Hume predicts Obama's presidency could be crippled by passage of health care reform
March 21, 2010 10:39 am ET
From the March 21 edition of Fox Broadcasting Company's Fox News Sunday:
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
















He sits there like he's a member of the English House of Lords.
Correct me if i'm wrong but didn't he Grope, i mean train Bret Baier?
The Fox News guy that gives new meaning to being "Balanced & Fair"
Speak truth to power.
Mr. News
[wow! spell-check knew them!]
The yeast that the Fox bots have mixed into these stories about HealthCare may have been just a little too much. The bubble created by too many ingredients seem to have exploded into a thousand tiny pieces.
Sorry Fox, elections matters....start you campaigning now..why waste a day.
...if Fox News has anything to say about it.
After today, it's full-on campaign mode to repeal something that'll help Americans.
http://www.aolnews.com/healthcare/article/raucous-ugly-build-up-to-house-health-care-vote/19407962?icid=main|main|dl1|link4|http://www.aolnews.com/healthcare/article/raucous-ugly-build-up-to-house-health-care-vote/19407962
Except, like most fearmongering, he was totally wrong about that. FOX Propaganda is grasping at straws because they fully well realize how badly a successful health reform law would be for the Republican Party.
There is NO CENTER HUME. You idiots have strayed so far off the cliff that the center is now the republicans of five years ago - bush in his first term would essentially be the center right now. And if obama moves to that right-wing crap - the GOP will move even further down the drain of extremist, inflammatory, mccarthy-like tactics.
Clinton's center is not that far from this healthcare bill - this bill was essentially the compromise raised by republicans after clinton's proposal failed to garner support. The dems have centrists - they have blue dogs who consistently side with republicans. The GOP has extremists - universal opposition to a very centrists bill. You think liberals or progressives are happy with this result? Read that huffpost article written by Jane H for some perspective. She addresses all the reasons why progressives should or do hate this bill. If progressives hate it, it is definitely not extreme as reform goes. Of course, that means it won't be as effective as hoped and may not have the positive consequences that really address the issue. This of course, will be framed by republicans as a bad bill when in fact, the reason it won't be effective may happen because obama tried to pander to the right and the special interests far more than was necessary.
While Hume may be right about the rest of the Obama presidency, he could just as easily be wrong. My preferred scenario would be that radical republicans are repudiated for their obstructionist stance and replaced by more accommodating ones. This is likely to take more than one election cycle, however.
The New York Times has an interesting timeline. Progressives have been trying to enact universal healthcare since Teddy Roosevelt, who in 1908 had to leave the Republican Party to advocate it. Obama has succeeded where many other presidents failed.
As for how good the law will be, it is too early to tell. It is not too early to predict that there will be amendments to it that make it more effective, less expensive, and less dependent on private insurance companies.
http://current.com/items/90706157_conservative-legend-winston-churchill-founded-socialized-medicine-in-uk.htm
I also once heard Margret Thatcher on C-span say good things about the UK health care back in the 90's.
Socialized Medicine did not kill their political careers
Since being paid well for the minor leagues of news, he spews the company line devoid of any substance
a) Politics is not a sport, but if you want to treat it like that, clearly it's in Obama's interest to get HCR passed. Doing otherwise will be a failure.
b) As far as the "overwhelming majorities," keep in mind that FDR, JFK, and LBJ (until 1966) had well over 60 votes in the Senate for much of their presidencies. Exactly 60 is a big majority, but it's not overwhelming - it's ridiculous to think that Obama should have an easy time getting an entire party to vote for something, and that anything else is a failure of leadership.
c) Obama is completely intellectually inclined to govern from the centre; in fact, his ability to see both sides of every issue will certainly become a hallmark of his presidency, and distinguished him as a scholar and a legislator. I think he's emotionally and temperamentally a liberal - certainly he's driven by empathy - but he's also very clearly interested in working with Republicans.
In short, Hume's "political analysis" is nothing more than wishful thinking, baseless-bashing, and an overwhelming dominance by a political agenda. I.e., it's Fox News.
Boxer1979 predicts: Brit Hume is an idiot!
SMH!