits....which of those are you and your shrinking Party asking to do away with? All of them? The only folks I see wanting the government to intervene in personal medical decisions are the anti-choice folks.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (March 17, 2010 3:25 pm ET)
          1 7
          I would do away with both Medicare and Medicaid - they are both redistributionist socialist programs that we should never have passed in the first place. They are both unconstitutional because healthcare is not mentioned in the Constitution and as such is a state issue.

          I would keep veteran's benefits because we have an obligation to those who fought for our freedom. We owe them. We owe people on Medicare and especially Medicaid absolutely nothing.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by raddave43 (March 17, 2010 3:29 pm ET)
            3  
            You never read where it says Congress has the power to promote the general welfare? They were passed and passed the constitutional smell test.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (March 17, 2010 3:49 pm ET)
                7
              I have read it. It is in the PREAMBLE. The preamble is not legally binding. It does not have force majure. As such, healthcare is unconstitutional - it is a state issue. You are ignorant of reality if you claim otherwise.

              If you can show me where healthcare appears in teh Constitution I will retract my statement. Healthcare is like abortion in that the Constitution does not mention either of them as a right.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by dogbreath (March 17, 2010 3:57 pm ET)
                2  
                Lots of things don't appear in the Constitution, Scholar of Nothingness that is why there is a Supreme Court to INTERPRET the meaning of the Constitution. Just because you don't like something doesn't mean its unconstitutional. Sorry.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (March 17, 2010 4:12 pm ET)
                    6
                  I would encourage you to read the 10th Amendment - it says otherwise. SCOTUS can interpret the body of the Constitution - not the preamble which does not have force majure.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (March 17, 2010 4:09 pm ET)
                3  
                Probably the reason abortion wasn't mentioned in the Constitution is that at the time the Constitution was written, abortion was legal and was advertised openly. The first abortion laws didn't appear in this country until 1820 and the reasoning behind the law had more to do with a fear of being overrun by poor immigrants [they couldn't afford abortions] than it did religious reasons.

                Making abortion illegal again won't stop it, Dr. TP. Abortion has been with us since the beginning of time.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (March 17, 2010 5:57 pm ET)
                    3
                  Making abortion illegal again won't stop it,


                  Perhaps not, but it will reduce it. If women can't get abortions that are safe, perhaps they will be more reticent to have an abortion.

                  If a woman is facing potential time in prison, it might dissuade her. By criminalizing abortion, we can certainly reduce it. It we made an example of one woman - perhaps a 40 year prison sentence - who had an abortion, it would have a chilling effect on anyone else seeking an abortion ----- this most certainly would limit the number of abortions.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by bintx (March 17, 2010 6:23 pm ET)
                       
                    Sorry, that's not true.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by jlw7717595 (March 17, 2010 6:33 pm ET)
                       
                    Spoken like a true liberty-loving conservative. You go around screaming GOVERNMENT STAY OUT OF MY LIFE! but then you insert the government into a private decision between a woman, her God, and her family.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (March 17, 2010 11:42 pm ET)
                        1
                      The purpose of government is to protect our rights. Foremost among these is the right to life. That is why we have laws against murder and police and jails to enforce these laws. It is not a private decision (anymore so than the decision to shoot a package store clerk is a private decision) - it is the taking of a human life.
                      Report Abuse
              • Author by jlw7717595 (March 17, 2010 4:14 pm ET)
                1  
                As far as the Constitution not mentioning healthcare, it doesn't mention a National Bank either, but Alexander Hamilton argued in favor of Congress' "implied power" to charter one. I don't know that you will read it, but here is a link to the Avalon Project's document where Hamilton argues in favor of a broad interpretation of the Constitution. It's the Necessary and Proper Clause"

                http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/bank-ah.asp

                I would encourage everyone to read it, because it is certainly relevant today.

                As for abortion, the Constitution doesn't mention it, but the Supreme Court and scholars agree that there is a inherent right to privacy in the Constitution, though not specifically mentioned. Some scholars point to the Bill of Rights which address privacy of beliefs, personal property, etc. Others, like the Supreme Court stress the due process clause of the 14th Amendment.

                Your challenge to show where the Constitution mentions healthcare or abortions is somewhat juvenile, because we all know that they are not specifically mentioned. Much like the internet, assault rifles, slavery, and a host of other things were or are not mentioned. That is where precedent and interpretation come into play.

                Strict construction is another word for I don't want to think, much like judicial activism is another word for I don't agree with the ruling. If the founders wanted us to strictly interpret every word based on their intent why did they immediately begin to disagree on their intent after the Constitution's ratification?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (March 17, 2010 6:01 pm ET)
                    2
                  Slavery is mentioned. It is called the 3/5 clause. So-called "assault" rifles are covered under the 2nd amendment. It says the right to bear arms - it does not specify what arms. It says SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. Any gun control laws are an inherent infringement on my right to bear arms. I argue that any gun control laws are unconstitutional. I would argue that the 1st Amendment would protect freedom of the internet.

                  The right to an abortion is found in Arthur Goldberg's absurd opinion in Griswold vs. COnnecticut. He writes of an "emanation of a penumbra". That does not strike me as solid Constitutional grounds.

                  I fail to see how killing a child is related to privacy.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by benjr (March 17, 2010 6:10 pm ET)
                    1  
                    Right, because now you're a constitutional scholar. . . Just because it doesn't "strike" you as "solid Constitutional grounds" doesn't mean it's unconstitutional. It just means you don't like it.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by raddave43 (March 17, 2010 6:38 pm ET)
                       
                    The "right to bear arms" means to fight, or to defend your country, it does not mean to carry a weapon.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (March 17, 2010 11:39 pm ET)
                        1
                      That's not what SCOTUS said in the Heller case, and that's not what it will say in the McCormack case. Anthony Kennedy (the only vote that matters) was clearly sympathetic to Otis McCormack's position in oral arguments.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by raddave43 (March 18, 2010 2:10 pm ET)
                           
                        Anthony Kennedy is the only vote that matters? I thought all 9 justices had an equal vote.
                        Report Abuse
                  • Author by jlw7717595 (March 17, 2010 6:40 pm ET)
                       
                    No sir, slavery is not specifically mentioned. There are clauses pertaining to it, but slavery is not mentioned. You need to read you history book again. The founders specifically sidestepped the issue in the interest of the convention.

                    There is no arguing with you is there? The founders wrote the 2nd Amendment at a time when the most advanced weapon could only be fired three times in one minute. You don't think that there is room for interpretation in the second amendment for technological advances in weaponry? You don't think that a waiting limit when buying a handgun is not a reasonable compromise between your right to bear arms and the government protecting its citizens (which is the most solemn duty it has)? Or that some arms are declared illegal to own, such as mortars, Shermans, or Howitzers. I know, let's all mount a 50-cal on the back of our Hummer3.

                    You would argue that the first amendment protects the internet, but it is far from a settled issue, especially with terrorism, email, pornography and so on.

                    The issue with abortion is not killing children, it is the right of a woman to make a private decision without the intrusion of politicians in Washington. Funny to me that you don't want anyone rationing your healthcare (even though insurance companies do it, but that is for another time) or any politician coming in between your doctor and you, but you will specifically put a politician between a woman and her right to make a decision on abortion with her doctor and whomever or whatever she prays to.
                    Report Abuse
              • Author by blueline99 (March 17, 2010 4:19 pm ET)
                3  
                "force majure"... I don't think it means what you think it means... are you saying our constitution is an "act if God"

                Force majure is a legal term usually used within contracts and are typically in insurance... (how appropriate)

                You are a fraud BJF... plain and simple

                Not all rights in the constitution are enumerated... if we relied on enumerated rights we would not have clean food, clean water, police and fire protection...

                you are a child who doesn't understand what enlightened self interest means... you are an individual living within a society.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (March 17, 2010 6:03 pm ET)
                    2
                  It also means the force of law. If the government advised me not to eat trans fat, that would not have force majure. If the government banned me from eating trans fat that would have force majure.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by bintx (March 17, 2010 6:27 pm ET)
                       
                    If you are going to use a legal term, you really, really should learn how to spell it, even if you don't know what the HELL you are talking about. It's force majeure.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (March 17, 2010 11:38 pm ET)
                        1
                      Every time someone calls me stupid, racist, or calls out a typo I know I have won. You point to typos because you can't challenge me on the substance. I freely admit, I am a D- typist.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by aBeck in 10-O-C (March 18, 2010 2:10 am ET)
                        1  
                        Every time someone calls me stupid, racist, or calls out a typo I know I have won


                        force majure That is not a typo. You spelled it wrong several times. You are a poser, a braggart, and a show off and a plagiarist. You are also a howling bigot and certifiably insane!!!
                        You say stupid things and racist things. You act like a snot-nosed paste-eating child.

                        Bobby Jindal called, and he would like his name back. You have misused it long enough.
                        Report Abuse
                  • Author by blueline99 (March 18, 2010 11:19 am ET)
                       
                    BJF, you simply are wrong.

                    Force Majeure is a legal term that literally means "greater force" or "superior force" but is a common clause in a contract that is used to excuse a party from liability, typically defined as "act of God", or some kind of extraordinary event.

                    Whatever you think it means, it's in the wrong context.
                    Report Abuse
              • Author by all your eyes (March 17, 2010 4:20 pm ET)
                2  
                Article 1 section 8. Read it. Moron.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by cugagcmu805031 (March 17, 2010 5:32 pm ET)
                  1  
                  And read Paragraph 18 very carefully.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (March 17, 2010 6:05 pm ET)
                    1
                  I have - it doesn't mention healthcare. If you are basing your argument on the necessary and proper clause, you are on very weak ground.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (March 17, 2010 4:31 pm ET)
                2  
                The term is "force majeure" and is a legal term used to define an unforeseen act or event which would excuse a party from a contract. Not sure how you were intending to use it, but you, once again, showed what a fraud you are.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by raddave43 (March 17, 2010 6:35 pm ET)
                   
                No, it is Article 1 section 8 of the Constitution.

                The Congress shall have power To lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defence and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;


                The determination of Roe V. Wade did not make an abortion a right, but struck down existing laws as being un-constitutional.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by raddave43 (March 17, 2010 3:30 pm ET)
            1  
            You never read where it says Congress has the power to promote the general welfare? They were passed and passed the constitutional smell test.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by dogbreath (March 17, 2010 3:53 pm ET)
            2  
            Yeah, all those senior citizens are living pretty high on hog with their Medicare. Rolling around in the nursing homes, singing their praises to their socialized medicine.

            Here is the deal BJ and I know you are going to completely disagree with me, but I feel it must be said. You live in a country and in a community. In order for all of us to have a marginal level of success in our lives then we require a few things. I pay property taxes so that kids can go to school. They need that education to further themselves and to help make this nation a better place for all of us. This is part of my duty as a citizen of this country. It was done for me and it will be done buy my children. The elderly, on the other hand, have worked hard all their lives and they deserve to be taken care of when their medical situation requires it. I really don't care to return to the days when the elderly were living in absolute poverty because they needed medical care and couldn't afford it.

            Medicaid helps the poor who frankly, just need help sometimes. I want a poor mother to receive pre-natal care and a kid to be treated for his ear infection. Just because someone cannot afford care doesn't mean they shouldn't receive it.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (March 17, 2010 5:26 pm ET)
            2  
            bjf do away with medicare and medicade you definitly are not 65 yet. You ar a comlete right wing idiot.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by TURK 63 (March 17, 2010 5:31 pm ET)
            1  
            Curious, you do not acknowledge the people who financed America their entire working life.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (March 17, 2010 4:01 pm ET)
          2  
          He shows up when school's out. He's got a Ph.D. in talking points and paraphrased Wikipedia pages. He's the biggest joke on the site.

          He's a fraud.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by ScienceBuff (March 17, 2010 3:17 pm ET)
        3  
        The US government runs very little of the economy right now and the passage of this health care reform bill will have very little effect on that fact. This is far, far, FAR from a takeover of the health care industry.

        Now go change your underwear and take some deep breaths.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (March 17, 2010 3:57 pm ET)
        1  
        [http://swarthmoreasianorganization.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/end.jpg]
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Canadian Observer (March 17, 2010 5:19 pm ET)
        3  
        So considering the US is the last industrialized nation that doesn't have a universal healthcare system, does that mean every country, other than the US is socialist?

        Most of my business is south of the border (I'm a capitalist!) so I know and am friends with many Americans. The most common fear that I hear from those opposed to reform is "I don't want the government making decisions for me. I want to chose my own doctor. I don't want to be told what I can and can't eat...". They are usually quite shocked to hear that we do get to chose our own doctors, we decided when we want to see them, the government does not tell us what we can or cannot eat..etc, etc.

        One of my best friends had to claim bankruptcy due to some emergency surgery for her back. She has insurance and has been paying into it for years. They declined her claim because she had a snowboard injury many years ago in Canada (not that the Canada part has any bearing...I just love my Canada). She has had to close her business, effectively forcing 12 people out of work.

        Healthcare should and must be a right. How can a sick nation prosper? I assure you Canadians are amazed that the citizens of the US do not have a system that looks after everyone. Second on the list is the whole 2nd amendment thingy. You have the right to carry firearmes but not to health? Seems so odd to me.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by progressiveright (March 17, 2010 10:05 pm ET)
           
        For your information the United States has been a Socialist country since day one. The military, the post office, the police, the public school system, the public fire department, and the Federal reserve board are all Socialistic.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (March 17, 2010 2:59 pm ET)
      5  
      [http://france.worldcupblog.org/files/2009/11/crying-baby-300x300.jpg]
      Report Abuse
      • Author by marco21 (March 17, 2010 3:05 pm ET)
        5  
        Indeed. Look at BJ's teary-eyed posts.

        Same whine. Different day.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jlw7717595 (March 17, 2010 3:03 pm ET)
      5  
      Does anyone tire of these sensationalist claims? What gets me about Conservatives is that while claiming that the United States is the greatest hope for humanity and the greatest nation on earth, they argue that she can't survive one healthcare bill.

      Maybe we aren't so great if that is the truth.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (March 17, 2010 3:11 pm ET)
      3  
      Party time!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Turk72 (March 17, 2010 3:16 pm ET)
      3  
      I hope Rush is right on this one. I hope the poor policies of the current healthcare systm being changed will change the United States as we know it but I have no confidence that that will be the case. The bill doesn't go far enough to actually change the system. It will definitely help and is certianly a step in the right direction but I don't see things changing all that much.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Porkeater (March 17, 2010 3:17 pm ET)
      4  
      USA over "as we've all known it"... that is, with a totally unjust Healthcare System that punishes the sick, steals from the well, and lines the pockets of the immoral. Well, so long USA "as we've all known it". Your demise couldn't happen too soon.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by seahawks123 (March 17, 2010 3:32 pm ET)
        8
      The progressives would love it if there was no more exceptionalism in America anymore. Let the Government run everything and have their lives handed to them from cradle to grave. Anyone say North Korea or USSR?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by aerdna (March 17, 2010 3:34 pm ET)
           
        'exceptionalism'? Really? C'mon, man...
        Report Abuse
      • Author by dogbreath (March 17, 2010 3:36 pm ET)
        2  
        Yeah, having 30 million people covered by health care is suddenly going to turn us into a mirror-immage of the two of the vilest countries that ever existed. Your argument is running on empty.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by dirtylittlereligion (March 17, 2010 3:42 pm ET)
        3  
        HOLY FCUK!

        Every. Single. Day. Nothing but talking points. No original thought.

        As much as I disagree with RightON, at least he usually breaks out of the usual talking point spamming. The rest of you are incredibly predictable.

        Let me ask...do you get a little tingle down your leg every time you post some more regurgitation of the echo chamber? I bet you do...

        Just don't pull any muscles while you're patting yourself on the back for driving this country's discourse farther from critical thought.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dirtylittlereligion (March 17, 2010 3:45 pm ET)
          1  
          Oops. "Farther" should be "further"...I wouldn't want people to think I'm grammatically-challenged like Seahawks, here.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by seahawks123 (March 17, 2010 4:00 pm ET)
            5
          Never did deny it did you.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (March 17, 2010 4:04 pm ET)
            1  
            Deny what? Your nonsensical collection of BS?

            Seahawks, you really do need to turn of Fox/hate talk radio. It's not good for your health. You don't seem to have the ability to discern the difference between truth and lies.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (March 17, 2010 4:04 pm ET)
            2  
            Deny what? Your nonsensical collection of BS?

            Seahawks, you really do need to turn of Fox/hate talk radio. It's not good for your health. You don't seem to have the ability to discern the difference between truth and lies.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by dirtylittlereligion (March 17, 2010 4:16 pm ET)
            2  
            I seriously have no idea what you are talking about.

            If I've refused to answer some charge you've leveled against me, it's probably because you bored me to death (or possibly, knowing you, because I could not understand your stream of consciousness nonsensical writing style that you slip into). Do you think I'm just saying that to mock you? No, honestly, you ARE predictable to the point of boredom.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (March 17, 2010 4:03 pm ET)
        2  
        Do you just sit and listen to this BS non-stop every day? You just posted a whole string of ridiculously STUPID talking points. LOL!!!

        A clue, seahawks, none of that stuff is true and none of it has a DA*NED thing to do with being "conservative.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by seahawks123 (March 17, 2010 4:09 pm ET)
            7
          Come on RINO. You're a conservative like Obama is.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (March 17, 2010 4:13 pm ET)
            2  
            LOL!!!

            You do realize that every time you post that RINO nonsense, you show how stupid you really are, right? Being a conservative has nothing to do with supporting a political club.

            Carry on with your inane comments, seahawks. I truly believe that you have absolutely NO clue what the hell you're talking about. You just post what you've heard on Fox/hate talk radio.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by seahawks123 (March 17, 2010 4:18 pm ET)
                5
              No, I'm just opposed to everything the progressives stand for. I never hear you, by the way come out against any of it. You are quick to jump on their band wagon bashing anyone that has anything to say in opposition regardless of WHO is sayinng it. All critisism is a talikng point to you.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (March 17, 2010 4:26 pm ET)
                3  
                Nope, seahawks, you post TALKING POINTS which are not TRUE. You are a part of the problem, not the solution. You don't even know what a progressive IS any more than you know what a conservative is. You base your opinions on the complete BS spewed by Rush, Beck, Fox/hate talk radio. That's NOT conservatism, seahawks.

                There is nothing inherently good or bad with either conservatism or liberalism [now labeled with that SCARY term "progressivism."]. You really do need to turn the hatemongers off. They aren't conservatives.

                Your belief structure seems to be more authoritarian than conservative. You will hate whomever the figures you deem to be authoritative tells you to hate . . . unquestioned. That's not conservatism.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by New Frontier (March 17, 2010 4:55 pm ET)
                4  
                The same person who said this...
                "I'm just opposed to everything the progressives stand for."
                ...incredibly, then self-righteously said this, not even two seconds later:
                "You are quick to (...) bashing anyone that has anything to say in opposition regardless of WHO is sayinng it."
                It's just astounding.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by bintx (March 17, 2010 4:58 pm ET)
                  1  
                  Seahawks has no idea what he's talking about. He wouldn't know the difference between a "progressive" and a "conservative" if one of each came up and kissed his cheek. He just repeats what he's heard on Fox/hate talk radio or read on freerepublic and assumes that a) it's true, and b) it makes him a "conservative." It's really kind of sad . . . there's a lot of seahawks out there.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (March 17, 2010 5:36 pm ET)
                2  
                SEABAGS, you dumb a$$ progresives are what made this country great for the general public, not you conservative fools.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by angels4light (March 18, 2010 12:40 pm ET)
                   
                You do realize the Founding Fathers were Progressive and Liberal, and decidedly not Conservative (conservatives want to keep things they way they are, and in revolutionary times that meant keeping King George)? Progressives, like the late Tim Berners-Lee (look him up) invent things, create things, solve problems, in short they promote PROGRESS - hence the name.
                Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (March 17, 2010 4:10 pm ET)
        2  
        The progressives would love it if there was no more exceptionalism in America anymore. Let the Government run everything and have their lives handed to them from cradle to grave. Anyone say North Korea or USSR?
        You'd love it if there were no more opposing views to your right-wing agenda. Let you run everything--with no elections, no debate, no alternate ideas. Can you say North Korea or USSR?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by seahawks123 (March 17, 2010 4:19 pm ET)
            6
          Still don't deny it do you?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (March 17, 2010 4:27 pm ET)
            2  
            Deny WHAT? You didn't say anything to deny, seahawks. You simply posted a string of talking points which made NO sense. I don't know anybody who believes the crap you posted, even the people who spewed for you to repeat.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by seahawks123 (March 17, 2010 4:34 pm ET)
                7
              You're more vemonous than even the most stringent progressive. Do you have "issues". Where you abused as a child or something?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (March 17, 2010 4:56 pm ET)
                2  
                HUH?

                LOL!!!! No venom in my post, seahawks. And, no, I had a wonderful childhood with wonderful parents who taught me that I shouldn't believe everything I heard without question. They taught me to "look it up," when I had questions.

                My parents have been married for almost 62 years. Great people who have been grandparents for many, many children at the private Christian school where they worked for over 20 years.

                Nice try, though, seahawks. Just for the record, posts like yours don't bother me in the least except to make me sad for you.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by seahawks123 (March 17, 2010 5:16 pm ET)
                    3
                  Like I said, when I ever read how you have said anything about progressives or liberalism like you do real conservatives or republicans I will believe you as being a "conservative". Yeah like that will ever happen. RINO.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by John Paradox (March 17, 2010 8:48 pm ET)
                       
                    So you see only three things:
                    Real Americans [TM Faux News]
                    RINO
                    Democrats.

                    Since I dropped all parties years ago because of dislike of both*, I guess I'm a 'RINO' because you can't conceive of anything else.

                    *Actually, my last Party was Libertarian.
                    Report Abuse
          • Author by New Frontier (March 17, 2010 4:37 pm ET)
            1  
            Dodge. Reiterating, here's what you want:

            You'd love it if there were no more opposing views to your extreme right-wing agenda. Let you run everything--with no elections, no debate, no alternate ideas. Can you say North Korea or USSR?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by cugagcmu805031 (March 17, 2010 5:44 pm ET)
            1  
            We the people is the most accurate definition of American exceptionalism. Our talents, skills, intelligence, and all of the other great qualities of the citizens of this country is the foundation on which American exceptionalism is based. According to the conservative definition of American exceptionalism you are using, it seems that AE is some amorphous concept that they never can define to really mean anything. We are American exceptionalism. American exceptionalism is only a word unless it includes the people and what they add to the meaning.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by angels4light (March 18, 2010 12:47 pm ET)
           
        Progressives want progress, politically, economically, individually. Without exceptionalism, there is no progress. Our Founding Fathers were progressive, and liberal. They worked to solve the problem of opression, of keeping things the same (conservatism), just as any inventor does. Without inventors, things would not progress - just as we would not be having this conversation without the progressive work of people like Tim Berners-Lee. You need to learn to think for yourself, instead of accepting the cradle to the grave brain drain of Rush Limbaugh and his ilk.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by little poncho (March 17, 2010 3:36 pm ET)
      1 1
      reshie, go to costa rica and take beckie toy boy & kkklannity with you.......... take care of beckie boy...... after 3 days ALL OF AMERICA will forget you 3..... NO AMERICA WILL FORGET IN 3 SECONDS..... 3 - 2 - 1 FORGOTTON..
      Report Abuse
    • Author by billcnc (March 17, 2010 4:29 pm ET)
         
      Would this be the same end of the world that the republicans though would happen if the Government passes laws requiring "Seat Belts" in "EVERY" car?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by cugagcmu805031 (March 17, 2010 5:27 pm ET)
      1 1
      Now Rush has supplanted chicken little.

      The sky is falling! The sky is falling! says Chicken Little Rushie.
      Report Abuse