About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Limbaugh: Obama "no different than Castro, in the sense that" neither will be stopped by a governing document

July 02, 2010 2:48 pm ET

From the July 2 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Limbaugh: Obama believes U.S. has become an "unjustifiable superpower" via discrimination, and now "it's payback time"

Limbaugh: "We are now governed by people who do not like the country"; "our greatest threat ... is internal"

"Summer of rage": Obama Derangement Syndrome grips conservative media once again

Limbaugh: Dismissal of cases against black defendants "the natural course of events" with black AG and president

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by nerzog (July 02, 2010 2:55 pm ET)
      6  
      But the Teabaggers have their Kryptonite ready...

      [http://georgiainfo.galileo.usg.edu/tdgh-mar/Confederate%20Constitution.jpg]
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bintx (July 02, 2010 3:00 pm ET)
      6  
      OH, just shut up, you piece of racist slime. You don't believe anything you say. You just say it for the benefit of the STUPID people who continue to listen to and believe you.

      What a sad, miserable human being you are. Are you making your mama proud, Rush? Did you finally show your dear old dad that college dropouts could make it in the world?

      Just shut up.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by GreatMonkMiroku (July 02, 2010 3:01 pm ET)
      5  
      Yeah...wait, what?
      If this were true, Obama would have done it day one.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mjh (July 02, 2010 3:27 pm ET)
      1  
      Limbaugh: Obama "no different than Castro, in the sense that" neither will be stopped by a governing document


      Limpy, depending on which Castro you're referring to, there's one important difference: Obama's actually IN POWER.





      Report Abuse
    • Author by seahawks123 (July 02, 2010 3:45 pm ET)
        14
      Obama, Casto, Chavez, their all the same. Only we will be able to fire Obama.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (July 02, 2010 3:50 pm ET)
        7  
        What about Bush? He was pretty good at ignoring the Constitution.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by wookie (July 02, 2010 3:56 pm ET)
        8  
        Which would kind of undermine the idea that Obama is a dictator.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (July 02, 2010 4:06 pm ET)
        6  
        Blimpy, Savage, Beck, Hannity, Levin, SeaSlug... they're all the same. Full of sh*t and proud of it.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (July 02, 2010 4:14 pm ET)
        6  
        "Obama, Casto, Chavez, their all the same. Only we will be able to fire Obama." -- Seahags5-11


        Obama -- democratically elected
        Casto(?) -- Fidel: not in power
        Raul: handpicked successor
        Chavez -- democratically elected, nationalized the oil industry

        Hm, no, not really . . . keep trying, Seahags . . .


        Report Abuse
      • Author by CoolSlaw (July 02, 2010 4:28 pm ET)
        6  
        So then...Obama isn't a dictator like Chavez and "Casto" because we can vote him out, so they really aren't the same at all? Okay, so they're the same because they are completely different, got it!

        By the way, is "Casto" a super-villain from a superhero comic book? I'm wondering if his evil super-power is the ability to fill molds with liquid metals and plastics, or to create an ensemble for a television, stage or film production....maybe he has the super villainous power to bait a hook and fling it into the water to catch fish?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by soze169880 (July 02, 2010 4:47 pm ET)
        6  
        Obama, Casto, Chavez, their all the same

        Their WHAT is all the same?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mjh (July 02, 2010 7:53 pm ET)
          2  
          "Their WHAT is all the same?"


          The fact that they all have five letters in their last names.

          Oh wait, that's not all the same, either. Never mind . . .

          Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (July 02, 2010 4:47 pm ET)
        5  
        Seasquawk, others have skewered your lack of logic, so I'll settle for your syntax. Their is a plural possessive, and has NOTHING to do with the verb, to be. If you want to contract they are, the third person plural, present tense, of said verb, you must add an apostrophe and re to the pronoun they. "They're all the same" (although they're really not.)
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (July 02, 2010 5:01 pm ET)
        1  
        No, they aren't. Even Rush knows that . . . he laughs at stupid people like you who believe his garbage. He doesn't even believe this crap.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by New Frontier (July 02, 2010 4:01 pm ET)
      8  
      No different than Castro.

      [http://www.pensitoreview.com/images/photo-rush-limbaugh-cigar.jpg]

      [http://www.news.com.au/common/imagedata/0,,5897345,00.jpg]

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Invent a Scandal (July 02, 2010 4:27 pm ET)
        2  
        You should grow a beard el Fathead,

        Would be perfect!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by IRONY 101 (July 02, 2010 4:32 pm ET)
          5  
          Somehow I can't picture Rush Limbaugh roughing it in the Sierra Maestra for a cause he believed in. Rush's idea of rough conditions is when cable goes out...
          Report Abuse
      • Author by phredicles (July 03, 2010 8:14 pm ET)
           
        Dude, that is TOTALLY unfair.

        I mean, when did Fidel ever visit a country known for its underage sex tourism with a "borrowed" Viagra prescription?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (July 02, 2010 4:23 pm ET)
      3  
      Yep...and then we're gonna take your money away, Rush.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by cugagcmu805031 (July 02, 2010 5:05 pm ET)
      4  
      The fact that Limpy's idol, George W. Bush, wasn't stopped by his party's so-called dedication to the Constitution and the rule of law makes this another example of projection.

      Keep trying to cover for GWB's failure, Limpy. It still won't change the fact that he was an incompetent, ineffective president who sided with corporations and wealthy individuals like you over the rest of us.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (July 02, 2010 5:22 pm ET)
        4  
        The Republicans woke up from a deep sleep on January 20, 2009. All of a sudden, they loved the Constitution and hated deficit spending. Imagine that.
        Report Abuse