About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Beck says Daily Show segment "was hysterical" but Stewart "continues to get it wrong"

March 19, 2010 5:27 pm ET

From the March 19 edition of Fox News' Glenn Beck:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Daily Show's Stewart reprises Beck impersonation

Beck thanks Jon Stewart for "helping me get the word out on progressives," critiques his impersonation

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by dmhack (March 19, 2010 5:30 pm ET)
      21  
      Stewart completely deconstructed Becky. Sadly, he was preaching to the choir.

      How shocking that Becky doesn't understand what Stewart did.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Sharpe (March 19, 2010 6:15 pm ET)
        12  
        His audience is probably like whos jon stewart? They watch nothing but fox. How would they know anyone else on tv?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by marco21 (March 19, 2010 5:33 pm ET)
      10  
      Don't worry, Glenn. I am sure Stewart is anxious to tell you how you're wrong - again - and will do so next week... again.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Sharpe (March 19, 2010 6:20 pm ET)
        11  
        How does a high school grad think he is somehow not only smarter but so much more informed to the point that he and his audience think he can tell them things that no one else has ever heard before and sounds more like propaganda than fact. Who is beck to say stewart or anyone else for that matter is wrong? He is a nobody - a recovering alcoholic and drug addict who has been diagnosed with ADHD. Im not trying to be disrespectful and I know it is tough to kick addictions and one may struggle their whole life with ADHD but this guy has no background in anything and yet, feels compelled to pretend he is an expert on everything - theology, politics, history, government, constitutional law. Not only does he incessantly lie, but he really does not know about anything that he constantly talks about. How can anyone talk this moron seriously?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by brodiman (March 19, 2010 7:38 pm ET)
          4  
          Well Beck 'does a lot of reading', by which I think he has underlings find scary things for him to ramble about and he goes on as if he has read them himself. But I doubt it. A person with the history you have there isn't likely to be much of a reader. I mean, I don't think I know anyone with ADHD who can sit still for a minute, much less the time it takes to read a book. But then again his audience probably don't read much either, or at least read anything that disagrees with their pre-conceived notions about the world.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Jeremy Danials (March 20, 2010 1:20 am ET)
            1  
            Well Beck 'does a lot of reading'


            So do I. Difference: I am not as clueless as he is about the subjects I talk about, nor am I unable to finish articulating a thought. (Also, I know how to use words like "articulate."

            Also, I had a friend like Beck. Similar whacked-out anti-Government conspiracy theories. He was Paranoid Schizophrenic and Bipolar, with a Persecution complex and delusions of Grandeur. I think Beck's his long-lost dad.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by Sharpe (March 19, 2010 6:22 pm ET)
        8  
        Beck has taken one theology class which he proceeded to DROP OUT OF. He had no major, not a single college course, seemingly no free time to read. It seems like he gets progressively dumber as the days go by.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (March 19, 2010 5:34 pm ET)
      6  
      that sounds like an oxymoron.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Leftym0m79 (March 19, 2010 5:35 pm ET)
      11  
      You know when Jon did a send up of Keith Olberman a month ago, he had the sense of humor and self-confidence to show it in it's entirety. Why am I not surprised that Glenn didn't do the same thing.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Ination (March 19, 2010 6:09 pm ET)
        5  
        I don't think Beck would want to devote 15 minutes of his show to showing the clip. Olbermann's was much shorter.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by epkklk851 (March 19, 2010 6:32 pm ET)
        10  
        Not to mention the fact that Olbermann ended up agreeing with Stewart for reeming him and asking to be on the show. I can't imagine Glennie ever doing that.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by dirtylittlereligion (March 19, 2010 5:37 pm ET)
      11  
      YEAH! "Where was I wrong???"

      Then Beck shows a Pelosi quote that proves...what?

      That Democrats are going to keep legislating even after passing HCR?

      WOW!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (March 19, 2010 5:41 pm ET)
        10  
        Unbelievable, huh...?

        And Roger Ailes feels he has no responsibility to the public for getting this nutjob off the air? Ailes would apparently allow a maturbating baboon air time if it meant high ratings.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by juliajayne1 (March 19, 2010 6:37 pm ET)
          9  
          But that's what Glenn Beck is, Irony. In essence he's a masturbating baboon. He is paid to get on the air, and "noodle" with his jerk sidekick. They get a stream of consciousness thingy going and just think out loud. Any old Sh!t that comes to mind gets spewed on the air waves. Whatever comes to Becky's small mind gets blasted out into our living rooms.

          Now most people may have a few somewhat bizarre thoughts. But they don't "noodle" them on air and get paid for it. It really is like he's performing masturbation. He does this to get some sort of release and the TV audience watches. Either in horror (the people with brains). Or they (the ones without brains) eat it up like this guy is some kind of freakin' oracle.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (March 19, 2010 6:43 pm ET)
            6  
            You get my point...thank you.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by juliajayne1 (March 19, 2010 8:53 pm ET)
              3  
              Maybe I should have said he shoots his addle brained blatherings out into our living rooms, but it sounded too....hmmmmn, explicit. Ha! Hey, just using the word noodling was bad enough, except I actually got that from another Becky thread where used the word himself. Ahhhh, it's all too terrble to contemplate!

              And we all thought the comedians would be bereft of material when G Dub left office. ;-0)
              Report Abuse
                  • Author by juliajayne1 (March 20, 2010 1:37 pm ET)
                       
                    I'm not going to the Kelly thread if I don't get the link to the post where Robyn confided in you. If and when I get it, I'll make my apologies.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by jeter2 (March 20, 2010 2:26 pm ET)
                         
                      http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201003180028

                      Report Abuse
                          • Author by Bronwyn (March 20, 2010 5:30 pm ET)
                               
                            Thanks Jeter, I like you both.

                            Confided??? On an open board? Please.
                            Wow, have I learned a lesson here.
                            Report Abuse
          • Author by pete592 (March 19, 2010 10:30 pm ET)
            3  
            OMG. I can't tell the difference.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (March 19, 2010 5:37 pm ET)
      11  
      No, Glenn, Jon Stewart nailed you pretty good...and I don't think it was meant in good fun.

      You can try to soften it as much as you want but people think you are a psychotic nutjob. And I'm sure that must bother you because deep down, in your occasional lucid moments, you know how crazy you are.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dogbreath (March 19, 2010 5:38 pm ET)
      8  
      I seriously doubt that Jon Stewart would really want to sit down and watch your show Becky, unless he needed a good laugh.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Don Quixote (March 19, 2010 5:38 pm ET)
      13  
      Uber-right-wingers are missing the irony and satire gene. Remember, a recent survey showed that most believe Colbert is a real conservative who's on their side. Name one good living uber-right-wing satirist. Oh yeah, Limbaugh when he says "r*tard", but unfortuntately for it to be satire, it has to be funny.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by blueline99 (March 19, 2010 5:48 pm ET)
        11  
        Left wing satirists are funny because they expose hypocrisy, which is rampant among all walks of life, regardless of political affiliation.

        Right wing satirists aren't funny because the people they mock are the poor and suffering, and you can't openly mock them because it's not funny... or if you mock the other side, they can only be petty and mean.

        Which is why Jon Stewart is a genius comedian and Rush Limbaugh is sad.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Porkeater (March 19, 2010 5:53 pm ET)
          7  
          Also, the Rushbecks of this world take themselves far too seriously. That's why Colbert in particular remains funny.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by MagCynic (March 19, 2010 6:10 pm ET)
          17
        Name one good living uber-right-wing satirist.
        Steven Crowder.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Andy Kreiss (March 19, 2010 9:18 pm ET)
        3  
        Uber-right-wingers are missing the irony and satire gene.


        One of the most fascinating of the many bizarre characteristics of the far right. Right wing humor is rarely just slightly off, it doesn't barely miss the mark, it's usually the exact opposite of funny.

        Real humor has to be built on some truth. Right wing humor,as somebody mentioned, usually is used to attack those not in power,to afflict the afflicted. When it's not doing that, it seems to be making fun of some completely imagined enemy.

        If Stewart "got it wrong", it wouldn't be hysterical. This statement by Beck pretty much illustrates one of the worst defects of the right wing brain.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Porkeater (March 19, 2010 5:39 pm ET)
      11  
      Thanks to Beck, for exposing Stewart's genius to a wider audience. Pity he doesn't have the stones to show any of it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by loonz (March 19, 2010 5:45 pm ET)
      9  
      I think South Park did the best depiction of Beck with the "Dances with Smurfs" episode.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Quicksilver M.S (March 19, 2010 5:48 pm ET)
      6  
      All I can do now is LAUGH at the Conservatives are doing!
      The RIGHT are pulling out all the Stops!
      Scott Brown... Scott Brown.. Scott Brown did not save the USA as they had hoped!

      IT is now just a LAUGH FEST NOW!
      The Conservatives have lost the battle ... and they are lost as what to do!
      The Conservatives are LOST in the WOODS!
      [http://www.usefilm.com/images/9/3/3/933/238930-medium.jpg]

      They still have a phone to Call CONCEDE !


      http://ic2.pbase.com/g6/84/456484/3/80238364.o3INmCjw.jpg
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Dradeeus (March 19, 2010 5:50 pm ET)
      4  
      Don't worry, Beck. No one's stealing your thunder. No amount of acting will EVER make anyone look as crazy as you.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by The_Cat (March 19, 2010 6:02 pm ET)
      4  
      Uh, Glenn? Jon Stewart was making fun of you. I laughed. Ergo, he got it exactly right. You're a dweeb. You might wear a really nice suit, you might be on national television, you might even be a millionaire. But you're still a dweeb, and always will be.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by AB-001 (March 19, 2010 6:07 pm ET)
      4  
      Maybe Beck and fellow Stewart target Gretchen Carlson can commiserate together in the Fox Whining Room
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (March 19, 2010 6:07 pm ET)
      4  
      Beck gets everything wrong every day. If he thinks Stewart is wrong that must mean he's right.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Sharpe (March 19, 2010 6:14 pm ET)
      6  
      There damn well better be more legislation to come. This bill would be incredibly more popular - maybe a full 10 percentage points higher or more if the public option was included in the bill. The dems shot themselves in the foot by not including that - good policy, popular, fail-safe to provide competition. Who won't bring something like that to a vote? IT IS A NO BRAINER. Not including it is a travesty.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MagCynic (March 19, 2010 6:20 pm ET)
        1 12
        Which is exactly why those CBO numbers are bogus. It's not the final form of HCR by any stretch of the imagination.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Sharpe (March 19, 2010 6:45 pm ET)
          6  
          I agree but the point is that this bill is very likely to make no impact on the deficit or a small positive impact AND IT INSURES 30 MILLION PEOPLE. That is a pretty solid deal by all accounts. The CBO also said 80 percent of current insurance plans will go down.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by loonz (March 19, 2010 6:50 pm ET)
          5  
          The CBO can only score legislation that's being proposed now. I'm sure if there is more to come later on, the CBO will score that too. Also, when the public option was included in the House bill, it lowered the cost.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (March 19, 2010 6:52 pm ET)
          5 1
          The CBO numbers are NOT bogus.

          The CBO numbers aren't describing some non-existent HCR bill, you fool.

          They don't make predictions on potential bills. They make predictions on REAL things.

          The CBO projection is for the configuration that is there RIGHT NOW. That's what the CBO does.

          So if the bill changes, the CBO will have to do a REVISED projection.

          This is not rocket science - how come I've had to explain this to you at least 3 times now?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Sharpe (March 19, 2010 7:11 pm ET)
          3  
          The CBO said the public option significantly lowered the cost of the bill - by about 100 - 200 billion I believe. And that was in the house bill that hasnt been discussed in weeks if not months. This was scoring the senate bill and reconciliation. No public option will be included in the bill. The only changes would be if the senate wanted to change the reconciliation amendments which would then have to go back to the house or if the GOP passed an amendment to the actual bill which I find doubtful. If the CBO score does change after this, it will be by a very insignificant amount as the basic points are essentially etched in stone at this point.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by New Frontier (March 19, 2010 8:35 pm ET)
          5  
          Which is exactly why those CBO numbers are bogus.
          They're "bogus" exactly because the wingnuts don't like the numbers. Only for that reason and that reason only.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by christopher howard (March 19, 2010 7:05 pm ET)
        5  
        "This bill would be incredibly more popular - maybe a full 10 percentage points higher or more if the public option was included in the bill."

        True, Sharpe. Obama lost a ton of support from his base on this by treating progressives (who were for either Single Payer or at least a decent Public Option) as though they were handmaidens. While people like Beck were shrieking "socialism," Obama was bending over backward to appease ConservaDems. I'm a semi-regular on the lefty Crooks & Liars site too, and they think (with good reason) that on HCR Obama has totally pandered to the right side of the Democratic Party, as well as to Republicans whose votes he'll never get.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Sharpe (March 19, 2010 7:21 pm ET)
          4  
          Yup obama has been dangerously deaf to the cries from his most ardent supporters. His inability to stand up for anything that progressives believe in against strong opposition has become apparent. He has caved at every sign of threat - treating the GOP as if some bipartisan bill could be made for an entire yr and letting baucus try to achieve it in committee for months and months resulting in this endless process as well as his inability to use single payer as a bargaining chip and his unwillingness to tell congress he would not sign a bill without an option which was a campaign promise. He has also essentially ignored the issue of gay marriage and civil unions personally and allowed his DOJ to defend the defense of marriage act publicly (which he campaigned to repeal.)

          He has also failed miserably to take advantage of wall streets weak position by demanding or implementing financial reform a year ago which showed disregard for wall streets incredibly lobbying power. He brokered a deal with big pharma to not allow importation of prescription drugs which essentially meant no dramatically lower drug prices for america on the ridiculous claim that the FDA hadn't approved them and yet, we import food from other countries somehow. He also may have brokered a deal with a hospital lobbyist group to ensure there was no public option in the bill from the start - sounds about right considering the last time he talked about wanting it was almost a year ago and even then he said it was not necessary. Obama is not a socialist, not a progressive, he is a centrists. 15 years ago, republicans could have written this reform bill.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by SoloPocono (March 19, 2010 6:18 pm ET)
         
      I liked the beginning of todays show--with the embarassing combo of Bachmann, Santorum, the treasurer of Mass-Dem-> Ind-> Beck Zombie, and the loudmouth from Texas..and guess what folks??!!
      The commies are COMING the Commies are COMING!! <goes and runs under bed...ooops, can't type under there> After letting his viewers know that the "Commies" will be in DC tomorrow, (AKA "Workers of the World, AKA Unions), he ALSO ran off a list of OTHER groups who will be there--including Immigration reform ppl, Cindy's brave group, and two more I can't remember--only the Unions, (AKA in beck-speak: Commies), are there specifically for Health Care Reform-for support. They then ALL encouraged the tea party-ers, 9/12'rs, etc. to ALSO show up--and hesitantly remarked, after Beck questioned the volatility of the situation, that "American's are "too peaceful of a people" to "cause any problems". uhhmmm...and THAT came from the Texas "gentleman". Ya think MAYBE Beck shoulda said sumthin to his god, gold and GUNS 'mericans they might wanna keep it cool? After all, they are the ones who had hundreds of signs saying on 9?12 that they'd "Come Unarmed, THIS TIME"??
      Report Abuse
    • Author by WorldViewer (March 19, 2010 8:01 pm ET)
      4  
      Don't you love how Beck can't even accurately read the Pelosi quote, as reproduced, without getting the REPRODUCTION wrong?

      This is a taped show. They could have redone that take. What standards are these?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by vysotsky (March 19, 2010 10:53 pm ET)
      3  
      Beck: "He's saying that I'm crazy and all this kind of stuff, but he's missing the point: Jon, where am I wrong, exactly?"


      When considering a cheese sandwich, one does not ask whether or not the cheese sandwich is right or wrong: one simply recognizes that a cheese sandwich, while perfectly good for eating, is not good for other things... like political commentary and analysis.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Renaissance_Mandroid (March 21, 2010 9:56 pm ET)
         
      Ah yes, "Fair and Balanced". We have dismissed this claim.
      Report Abuse