About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Limbaugh: Tea Party is "the first time" that "everyday citizens" have "risen up" "since the Civil War"

April 19, 2010 3:22 pm ET

From the April 19 edition of Premiere Radio Network's Rush Limbaugh Show:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by raddave43 (April 19, 2010 3:26 pm ET)
      19  
      Limbaugh: Tea Party is "the first time" that "everyday citizens" have "risen up" "since the Civil War"


      And how did that turn out Rush?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (April 19, 2010 3:26 pm ET)
      17  
      I knew it! He was too busy looking up girls' dresses in the 60s. He missed the whole decade!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by dogbreath (April 19, 2010 3:30 pm ET)
        11  
        Girl's dresses? Not so sure about that. . .
        Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (April 19, 2010 3:49 pm ET)
        10 1
        Because of the Tea Party, it's the first time something has "risen up" for Limbaugh since the 60s, if you know what I mean and I think you do.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (April 19, 2010 3:27 pm ET)
      10  
      All three thousand of them ? And the infiltrators also ?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DixieChyc (April 19, 2010 10:25 pm ET)
          2
        Have you been to a Tea Party? I think not. I have been to six. There were infiltrators at the last one (4/15), but only two and they were obvious; no one paid them any real attention, which is what they wanted. I may disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it. That is what freedom of speech is all about. You may not like what we tea partiers have to say, but we have the right to speak, to debate, to dissent. Make fun, feel free. Sticks and stones may break my bones....well, you know the rest.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dkylep (April 20, 2010 1:06 pm ET)
             
          Well, yay, you've been to six Tea Parties. So then, I assume that you have a grasp on what precisely the Tea Party stands for. Beyond nebulous cliches about things that are easily disproven. Or are you one of the ones who holds up signs comparing Obama to Hitler?

          So do please inform everybody about what precisely the Tea Party stands for, in your view. Nothing vague now; since you're implying that you're an expert on the Tea Party movement (if something so pathetic can be called a 'movement', beyond implying that it is something similar to what floats in a toilet that is) do tell what the Tea Party is dissenting so loudly about. And also inform as to why the Tea Party isn't dissenting about things that happened during the Dubya Years, like the torture of suspects, the rampant financial corruption that lead to the recession that's still going on, or the blatant outsourcing of jobs that has been going on for decades now, under both parties. Why have you chosen now to protest against Obama, specifically?

          Oh yeah, by the way, I love how you are proactively assigning blame about any activities that the Tea Party members do to 'infiltrators' and others who want to discredit you people (as if you're not already discredited enough).
          Report Abuse
          • Author by DixieChyc (April 20, 2010 8:15 pm ET)
               
            So, you want to understand the Tea Party movement? I will take the time to try to help you understand. I will answer you first with a bit of history. Blacks and whites came together in the 1960s to support the Civil Rights Movement. The majority of the Civil Rights protestors were Republicans, including Martin Luther King. Do you think that the black Civil Rights protestors marched alone? Did they not have the support of thousands of whites marching with them?

            The Tea Party Movement is not made up of a bunch of racists, as you infer. Among its ranks are a diverse group of citizens who cherish American values. At a recent Tea Party, one black man said that the Tea Party detractors are using the oldest tactic in the book – race baiting; they are pitting whites and blacks against each other. The black people who are attending the Tea Parties do not appreciate being called Uncle Toms. However, one black male Tea Partier suggested that the name callers should read the book Uncle Tom before they continue the name-calling. He said that Uncle Tom was a heroic figure who stood up against the Democrat Simon Legree, who wanted to enslave people.

            It was mentioned that Keith Olberman said the Tea Partiers are afraid of Barack Obama because he is black. A black female Tea Partier was asked if SHE was afraid because the President is black. She asked if she should be afraid because the President is half-white. A black male, when asked the same question, said he was not afraid of the President. What he feared was losing his liberty, that his rights were being taken slowly away; because in his black male opinion, the current administration is steering America towards European-style socialism. One black speaker said he has been called an Oreo, a Token, a Sell-Out, and an Uncle Tom. He said to tell all those people who call him names, to tell them that all the name-calling does to an old paratrooper like him is to make him dig his heels in even further! He said it has nothing to do with your color, nothing to do with race, but everything to do with character; and we have no character in Washington D.C.

            What built this great country called America was not government. To sum it up, we Tea Partiers, as a whole, are for fiscal responsibility, limited government, and free markets. I, for one, happen to like the fact that we separated ourselves from Britain 233 years ago. And I do not want to see this country reattached to Europe now. America is on a precipice. We are either going to go the way of European style socialism or we are going to retain a uniquely American republic built on a Constitution worth upholding. In the manner of Martin Luther King and the Civil Rights movement, the Tea Party movement is made up of individuals who seek the right to speak out with courage and conviction, in a non-violent way. Non-violence, however, does not mean passive. It does not mean we will lay down like a whipped dog. And just like the Civil Rights movement of the 60s, the Tea Party movement is not going away. There is too much at stake.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by bobklahn (April 21, 2010 10:38 am ET)
                 

              "To sum it up, we Tea Partiers, as a whole, are for fiscal responsibility, limited government,"

              As Bill Clinton said, if you really believed in that you should not have put the people you did in office. Under Clinton the federal govt was reduced in size for the first time in decades. Reagan, Bush I and Bush II didn't do that.

              Under Clinton we had 4 balanced budgets in a row. That was the most balanced budgets in a row since 1930, and only the second time that many in the 20th century.

              "and free markets."

              Free trade is one of the biggies that is sinking this country. Free trade means Socialist country China gets to wipe our our industry. Enjoy your choice.

              "We are either going to go the way of European style socialism or we are going to retain a uniquely American republic built on a Constitution worth upholding."

              Apparently you do not understand a thing you are saying. If you think our constitution has anything to do with socialism, pro or con, you do not know what you are talking about.

              "In the manner of Martin Luther King and the Civil Rights movement,"

              After the Civil Rights act was passed the opponents migrated to the republican party. Those who supported civil rights became democrats. To invoke the civil rights movement in support of republican obstructionism is an insult to those who sacrificed so much.

              "And just like the Civil Rights movement of the 60s, the Tea Party movement is not going away. There is too much at stake."

              The only thing at stake is your position of privilege and your feeling of entitlement.

              America is on the precipice, and you object to bringing her back.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by bobklahn (April 21, 2010 10:23 am ET)
             
          You are entitled to you own opinions.
          You are not entitled to your own facts.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Sharpe (April 19, 2010 3:28 pm ET)
      17  
      Obama got 30 or 40 percent of the vote nutjob? You are really a POS rush!

      The civil rights movement must have been a bunch of rich corporate CEOs or something I guess.

      I think comparing the tea baggers with civil war pro-slavery secessionist bigots is an apt comparison. Im sure most teabaggers are in fact pro-slavery or at least their grandpaps were, they may just be racist tards.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Lord of Light (April 19, 2010 4:45 pm ET)
        7 1
        I think comparing the tea baggers with civil war pro-slavery secessionist bigots is an apt comparison. Im sure most teabaggers are in fact pro-slavery or at least their grandpaps were, they may just be racist tards.

        My thoughts entirely. I hope they're crushed just like all those POS Southern racists were. The Tea Party morons are right about one thing: Some of us on the left do want to destroy your way of life -- that is, the one where black people and minorities are excluded from positions of power and other facets of society, and where intellectuals are attacked because they don't eat corndogs with you. Hey, losers, I'm voting in November too -- and there are a lot more of me. We won in 2008 and I look forward to cleaning your clocks again.

        P.S. Because Tea Baggers say they're not racist -- or are too cowardly to admit it -- doesn't mean they're not. Patronizing a few African Americans also means nothing. Racism is an attitude, and all of you idiots I've heard speak have it.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by DixieChyc (April 19, 2010 10:40 pm ET)
            3
          I sense a high degree of anger here. Just who is the angry mob, may I ask? Is it the tea partiers? Or should you go look in the closet mirror? Do you even know what a moron is? And do you really think that all of us tea partiers are uneducated white racists who attack intelliectuals such as yourself while we eat corndogs? Wouldn't you be surprised to know there might be a tea partier or two or more who work in higher education? Some intellectuals really ARE full of themselves. LOL! And by the way, just like the boy who cried wolf repeatedly until noone came to his aid when there really was a wolf, the cries of racist over and over again are having the same effect. When you really find one, who is going to pay attention?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by politeradical (April 19, 2010 11:45 pm ET)
            2  
            The boy who cried wolf is an interesting metaphor coming from a group who has repeatedly predicted socialist doomsday scenarios since Obama was elected.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Lord of Light (April 20, 2010 2:20 pm ET)
               
            I sense a high degree of anger here.

            Correct. No tolerance for racists. And yes, there's none of that in your group at all -- not the ones yelling the N-word at congressmen, not the ones hoisting signs depicting Obama as a witchdoctor, not the ones calling him an African citizen, not the ones waving Confederate flags ... nope, none of that. Crying wolf? There are plenty of examples, but if you have on blinders, you'll never see them.

            BTW, Jim Crow law advocates said they weren't racists 40 years ago, too. Simply saying something does not make it true.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by dogbreath (April 19, 2010 3:28 pm ET)
      6  
      It's proof! He was born yesterday!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Sharpe (April 19, 2010 3:30 pm ET)
        14  
        well he did make some sense in that clip = i could not think of a better comparison for teabaggers than secessionist slave owners.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by GBU-15 (April 19, 2010 3:32 pm ET)
      9 1
      What about the Bonus Marchers in the 1930's. What about the Coal miners strikes in the 1920's in West (by God) Virginia? Pepole did protest America's against involvement in Europe until Pearl Harbor. The Teabaggers did not invent dissent with the government Rush and you know that.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Sharpe (April 19, 2010 3:41 pm ET)
        10  
        vietnam war protestors anyway?? The teabags dont hold a candle to those rallies.

        http://www.historycentral.com/vietnam/bigantiwar.html

        Of course, there was this:

        http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.bet.com/Assets/BET/Published/image/jpeg/c3bd0a62-6f29-9340-8044-dba23b5042da-ontv_fb_BHM_MillionManMarch.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.bet.com/News/Features/BHM08_BlackHistoryMonthTimeline19881998.htm%3Fi%3D7&h=400&w=536&sz=183&tbnid=l3c0ivQa2fmPHM:&tbnh=99&tbnw=132&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmillion%2Bman%2Bmarch&hl=en&usg=__4YMpnYsVAy_GFRREThlisSLiCdw=&ei=wbDMS62MIYaKlwf5hpTsBQ&sa=X&oi=image_result&resnum=9&ct=image&ved=0CB0Q9QEwCA

        And this - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7s30wFCqlw


        And this - http://newstandardnews.net/content/index.cfm/items/2404

        And this - http://www.womensenews.org/story/health/040425/pro-choice-march-largest-history

        But lets just ignore all that I guess because it doesn't fit the agenda rush is shoving down his viewers throats!





        Report Abuse
      • Author by Sharpe (April 19, 2010 3:44 pm ET)
        7 1
        I dont remember teabaggers fielding this crowd:

        http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.now.org/images/nnt/200405/march.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.now.org/nnt/spring-2004/march.html&usg=__u1O0Ue0Tn5JofLg_i0HYVYA1Zio=&h=307&w=236&sz=34&hl=en&start=11&um=1&itbs=1&tbnid=bj8iqhQQUJsJHM:&tbnh=117&tbnw=90&prev=/images%3Fq%3D1%2Bmillion%2Bpro-choice%2Bmarch%2Bpics%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN%26tbs%3Disch:1
        Report Abuse
    • Author by blueline99 (April 19, 2010 3:33 pm ET)
      15  
      Yes, the Tea Partiers are rising up against a democratically elected President who won the popular vote and the electoral college.

      But, because they didn't vote for them, they feel he is not legitimate... because he is fulfilling his campaign promises they don't feel he is legitimate

      This doesn't make the Tea Party right, it just makes them angry.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Lizinbklyn (April 19, 2010 3:33 pm ET)
      10  
      Hmmmm, everyday citizens, excluding 'chickenhawks' naturally . .

      You mean like those who protested THE VIETNAM WAR and those who protested THE IRAQI INVASION ???
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Sharpe (April 19, 2010 3:34 pm ET)
      9  
      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/19/gun-rally-second-amendmen_n_542872.html

      how about these lunatics? They want to be considered civil war secessionists toooo Rush! Why are you so pro-teabags and not giving some of that love to pro-militia or pro-gun fanatics?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by afriend (April 19, 2010 3:58 pm ET)
        5  
        Why are you so pro-teabags and not giving some of that love to pro-militia or pro-gun fanatics?

        He's not happy being the head of the Republican Party..he wants to be the head of the tea-party movement...all without getting off his militarily deferred cyst.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (April 19, 2010 3:35 pm ET)
      8  
      The right has made it clear they do not consider liberals real Americans so anti-war protestors and people like that don't count as "everyday citizens."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dimes (April 19, 2010 3:39 pm ET)
      6  
      Everyday citizens like these guys?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by 4teepee (April 19, 2010 3:44 pm ET)
      9  
      Hey Rush, it was the southern ruling class (the plantation owners) that rose up.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (April 19, 2010 3:45 pm ET)
      6  
      Sounds like this blimp doesn't consider himself " everyday citizen "
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (April 19, 2010 3:48 pm ET)
      11  
      The Teabag movement is the first time that everyday corporations and everyday PAC's and everyday millionaires and billionaires have shammed enough people into being scared of a president.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by txthinker (April 19, 2010 3:48 pm ET)
      14  
      Limbaugh: Tea Party is "the first time" that "everyday citizens" have "risen up" "since the Civil War"
      By ignoring the civil rights marches, Vietnam War protests, and womens' rights marches of the '60s and '70s, Rush Limbaugh brings home the point that to him, the phrase "everyday citizens" means "white men".

      He's a racist, a sexist, and a narrow-minded imbecile.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (April 19, 2010 3:52 pm ET)
        6  
        Good points, thanks.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Andy Kreiss (April 19, 2010 7:05 pm ET)
        2  
        "everyday citizens" means "white men".


        Not all white men, though. I'm a white man, and I'm sure Boss Hogg wouldn't include me. Angry failure type white men who need somebody to blame for their problems, these are the everyday people I think he's talking about.

        Or maybe it's more simple. Everyday people could just mean the people who swallow his tripe every day, no matter how badly it contradicts what he said yesterday.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (April 19, 2010 3:50 pm ET)
      10  
      Did you forget about war veterans marching on Washington DC twice last century? Or how about destitute people rising up during the Great Depression? Or the Civil Rights marches?

      And then, the Tea Party movement is NOT a grassroots movement anyway - it's a corporate Republican faux grassroots movement that's based upon lies and disinformation and propagandized Republicans and Libertarians.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by AB-001 (April 19, 2010 3:54 pm ET)
      6  
      Limbaugh is never one to let facts get in the way of what he calls "relentless pursuit of the truth."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Moderate Man (April 19, 2010 3:55 pm ET)
         
      "Everyday citizens?" Is Rush trying to imply that the rebel confederate soldiers where everyday citizens? While they were citizens, I hardly see their actions as normal for a citizen. One typically does not rebel against their nation...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by 1st Republic 14th Star (April 19, 2010 3:58 pm ET)
      7  
      God what an idiot.

      How about this?

      Or this?

      Or this?

      This?

      This?

      And this is only a partial list. And none of these protests was funded and organized by lobbyists.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by blueline99 (April 19, 2010 4:01 pm ET)
        8  
        Stop bringing facts that disrupt Rush's narrative...
        Rush's lies are best when taken when facts aren't around to muddy the waters.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Johaely (April 19, 2010 4:25 pm ET)
        6  
        Those don't count becuase they were all organized by progressives, liberals and commies (not that there is a difference, amirite?)
        Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (April 19, 2010 4:37 pm ET)
      6 1
      Limbaugh: ...and that's what they (the Tea Party people) are trying to hold onto. The country that they love.

      I endured over a minute of Rush's bleeping nonsense to unearth the above gem and came to this conclusion:

      The country the Tea Party loves doesn't have a black man running it.

      That is the crux of their protestations, of Rush's complaints. There may be other logical, tangible bases on which to reject the Obama presidency. But it tends to boil down to race.

      All points of order lead to his skin color. They never discuss the issues of our time. They latch onto false issues (gun ownership, taxes, deficits, the debt), issues they took no interest in under Bush, all because they cannot directly tackle Obama's main defect of character, his glaring lack of 100% whiteness.

      Randy
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (April 19, 2010 4:50 pm ET)
        5 1
        I think you've completed the circle here. In Blimpy's fevered brain, and by extension that of the Teabaggers, the "Real America" they long for hasn't existed since the 50s (except for the tax rate). That's why he can make the above statement in all its absurdity. To him, the Civil Rights movement and the Anti-War movement spoiled "his" America, so they don't count.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (April 19, 2010 5:03 pm ET)
        4  
        Well, for some, I think the objection is that he's a Democrat, and the rightwing media, pundits and politicians have demonized Liberals.

        I don't doubt that some of the objections are due to the color of Barack Obama's skin. I think many of the objections are due to the political party he belongs to and the massive defeat they suffered in November of 2008. It's vengeful behavior to my eyes, and that's due to the Dems doing so well in that election.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by fantagor (April 19, 2010 5:31 pm ET)
          4 1
          Don't get me wrong: Obama's Democratic-ness is a huge drawback. But add to that the indelible nature of his pigmentation and you have a large contingent (not large enough to swing an election, thankfully) of POed white people yelling to get "their country back," as if Obama were a Hun and they a cowering pack of poor villagers about to be beheaded by the swarthy devil helming the nation. It's just another type of "white flight," a flight from reality.

          Randy
          Report Abuse
      • Author by DixieChyc (April 19, 2010 10:53 pm ET)
          3
        Get over it, Randy. Do not make race the issue. Come on; you remember the good old Bush-bashing days! There were plenty of protests during the Bush years. Lots of vicious arrows were fired his way. Did he take offense and try to defend himself or target any particular news station? No. He just took it. At the very liberal institution of higher education where I work, all I heard for eight years was hate and anger towards Bush, and not once can I recall anyone claim they were racists for their dissent. Open your eyes to the truth! It is not about race, and it is not about a black (half white) man in the White House.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by DixieChyc (April 19, 2010 10:59 pm ET)
            3
          What am I saying? The Bush-bashing days are still here! Obama will be long gone in a couple of years and he will still be blaming Bush for everything.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by afriend (April 20, 2010 5:11 pm ET)
          1  
          It is not about race, and it is not about a black (half white) man in the White House.

          This sentence says it all....racist.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by fantagor (April 21, 2010 4:12 pm ET)
             
          Bush STARTED A WAR based on false intelligence, oversaw TWO recessions, one nearly a DEPRESSION, SPIED on Americans without a warrant, and opened a GULAG in Cuba.

          Obama moved into the White House to clean up the previous occupants mess.

          Guess which president's death threats are FOUR TIMES the other presidents? As I said before: the Tea Party wants America to return to the days when a black man wasn't president, ever.

          Randy
          Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (April 19, 2010 4:58 pm ET)
      7  
      Hey Rush,

      Sure you want to compare the Tea Partiers with the South during the Civil War?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mhughen (April 19, 2010 5:23 pm ET)
      8 1
      The Iraq war was the first war in history to protested BEFORE it actually happened. It was protested here and around the world. Go F*&K yourself you fat liar!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (April 19, 2010 5:25 pm ET)
      4  
      This just shows how little Rush knows about the history of the Civil War.

      The "everyday citizens" who had "risen up" and were responsible for secession weren't the men who were sent to fight the war.

      The monied interests and their political representatives started the war, and men who mostly had never owned slaves or even understood the concept of state's rights, were the ones who fought and died for the South.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Jeremy Danials (April 19, 2010 5:59 pm ET)
        5  
        AAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNDDDDDDDDD now you say what needs to be said. Next time these rich chickenhawks want to start a pointless war, our soldiers need to lay their arms on the RNC's doorstep and say "fight your own D@%N war. I ain't dying so you can rape another country economically.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by SBrick (April 19, 2010 5:41 pm ET)
         
      This man lives within his own reality...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by edgewaterprog (April 19, 2010 6:27 pm ET)
      3 1
      I hate to tell Blimpy that capitalism was not a founding pricipal of the country. I am not demeaning the importance of it to the country or discounting the positive things it has done.

      I think I was taught in High School that the economy was closer to a merchantilist than capitalist at its founding.

      The rest of Blimpy's comments were like so much chatter. Like listening to a big dumb squirrel in the tree next to my window.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (April 19, 2010 6:49 pm ET)
      2 1
      Mr. Limbaugh,

      To make it simple for you, the every day citizens rose up against the Republican power in 2006 and 2008. Too bad you missed out on such long ago history.

      Could it be that your back hurt during that cycle and you need too much relief.

      Your possible ongoing Oxyicotin REGIME is the only thing that makes sense anymore. No one can be as wrong as you so many times a day.

      P.S. Rush, you can stop the childlike, repetative use of the word REGIME. No one is using it. You did okay with Democrat but this is a failure. But hey, one out of thousand isn't bad for YOU.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by goonhee9633 (April 19, 2010 8:23 pm ET)
         
      Substitute "fat ignorant middle aged white people" for "everyday citizens" and he just may be right.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by JackInEC (April 19, 2010 8:55 pm ET)
         
      A little history lesson for Rush:

      1880's to 1900's: Child labor reform
      1900's: Coal strikes, and subsequent labor reform
      1920: Prohibition
      1920: Women's Suffrage
      1930: Hoovervilles, and the subsequent New Deal
      1933: Repeal of Prohibition
      1940's: World War II bond drives and other War efforts (led by the government, but wholehearted organized and supported by the citizenry)
      1950's through 1970's: Civil Rights Movement
      1960's: Anti-War Movement
      1970's: Women's Rights
      2000's: Anti Iraq War movement and reaffirmation personal liberties and constitutional law.

      I'm sure there are more, but I only had about 45 seconds to think about it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Randall Flagg (April 20, 2010 2:18 am ET)
         
      Why does anyone who has a different viewpoint on how to do things "hate and want to destroy America" according to the right wing media? It's all fear mongering and chasing after ratings and money for these people. Also they have some funny ideas about how democracy works. The party that was voted into vast majorities in the House and Senate, and won the Presidency in the last election, is somehow the minority? The party that lost, by a large margin of votes, is the majority? Maybe some simple math lessons are in order.
      Report Abuse