About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Limbaugh: Rep. Alan Grayson is "an order of fries short of a Happy Meal"

April 02, 2010 3:38 pm ET

From the April 2 edition of The Rush Limbaugh Show:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by progressiveright (April 02, 2010 3:40 pm ET)
      12  
      As compaired to you Rush who are a main dish, order of fries, and toy short of a happy meal. The only thing you have is the drink for taking your Oxy.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jjamele2880 (April 02, 2010 3:43 pm ET)
        12  
        Take a good look at Rush. I think we know where Grayson's missing fries ended up.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by progressivevoicedaily (April 02, 2010 3:58 pm ET)
        8  
        From the looks of it Rush Slimbaugh could have used a few of those happy meals WITHOUT the fries....However, I think Rush is the one who's mind is slipping. I think he's back to snortin oxy's
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Lord of Light (April 02, 2010 3:42 pm ET)
      12 1
      As opposed to Rush, who's two testicles short of having the courage to debate Grayson face to face.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (April 02, 2010 3:59 pm ET)
        8  
        Agreed. Grayson would tear Rush a new one. That's why Blimpy doesn't have guests or do debates.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by txthinker (April 02, 2010 4:07 pm ET)
          8  
          And why he broadcasts from his secret bunker.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mary59 (April 02, 2010 4:40 pm ET)
            7  
            Even Archie Bunker wouldn't want to bunk in his bunker.

            He's short more than testicles. He just sorta missing his aorta, which could pump some blood back out of his heart, if he had one.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by jjamele2880 (April 02, 2010 3:42 pm ET)
      6  
      I bet Rush is really proud of that remark. Good comeback to anyone who claims that Limbaugh just phones it in and doesn't earn his $25 mil per.

      <sarcasm off>
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© (April 02, 2010 3:43 pm ET)
      6  
      El Fathead mocks what he can't understand.
      ~
      Report Abuse
    • Author by blueline99 (April 02, 2010 3:47 pm ET)
      10  
      I think Rep. Alan Grayson is a bold, forward thinking Congressman who doesn't compromise his values and isn't afraid to put himself out there.

      His speech on the floor during the HC debates about people dying because the lack of insurance was a great wake up call.

      His proposal to open Medicare to everyone was another good example of reminding everyone that the debate wasn't as radical as the right tried to make it out to be.

      I hope he continues to serve Congress and the fact that he gets under the skin of Rush and Friends just shows me that what he's doing, he's doing right.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (April 02, 2010 4:51 pm ET)
        5  
        Here's Grayson's response to the idiotic sign in the doc's office:

        The outspoken Grayson described Cassell's sign as "ridiculous."

        "I'm disgusted," he said. "Maybe he thinks the Hippocratic Oath says, ‘Do no good.' If this is the face of the right wing in America, it's the face of cruelty. … Why don't they change the name of the Republican Party to the Sore Loser Party?"
        Report Abuse
    • Author by New Frontier (April 02, 2010 3:47 pm ET)
      9 1
      Leave it to the Mr. Tub-O-Lard Unhappy Meal to think of a food metaphor.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by afriend (April 02, 2010 4:23 pm ET)
        7  
        Leave it to the Mr. Tub-O-Lard Unhappy Meal to think of a food metaphor.

        Yeah, Fatso is all about food, drugs, and bending over metaphors...truly porcine...
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Porkeater (April 02, 2010 3:49 pm ET)
      8 1
      Rep Grayson is twenty times the man Rush could ever dream of being. Except in blubber volume, that is.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MagCynic (April 02, 2010 3:51 pm ET)
      1 20
      Apply the same MMFA standard to Alan Grayson and we can call him a violent, hateful person as well.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by progressivevoicedaily (April 02, 2010 4:00 pm ET)
        8  
        That's not true Mag and you know it.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by MagCynic (April 02, 2010 4:17 pm ET)
            16
          That's not true Mag and you know it.
          Well first let me define the MMFA standard as applied to conservatives.
          1. Take your words literally.
          2. Opinions are automatically lies or at least misinformation.
          3. No joking, use of hyperbole, or analogies.

          With this in mind let's look at some witty Alan Grayson lines:
          I have trouble listening to what [Cheney] says sometimes, because of the blood that drips from his teeth while he's talking
          Taken literally does that have any violent or hateful imagery? Yes, of course it does.
          Don't get sick, and if you do get sick, die quickly.
          Does Grayson literally mean the GOP wants people to die quickly? Is this hateful if he does? I would say so. And it's a lie.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© (April 02, 2010 4:39 pm ET)
            9  
            Cheney lied us into a disasterous war for oil and made torture official U.S. policy.

            The GOP doesn't give a cr*p about whether lots of people die quickly, as long GOP needs for power and money are served.

            There's justification for what Grayson said.

            You're a dimwit, maggie. And you defend evil people.
            ~
            Report Abuse
            • Author by MagCynic (April 02, 2010 5:18 pm ET)
                12
              There's justification for what Grayson said.
              BS. It's either OK for everybody or OK for nobody. And using supposed beliefs of the GOP does nothing to further any point with me. I don't like political parties. Period.

              You're obviously extremely partisan with statements like, "The GOP doesn't give a cr*p about whether lots of people die quickly, as long GOP needs for power and money are served."

              I'm no fan of the GOP and even I wouldn't say that that's what they believe. You are insane if you honestly think this.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by my4cents (April 02, 2010 8:31 pm ET)
                2  
                "I don't like political parties"
                And yet, your posts consistently prove otherwise. You might not defend the party itself but it's apparent which party's water you carry.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by progressivevoicedaily (April 02, 2010 4:42 pm ET)
            9  
            I would argue that since the GOP is against healthcare reform, have always been against healthcare reform, and will always continue to be against healthcare reform if it hurts profits in any way, YES, THEY DO WANT PEOPLE TO DIE QUICKLY IF THEY DON"T HAVE HEALTHCARE INSURANCE!!!!IF THERES NO MONEY TO BE MADE OFF OF THEM, THEY WOULD JUST ASSUME THEY DIE QUICKY. VERY BOLD and THOUGHTFULLY ANALIZED STATEMENT IF YOU ASK ME!!)
            Report Abuse
            • Author by MiniTru (April 02, 2010 4:47 pm ET)
              6  
              THOUGHTFULLY ANALIZED
              I think "analized" describes Maggie to a tee.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by jjamele2880 (April 02, 2010 5:32 pm ET)
            6  
            Mags, all have to judge the Republicans on is

            1. What they say, and
            2. What they do.

            Seems to me that you, BJ Fan, k1dork, etc. want us to ignore these two things and just ASSUME that the Republicans are much more caring than their words and actions indicate. Sorry. I usually just take it for granted that people are not soulless, heartless sociopaths. With Republicans, I insist on proof.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by whatIthink (April 02, 2010 5:48 pm ET)
            3  
            Umm, yeah, actually the GOP does want people to die quickly. Why else would they deny health insurance to millions of people? Why else whould they fight to allow insurance companies to continue to revoke plans on a whim? Why else would they fight to allow insurance companies to pay for coverage one day then deny paying for the exact same coverage the next? Why else would they fight to allow insurance companies to keep a couple of profit points at the very real cost of human lives? Why else would they spread lies about death panels, and rationing care, and wanting to kill grandma, and plans for euthanasia, and plans for eugenics, and so on? Lack of health insurance kill people every day, insurance companies kill people by playing games with coverage for profits, scaring people into believing their are death panels or that the government is hell bent on conducting policy which will kill them leads to real life deaths...and the GOP fought for all of those things...therfore, it is a valid conclusion to say that the GOP wants people to die quickly. Why else would they fight so hard to remove and deny the very things that would promote and lengthen life?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Ruby (April 02, 2010 6:38 pm ET)
            3  
            2. Opinions are automatically lies or at least misinformation.

            Conservatives always hide behind the "it's my opinion" thing. As if because something is "opinion" that means you can't call it out for being false.

            I can't sit here and go, "It's my opinion that the sky is green and no one can tell me I'm wrong or lying because it's only my opinion".

            Just because someone holds an opinion doesn't mean it's not misinformation.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by New Frontier (April 02, 2010 4:19 pm ET)
          10  
          No, no. It's the same thing. Alan Grayson uses violent and hateful rhetoric about Limbaugh and all sorts of Republicans all the time on The Alan Grayson Show which airs 15 hours per week on the radio, worldwide.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by txthinker (April 02, 2010 4:08 pm ET)
        9  
        What has Alan Grayson ever said that could be characterized as "conservative misinformation"???
        Report Abuse
        • Author by MagCynic (April 02, 2010 4:10 pm ET)
            15
          What has Alan Grayson ever said that could be characterized as "conservative misinformation"???
          Uh... I have no clue. What does that have anything to do with what I said?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by raddave43 (April 02, 2010 4:20 pm ET)
            13  
            What has Alan Grayson ever said that could be characterized as "conservative misinformation"???
            Uh... I have no clue. What does that have anything to do with what I said?


            Because exposing conservative misinformation is the mission of MMFA, you have been told this many times.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by MagCynic (April 02, 2010 4:27 pm ET)
                15
              What does that have anything to do with what I said initially?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by raddave43 (April 02, 2010 4:35 pm ET)
                10  
                Because that is mmfa's standards, so they can't be applied to Grayson.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by MagCynic (April 02, 2010 4:36 pm ET)
                    13
                  I'm referring to MMFA's standards of disallowing any form of hyperbole or analogies to be spoken by a conservative.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by pete592 (April 02, 2010 4:41 pm ET)
                    8  
                    Disallowing in what way? Are they campaigning to repeal the First Amendment?
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by MagCynic (April 02, 2010 4:52 pm ET)
                        11
                      Take this MMFA headline for example:
                      Beck: "I wouldn't mind if both ... parties would burst into flames"
                      What's the point of running with that quote? He's obviously not hoping members of both parties die a horrible, painful, fiery death. By MMFA's standards, though, that is the only reason they would post it; to further there template that he's a crazy, lying, violent psychopath.

                      If you don't take his words literally, then there's nothing that pushes conservative misinformation in that quote. Since they did post it I can only assume they did in fact take his words literally.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by New Frontier (April 02, 2010 4:58 pm ET)
                        5  
                        Beck: "I wouldn't mind if both ... parties would burst into flames"
                        As if there's absolutely nothing at all crazy, lying or violent about that statement so long as you don't take it 100 percent literally.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by MagCynic (April 02, 2010 5:09 pm ET)
                            11
                          Well... why would you? What is crazy, lying, or violent about it? It's an expression, a figure of speech if you will. It also destroys the notion that he's just a GOP shill.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by New Frontier (April 02, 2010 5:28 pm ET)
                            4  
                            What is crazy, lying, or violent about it?
                            To you? Obviously nothing, LOL.
                            Report Abuse
                          • Author by DellDolly (April 02, 2010 5:36 pm ET)
                            4  
                            As was previously explained to you at least 4 times that I've seen, these comments you claim are in jest or are hyperbole are STILL offensive as jesting or hyperbole.

                            MMFA has ALWAYS understood, despite your assertions to the contrary, that many of the things that these fools say are NOT intended to be taken literally.

                            But that doesn't stop them from being offensive comments that further the conservative agenda.
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by MagCynic (April 02, 2010 5:39 pm ET)
                                7
                              But that doesn't stop them from being offensive comments that further the conservative agenda.
                              I'm sorry you're a sensitive wimp who can't help themselves from being offended by words like "burst" and "flames". I feel sorry for you.

                              And how exactly does "I wouldn't mind if both ... parties would burst into flames" further the conservative agenda?
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by DellDolly (April 03, 2010 3:27 am ET)
                                   
                                And how exactly does "I wouldn't mind if both ... parties would burst into flames" further the conservative agenda?

                                Well, saying that BOTH parties are EQUALLY offensive and have equally offensive platforms, positions and outcomes furthers the conservative agenda by failing to accurately portray the massive failings of the conservative side versus much less egregious sins on the progressive side.

                                That's for starters.

                                But, my point was that YOUR claim that MMFA doesn't KNOW that the hyperbolic comments shouldn't be taken literally is ridiculous.

                                It's a strawman argument that you push around here all the time, and I shot it down. Now, I understand that's frustrating, to have what you thought was one of your most powerful arguments totally debunked, but TOO BAD, SO SAD.
                                Report Abuse
                          • Author by peace4all (April 02, 2010 5:45 pm ET)
                            2  
                            Well... why would you? What is crazy, lying, or violent about it? It's an expression, a figure of speech if you will. -magicdope

                            he's right i often use that common expression in my daily life. you know as in "i'm going to my inlaws this weekend. i really hope they burst into flames." can't you just sense the love in that statement?
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by MagCynic (April 02, 2010 5:57 pm ET)
                                7
                              So in your world nobody can ever use expressions to make an emphatic point?
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by mescal (April 02, 2010 9:16 pm ET)
                                4  
                                So, in your world nobody can ever call someone out for their consistently violent an hateful rhetoric?

                                Are you one of those 'conservatives' that believe that the First Amendment prohibits others from answering back?

                                Just asking.
                                Report Abuse
                • Author by MagCynic (April 02, 2010 4:36 pm ET)
                    13
                  I'm referring to MMFA's standards of disallowing any form of hyperbole or analogies to be spoken by a conservative.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by MiniTru (April 02, 2010 4:49 pm ET)
                    7  
                    So, since Grayson isn't a conservative, according to your exact statement. MMfA's "standards" cannot be applied to Grayson.

                    You guys just can't get it right, can you?
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by MagCynic (April 02, 2010 4:54 pm ET)
                        11
                      Do you selectively choose what posts to read? I've already stated what MMFA standards I'm referring to. It has nothing to do with their state purpose of exposing conservative misinformation. Try to keep up with the conversation next time before you jump head first into it.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by New Frontier (April 02, 2010 4:59 pm ET)
                        5  
                        MMFA standards
                        = Total fabrications in your head.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by MagCynic (April 02, 2010 5:11 pm ET)
                            11
                          = Total fabrications in your head.
                          Nope. Just observations of various patterns with respect to what MMFA chooses to post. Very little of their postings have anything to do with actual, legitimate conservative misinformation.

                          For example, if Sean Hannity said on his program that you can lose weight by eating 10 hamburgers a day and not exercising, is that conservative misinformation?
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by New Frontier (April 02, 2010 5:26 pm ET)
                            4  
                            Yep. Total fabrications in your head. But do keep trying. Maybe eventually you'll find someone to agree with you!
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by MagCynic (April 02, 2010 5:28 pm ET)
                                11
                              Nope. Just observations of various patterns with respect to what MMFA chooses to post. Very little of their postings have anything to do with actual, legitimate conservative misinformation.

                              For example, if Sean Hannity said on his program that you can lose weight by eating 10 hamburgers a day and not exercising, is that conservative misinformation?
                              Report Abuse
                          • Author by New Frontier (April 02, 2010 5:30 pm ET)
                            3  
                            I see 49 thumbs-down for you so far, but don't let that discourage you! Your arguments may yet convince someone!
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by MagCynic (April 02, 2010 5:36 pm ET)
                                9
                              For example, if Sean Hannity said on his program that you can lose weight by eating 10 hamburgers a day and not exercising, is that conservative misinformation?
                              You have no retort to this do you? You read this example and immediately realized what MMFA does the vast majority of the time in their quest to root out conservative misinformation.
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by New Frontier (April 02, 2010 5:41 pm ET)
                                4  
                                Your hilarious "MMFA standards" are fantasies in your head, your premise is faulty, and your example silly. Otherwise, you're a sheer genius making highly convincing arguments... to yourself. Ignore the 50 thumbs-down and you'll feel better.
                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by MagCynic (April 02, 2010 5:50 pm ET)
                                    8
                                  Your hilarious "MMFA standards" are fantasies in your head,
                                  So every single one of MMFA's post is a legitimate example of conservative misinformation? You're saying I'm not going to be able to find one example of something other than conservative misinformation?
                                  Report Abuse
                                  • Author by New Frontier (April 02, 2010 5:56 pm ET)
                                    2  
                                    Look, why don't you pour yourself a beer and celebrate the stunning victory in your head of having convinced everyone that you are right about everything. Those 50 thumbs-down don't mean a thing!
                                    Report Abuse
                                    • Author by MagCynic (April 02, 2010 5:59 pm ET)
                                        7
                                      I don't really care about thumbs down if they come from people who can't tell the difference between legitimate conservative misinformation and a sensationalized post about an opinion somebody holds.

                                      Honestly now, if Sean Hannity said on his program that you can lose weight by eating 10 hamburgers a day and not exercising, is that conservative misinformation?
                                      Report Abuse
                                      • Author by christopher howard (April 02, 2010 6:16 pm ET)
                                        1  
                                        "Honestly now, if Sean Hannity said on his program that you can lose weight by eating 10 hamburgers a day and not exercising, is that conservative misinformation?"

                                        Okay, I'll play the silly game.

                                        1) It is probably more a piece of misinformation uttered by a conservative.

                                        2) It might be conservative information, since even diet is part of the culture wars these days and Hannity might be pushing it as part of a "liberal vegetarians are trying to steal your hamburgers" gambit.

                                        Report Abuse
                                        • Author by MagCynic (April 02, 2010 6:20 pm ET)
                                            7
                                          The answer is no. All you had to do was say "no". To be conservative misinformation it has to be rooted in some core belief of conservatism. It has to advance conservatism by being deliberately disingenuous. Hardly any of these posts satisfy this requirement.
                                          Report Abuse
                                          • Author by christopher howard (April 02, 2010 6:41 pm ET)
                                            2  
                                            If a core conservative belief is that liberals are evil vegetarians, and I've heard variations of this theme before, then pushing a "10 hamburgers a day is good for you" line to combat said liberal conspiracy constitutes conservative misinformation.
                                            Report Abuse
                                          • Author by New Frontier (April 02, 2010 7:20 pm ET)
                                            1  
                                            Hardly any of these posts satisfy this requirement.
                                            Congrats!! You convinced a grand total of 0 people with your persuasive arguments.
                                            Report Abuse
                                      • Author by bintx (April 02, 2010 10:41 pm ET)
                                        1 1
                                        You don't even know what a "conservative" is. I would argue that MMFA's mission is distorted because they are calling these a**hate "conservatives." There is virtually nothing conservative about them. For the most part, they are a bunch of uneducated, dishonest, mentally unstable radio DJs with absolute NO knowledge of the crap they spew.

                                        You always talk about Beck being a "common" man. No, he's not. He is a jerk who is doing his DAM*DEST to tear our country apart . . . for what? MONEY and ATTENTION. That's all. He doesn't give a rat's patoot about the crap he spews except that it's making him rich. He's a jerk.
                                        Report Abuse
                                      • Author by bintx (April 02, 2010 10:41 pm ET)
                                        2 1
                                        You don't even know what a "conservative" is. I would argue that MMFA's mission is distorted because they are calling these a**hate "conservatives." There is virtually nothing conservative about them. For the most part, they are a bunch of uneducated, dishonest, mentally unstable radio DJs with absolute NO knowledge of the crap they spew.

                                        You always talk about Beck being a "common" man. No, he's not. He is a jerk who is doing his DAM*DEST to tear our country apart . . . for what? MONEY and ATTENTION. That's all. He doesn't give a rat's patoot about the crap he spews except that it's making him rich. He's a jerk.
                                        Report Abuse
                              • Author by arkange1 (April 02, 2010 8:23 pm ET)
                                1  
                                No that's just Hannitard being a dumba** as usual! Yet, sadly, some of his audience would take it literally!
                                Report Abuse
                              • Author by DellDolly (April 03, 2010 3:30 am ET)
                                1  
                                For example, if Sean Hannity said on his program that you can lose weight by eating 10 hamburgers a day and not exercising, is that conservative misinformation?

                                Nope, it's not "conservative misinformation" because it doesn't further the conservative agenda.

                                The conservative agenda doesn't hope that people get fat and lazy. That's not a political agenda.

                                What a dunce you are, and a troll, pretending that you don't understand this stuff and just desirous of negative attention.
                                Report Abuse
                • Author by jeter2 (April 02, 2010 4:52 pm ET)
                    4
                  Rad, I get what you're saying, I think we all know MMFA only covers Conservative mis-information & Conservatives name-calling..

                  However Grayson did call the Right "Nazis"...& Palin a "dingbat"

                  Now I'm not gonna dispute that Palin is a dingbat ;-) But sometimes it would be great if a few folks here could at least acknowledge that some Liberals also step over the line of civility & do name-call.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by christopher howard (April 02, 2010 4:58 pm ET)
                    3  
                    I do hereby acknowledge that. I don't like the Nazi label being thrown about by either side because, as an ardent student of that period, I find it disrespectful to both the history and the real Nazis' victims.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by jeter2 (April 02, 2010 5:17 pm ET)
                        2
                      Thanks for acknowledging that Christopher

                      I'll be the first one to admit that most of the hate, hostility, smears & name-calling comes from these right-wing [radio/tv] talk show hosts [and others]....but the Left aren't always boy scouts [or girl scouts] & occasionally spew a little venom themselves ;-)
                      Report Abuse
                  • Author by raddave43 (April 02, 2010 5:31 pm ET)
                    3  
                    I will admit that everyone, no matter their politial beliefs has probably crossed the line of civility and have called someone else a name at least once in their lives. I have never heard Grayson call the right "Nazis," but if he has I disaprove of it. I don't think anyone except Nazis should ever be labled that.
                    Report Abuse
              • Author by Marker (April 02, 2010 7:07 pm ET)
                3  
                Quit trying to derail the thread. Pay attention and you might learn something.
                Report Abuse
    • Author by rott250 (April 02, 2010 3:51 pm ET)
         
      Uh Grayson is on the lunatic side but I'm sure none of the liberals on here can recognize this. I'm also sure that media matters will not post this because I'm not a liberal. Whatever happened to free speech? Can't handle a different opnion?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (April 02, 2010 4:39 pm ET)
      8 1
      Limbaugh is one pizza short of exploding.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ojnabieoot (April 02, 2010 4:48 pm ET)
      5 1
      And the Republicans are a few jack@$$es short of a donkey farm.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (April 02, 2010 4:49 pm ET)
      5 1
      from the looks of Mr limbaugh, he got the supersized fries. For this comment, I just went down the same gutter Limbaugh resides in.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by canaanxing9025 (April 02, 2010 4:55 pm ET)
      4 1
      Oh Good Grief, with Limbaugh is always about one orafice or another.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by cugagcmu805031 (April 02, 2010 5:32 pm ET)
      4 1
      What Limpy is really saying, "Yeah, Rep. Grayson is smarter than I am. Boo hoo."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rajihammr (April 04, 2010 12:35 pm ET)
         
      I'd like to see Grayson host an alternative radio show, I think he would give the Limpman some stiff competition, you should pardon the expression.
      Report Abuse