About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Schultz to Hannity: "To say that there isn't any tea party racism -- Sean, you're lying"

July 17, 2010 12:07 am ET

From the July 16 edition of MSNBC's The Ed Show:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Not looking very hard: Hannity says he "can't find any" racist tea party signs

Right-wing media attempt to erase "bigoted statements" from the tea party movement

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by jediknight65 (July 17, 2010 12:29 am ET)
      5  
      teabaggers don't care because they will just try to ignore its existance
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Bongo Fury (July 17, 2010 12:36 am ET)
        4  
        Faux Nous..if you don't see it,it's not there.Anyone want to see my etch-a-sketch of "The Scream"?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by donwelty (July 17, 2010 12:47 am ET)
      8  
      Hannity says he would be waterboarded to show he can take it.

      Hannity claims that there are no racist signs at Tea Party gatherings.

      Zero for two.

      Since Ed will send videos to Hannity, on the integrity scale, Hannity is

      Zero for three.

      I was upset to hear that Hannity's early radio career included a stint at KCSB, radio station for UCSB. I was pleased to hear that he was asked to leave.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by dogbreath (July 17, 2010 9:27 am ET)
        6  
        Don't forget the money he has bilked out of his loyal flying monkeys that was supposed to go to help the troops, but surprise! it has ended up in his pocket instead. Hannity has the brain of a squirrel and the ethics of a snake - and that's being pretty mean to snakes!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by fairliberal (July 17, 2010 5:26 pm ET)
            8
          How about providing some proof of your allegations.I'll bet you can't show any evidence that Hannity has taken a dime . Here is what the Freedom Alliance has said....

          . The blog posting accuses our friend Sean Hannity of personally benefiting from Freedom Alliance. This is FALSE. Freedom Alliance has never provided planes, hotels, cars, limos, or anything else to Sean. Sean gets nothing from Freedom Alliance except our gratitude for his personal generosity and for all he has done to help the troops and our organization. We have never had to ask Sean for anything, he always generously offers his help before we have a chance to ask him. But to be clear Sean pays for all his own transportation, hotels, and all related expenses for himself and his family and friends and staff, which over the years has added up to tens of thousands of dollars. He does not use any Freedom Alliance Funds or Concert funds in any way, period.

          2. Sean Hannity has contributed $100,000 to the Wounded Warriors Foundation, over $200,000 to the Freedom Alliance, and over tens of thousands of dollars to other military charities and individuals. We only make this information public because of the outrageous slander against him. Sean has no management or operational involvement in, or control over, Freedom Alliance. He has been a selfless patriot in his efforts to raise funds for the education of children of armed services personnel

          http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2475155/posts

          So where is your proof?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Johaely (July 17, 2010 6:21 pm ET)
            3 1
            He provided over 200000to the charity he is accused of embezzling the money? now that proves it all right. And the statements comes form its own website, bring data from an inependent group and it would be more trusworthy.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by fairliberal (July 17, 2010 6:36 pm ET)
                9
              Perhaps you forgot, in this country , the accuser provides the evidence of guilt, your good pal dogbreath made allegations he cannot support. Do you approve of that? Interesting how you libs give the benefit of the doubt to liberal groups even when you can see their guilt but declare Hannity's guilt when no evidence is presented. Liberal justice, I guess.

              And don't you love the way he uses the term "monkeys", that is so evil when the right uses it, but it is OK when he uses it? Do you approve of that also?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Johaely (July 17, 2010 7:24 pm ET)
                4  
                FUnny how you now seem to live to those standards but not during things like the Black Panters case.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by fairliberal (July 17, 2010 7:53 pm ET)
                    9
                  Wrong again, I saw evidence in the black panther case and read the sworn testimony of eyewitnesses. Show me the same in this instance. It seems that you along with your good aptly named pal dogbreath cannot provide any evidence at all. And I guess you have no opinion at all about the "monkey" issue either?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by DellDolly (July 17, 2010 8:15 pm ET)
                    6  
                    What eyewitnesses? The ones who couldn't testify to a SINGLE voter professing that they were too scared to vote, you mean?

                    What evidence? The evidence that PROVES that no voter was intimidated, and therefore NO charges were appropriate? The evidence that proves that it was the Bush Administration that decided to not pursue criminal charges?

                    What a doofus.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by fairliberal (July 17, 2010 8:55 pm ET)
                        6
                      If you were aware of how voter intimidation cases were handled perhaps you would be more qualified to speak onthis issue. But of course you routinely comment on issues you know nothing about, the Arizona Law is another prime example.

                      But for your info, the civil cases usually would be pursued first to obtain an injunction, then a decision would be made on the criminal case, since Bush only had 2+ months left in office the case was left in the hands of the Obama administration, we all know what criteria they used, race.

                      http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/5560444/former_doj_lawyer_claims_race_related.html
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by bintx (July 18, 2010 2:01 pm ET)
                        3  
                        FL, eyewitness testimony which is as impeachable as Bartle Bull's and the testimony of a political operative from the Bush administration is worthless, you dumba**. Bartle Bull was a poll watcher for John McCain who had publicly stated his EXTREME dislike for Obama prior to this incident. His motives for his "eyewitness" account are suspect, at best. Also, the Bush DOJ determined that there was insufficient evidence upon which to file criminal charges and they filed CIVIL actions on 1/7/09 . . . 13 days before Obama was sworn in. You have NO IDEA what the HELL you are talking about as usual.

                        Oh,and I wouldn't be saying anything about people commenting on issues upon which they know nothing. You are undoubtedly the most ill-informed little groupie I've ever seen.
                        Report Abuse
                  • Author by Johaely (July 17, 2010 8:22 pm ET)
                    3  
                    Which was? Know a reason why the black panter case wasn't talked about during the elections? becasue it was irrelevant and affected no one.

                    And also Cultural references fly over your head, but i would have expected that from you who focus on small semantics to attack.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by fairliberal (July 17, 2010 9:01 pm ET)
                        6
                      "Know a reason why the black panter case wasn't talked about during the elections? becasue it was irrelevant and affected no one"

                      Are you serious? Since it didn't happen until election day , how in the heck could it have been discussed during the elections?

                      And what cultural references are you referring to? This is about dogbreath claiming that money from the charity went into Hannity's pocket, neither he, you or dollysue can provide any evidence of that. None what so ever, and the fact that you have not even tried shows that you know it is a bogus claim, but you just don't have the honesty to admit it. I expect that from the doofus dollysue but you can do better.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Johaely (July 17, 2010 10:30 pm ET)
                        4  
                        "Flying monekys". never heard of the wizard of Oz? and this happened in one polling station in a remote town and the police handled it. the Bush DOJ saw the case for what it was and didn't proceed with it, becuase it would hvae been a waste of time.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by bintx (July 18, 2010 2:03 pm ET)
                        2  
                        It's under investigation, fairliberal. It's not a bogus claim. It's been under investigation for 3 years. Even the charity rating site which rates all charities has downgraded Hannity's scam to "needs improvement." Very little of the money raised goes to the supposed beneficiaries. Most of it is eaten up in "administrative costs."
                        Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (July 18, 2010 2:05 pm ET)
                2  
                "Flying monkeys" were the minions of the Wicked Witch of the West who did all of her dirty work. Most intelligent people understand that reference. Racist little twits like you see something nefarious in the reference to monkeys.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by John Paradox (July 19, 2010 9:44 am ET)
                     
                  I've noticed that the wingnuts seem to have little familiarity with Culture, either Pop or Classic. I've used Monty Python, Firesign Theater, various movies and TV show references in my comments.. as have other 'libruls' (non-wingnuts). Yet, one mention from one of the top movies of all time and the wingnuts are as clueless as they are about any form of Culture (how do you think things like Beck 'interpreting' the sculptures can be more than a silly parody?)
                  So, I have only one thing to say, to completely confuse the wingnuts:
                  Rosebud!
                  Report Abuse
    • Author by clearstate (July 17, 2010 1:19 am ET)
      5  
      That's how he met his good racist friend Hal Turner. But Sean denies that he even knows him. Talk about pal'n around with racists!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mdey (July 17, 2010 1:45 am ET)
      5  
      I guess that's the talking point all the wing nuts are running with.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by canaanxing9025 (July 17, 2010 7:14 am ET)
        4  
        mdey:

        I think you are right. They know full well that they are vulnerable on the race issue, and they are doing what they do best: they are lying.

        I think a lot of people, white, black and brown, are fed up with the race baiting emanating from Fox, and it's 'political movement' the Tea Party. Fox is damaging the Republican Party. The Party Fox was created to support.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dogbreath (July 17, 2010 9:30 am ET)
          7  
          Agreed. But I think that a tremendous amount of racism is being stirred into the Republican party as a whole by people like Limbaugh, the self-acclaimed leader of the GOP. The entire party is under a mask of suspicion in my mind until they start calling these folks out for what they are. Yet, they can't because the racists and hate merchants make up a considerable portion of their base.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by canaanxing9025 (July 17, 2010 9:53 am ET)
            4  
            dogbreath:

            And Chris Matthews is still waiting...
            Report Abuse
          • Author by einreb (July 17, 2010 10:04 am ET)
            6  
            When Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachmann or even Rand Paul attend a rally, they could demand that folks carrying racist placards, dixie flags and offensive materials discard them immediately. They could refuse to speak until their request was honored.

            This action would put people on notice that racist messages are unacceptable at their events. Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachmann, Rand Paul's failure to do this is a tactic or covert approval of these messages. It's that simple.

            But then, they immediately launch into not-so-subtle racist remarks, so what was I thinking?

            Report Abuse
            • Author by fairliberal (July 17, 2010 6:12 pm ET)
                8
              You make a good point about self-policing, but I wonder why you do not mention the dems in your discussion, they have a rather checkered history of racism and ignoring it in their midst.

              http://gopcapitalist.tripod.com/democratrecord.html
              Report Abuse
              • Author by einreb (July 17, 2010 6:48 pm ET)
                7  
                The link you sent me uses "the Democrat Party" in the first and in the second sentence. I always stop reading an article that refers to the Democratic party that way because the author is showing no respect for his audience.

                About 3/4 of the examples cited happened before I was born. Probably half were from the nineteenth century.

                I didn't include Democrats in my words only because I don't see Democrats currently waving racist signs. But believe me. If they did, EVERYBODY would hear about it from me. Racism is racism, regardless of political party.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by DellDolly (July 17, 2010 8:19 pm ET)
                  4  
                  That's right - any individual party gets to name themselves, not their opponents.

                  The political party is the Democratic Party. Republicans don't get to choose an alternative name because they don't like associating the party with little d democratic principles.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by DellDolly (July 17, 2010 8:17 pm ET)
                3  
                No, CURRENT Democrats do NOT have a checkered history of racism. Even deceased Senator Robert Byrd had renounced his membership in the KKK decades ago.

                The racist people moved over to the Republican Party decades ago and still reside there today.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (July 18, 2010 2:14 pm ET)
                3  
                Wow, Fairliberal, you don't disappoint . . . you still post inane and irrelevant links to sites which do nothing at all to support your opinion. What you linked to was a blog site . . . an unknown person's blog site. Just because it's on the "internets," doesn't mean that it's factual, you twit.

                You really aren't a very bright person, are you?
                Report Abuse
            • Author by fairliberal (July 17, 2010 6:26 pm ET)
                8
              More on those racist republicans..

              http://nodnc.com/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=401
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Johaely (July 17, 2010 6:30 pm ET)
                5  
                Everybody knows that republicans originally were the anti-slavery party, but ever since Nixon and the Southern Strategy that's no-more. many of the dixiecrats (southern racist democrats) switched parties or changed their politics after the passing of the Civil Rights act. The Democratic Party of before isn't the same as of today.

                http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dixiecrat
                Report Abuse
                • Author by fairliberal (July 17, 2010 6:48 pm ET)
                    9
                  But liberal racism lives on...

                  http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/07/liberal_racism.html
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Johaely (July 17, 2010 7:26 pm ET)
                    5  
                    So you use a blog, like always, to prove your point. never a study, primary source or encyclopedia always blogs, editorials and Rasmussen to prove your point.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by fairliberal (July 17, 2010 8:00 pm ET)
                        9
                      If you recall it was a blog that provided the initial story about Hannity and the charity, I guess when you want to believe it, they are quite acceptable to you, when you don't you will dismiss them. Yup, you are a true devotee of mmfa.

                      Here is something else to ponder...

                      http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/guideDesc.asp?catid=162&type=issue

                      BTW, you dispute my links but you still have not provided ANY that prove the bogus charge about Hannity. I wonder why?
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Johaely (July 17, 2010 8:23 pm ET)
                        3  
                        I don't believe based on a blog. i never heard of that blog i just heard it from here and possibly tv. and you what's the funny thing? it was a conservative blogger who put the sotory out, not a liberal one attempting to diffame hannity (as it were possible to do so more).

                        And not only do you once again put a blog to support your worldview of "ALL RACISTS ARE LIBERALS!" the blog doesn't even try to be objective. Why would i read a screed that that goes on about the "Democrat PArty" and how liberals are all horrible and conservatives pure and right.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by fairliberal (July 17, 2010 9:07 pm ET)
                            6
                          " the blog doesn't even try to be objective"

                          Give me a break, you object to the blog because it is not objective, but you come to this site. What a joke.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by Johaely (July 17, 2010 10:32 pm ET)
                            3  
                            Because thiw website is not a blog and doesn;t resort to base childish name-calling when referring to other groups. This website has a blog and colummns aside from their research, which they back up with relevvant links, corrections and sources instead of just looking for other opinion to support their point.
                            Report Abuse
                          • Author by bintx (July 18, 2010 2:23 pm ET)
                            2  
                            fairliberal . . . there is one section of this site which is a "blog." It is labeled as such. Posting actual video clips of your heroes' stupidity and lies does NOT a blog make.
                            Report Abuse
                      • Author by bintx (July 18, 2010 2:22 pm ET)
                        2  
                        Actually, fairliberal, Hannity's problems with his charity have been under investigation for over 3 years. I might add that VoteVets, an organization whose children are supposed to be the beneficiaries of this bogus charity filed the complaints with the FTC and with the IRS. I'm sure that when the FTC and the IRS complete their investigations, there will be proof, one way or the other. Kinda hard to present "proof" when a claim is still under investigation, don't you think?

                        BTW, using a blog as proof of anything is ridiculous and shows how lacking in knowledge and information you are.

                        Report Abuse
                  • Author by PurpleState (July 18, 2010 7:21 am ET)
                    4  
                    Lives on? Only through the opinion of one writer.

                    You're going to have to provide a lot more than one person's perspective of a writer that sees Obama as a half-black, half-white man in the middle of his argument and as just a black man by the end.

                    I'm starting to view these claims of "racism" on both sides and understand the dynamics. Liberals look at the unfair treatment of minorities and call it racism. Conservatives look at the attempts to make minorities equal in society and label the attempts to stifle whites as "racism".

                    Why not call it what it actually is--"anti-conservatism"?
                    Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (July 18, 2010 2:17 pm ET)
                3  
                I doubt that you are aware of this, twit, but the people you are referring to were absorbed into the Republican Party. The Southern Democrats are no more. They took their racism to the Republican Party following the passage of the Civil Rights Act. Ever hear of the "Southern Strategy"? When I was a child, most people in Texas were Democrats . . . now, they are Republicans. Nothing changed . . . they just changed their political club affiliation.

                Lordy . . . not a bright person, are you?
                Report Abuse
    • Author by usappa00 (July 17, 2010 2:46 am ET)
      7  
      Wouldn't be the first time. Hannity is about as honest as a Karl Rove Op-Ed.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (July 17, 2010 7:38 am ET)
      7  
      Ed, no one from the Tea Party has actually killed a black person and dumped his body in a river...that we know of.

      The Tea Partiers haven't burned crosses on black people's lawns...or firebombed their houses.

      The Tea Partiers haven't lynched any black people.

      They haven't beaten any black people to death or shot any black person with a high powered rifle from a sniper position.

      Harrrrumph...! How can you say Tea Partiers are racist?

      <sarcasm>
      Report Abuse
    • Author by christopher howard (July 17, 2010 8:24 am ET)
      8  
      But... but... a deceased Democratic senator was in the Klan in the 1940s so our racism doesn't ever count!! -- Fairliberal's Intern
      Report Abuse
    • Author by christopher howard (July 17, 2010 8:36 am ET)
      10  
      Hey, Sean:

      [http://iusbvision.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/tea-party-acorn2.jpg]
      [http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/files/2009/09/racist_tea_party.jpg]
      [http://www.newyorkslime.com/tea-party-racist-signs-04-back-to-kenya.jpg]
      [http://blog.beliefnet.com/crunchycon/obama-witchdoctor-muck.jpg]
      [http://freerangetalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/ZZ56685266.jpg]
      Report Abuse
      • Author by christopher howard (July 17, 2010 8:49 am ET)
        3  
        [http://newsone.com/files/2010/01/obama-pimp-mustache.jpg]
        [http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_kC5MT2r5U8s/S3Czp45t6MI/AAAAAAAANs0/IDyKEudRATU/s320/racist+tea+party+sign.jpg]
        [http://zoecarnate.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/racist-obama-sign-3.jpg]
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jjamele2880 (July 17, 2010 8:53 am ET)
          8  
          So what you guys are saying here is that you don't have any evidence or racism either, right? ;>)

          Report Abuse
          • Author by worrierking (July 17, 2010 9:02 am ET)
            8  
            Clearly, those signs were all made by liberal plants at the Teahadist's Woodstock.

            If we liberal plants would stop going to these get togethers, there'd only be a few dozen people in attendance and half of them probably would come for the free tea.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by soze169880 (July 17, 2010 11:52 am ET)
              5  
              It's really impressive how all the real, non-plant teabaggers made them get rid of those signs.
              ...say what?
              Report Abuse
        • Author by DAWUSS (July 17, 2010 9:16 am ET)
          7  
          I have to admit - Obama as Mr. T is badass
          Report Abuse
          • Author by dogbreath (July 17, 2010 9:32 am ET)
            4  
            I agree. I think he should show up on the floor of the Senate in that garb and kick some ass. Maybe they would start working again.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by opopop (July 17, 2010 11:34 am ET)
            3  
            With the Mr. T hairdo I thought he was Dhalsin out of the Street Fighter games haha.

            Sorry, off topic I know, not much more to say than Hannity is a fraud though.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by alienofwar (July 17, 2010 11:40 am ET)
          5  
          Obviously nothing racist there...
          Report Abuse
        • Author by ProgLib (July 17, 2010 1:45 pm ET)
          4  
          Nope... can't be racist. They are just proud, teabagging Americans.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Dradeeus (July 17, 2010 9:01 am ET)
      4  
      To quote Arkansas tea party candidate Bill Roper-

      "I don't like non-whites in my country, in any form, or fashion, or status."
      Report Abuse
      • Author by einreb (July 17, 2010 10:10 am ET)
        5  
        Sadly, he probably has a future in the GOP.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dogbreath (July 17, 2010 12:35 pm ET)
          3  
          They'll probably put him in a leadership position before the end of the summer.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by fairliberal (July 17, 2010 10:14 pm ET)
          9
        To quote black pantherand democratic Barack Obama supporter, King Samir Shabazz who said "You want freedom? You're gonna have to kill some crackers! You're gonna have to kill some of their babies!"

        Report Abuse
        • Author by fairliberal (July 18, 2010 11:47 am ET)
            4
          Gee, why the thumbs down, I am only quoting of of your own. Are you afraid of your own words?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Johaely (July 18, 2010 5:19 pm ET)
               
            If you "quote" somebody without nay kind of source, its just making stuff up.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by fairliberal (July 18, 2010 8:05 pm ET)
                1
              Funny , how you didn't make that statement to dradeeus. But you're an objective guy huh?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Johaely (July 18, 2010 8:24 pm ET)
                   
                I'm talking about you to you. The same applies for him but now is that i see the quote which googling shows that is wrong. but that still doesn't make part of the tea party anyless racist.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by fairliberal (July 18, 2010 10:30 pm ET)
                    1
                  Well since you are obviously incapable of finding the quote yourself, perhaps you should view the video. Pictures are much easier aren't they.

                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mw_RKFB1z9E

                  After you watch, tell me if the quote is wrong.

                  These are the fine folks that Holder and Obama protect.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Johaely (July 18, 2010 10:53 pm ET)
                       
                    how are Holder and Obama protecting them for not making this non-issue a massive deal?

                    But something has been bugging me. what does this have to do with Sean Hannity being unable to find racism in the tea parties?
                    Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (July 18, 2010 2:25 pm ET)
          2  
          And?

          I know a lot of Obama supporters who say stupid things . . . you hate the man and you say some of the stupidest things I've ever seen in my life . . . what does that have to do with Obama?

          I might add that Shabazz said these ridiculous things on a street corner LONG before the 2008 election. Grow up and get help. You're sick.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by fairliberal (July 18, 2010 2:49 pm ET)
              4
            Your comments might matter if you applied the same standards to you good liberal pal dradeeus who equates Roper with the Tea party. If Roper is an example of the Tea Party members , it is equally fair to hold up Shabazz as an example of the democrats and the Obama supporters. After we have the added proof in the fact that he is being protected by the Obama administration. Can you show any endorsement of Roper by the Tea Party movement?

            I'll wait for your documentation.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Johaely (July 18, 2010 5:16 pm ET)
                 
              "We have the added proof that he is being protected by the Obama administration" Which is...where?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by fairliberal (July 18, 2010 8:07 pm ET)
                  3
                I guess you are unaware that the Obama administration dropped the charges against the panthers and reduced the charges against Shabazz. You should try looking into things before you open you mouth. You might learn something, but I doubt it.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Johaely (July 18, 2010 8:22 pm ET)
                     
                  You are making the accusations, why haven't you provided proof? With what Fox is saying right now i won't believe it for two reasons: One Fox only seems to live right now to get rid of Obama and two, its far too convoluted ot be possible.

                  And you should know that sentences can be reduced and charges dropped.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by fairliberal (July 19, 2010 3:01 am ET)
                      3
                    Are you really as ill informed as you seem to be? And I see you didn't mention that I misquoted Shabazz now, I guess your eyes and ears do work after all.

                    "And you should know that sentences can be reduced and charges dropped"

                    Do you consider it normal legal practice to drop charges after a case is won by default? I'll be curious to see if you demand proof of that, it would be an indication of just how ill informed you are.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Johaely (July 19, 2010 10:22 am ET)
                         
                      Of all people you shouldn't be calling me ill-informed. just like the ACORN BS this is just an attempt to create a controversy. How was this case won by default? I'm not informing myself because there are more important things to pput my mind on. this made up controversy is just like the ACORN scare and is just pure old race-baiting.

                      And what does this have to do with Sean Hannity not seeing racism in the Tea Party?
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by fairliberal (July 19, 2010 11:58 am ET)
                           
                        If you don't know how this case was won by default there is no reason to even post anything on it, you obviously are clueless.
                        Report Abuse
    • Author by cbcbcb (July 17, 2010 9:57 am ET)
      7  
      I would say that about 20% of Tea Partiers are the textbook definition of racists and another 30% are closet racists who would prefer not to be associated with blacks and other minorities and believe that they are inferior.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by teh.stoopid.lib (July 17, 2010 10:58 am ET)
           
        I think your numbers are WAY low.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by soze169880 (July 17, 2010 11:53 am ET)
        7  
        And 40% of the remainder are just imaginary people Glenn Beck used to inflate the numbers.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by dogbreath (July 17, 2010 12:36 pm ET)
        3  
        And NONE of them call out the minority for their obvious racist displays, making them, as far as I am concerned, just as bad.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by alienofwar (July 17, 2010 11:45 am ET)
      3  
      Woah Sean Hannity that's a lot of finger waggin' right there. What are ya trying to do, distract and confuse the guy so that he can't come up with any straight answers? lol.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by seahawks123 (July 17, 2010 12:29 pm ET)
      2 8
      There are always fringe elements in any group. There are racists in the NAACP and the DNC as well.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by The_Cat (July 17, 2010 12:38 pm ET)
        4  
        And do you hear Hanniry denying racism at NAACP or the DNC? No. When he denies it among the teabaggers, he's being absurdly partisan. Besides which, the racists in the NAACP and DNC don't appear on national TV carrying signs demonstrating their racism, do they? That's a teabagger special right there.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (July 17, 2010 12:56 pm ET)
        1  
        Someday, somewhere, you are going to have no choice but to try and defend, and support one of your statements. My guess would be heavy restraints and serious threats would have to be used.

        I have no doubt there are a handfull of members of the NAACP and the DNC that have an irrational moment or two of anger at someone with a mellinine count differant from theirs. They will find no support in these organizations for those feelings, but. If Faux ever finds something which can be interpeted (heh heh) this way they'll make sure to make everyone hears of their interpetation. The NBP certaintly gets more airtime on Faux than any rational liberal group does.

        Where do you go to inform your self on real liberal thought? Not anywhere actually of a leftwing bent I'm thinking.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pilotx (July 17, 2010 9:46 pm ET)
        3  
        So you admit there are racists in the Tea Parties. Acceptance is the first step to recovery.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by RKAllen (July 17, 2010 12:49 pm ET)
      4  
      Is the Tea Party a racist movement?

      Not even close. The make of the party is largely those with legitimate concerns about the size of government, defecit spending, and the economy. It attracts independents and Democrats, while appealing largely to conservatives and Republicans.

      To deny this is to be ignorant of the facts.

      Are there racist and bigoted people within the Tea Party?

      No question that there is. It is perhaps the largest group, seconded only by the Republican party, that stands opposed to our nation's President and his policies. It is only natural that a "grass roots movement," would foster a few weeds here and there.

      To deny this is to be ignorant of the facts... and yes this makes Sean Hannity a liar.

      Fighting the Tea Party on these grounds will yield no victory because it is not the experience of the average observer as a whole. Finding evidence of racism within their ranks and painting them with the same wide brush is no different than taking edited footage of ACORN employees and painting the entire organization in the same manner.

      We are better off fighting them on their policies and ideas. You barely have to scratch the surface to find out that the majority of them really only parrot what they hear on Fox News and talk radio. Dig a little deeper and the average Tea Party person will fold when they discover how little they know about the Constitution, our system of government, history, etc.

      That's how you defeat them, and it is far easier than trying to tie them to racism.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pilotx (July 17, 2010 12:56 pm ET)
      2  
      Oh Steven WTF? Thanks ALOT. You know you've seen the signs why help that doofus? SMH
      Report Abuse
      • Author by runnerin1 (July 17, 2010 5:00 pm ET)
           
        I noticed the same thing. Apparently, he hasn't seen any either.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by ProgLib (July 17, 2010 1:42 pm ET)
      2  
      "Obama's Plan: White Slavery"

      Nope... no racism there, at all. Why would anybody think that? That damn LIBERAL MEDIA! They should show how conservative they are by being stupid and ignorant.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MilitantMNMan (July 18, 2010 2:19 am ET)
      2  
      Hannity, you're neither honest nor intellectual.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by page2 (July 19, 2010 11:15 pm ET)
         
      Greeting Comrades and Koolaid drinkers,

      Boy, it's no wonder all of the liberal TV shows have such terrible ratings. Hey, are the Black Tea Party members racists too? Just curious. Since you folks obviously don't get out much, you probably didn't see the stories below if it wasn't spoon fed to you by Oberman, Madcow or Chris "Tingly" Mathews. Where was your uproar when MSNBC and Contessa Brewer purposely tried to stir up racial tensions by editing out the black man carrying weapons and saying it was whites?
      http://newsbusters.org/blogs/kyle-drennen/2009/08/18/msnbc-no-mention-black-gun-owner-among-racist-protesters

      Teacher Who Sought to 'Demolish' Tea Party Placed on Leave From School

      An Oregon teacher who announced his intention to "dismantle and demolish the Tea Party" has been placed on administrative leave until his school district finishes its investigation into whether his political activity crossed the line.

      Jason Levin has said he would seek to embarrass Tea Partiers by attending their rallies dressed as Adolf Hitler, carrying signs bearing racist, sexist and anti-gay epithets and acting as offensively as possible -- anything short of throwing punches.

      Oh, yeh. Still waiting for proof for the Hannity stealing allegations. Facts? We don't need no stinking facts!
      Report Abuse