Limbaugh: Republicans are "trying to save" "our society" by opposing Islamic community center

I think its to save all those brave neocons from the awful threatening brown folk.

Those bed wetting, size extra large, assult rifle wielding, scared of shadows neocons. What would we do without their manly example of true strong, yet somehow fragile american society.

And yet, they'll never accept responsibility.

No, SeaSnorkel, we Libruls can disbelieve a religion and still defend the First Amendment rights of its adherents. Neat trick, huh?

Sorry you can't do stuff like that... Binary Thinking, you know.

You have absolutely no clue as to what's "normal" for anyone.

Don't you know we do it just to tweak conservatives? ;)

We leftists defend everyone's Constitional rights.

seastain, I thought you were still in booking after that incident last night.

I'm a passionate Christian seahawks.

Squawks, believe it or not, faux conservatives like you don't have the religious market cornered. [I really doubt, based upon your twisted comments regarding Christianity, you're very religious at all.] Your comment is, as usual, ridiculously stupid and devoid of any facts AT ALL. I'll just pass it along to all of the theologians at our local Baptist university at church on Sunday. They'll get a kick out of your stupidity . . . most of them are Democrats.

Once again, seahawks123 proves he has no idea what he is talking about.

I am strong true Christian and very left. The Bible is socialistic and Israel has some of the most successful communist communities in the world. These communities are kibbutzes and almost every Israeli national leader has come from one. There is a large religious left group in this country and we are growing.

media matters (for very little)...

And you count for nothing.

Well, see... Rauf thought building a community center was a way to build bridges. Silly Imam...he didn't foresee the FOXbot a$$holes using it as a phony wedge issue to agitate the brain dead Republican base.

Nobody cared about this community center being built back in December. The neighborhood approved of it. Laura Ingraham even gave it a thumbs up. Nobody gave a crap until Pam Geller started her nonsense. It's an artificial controversy, a wedge issue to keep the lower class divided against itself and hand the GOP an electoral windfall. Nothing more. Hopefully there comes a day when we won't fall for cynical ploys like this.

"He went on to say how the US has become more tolerant of religious diversity "
If you're referring to his "How can America be Islamaphobic if the evil liberals managed to vote in that secret Muslim Manchurean Candidate" comment, that has it's own thread.

Oh, OK, I get it... Martin Luther King should have been more sympathetic and receptive to the sentiments of those who wanted to deny colored people their civil rights.

According to the dear imam, these victims are few and far between

This is a lie. He never said that, he said American foreign policy was responsible for more civilian deaths than Al-Qaeda. That's a fact.
And for the record, your "clarification" is just as stupid. So if Muslims want to be tolerated, white Christians get full veto power over everything they do. How American of you.

He went on to say how the US has become more tolerant of religious diversity throughout the years. They only ask for tolerance in return

And this changed his bigotry how?

Sorry, fauxconservative, but tolerance for religious diversity was part of this country from the BEGINNING. Folks like you and Rush seem to think that Muslims have to ask permission to be here and that they have to EARN their right to worship in this country. According to the Constitution [you know, that document you claim to support], no one has to ask ANYONE for permission to worship or not worship in any way or in any place they wish. This outrage is being fueled by purely political motives by the faux conservative entertainers on Fox/hate talk radio. They know that their faux conservative followers [you] will believe whatever BS they shovel.

the US has become more tolerant of religious diversity throughout the years. They only ask for tolerance in return.

Given that we have freedom of religion right there in that Constitution-thingie (that you conservatives claim to be so fond of), we don't get to ask for ANYTHING "in return" for being tolerant of religious diversity.

"They only ask for tolerance in return."

Nope, you're either lying or ignorant.

They aren't asking for tolerance in return.

They're asking to be allowed to DENY the peaceful Sufi sect, who ARE Americans, their constitutionally-granted right to build a religious-themed structure anyplace that zoning regulations allow!

This group should NOT do that. They shouldn't "tolerate" that restriction, ANY restriction, on their freedom to express their religion in whatever way they see fit! One has the freedom to express oneself until it starts significantly impigning on another person's freedoms. But you don't have the 'freedom' to insist that your bigotry needs to be "tolerated" in such a way that it would prevent this group from builing where they want to build!

Wow, proudconservative, that has to be some of the most azz-backwards double talk I've seen in a long time. I understand you're just repeating Rush's drivel, but he's doing it on the fly, you actually got to see it in writing and still posted it.

You really were unable to see the flaws in Blimpy's logic there ? You don't see the idiocy of claiming that the U.S. is very "tolerant", then going on to say that all they ask in return for that tolerance is a little tolerance of their intolerance ?

Rush Limbaugh has the easiest job in the world- BS-ing people like you.

No, see, the way you save society is by using divisive wedge issues and cutting taxes.

Will the two trolls on this thread a) condemn this, b)find a way to blame the victim, or c) demonstrate the amazing talent of their trained crickets?