About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Beck: "We are living in 1984"

July 28, 2010 12:41 pm ET

From the July 28 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Glenn Beck Program:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Beck: "I was wrong. Our government is not marching down the road towards communism or socialism... they're marching us to a brand of non-violent fascism... towards 1984"

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by soze169880 (July 28, 2010 12:42 pm ET)
      10  
      Well, conservatives are, considering they think Reagan's still alive.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by christopher howard (July 28, 2010 12:43 pm ET)
        9  
        Exactly. Wasn't 1984 Morning in America?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by soze169880 (July 28, 2010 12:44 pm ET)
          10  
          Yeah, but Glenn associates mornings with hangovers.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Bongo Fury (July 28, 2010 1:14 pm ET)
          4  
          I thought 1984 was a song from Al Stewart's "Russians and Americans" album.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Invent a Scandal (July 28, 2010 1:28 pm ET)
            4  
            I don't think Notradumbass even knows what day it is.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by indigo1968 (July 28, 2010 1:41 pm ET)
              3  
              Does Beck have any original thought to offer any longer?
              Report Abuse
          • Author by okiepoli (July 28, 2010 6:11 pm ET)
            1  
            No, no - Spirit!
            Report Abuse
          • Author by shaggles (July 28, 2010 7:03 pm ET)
            1  
            I was thinking Bowie but that's a good one. Glad to see I'm not the only Al Stewart fan.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (July 28, 2010 12:42 pm ET)
      9  
      And FOX is the Ministry of Truth, right?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (July 28, 2010 12:43 pm ET)
      13  
      No, Glenn...you are living in 1971. The rest of are living in the present.

      Your real problem is that you're insane, Glenn...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dmhack (July 28, 2010 12:44 pm ET)
      10  
      Wasn't Orwell as socialist?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by soze169880 (July 28, 2010 12:46 pm ET)
        5  
        Yep. Much like Martin Luther King, he'd rather co-opt him than acknowledge how completely at odds their philosophies are.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (July 28, 2010 12:47 pm ET)
        6  
        Don't know. I'm going to check with the ministry of truth and find out.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by MiniTru (July 28, 2010 12:53 pm ET)
          5  
          I'm right here. We're not.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by mary59 (July 28, 2010 12:59 pm ET)
          2  
          ministry of google truth shows that truth is indeed stranger than fiction:

          In 1949 Orwell was approached by a friend, Celia Kirwan, who had just started working for a Foreign Office unit, the Information Research Department, which had been set up by the Labour government to publish pro-democratic and anti-communist propaganda. He gave her a list of 37 writers and artists he considered to be unsuitable as IRD authors because of their pro-communist leanings. The list, not published until 2003, consists mainly of journalists (among them the editor of the New Statesman, Kingsley Martin) but also includes the actors Michael Redgrave and Charlie Chaplin. Orwell's motives for handing over the list are unclear, but the most likely explanantion is the simplest: that he was helping out a friend in a cause - anti-Stalinism - that both supported. There is no indication that Orwell ever abandoned the democratic socialism that he consistently promoted in his later writings - or that he believed the writers he named should be suppressed. Orwell's list was also accurate: the people on it had all at one time or another made pro-Soviet or pro-communist public pronouncements.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by bintx (July 28, 2010 12:46 pm ET)
      8  
      No . . . I was only 31 years old in 1984 . . . I'm MUCH older now. Things are no worse for me now than they were in 1984. In fact, I'm enjoying life just like you are, Beck. I just don't make my money trying to make a bunch of hapless listeners BELIEVE that the world is DOOMED while laughing at their gullibility.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (July 28, 2010 12:53 pm ET)
        7  
        I remember when 1984 came and went... no big deal.

        Then there was a con man predicting that The Rapture would happen in 1988... nothing.

        The Republicans predicted economic Armageddon if Bill Clinton's tax hikes on the wealthy were passed... nope.

        Y2K....yawn.

        I feel pretty sure that nothing supernatural will happen in 2012, just as I'm fairly certain that Beck's predictions of impending Marxist Catastrophe will turn out to be bullsh*t... like everything else he says.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (July 28, 2010 1:02 pm ET)
          4  
          I was also very, very pregnant with my son at this time in 1984. I was HOT and miserable!
          Report Abuse
        • Author by papa bear3 (July 28, 2010 1:17 pm ET)
          5  
          yeh, but Y2k+1 was a bytche!!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by draftedin68 (July 28, 2010 12:52 pm ET)
      8  
      The Good Ol' Days

      Ahh yes, 1984 - the year Beck's brain grew its last new cells.

      Must be a real bummer going through a 26-year blackout.





      Report Abuse
      • Author by papa bear3 (July 28, 2010 1:20 pm ET)
        7  
        . . .if he didn't have flashbacks, he'd have no memory at all,

        that's a lyric somewhere . . .
        Report Abuse
    • Author by David2012 (July 28, 2010 12:54 pm ET)
      4  
      Very, very good, Glenn.

      We'll devote next week to working on 3+3.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MiniTru (July 28, 2010 1:02 pm ET)
        5  
        Don't bother. Glenn already knows it's 7, and no one will ever convince him differently.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by cst (July 28, 2010 12:54 pm ET)
      7  
      Oh my God... Beck just made an actual LITERARY REFERENCE!
      Of course, that still doesn't prove he's read the book.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by soze169880 (July 28, 2010 12:58 pm ET)
        5  
        I guarantee he hasn't. Beck loves to throw out these references, but he clearly doesn't know anything about them (case in point, he keeps incorrectly quoting Martin Niemoller's poem as beginning "First they came for the Jews").
        Report Abuse
    • Author by TheDayV (July 28, 2010 12:54 pm ET)
      6  
      I'd say we're living more in Fahrenheit 451. You know, where the government does all the thinking because the people chose to be stupid and learning is the enemy because it makes your brain hurt.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by CoolSlaw (July 28, 2010 1:07 pm ET)
        7  
        Who needs great thinkers like Orwell, Bradbury, H.G Wells, and Tolkien?

        We got Glenn Beck, Steve Doocy, Paris Hilton, and snookie...or pookie...or whatever that idiot from Jersey Shore is called to inspire our culture now!

        /sarcasm
        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (July 28, 2010 1:25 pm ET)
          5  
          And don't forget, five (5) spinoffs of the brilliant hit Real Housewives.

          Plus, Donald Trump's Omarosa: The Ultimate Merger looks promising, as well.

          Gag.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by soze169880 (July 28, 2010 2:39 pm ET)
          1  
          ..or whatever that idiot from Jersey Shore is called

          Chris Christie?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by tbone (July 28, 2010 1:09 pm ET)
      5  
      My senior year in college - excellent. Had a light load, was working a fun part-time job, wasn't broke ALL the time, met my wife, and partied my lily white ass off.

      p.s., Glenn, your demographic is more interested in about 1954.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by christopher howard (July 28, 2010 1:13 pm ET)
        5  
        Or 1854, before they had to free all those troublesome slaves.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (July 28, 2010 1:26 pm ET)
          4  
          I'm sure many of Beck's zombies would love to return to that era, before the "War of Northern Aggression".
          Report Abuse
          • Author by John Paradox (July 28, 2010 2:41 pm ET)
            1  
            Every time someone uses WONA, I can't help but think of Tom Servo 'going Southern Belle' in Squirm.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by MaineiacMan (July 28, 2010 1:38 pm ET)
        9
      He's right. Tucked into the financial reform legislation just passed was a provision that now allows the SEC to deny "Freedom of Information Act" requests. If we, as citizens, do not have that access, as a tool to keep our government honest and corruption at bay we are headed away from a Democratic Republic and toward "crony capitalism" and a "ruling class".

      Pres Obama said he'd give us "accountability" and the most "open" government ever. This is another example of him doing the opposite.

      President Obama's administration is building all of this framework and it really ought to scare you to death....because when the shoe is on the other foot and a Republican is in office, it will all still be in place. I guess at that point you'll start crying about "big brother" and "cronies in the White House" and you know what, I'll join you then too. What's right is right and what's wrong is wrong, no matter who is in office.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (July 28, 2010 1:54 pm ET)
        6  
        I believe your referring to this.
        Way down on page ten, second point from the bottom of the page.

        This section protects private information submitted to the SEC in a couple ways from being released to the public.

        Liar, fear monger, and all arround poopyhead. Take a bow.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by MaineiacMan (July 28, 2010 2:02 pm ET)
            7
          You call that a 'point'? "Protecting Confidentiality"?

          That is pretty much exactly what I said. Keeping PUBLIC information that was available threough the "Freedom of Information Act" secret.

          Welcome to the creation of the "ruling class" and merger of government cronies with crooked capitalists that are willing to play for pay.

          Poopyhead!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (July 28, 2010 2:17 pm ET)
            4  
            Um, no, it's "not pretty much exactly what you said."

            Report Abuse
            • Author by MaineiacMan (July 28, 2010 2:22 pm ET)
                6
              Protecting confidentiality = allowing secrecy

              Obama said that this bill would 'increase transparency'. If that is so, why is the SEC now denying "freedom of Information Act" requests and citing this bill as the reason why?

              Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (July 28, 2010 2:25 pm ET)
                1  
                Did you read the section you are complaining about? I'm guessing not.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by eweston8542983 (July 28, 2010 2:28 pm ET)
                2  
                Like Dave says, you want your financial info released to anybody while a connected investigation is going on. Your financial habits, strategy, and tactics out where your competitors can see and examine them?
                Report Abuse
              • Author by soze169880 (July 28, 2010 2:41 pm ET)
                3  
                Protecting confidentiality = allowing secrecy

                Tell us your name, home address and phone number and include a recent picture or else you're a great big hypocrite and also Hitler also.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by John Paradox (July 28, 2010 2:43 pm ET)
                  3  
                  We'll also need SS#, numbers and PINS for any credit cards....
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by MaineiacMan (July 28, 2010 2:51 pm ET)
                      6
                    And when you are all screaming about this when a Republican is in charge, you'll be the biggest hypocrites of all.

                    •March 2009 – FOIA was used to discover that the SEC had investigated Madoff and R. Allen Stanford, but failed to follow through on prosecution in time to save investors.
                    •2009 – FOIA was used to get records showing that the Fed knew AIG execs would get their bonuses under the bailout legislation proposed by Congress.
                    •SEC whistleblower Gary Aguirre forced the SEC to release documents through FOIA requests that showed he was correct in accusing the agency of interfering in an investigation of Pequot Asset Management — and allowed him to get a settlement for wrongful termination.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by soze169880 (July 28, 2010 2:58 pm ET)
                      2  
                      Why are you going after Free Market Hero Bernie Madoff, socialist?
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by bintx (July 28, 2010 4:14 pm ET)
                      3  
                      I'll ask you again, have you read the actual portion of this law which you are complaining about or are you getting all of your information from the story which has been posted on Fox? Or did you pick it up from here.

                      Either way, you should cite your sources.
                      Report Abuse
          • Author by David2012 (July 28, 2010 2:21 pm ET)
            4  
            Do you think it is right that any personal files that you are required by the SEC, through its subpoena power, to produce in connection with an investigation should be fair game for disclosure to any member of the public who for any reason at all wants to see them, then?

            Because I don't.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by MaineiacMan (July 28, 2010 2:26 pm ET)
                4
              David,

              Apparenly you are more than happy to let the government decide who can ask for what. I hope you'll trust the next administration in the same way that you apparently trust this one! Because the framework is now in place for them to use it for "cronie capitalism" too!
              Report Abuse
              • Author by David2012 (July 28, 2010 2:30 pm ET)
                5  
                It's really simple. If I or my company gets investigated by the SEC, and I have to produce files on transactions and backup for disclosure that we've put in securities law filings, I don't want my competitors to be able to run barefoot through thos materials. You seem to think that's a-okay, and that tells me mostly that you don't know much about the SEC or the securities laws.
                Report Abuse
    • Author by Oldphoto678 (July 28, 2010 2:09 pm ET)
      2  
      Not me Glenn. I'm living the good life right here in 2010. You should try and catch up.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MaineiacMan (July 29, 2010 5:53 am ET)
           
        What world do you all live in? You do realize that when Republicans get in office, that this framework will built for them to use as well! If you feel this is a good bill under Obama, I trust that you'll feel the same way when we have a Republican president. I guess I'm more of a Libertarian and I dont trust either party with all of the power and control that Pres. Obama is grabbing. I feel that our government has outgrown our country and beginning to enslave the population to them.
        Report Abuse