Special Report: Fox has agreed to run MMFA ad higlighting News Corp donation to RGA
Bret Baier says the $1 million donation was "a surprise to us -- to many of us"
September 01, 2010 7:04 pm ET
From the September 1 edition of Fox News' Special Report with Bret Baier:
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

















The whole interview with Barbour felt like a complete wink-and-a-nod moment. As if we all don't know that the Repubican Party isn't completely owned by the monster it has created in FOX.
Really? Wow. That's so unexpected. After News Corp has given them $1,000,000 Barbour is pretty certain his group will receive the same kind of preferential treatment from Fox News that they've always received.
I'm pretty certain we here expected that, too.
My fiancé and I are going to begin canvassing in my neighborhood in about 2 weeks, and then we'll go over to his side of town and repeat the process.
Once you hang a name, face and ideology on the rogues' gallery the GOP is trying to con people into voting for, things are suddenly not so gloomy for Democrats.
Randy
I understand and share your frustration and apprehension at them taking Congress back over because of propaganda and dirty politics, but I'll still hope for them to continue our country's recovery.
But if the balance shifts, I'll still hope that things go right.
I'll be doing all I can to ensure they don't, of course.
I think that the GOP has problems with the tea party candidates. Moderates and many true conservatives won't vote for these crazy people.
1. As disenchanted as Dems may be, they pay attention and understand that they must vote to hold power, and they will.
2. Tea Party is fighting with GOP in many races and will take votes from them, and discourage GOP voters.
While News Corporation has used its political action committee to shower Democrats with campaign contributions, the total of those donations is dwarfed by the $1 million check it cut to the RGA.
Data collected by CQ Moneyline shows that News Corporation, through its political action committee, has contributed over $105,500 to Democratic candidates in the 2010 election cycle, while donating $74,700 to Republicans during the same time period. News Corporation's PAC has also donated $7,500 to Democratic-affiliated leadership PACs and $14,500 to GOP-related PACs. News Corporation, owned by Rupert Murdoch, has also given a total of $45,000 to other Democratic and Republican committees.
On the Democratic side, that includes $30,000 to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and $15,000 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. As for Republicans, News Corporation donated $30,000 to the National Republican Congressional Committee and $15,000 to the National Republican Senatorial Committee.
A corporation's PAC is subject to a maximum spending limit of $5,000 per candidate per year and $15,000 per political party per year.
News Corporation is not alone among media corporations who donated to political parties and candidates, ultimately raising the issue of whether media companies and politics should mix.
"This is one piece of the puzzle that the public should consider when they are viewing coverage of politics," said Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics.
General Electric, which owns NBC, has also made substantial political contributions in the 2010 election cycle. For example, GE donated $688,900 to Democrats through its PAC this election cycle compared to $410,100 to Republicans. The company has also given $75,500 to Democratic-affiliated leadership PACs and $74,500 to Republican-affiliated leadership PACs.
Meanwhile, GE has donated $237,000 to the Democratic Governors Association and $205,000 to the Republican Governors Association"
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/08/17/fox-news-takes-heat-for-news-corporations-gop-donation/
Thousands of dollars... as opposed to a million dollars... He(Hotwings) is technically correct, but the scale of the donation given to the RGA is signifigantly larger... Like, and order of magnitude larger...