Perino, Van Susteren push falsehood that only Stupak amendment will prohibit federal funding for abortion

VanSusteren is a lawyer who endlessly examined the OJ Simpson case blow by blow. I know she must have read the helth Care bill and maybe even watched jon Stewart skewer that betsy personna.Why is this otherwise bright woman allow herself to appear on national tv pretending not to know what is in the bill. there is no federal funding of abortion, directly or indirectly.

Perino was much cuter in the WH Briefing Room, interpreting Bushisms for the rest of the world. But at least it was honest work. Now that she's gone over to the the Dark Side (Fox), she's lost her innocence.

Dana seems to have a problem with reality. Belief is better facts.

A bit off-topic, but the front page of foxnews.com has gone absolutely crazy this week. They are scared to death that health care is going to pass and be popular.

Notice how all four of the last posts were basically identically the last few nights. Susteren still lying about stupak being the only law that could possibly ban federal funded abortions when in reality, stupak would just generally start the process of banning abortions entirely. Hannity with the same crap about all the deals which are ALL going to be taken out in the reconciliation bill (I dont think hannity has any clue what reconciliation is.) And Morris continuing to advertise on fox to kill the bill even though no protest in the world would stop the vote at this point. Just the same redundant vomit every single night this week. This just proves - one, how little these people know about the bill or that they are just total liars. And two, how idiotic they are to not be able to come up with real arguments that are truthful and make sense or at least another fake argument.

I can come up with better and accurate reasons to not pass this bill and I actually want it to pass. One can say why are we giving all this tax money via subsidies to the insurance industry that caused the mess in the first place? Why not force the insurance companies to provide such sums of money for the millions of new customers they are getting. One can also claim that this bill's only plan to lower costs is by regulation and not by competition - so essentially congress is assuming that their regulation is tight enough so that insurance won't find any loopholes which they most certainly will. Someone that actually knows something about the bill could also ask why many of the crucial laws like the one banning pre-existing conditions for adults don't kick in for years. Why not just start that policy now? But these childish arguments about almost completely irrelevant issues like haggling over the process is ridiculous - have these people never seen congress in action before? These bodies have more rules and insane votes and processes than any other agency in the country. But the constitution allowed each individual body of congress to write their own rules and so over the next two centuries they tried to outsmart each other by writing in everything that every popped into their head.

Only the Stupak Amendment can prevent another Cuban Missile Crisis, whatever that was!

Actually, the Hyde Amendment has already prohibited it. Stupak's language would just be an exercise in redundancy.

I'm still amazed anyone would take perrino seriously after saying that "no terrorist attacks occured on US soil during the gw bush years". She's just another delusional lying fox commentator.