Fox calls 14th Amendment "the anchor baby amendment"

This entire group certainly marches as one. "Anchor babies" is the newest term, appearing at the top of all the Republican talking points this morning.

Okay. In that case, I'm gonna call the 2nd Amendment the "overcompensation for latent homosexuals amendment" and the 5th Amendment the "I'm only confirming my guilt by invoking it" amendment. Oh, and the 21st is the Glenn Beck amendment, obviously.

How about repealing the amendment and making it retroactive?

What do you think, Doocy? Carlson??? Why so quiet all of a sudden?

Glad to see that Retchin's legs are back.

Mostly this was enacted because black people were considered not citizens of the United States during reconstruction.

If they want to change this, then they need a Constitutional amendment.

And, this just shows their racism, again, I think. Basically, they don't want "brown" people coming here and having babies who are then citizens.

It's ridiculous, it's not going to be changed.

I wonder what " Dragon Lady" Michelle Malkin thinks of all this!

.

Oh please, let the Republicant Party use the 14th Amendment as an issue. Please, please, please.

USA is heading for elections in November. Can it really be true that the Democratic Party is going to lose to the yahoos of the Republicant Party? I concede I am very disappointed in the Democratic Party but not to the point of allowing the Republicant Party back into power.

Is it possible the majority of voters will be willing to vote against their own personal self interests by voting for the Republicant Party? Really?

Ema Nymton
.

The right seems to have taken it's eyes off the ball.

First we need an amendment that bans abortion, then an amendment that bans flag burning, then an amendment to ban gay marriage and then an amendment to allow school prayer.

Do any of these clowns understand the process of amending the Constitution?

FOX is trying to redefine what it means to be an American...in the past we WANTED to to be the beacon of hope for people all over the world. Now, we're just downright nasty and closed.

Someone says that Michell Malkin is an Anchor bay, is that true?

Michelle Malkin was born in the United States when her parents (Filipino) were here on student visas.

Openly promoting the introduction of a racial slur into the mainstream media.

Denigrating the amendment to the constitution that ended the injustice of slavery, paid for with a bloody war that nearly destroyed America.

All because they want to make you afraid of Mexicans.

Stay classy Stave and Gretchen!

Off-topic, apologies in advance, but looking over news stories covering last night's primaries, I notice that the media's disdain for raw numbers continues, and now even reporting percentages is starting to become rare. Not that long ago, stories would routinely give both raw vote totals and percentages, now it's more likely you'll see "this guy won, that guy lost, end of story" without numbers. The continuation of the dumbing down of America continues- and besides, I don't want the media deciding what a "landslide" or "easy victory" or "narrow win" means- give me the f-ing totals and go back to treating me like a damn grownup.

Sorry again for the rant, but I think there is something almost fascistic in the way we have to hunt down raw vote totals and can't expect to get them from the MSM anymore- it's as if the vote totals are none of our business.

OK. Then let's call the 2nd amendment the "big gun = tiny penis" amendment.

Where's Malkin?

The reason for doing this is the parents do come here and have their children so they can reap the benefits of the system. They are not questioned at all and handed food stamps, housing, medical, dental, free lunches at school, the list goes on and on. The people of whatever state they decide to park their backsides in is footing the bill for them and their children. I've see it and see it everyday, I know for a fact, they are eating better than my family is, the food stamps we supply them (over $1000 a month for a family of 5) with is more than I can afford to spend on my family a month (approximatly $500 a month for a family of 4), I'm eating hamburger and they're eating T-bones, but please remember that we are feeding them free breakfasts and lunches at school, even during the summer. Oh and we clothe their children on our dime too, they go down at the beginning of the school year and pick up underwear, socks, clothes, shoes, backpacks and school supples for nothing, zero, while I'm down at the store buying every single item. Let's not forget also that they are all working to, but you either have a fake social security number, or are being paid under the table, you or I can't do that or we go to jail, they just move. There are enough people we need to help that we should be taking care of our own. Come legal and if you need help come on, but sneak accross the border, then I pay for you and your children to eat, be educated, home, ect...that I have a problem with. A month or so ago, we had the school stats for the state of Texas come out, our school system is made up of 66% minorities.....still can't figure out if their are more of you, how are you the minority???? I believe most people who do not understand why the border states want help is because they are states no where near the border....with no understanding of the rate with which they are coming accross border. I watch the news and personally think they are now even showing a fraction of whats really going on down here at the border.

will ms. malking comment on this?

As an "anchor baby" myself, I find the term incredibly dehumanizing and offensive. It isn't factual at all in the sense that my own birth-based citizenship had no bearing on my parents, who worked their a**es off and sacrificed everything for their little "anchor babies". There was no "anchoring" in my family. It took my mom decades to become a citizen; they both learned English and are now citizens.

If you call me that in person, better be prepared to join me in jail or the hospital. I can assure you that each of us will end up in one or the other, or both. Also be careful about who is in earshot if you use that term in public. If it's me, again, be prepared for all the social services you're going to need.