Hannity cites op-ed by "Democratic" pollsters Caddell and Schoen to declare that Obama divides people by race
July 28, 2010 11:14 pm ET
From the July 28 edition of Fox News' Hannity:
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
















Sure, Tom Vilsack's response to the Shirley Sharrod "situation" was stupid and awful, but it was Breitbart and Fox who lit the racist fuse.
But i simply won't believe, until clearly shown, that the majority of American people are going to simply watch FOX and accept its word as reliable. I simply won't believe that most Americans will fail to encounter the truth, or something like it, somewhere in their daily round.
Even those of us who grew up with 3 tv networks - none of which was on all day - cannot possibly be getting all our news, or "news" from one source only.
The entire "racial" argument chez FOX is a bastion of falsehood in a sea of reluctantly admitted truth: that the President is not only non-racist, but the other side is pushing that head. He is so un-racist, he still lets people get away with unconscionable crap, and errs on the side of rw aggression.
The FOX argument depends entirely on people looking at nothing but FOX, and/or always giving FOX the benefit of the doubt. And i just can't - won't - believe that most Americans do that.
It becomes a constant call to action. Using racial tensions and race baiting as Hannity is demonstrated doing here to appeal to the misgivings and fears of their viewers is one such measure they resort to in order to trick their viewers into supporting the political machine they actively advocate for.
They afraid of the future and hear friends and neighbors comment on things like the poor being to blame for all of our problems and to them it makes sense. In hard times, people need their scapegoats. The wealthy by way of Fox and talk radio, have convinced the working class that it's those other workers and the poor who are the cause of everyone's financial difficulties.
I was the president of my local when Reagan fired the ATCs. My people thought he was great to stand up to these guys who made too much money. The controllers made less than the people I represented. It didn't matter. They need someone to blame.
Since the industrial revolution, the owners of industry have pitted one race, nationality or classification of worker against the others. If they're arguing among themselves, they can't be focusing on management.
Like the sheep that we are, we've always gladly ran to the slaughterhouse, fighting each other along the way.
Another bit of classic Rovian politics: polls mean nothing -- until we find one that supports our view . . .
He's carrying around a little extra weight and that's the meaning of the word "hippy".
This way we won't confuse him with another fat ass who has a radio show.
Stick to race. It's your idee fixe.