About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Limbaugh: Public-sector union employees are "freeloaders" and "leftist, socialist, neo-communist"

April 22, 2010 2:51 pm ET

From the April 22 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Limbaugh says "government union" leaders "essentially are communists"

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by txthinker (April 22, 2010 2:53 pm ET)
      13  
      Hey, Rush!!! Does that include the union nurses who took care of your sorry a$$ when you were in Hawaii and experienced chest pains?????
      Report Abuse
    • Author by blueline99 (April 22, 2010 3:04 pm ET)
      7  
      Right on Rush... keep rocking

      Let's call these Pinkos out!!1

      Especially these guys and these guys!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dkylep (April 22, 2010 3:10 pm ET)
      5  
      You're not getting it. Such people are only bad and evil when they aren't of immediate use to people like Blimpaugh. If he has use for them in the immediate present, he'll go out of his way to ass-kiss them and sing their praises to the heavens. Partially because he's a greedy prick, but more importantly because he's a miserable little coward who doesn't have the courage of his convictions.

      People like Blimpaugh, Becky, O'Reilly, etc, are real tough guys when there is nobody standing there ready to beat them over the head when they stand up and tell a lie with a straight face. They aren't brave enough to hold to their convictions (supposed convictions anyway) when they're sick or hurt or want some new luxury. Rather like Nancy Reagan all of a sudden didn't hate stem-cell research so much, or when Dick Cheney didn't disown his lesbian daughter and supported her having a child and starting a family.

      It's all about greed and hypocrisy. That makes it more astounding than ever that people actually listen to this crackpot and the others like him. It's not like the thinking is some deep logical conundrum, or the evidence showing that they're filthy greedmongers is difficult to find. Especially in today's world, where information on virtually everybody is just a couple of websearches away (usually anyway).

      Report Abuse
      • Author by seahawks123 (April 22, 2010 3:16 pm ET)
          23
        I actually think you are the ones that are greedy. You're the ones wanting other peoples money trying to take away from others.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (April 22, 2010 3:27 pm ET)
          8  
          If we're going to decide what to spend our money on, I vote to spend on our kids and cut the military.

          Anyone who disagrees with me is greedy. It works both ways.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (April 22, 2010 3:29 pm ET)
          5  
          Hey, squawks, you didn't respond to my posts. BTW, have you ever answered my question regarding the substance of Federalist 10 and the attributed author??? I mean, after all, you were the one who told me to read the Federalist Papers. I assumed that you had, apparently, my assumption was wrong.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (April 22, 2010 3:31 pm ET)
          4  
          BTW, squawks would spell "you're" "your" and he wouldn't capitalize his sentences. You really do need to try harder to keep your personalities separate.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by seahawks123 (April 22, 2010 3:45 pm ET)
              9
            And you haven't responded to mine. Name the conservative you like and don't bash. Till then.....
            Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (April 22, 2010 3:57 pm ET)
              5  
              Oh, squawks, I did and you know it. I did it when you asked me the first time . . . two weeks ago. I've linked it to you twice today.

              [url=I found it for you . . . I doubt your computer skills are very good.]Your text to link here...[/url]

              I also told you today that I really don't have too many "liberals" that I can say I respect, either, I don't really do a political ideology check to see who I respect. I also told you today that I respect Lindsey Graham for raising his younger sister when their parents died when he was 21 and for his military service. I also told you that I find the man, probably a lot like you, who is currently trying to "out" Graham as a gay man, despicable.

              Okay, squawks. Everybody knows I've answered your question NUMEROUS times . . . answer mine. You're the one that told me to "read the Federalist Papers," I think it only common courtesy that you answer my questions.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (April 23, 2010 1:20 am ET)
                  2
                Figues that Lindsey "Grahamnesty" is the one Republican you like. Graham is a total RINO. He calls himself a Republican, but he is no conservative. I pray to God that a primary chaellenger boots his sorry a$$ next election cycle. A conservative state like South Carolina can do FAR better than a liberal like Graham.

                Graham needs to go and take those two dingbats from Maine with him.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (April 22, 2010 3:58 pm ET)
              3  
              Sorry, I C&P'd the link from my earlier post to you today . . . didn't copy properly.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (April 22, 2010 3:37 pm ET)
          7  
          Not me. I am willing to GIVE more of my money if that means poor folks in our country get health care, good health care. I'm not getting money from anyone. I make "too much" money in my job. I want people like me to pay a little more, to make our country a little better.

          I don't think that's too wrong.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by cugagcmu805031 (April 22, 2010 4:02 pm ET)
            7  
            I feel the same way. I am willing to pay more in taxes to help my fellow citizens who aren't as well off as I am. Some conservatives are incapable of understanding that if no one pays taxes, many of the services we take for granted wouldn't exist. Squawks' comment reminds me of the 9/12 rally last year when the tea partiers were wondering why transportation services in DC were not up to their expected standards.

            They had no idea that the conservative members of Congress who had been speaking at their rally were the main reason the problem existed because they refused to approve the funds to improve DC's transportation system. Why rail against paying taxes and "big" government, and then turn around and demand that the governmrnt does what you've just stated that you don't want it to do? No wonder so many on the right are so confused. Their leaders tell them the government is bad, and then they sit in Congress and thwart all attempts the government makes to do its' job in an effective manner.

            I wouldn't follow them to look at the nearest piece of gum stuck to a sidewalk.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by So Fain (April 22, 2010 4:24 pm ET)
              3  
              Same here. I mailed my check on the 15th and was happy to pay. At least this time I feel like my money is going to help the average joe instead of the top 1%ers.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (April 22, 2010 5:38 pm ET)
          1  
          SEABAGS as usual you don't know what you are talking about or make any sensce at all.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by scubcap647 (April 22, 2010 3:15 pm ET)
      7  
      As a public sector employee, I can assure Rush that I am neither a freeloader nor am I a neo-communist.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by seahawks123 (April 22, 2010 3:15 pm ET)
        15
      I just heard audio of a teacher screaming at a protest in Illinois....GIVE ME MONEY, WHERE'S OUR CASH?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (April 22, 2010 3:18 pm ET)
        7  
        Wait until your pay and benefits are cut and your workweek extended.

        Then get back to us.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pros2pros2940 (April 22, 2010 3:25 pm ET)
        6  
        Wow....very insighful.
        /sarcasm
        Report Abuse
      • Author by afriend (April 22, 2010 3:30 pm ET)
        9  
        I just heard audio of a teacher screaming at a protest in Illinois....GIVE ME MONEY, WHERE'S OUR CASH?

        I just heard the same thing from some teabaggers, wanting their taxes back...I also heard the same thing from some Wall Street bankers this morning.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by txthinker (April 22, 2010 4:16 pm ET)
          3  
          I also heard the same thing from some Wall Street bankers this morning.
          I believe they worked for Goldman Sachs.....
          Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (April 22, 2010 3:39 pm ET)
        6  
        In what context was she saying this? That's the important part. Since you just heard it, you should be able to provide a link for this right? Right?

        Yeah, didn't think so.

        Maybe it was in regards to, not getting paid diddly squat for doing a really hard and tough job? Maybe her pay and benefits got cut?

        What was the context? What was the protest in regards to? I highly doubt it was someone just looking for a handout, although, that would play into your little fantasy land.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by shaggles (April 22, 2010 3:46 pm ET)
          5  
          I was going to post something similar but I doubt the "audio of a teacher" really exists.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by christopher howard (April 22, 2010 3:47 pm ET)
          5  
          My thoughts exactly, Magnolia. How about that link you just heard, Seahawks? I'd like to hear that freeloading teacher for myself (you know how overpaid and underworked those teachers are).
          Report Abuse
      • Author by cugagcmu805031 (April 22, 2010 4:09 pm ET)
        5  
        Many states are having budget problems and are cutting salaries. Some may even be delaying payments until some time in the future. I remember that CA issued IOUs last year which meant that the state would pay its' bills at a later date. This teacher may be in the latter category. My state has told us that if we're due a tax refund from the state, we'll have to wait until the fall before we receive it.

        It's really not a good idea to post things without thinking about them in a rational way beforehand. There's more than one answer/solution to a problem in many instances.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by So Fain (April 22, 2010 4:26 pm ET)
        3  
        [http://i322.photobucket.com/albums/nn421/BilriX/troll-2.gif]
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (April 22, 2010 4:35 pm ET)
          2  
          Yeah, he's doing the double whammy this afternoon. He's the sock puppet for another of our wonderful trolls. Sometimes, he forgets and posts EXACTLY like the other one! LOL!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by marco21 (April 22, 2010 3:20 pm ET)
      6  
      Rush hating on Americans. What a surprise.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by edgewaterprog (April 22, 2010 3:22 pm ET)
      7  
      I am sure the union teachers are really proud of the job they did on you, Rush.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by cugagcmu805031 (April 22, 2010 3:48 pm ET)
      6  
      This doesn't make any sense at all. How can one be an employee and a freeloadeer at the same time? Even if employers pay a portion of their employees' health care costs, the employees have to pay the rest. Freeloading has traditionally meant getting something for nothing. Limpy is running out of topics to bloviate about. He reminds me of Bill Kristol because both of them are always wrong about everything.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by John Paradox (April 22, 2010 4:55 pm ET)
        3  
        Freeloading has traditionally meant getting something for nothing.


        Money for nothing, and Dominican Republic boys for free....

        [apologies to Dire Straits]
        Report Abuse
    • Author by 4teepee (April 22, 2010 4:10 pm ET)
      4  
      Limbaugh is a freeloader living off the public airwaves.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (April 22, 2010 4:19 pm ET)
        4  
        Exactly. The man has never done an honest day's work in his life. He sits in a studio and trashes people for 3 hours a day.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Gravity_78 (April 22, 2010 4:17 pm ET)
         
      Rush is against paying for teaches so that our kids get educated and states stop laying off teaches. Rush knows that the dumber people are the less they vote, and the less they fight for their rights.
      Rush the police say you get no service since you do not want to pay them, how does that work for you. When are you going to move out of the country like you promised use you would do. If you don't like leave, see that works both ways too.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (April 22, 2010 4:22 pm ET)
      3  
      I know there is freedom of speech but it won't be long bow and the population is going to wrestle away FCC regulations from the FCC and apply new regulations to anti american inflammatory language. George washington didn't need the FCC.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (April 22, 2010 4:22 pm ET)
        18
      Unions destroy everything they touch. Teachers unions are destroying the education system. There is no reason whatsoever for public sector employees to be unionized (they receive higher wages than the private sectors).

      Companies that are not unionized (i.e. Walmart) have higher profit margins than those that are. If the company has higher margins, they can employ more people.

      Unions are greedy and selfish. They may have had their purpose at the turn of the 19th century, but they are obsolete and no longer needed.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by So Fain (April 22, 2010 4:31 pm ET)
        9  
        Companies that are not unionized (i.e. Walmart) have higher profit margins than those that are. If the company has higher margins, they can employ more people.

        I gotta give it up. It takes balls to defend poor WalMart.

        WalMart employees don't make a living wage, get no benefits, have dead peasants insurance taken out on them and leave with ZERO real world skills or experience.

        That may be how you see this country working in the future, but the rest of us remember Rush's "good ol days" back when the unions built America.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by christopher howard (April 22, 2010 4:48 pm ET)
          6  
          "They may have had their purpose at the turn of the 19th century, but they are obsolete and no longer needed."

          In your opinion, what purpose did unions serve at the turn of the 19th Century that they did not serve, say, toward the middle (latter Industrial Revolution), the late 19th Century (Gilded Age), the earlier portions of the 20th or today? What factor gave them purpose in 1801 and what circumstances made them no longer so in 1850, 1888 or 1920? Please be specific.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (April 22, 2010 4:56 pm ET)
            1 9
            Child labor is the first thing that comes to mine. It is absolutely criminal for a nine year old to work 16 hours in a sweat shop of a factory. Regrettably this happened often at the turn of the century. Unions valiantly campaigned to end abuses such as this.

            Health and safety conditions were deplorable at the turn of the century. Working in a factory 110 years ago involved risking your life. Unions valiantly campaigned for safety standards.

            However, we have laws against child labor and there are many laws and regulations that require workplace safety. Since we have laws in effect which protect against these abues, unions are not needed to defend agaisnt them.

            Like I said they had their purpuse 110 years ago, but they are not needed today.

            If soemone does not like working at WalMart they are free to find another job. WalMart is abusing nobody. Employees voluntarily agree to the conditions of employment that WalMart mandates. Walmart is not forcing children to work 16 hour days, and WalMart does not have an unsafe workplace environment.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by ilikeike (April 22, 2010 5:13 pm ET)
                 
              in your hero george w bushs term those laws were often not enforced and the employees only had unions to fall back on to protect them
              Report Abuse
            • Author by congero6189599 (April 22, 2010 5:28 pm ET)
              5  
              I guess you've never worked in a meat-processing plant, Or worked as a farmworker. My guess is you have never worked for a wage in your life.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (April 22, 2010 6:00 pm ET)
                2  
                Except maybe a paper route and his mom drives the car for him.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (April 23, 2010 12:40 am ET)
                  4
                My guess is you have never worked for a wage in your life.


                Then you would be very much mistaken. I have been continually employed since age 15.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by soze169880 (April 23, 2010 1:10 am ET)
                     
                  I have been continually employed since age 15.

                  Is that when you dropped out of school to work at Paulie's cab stand?
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by The_Cat (April 22, 2010 11:12 pm ET)
                 
              Mao-Mart: Always Chinese Communist slave labor. ALWAYS.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (April 23, 2010 1:18 am ET)
                  2
                Slave labour is not paid. Walmart pays its employees. Your claim that Walmart uses slave labor is preposterous.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by The_Cat (April 23, 2010 11:23 am ET)
                     
                  And, have you ever shopped at Mao-Mart, Bobby Jindal fan? And, have you ever turned over the over-priced piece of plastic to see where it was made? And is that answer not most often China?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (April 23, 2010 3:53 pm ET)
                      1
                    I don't care where something is made. I would prefer something be made with non-union labor because it will result in a cost savings for the consumer.

                    I don't shop anywhere period. However, my wife (who does the shopping) often shops at Walmart. We are determined to live below our means, so we are very cost conscience.

                    We know that the s*it is going to hit the fan, so we are saving as much money as we possibly can.
                    Report Abuse
      • Author by congero6189599 (April 22, 2010 4:41 pm ET)
        6  
        Yea Bobby Jindal Fan I dare you to go to W.Virginia and tell that to the families of the dead miners who worked at that non-union mine.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (April 22, 2010 4:59 pm ET)
            10
          I would conded that you have a point with regard to the mining industry. Obviously, much needs to be done to increase the safety of mines. However, this is an exception - not the rule. Walmart does not have an unsafe work environment - therefore there is no need for a union.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by congero6189599 (April 22, 2010 5:11 pm ET)
            4  
            Well thats mighty,mighty...ummmmmm . Well I'll concede that you have no points worhty of discussion. BTW whatever became of your proof that the POTUS couldn't get a passport,or that he never wrote any of his books? Do you conded on that too?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (April 22, 2010 5:15 pm ET)
                12
              I have no PROOF that Christ rose from the dead, but I have no doubt that it is true.

              I do not have this level of certitude wiht regard to my claims about Barry, but my best guess is that Ayers wrot ethe books. I could be wrong, but if I had to bet money, I would say Ayers.

              I never claimed Barry COULDN'T get a passport. I would like to see proof that he HAS an AMERICAN passport (my bet is that he probably did have one prior to receiving a diplomatic one when he became Senator).

              What I stated is that a CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH is insufficient to obtain a passport.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by soze169880 (April 22, 2010 5:22 pm ET)
                5  
                I have no PROOF that Christ rose from the dead, but I have no doubt that it is true.

                Then why do you worship Reagan?
                Report Abuse
              • Author by congero6189599 (April 22, 2010 5:23 pm ET)
                4  
                Just as thought! You are full of bunk. Certificate of live birth is no different than a birth certificate . It like saying drivers license and license to drive. They are the same thing. Since you said a certificate of live birth is not enough to get a passport, prove it! Where in writing does it say that and don't give me this bun k about your beliefs in the resurrection. Prove it!
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (April 23, 2010 12:35 am ET)
                    4
                  Then why is it that Barry has only released a CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH (which anyone can get) and still us either unwilling of unable to release a LONG FORM birth certificate.

                  Arizona put him in a pinch. THey just passed a law requiring anyone on the ballot to provide a birth certificate. Either Barry will have to produce a certificate to the Arizona Secretary of State or he won't be on the AZ ballot.

                  I know AZ is a pretty red state that Palin will undoubtedly win, but this sends a message to all other states.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by soze169880 (April 23, 2010 12:53 am ET)
                       
                    Hey, remember when Rape fan pretended not to be a birther? Ah, young and innocent days.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by progressiveright (April 23, 2010 1:14 am ET)
                    1  
                    Because that is a birth certificate in the state of Hawaii you idiot.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (April 23, 2010 1:25 am ET)
                        5
                      Except that it isn't. Gov. Lingle has said that she has seen his real LONG FORM birth certificate. He has publicly produced his Certificate of Live Birth. Why would Gov. Lingle claim that she saw the actual birth certificate if this were not the case?

                      I have said many times that the preponderous of evidence indicates Hussein was born in Hololulu on 8/4/61. However it begs the question why he is being so secretive about it. Clearly he is hiding something.

                      Although I 95% believe Barry was born in Hawaii, I desperately hope that someone can prove he was not. That way we won't have to wait another 1,004 to rid ourselves of this menace.

                      I would be filled with tears of joy of someone could prove he was not born in Hawaii - our country would be saved. However, I am not counting on it.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by mmfa.fan (April 23, 2010 5:57 am ET)
                        1  
                        Why would Gov. Lingle claim that she saw the actual birth certificate if this were not the case?


                        Exactly.

                        I have said many times that the preponderous of evidence indicates Hussein was born in Hololulu on 8/4/61. However it begs the question why he is being so secretive about it. Clearly he is hiding something.


                        Begging the question means using the conclusion you are arguing for as a premise in your argument (circular reasoning).

                        Figures you'd be a birther, goes well with this whole made-up persona of yours.
                        Report Abuse
              • Author by congero6189599 (April 22, 2010 5:33 pm ET)
                1  
                Still waiting for your proof that a certificate of live birth cannot be used to get a passport.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by afriend (April 23, 2010 8:15 am ET)
                     
                  Still waiting for your proof that a certificate of live birth cannot be used to get a passport.

                  I'm still waiting for a certified copy of Palin's high school diploma.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (April 22, 2010 6:10 pm ET)
                3  


                I do not have this level of certitude wiht regard to my claims about Barry, but my best guess is that Ayers wrot ethe books. I could be wrong, but if I had to bet money, I would say Ayers.


                You are wrong.


                What I stated is that a CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH is insufficient to obtain a passport.


                And you are incorrect. It depends upon what is contained on said Certificates. In Texas, when one requests a certified copy of one's birth certificate, the state DISCOURAGES obtaining copies of the so-called "long form" certificate. The "short-form" or "Certification of Vital Record" is all that is required to obtain a passport. It contains the person's name, date of birth, county of birth, parents' names and the file number for the "original" record.

                You've shown your lack of intelligence again, BJ. Give it up. Go pretend to be someone special on another site. The jig's up here. We all know you're a joke.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (April 23, 2010 3:48 pm ET)
                    1
                  I do not know what information is contained in Texas birth records. However, the information on a Hawaiin certificate of live birth is insufficnet. Perhaps the information on a Texas document is -- I don't know.
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by ilikeike (April 22, 2010 5:14 pm ET)
               
            try the meat packing inductry. sure ther are laws but they are not enforced. if they have a union those employees at least have a chance at decent conditions
            Report Abuse
      • Author by dkylep (April 22, 2010 4:42 pm ET)
        5  
        Of a host of absurd and lunatic statements that you've made, this one is right up there near the top. Are you actually defending Wal-Mart's hiring practices?!? Honestly? And their union-busting tactics, to prevent the people working there from receiving wages that are commensurate with their simply living in society?

        No doubt you'll post some rubbish about how Wal-Mart is a wonderful example of corporate success and should be emulated. After which I'll post some links demonstrating the incredibly low wages, horrid working conditions, hegemonic and monopolistic price wars (which succeed in one thing, and that's putting small, local businesses out of business. You know, the small business owners that you and your ilk are always claiming to support and that create jobs. Those guys. The ones Wal-Mart and it's like put out of business as a matter of course), along with numerous other truly terrible facts.

        You'll then respond with your usual made up garbage, where you claim that it's all a liberal plot and that only right-wing approved sources can give 'facts' about things.

        So I'll save the trouble of your reply and the various ones after that and just point out, yet again, that you're a truly horrid person if you believe the things you write. You're willfully ignorant, callous, greedy, and just generally evil. You and those like you are one of the primary causes of many of the worst things that have happened to mankind in its history, and you're damned lucky that the people who actually believe in rights and freedoms aren't like you, or you and yours would have been killed or jailed long ago.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by fishgirl26 (April 22, 2010 4:43 pm ET)
        6  
        "Unions are greedy and selfish. They may have had their purpose at the turn of the 19th century, but they are obsolete and no longer needed."

        Really BJF? Who do you think is out there rebuilding refineries so they don't blow up? UNION GUYS
        Who do you think service employees are? UNION PEOPLE
        Why do you think those guys died in that Massey Mine? NOT A UNION MINE
        Skilled labor requires that people have verifiable SKILLS who spend years mastering their trade.

        Unions protect workers you dink! As the daughter of a lifetime UA worker I say to you "Go F yourself"
        Report Abuse
      • Author by peace4all (April 22, 2010 4:49 pm ET)
        5  
        nice to see that you still have nothing constructive to add to the conversation.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by soze169880 (April 22, 2010 5:05 pm ET)
          3  
          I think he's been replaced by a bot. He's not even entertainingly nuts anymore, he just sounds like he's transcribing Hannity.(I know this is a Rush thread, but Hannity is BJfan's kindred spirit in terms of how boring- and often repeated verbatim- his lies are.)
          Report Abuse
          • Author by John Paradox (April 22, 2010 9:01 pm ET)
            1  
            I think he's been replaced by a bot.


            Now, see.. if he'd been in a Union.....

            Report Abuse
      • Author by ilikeike (April 22, 2010 5:11 pm ET)
           
        go take a job at walmart then if you think its such a paradise.low pay, crap benefits, and if you do persevere and become a manager expect to work at least 60 hours per week with no compensation for your overtime
        Report Abuse
      • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (April 22, 2010 5:47 pm ET)
        1  
        BJFOOL YOU ARE A DUMBA$$. Unions helped build the working middlle class in this country and helped make it strong. Without them we all would be at the mercy of the business owners who could then pay us as little as they wanted.Its the business owners that are greedy and selfish.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by progressiveright (April 23, 2010 1:11 am ET)
           
        BJFan are you willing to give up everything that you have that came because of unions? Here is a partal list so you know what you will lose.
        Paid time off
        overtime (if hourly)
        a pension
        safe working conditions
        no child labor
        pay raises
        paid by the hour not the peice
        medical
        dental
        not having to be in debt to your employeer

        I do not want to lose any of these things. That is why I am and will all ways say unions are good.

        Walmart has been fined more for violating employee rights than any other company in history and they continue to violate these rights.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (April 23, 2010 11:18 pm ET)
            1
          None of those things came to me from unions. My company is 100% nonunionized. I have all of those things because I negotiated them in my employment contract.

          I don't get overtime - I don't make pieces - I am not in debt to my employer - nobody under the age of 22 (except for interns) works for my company - I work in an office (no safety concerns there).

          OF course I have insurance and paid vacations, but it is stipulated in a employment contract we negotiated.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by fishgirl26 (April 22, 2010 4:39 pm ET)
      3  
      Can you just see some water dept. guy sitting in his truck right now thinking to himself "I wonder if there is something else on the radio right now cause this guy is CRAZY!"
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dalebssr (April 22, 2010 5:27 pm ET)
         
      Someone needs to tell Alaska that their neo-communists. Alaska is 2nd in the nation for union jobs per capita and has a massive public employees sector. I'm sure they would love to know that they're the demon seed of Obama, muh ahahaahahhaa!!!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (April 22, 2010 5:35 pm ET)
      1  
      RUSH,You are the biggest freeloader in this country, all you do isd sit on your fat a$$ every day spreading hate and intollerance over the public airwaves and being paid way too much for it. You are a worthless piece of cr@p.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (April 23, 2010 12:39 am ET)
          3
        Who are you to say that Rush or anyone else is overpaid. Rush is paid what the market will bear. RUsh attracts a massive audience and advertisers are willing to pay Rush a lot of money in order to bring their message to his audience.

        If he didn't deliver the audience, companies would not pay his salary in the form of advertising.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by progressiveright (April 23, 2010 1:18 am ET)
             
          Not one person is worth being paid that much we need a maxium pay law in this country that sets the most any person may earn is the President and then no other person may earn from one job more than 75% of that pay and all jobs put together may not be more than 85% of Presidental pay. Also no person may earn more that 10x the average pay in the company they work for.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (April 23, 2010 11:20 pm ET)
            1 1
            I'm sure Karl Marx would agree with that.

            Companies have the right to pay their employees whatever they choose and it is none of your business.

            What about self-employed people. Should there be a 100% tax rate on anything they earn over $400K. If so what reason would they have to produce once they have sold $400K worth of widgets?
            Report Abuse
    • Author by progressiveright (April 23, 2010 1:06 am ET)
         
      This includes every law enforcement officer, firefighter, EMT, member of the armed forces. This man respects noone but himself and I doubt he truly respects himself.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jmh (April 23, 2010 12:38 pm ET)
         
      Is not mr limbaugh one of the biggest freeloaders?
      he does not contribute one iota of productive, constructive or useful output in our society. He appears to be, in fact, to be merely a scofflaw, thug, and criminal who, by the luck of the gods, has avoided well deserved incarceration for his criminal activities.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Bobby Jindal fan (April 23, 2010 11:21 pm ET)
          1
        He provides au audience of millions to listen to the pitches of advertisers. If you were trying to sell widgets would you not pay a premium for a show with millions of listeners.

        Rush's sponsors seem to think it is a worthwhile investment to advertise on his show.
        Report Abuse