Limbaugh: Tea Party is "the first time" that "everyday citizens" have "risen up" "since the Civil War"
April 19, 2010 3:22 pm ET
From the April 19 edition of Premiere Radio Network's Rush Limbaugh Show:
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
















And how did that turn out Rush?
So do please inform everybody about what precisely the Tea Party stands for, in your view. Nothing vague now; since you're implying that you're an expert on the Tea Party movement (if something so pathetic can be called a 'movement', beyond implying that it is something similar to what floats in a toilet that is) do tell what the Tea Party is dissenting so loudly about. And also inform as to why the Tea Party isn't dissenting about things that happened during the Dubya Years, like the torture of suspects, the rampant financial corruption that lead to the recession that's still going on, or the blatant outsourcing of jobs that has been going on for decades now, under both parties. Why have you chosen now to protest against Obama, specifically?
Oh yeah, by the way, I love how you are proactively assigning blame about any activities that the Tea Party members do to 'infiltrators' and others who want to discredit you people (as if you're not already discredited enough).
The Tea Party Movement is not made up of a bunch of racists, as you infer. Among its ranks are a diverse group of citizens who cherish American values. At a recent Tea Party, one black man said that the Tea Party detractors are using the oldest tactic in the book – race baiting; they are pitting whites and blacks against each other. The black people who are attending the Tea Parties do not appreciate being called Uncle Toms. However, one black male Tea Partier suggested that the name callers should read the book Uncle Tom before they continue the name-calling. He said that Uncle Tom was a heroic figure who stood up against the Democrat Simon Legree, who wanted to enslave people.
It was mentioned that Keith Olberman said the Tea Partiers are afraid of Barack Obama because he is black. A black female Tea Partier was asked if SHE was afraid because the President is black. She asked if she should be afraid because the President is half-white. A black male, when asked the same question, said he was not afraid of the President. What he feared was losing his liberty, that his rights were being taken slowly away; because in his black male opinion, the current administration is steering America towards European-style socialism. One black speaker said he has been called an Oreo, a Token, a Sell-Out, and an Uncle Tom. He said to tell all those people who call him names, to tell them that all the name-calling does to an old paratrooper like him is to make him dig his heels in even further! He said it has nothing to do with your color, nothing to do with race, but everything to do with character; and we have no character in Washington D.C.
What built this great country called America was not government. To sum it up, we Tea Partiers, as a whole, are for fiscal responsibility, limited government, and free markets. I, for one, happen to like the fact that we separated ourselves from Britain 233 years ago. And I do not want to see this country reattached to Europe now. America is on a precipice. We are either going to go the way of European style socialism or we are going to retain a uniquely American republic built on a Constitution worth upholding. In the manner of Martin Luther King and the Civil Rights movement, the Tea Party movement is made up of individuals who seek the right to speak out with courage and conviction, in a non-violent way. Non-violence, however, does not mean passive. It does not mean we will lay down like a whipped dog. And just like the Civil Rights movement of the 60s, the Tea Party movement is not going away. There is too much at stake.
"To sum it up, we Tea Partiers, as a whole, are for fiscal responsibility, limited government,"
As Bill Clinton said, if you really believed in that you should not have put the people you did in office. Under Clinton the federal govt was reduced in size for the first time in decades. Reagan, Bush I and Bush II didn't do that.
Under Clinton we had 4 balanced budgets in a row. That was the most balanced budgets in a row since 1930, and only the second time that many in the 20th century.
"and free markets."
Free trade is one of the biggies that is sinking this country. Free trade means Socialist country China gets to wipe our our industry. Enjoy your choice.
"We are either going to go the way of European style socialism or we are going to retain a uniquely American republic built on a Constitution worth upholding."
Apparently you do not understand a thing you are saying. If you think our constitution has anything to do with socialism, pro or con, you do not know what you are talking about.
"In the manner of Martin Luther King and the Civil Rights movement,"
After the Civil Rights act was passed the opponents migrated to the republican party. Those who supported civil rights became democrats. To invoke the civil rights movement in support of republican obstructionism is an insult to those who sacrificed so much.
"And just like the Civil Rights movement of the 60s, the Tea Party movement is not going away. There is too much at stake."
The only thing at stake is your position of privilege and your feeling of entitlement.
America is on the precipice, and you object to bringing her back.
You are not entitled to your own facts.
The civil rights movement must have been a bunch of rich corporate CEOs or something I guess.
I think comparing the tea baggers with civil war pro-slavery secessionist bigots is an apt comparison. Im sure most teabaggers are in fact pro-slavery or at least their grandpaps were, they may just be racist tards.
My thoughts entirely. I hope they're crushed just like all those POS Southern racists were. The Tea Party morons are right about one thing: Some of us on the left do want to destroy your way of life -- that is, the one where black people and minorities are excluded from positions of power and other facets of society, and where intellectuals are attacked because they don't eat corndogs with you. Hey, losers, I'm voting in November too -- and there are a lot more of me. We won in 2008 and I look forward to cleaning your clocks again.
P.S. Because Tea Baggers say they're not racist -- or are too cowardly to admit it -- doesn't mean they're not. Patronizing a few African Americans also means nothing. Racism is an attitude, and all of you idiots I've heard speak have it.
Correct. No tolerance for racists. And yes, there's none of that in your group at all -- not the ones yelling the N-word at congressmen, not the ones hoisting signs depicting Obama as a witchdoctor, not the ones calling him an African citizen, not the ones waving Confederate flags ... nope, none of that. Crying wolf? There are plenty of examples, but if you have on blinders, you'll never see them.
BTW, Jim Crow law advocates said they weren't racists 40 years ago, too. Simply saying something does not make it true.
http://www.historycentral.com/vietnam/bigantiwar.html
Of course, there was this:
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.bet.com/Assets/BET/Published/image/jpeg/c3bd0a62-6f29-9340-8044-dba23b5042da-ontv_fb_BHM_MillionManMarch.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.bet.com/News/Features/BHM08_BlackHistoryMonthTimeline19881998.htm%3Fi%3D7&h=400&w=536&sz=183&tbnid=l3c0ivQa2fmPHM:&tbnh=99&tbnw=132&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmillion%2Bman%2Bmarch&hl=en&usg=__4YMpnYsVAy_GFRREThlisSLiCdw=&ei=wbDMS62MIYaKlwf5hpTsBQ&sa=X&oi=image_result&resnum=9&ct=image&ved=0CB0Q9QEwCA
And this - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7s30wFCqlw
And this - http://newstandardnews.net/content/index.cfm/items/2404
And this - http://www.womensenews.org/story/health/040425/pro-choice-march-largest-history
But lets just ignore all that I guess because it doesn't fit the agenda rush is shoving down his viewers throats!
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.now.org/images/nnt/200405/march.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.now.org/nnt/spring-2004/march.html&usg=__u1O0Ue0Tn5JofLg_i0HYVYA1Zio=&h=307&w=236&sz=34&hl=en&start=11&um=1&itbs=1&tbnid=bj8iqhQQUJsJHM:&tbnh=117&tbnw=90&prev=/images%3Fq%3D1%2Bmillion%2Bpro-choice%2Bmarch%2Bpics%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN%26tbs%3Disch:1
But, because they didn't vote for them, they feel he is not legitimate... because he is fulfilling his campaign promises they don't feel he is legitimate
This doesn't make the Tea Party right, it just makes them angry.
You mean like those who protested THE VIETNAM WAR and those who protested THE IRAQI INVASION ???
how about these lunatics? They want to be considered civil war secessionists toooo Rush! Why are you so pro-teabags and not giving some of that love to pro-militia or pro-gun fanatics?
He's not happy being the head of the Republican Party..he wants to be the head of the tea-party movement...all without getting off his militarily deferred cyst.
He's a racist, a sexist, and a narrow-minded imbecile.
Not all white men, though. I'm a white man, and I'm sure Boss Hogg wouldn't include me. Angry failure type white men who need somebody to blame for their problems, these are the everyday people I think he's talking about.
Or maybe it's more simple. Everyday people could just mean the people who swallow his tripe every day, no matter how badly it contradicts what he said yesterday.
And then, the Tea Party movement is NOT a grassroots movement anyway - it's a corporate Republican faux grassroots movement that's based upon lies and disinformation and propagandized Republicans and Libertarians.
How about this?
Or this?
Or this?
This?
This?
And this is only a partial list. And none of these protests was funded and organized by lobbyists.
Rush's lies are best when taken when facts aren't around to muddy the waters.
I endured over a minute of Rush's bleeping nonsense to unearth the above gem and came to this conclusion:
The country the Tea Party loves doesn't have a black man running it.
That is the crux of their protestations, of Rush's complaints. There may be other logical, tangible bases on which to reject the Obama presidency. But it tends to boil down to race.
All points of order lead to his skin color. They never discuss the issues of our time. They latch onto false issues (gun ownership, taxes, deficits, the debt), issues they took no interest in under Bush, all because they cannot directly tackle Obama's main defect of character, his glaring lack of 100% whiteness.
Randy
I don't doubt that some of the objections are due to the color of Barack Obama's skin. I think many of the objections are due to the political party he belongs to and the massive defeat they suffered in November of 2008. It's vengeful behavior to my eyes, and that's due to the Dems doing so well in that election.
Randy
This sentence says it all....racist.
Obama moved into the White House to clean up the previous occupants mess.
Guess which president's death threats are FOUR TIMES the other presidents? As I said before: the Tea Party wants America to return to the days when a black man wasn't president, ever.
Randy
Sure you want to compare the Tea Partiers with the South during the Civil War?
The "everyday citizens" who had "risen up" and were responsible for secession weren't the men who were sent to fight the war.
The monied interests and their political representatives started the war, and men who mostly had never owned slaves or even understood the concept of state's rights, were the ones who fought and died for the South.
I think I was taught in High School that the economy was closer to a merchantilist than capitalist at its founding.
The rest of Blimpy's comments were like so much chatter. Like listening to a big dumb squirrel in the tree next to my window.
To make it simple for you, the every day citizens rose up against the Republican power in 2006 and 2008. Too bad you missed out on such long ago history.
Could it be that your back hurt during that cycle and you need too much relief.
Your possible ongoing Oxyicotin REGIME is the only thing that makes sense anymore. No one can be as wrong as you so many times a day.
P.S. Rush, you can stop the childlike, repetative use of the word REGIME. No one is using it. You did okay with Democrat but this is a failure. But hey, one out of thousand isn't bad for YOU.
1880's to 1900's: Child labor reform
1900's: Coal strikes, and subsequent labor reform
1920: Prohibition
1920: Women's Suffrage
1930: Hoovervilles, and the subsequent New Deal
1933: Repeal of Prohibition
1940's: World War II bond drives and other War efforts (led by the government, but wholehearted organized and supported by the citizenry)
1950's through 1970's: Civil Rights Movement
1960's: Anti-War Movement
1970's: Women's Rights
2000's: Anti Iraq War movement and reaffirmation personal liberties and constitutional law.
I'm sure there are more, but I only had about 45 seconds to think about it.