About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Special Report: Fox has agreed to run MMFA ad higlighting News Corp donation to RGA

Bret Baier says the $1 million donation was "a surprise to us -- to many of us"

September 01, 2010 7:04 pm ET

From the September 1 edition of Fox News' Special Report with Bret Baier:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

FoxPAC: Fox News' Corporate Parent Gave Republican Governors Association $1 Million

Burns: News Corp. Is "Doing Everything The RNC Should Be Doing, They Just Do It A Lot Better"

Did The Donation Violate Company Policy?

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by dogbreath (September 01, 2010 7:11 pm ET)
      15 3
      Wouldn't you think they might want to interview Media Matters since they are the one's wanting to do the ad?

      The whole interview with Barbour felt like a complete wink-and-a-nod moment. As if we all don't know that the Repubican Party isn't completely owned by the monster it has created in FOX.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MidnightWriter (September 01, 2010 7:16 pm ET)
        10 1
        And what a stunning revelation the interview contained. Barbour doesn't think Fox News will cover the RGA any differently.

        Really? Wow. That's so unexpected. After News Corp has given them $1,000,000 Barbour is pretty certain his group will receive the same kind of preferential treatment from Fox News that they've always received.

        I'm pretty certain we here expected that, too.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (September 01, 2010 7:15 pm ET)
      3  
      Doesn't matter anymore. The republicans are sure to win the house and quite sure toi win the senate. They are salivating perhaps too soon ?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by dogbreath (September 01, 2010 7:22 pm ET)
        12 1
        I don't think the Republicans are going to win as big as the media is predicting. I just don't buy that Americans are that ticked off that they are willing to turn the Congress back over to the guys that got us in this predicament to begin with. However, losing the Congress in the short run might be better for the Dems come 2012, as the Republicans are sure to do nothing and I am not sure that is going to go over well with the electorate.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by cugagcmu805031 (September 02, 2010 12:27 am ET)
          6 1
          I think that the people conducting the polls don't understand progressives as well as they think they do. I vote in almost every election, but I don't see any reason to swing from the rafters and put on a show to illustrate how enthusiastic I am about voting for a particular candidate. I just show up at the polls and vote. I also think that some in the media are using the "enthusiasm gap" to hype republican candidates. They don't have a plan that is any different than the one GWB had. I am in no way demoralized about the way things are going in the country to a point that would cause me not to vote. I know why things haven't improved as quickly as they should have: republican obstructionism.

          My fiancé and I are going to begin canvassing in my neighborhood in about 2 weeks, and then we'll go over to his side of town and repeat the process.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by fantagor (September 03, 2010 2:28 am ET)
            2  
            Agreed. Who cares what the attitude of the voter is so long as he or she votes. Also, the generic Republican vs. generic Democrat polls are absolutely worthless dreck. Nobody votes for FILL IN THE BLANK. They vote for a specific name with a specific public persona.

            Once you hang a name, face and ideology on the rogues' gallery the GOP is trying to con people into voting for, things are suddenly not so gloomy for Democrats.

            Randy
            Report Abuse
        • Author by mjlilgui (September 02, 2010 10:02 am ET)
          2 1
          I'd rather the country turn around under Republican rule than suffer through another recession. I'd rather not score political points at the expense of the country. That's something Newt Gingrich, Rush, Beck et al are banking on, and that kind of thinking is woefully backwards.

          I understand and share your frustration and apprehension at them taking Congress back over because of propaganda and dirty politics, but I'll still hope for them to continue our country's recovery.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by txthinker (September 02, 2010 11:01 am ET)
            4 1
            I'd rather the country turn around under Republican rule than suffer through another recession.
            Republican rule would move this country from recession to depression. With no way out, since former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan reduced interest reates to near-zero in an attempt to keep the economy afloat the LAST time the Republicans were calling the shots.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mjlilgui (September 02, 2010 11:05 am ET)
              2  
              I know, and I don't disagree with you. I was ecstatic with the change of parties in 2006 and 2008.

              But if the balance shifts, I'll still hope that things go right.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by mjlilgui (September 02, 2010 11:06 am ET)
              2 1
              I just realized I worded my post poorly. I wasn't implying that the democrats would cause a recession. I meant I would hope that we wouldn't experience another IF Republicans took control.

              I'll be doing all I can to ensure they don't, of course.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (September 01, 2010 7:24 pm ET)
        12  
        The media has also been saying that there is a strong anti-incumbent mood. Less than 10 incumbents have been beaten out of the 300+ up for re-election.

        I think that the GOP has problems with the tea party candidates. Moderates and many true conservatives won't vote for these crazy people.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dogbreath (September 01, 2010 7:30 pm ET)
          9  
          My husband is a Republican and says that the only thing worse than the Dems in office now are the crazed lunatics that are running on the Republican ticket throughout the country. I thought that was pretty funny coming from someone who always votes Republican. I think he might leave a few spots blank on his ballot this year.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by cugagcmu805031 (September 02, 2010 12:33 am ET)
            3 1
            In our last year on the job before we retired, my co-worker's republican husband voted for democrats because he finally saw how crazy republicans are. She told me that he said he didn't understand why he had been voting for them for over 30 years. I think he had been preoccupied with running his business all of those years, but after he retired he had more time to really pay attention to how incompetent they are. Their antics in 2008 really turned him off.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by StPete (September 04, 2010 10:08 am ET)
           
        I wouldn't be so sure the Dems will lose as badly as pundits predict for two reasons.

        1. As disenchanted as Dems may be, they pay attention and understand that they must vote to hold power, and they will.

        2. Tea Party is fighting with GOP in many races and will take votes from them, and discourage GOP voters.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (September 01, 2010 7:16 pm ET)
      4  
      Lemme guess, it'll be aired once, during Red Eye, where only OlbermannWatch.com sees it.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ajzito (September 03, 2010 1:26 pm ET)
           
        I think they just want to get a clean copy of the commercial so they can slice and dice it during some 'news' segment. They can withdraw a commercial at the last minute under any number of pretexts.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by HotWings (September 03, 2010 12:04 am ET)
        1
      News Corp has also given a lot of money to Democrats too.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Ro (September 03, 2010 4:36 am ET)
        2  
        Post proof or retract.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Major Tom (September 03, 2010 3:57 pm ET)
             
          "Bloomberg was the first to report the contribution, based on the RGA's Internal Revenue Service filings. A review of the News Corporation IRS filings by CNN shows that a subsidiary of the company called News America Inc. made additional donations to both Democrats and Republicans in the 2010 election cycle, including $50,000 to the Democratic Attorneys General Association and $65,000 to the Republican State Leadership Committee. Those committees, as well as their Democratic counterparts, are 527 groups, meaning they are not subject to campaign finance contribution limits.

          While News Corporation has used its political action committee to shower Democrats with campaign contributions, the total of those donations is dwarfed by the $1 million check it cut to the RGA.

          Data collected by CQ Moneyline shows that News Corporation, through its political action committee, has contributed over $105,500 to Democratic candidates in the 2010 election cycle, while donating $74,700 to Republicans during the same time period. News Corporation's PAC has also donated $7,500 to Democratic-affiliated leadership PACs and $14,500 to GOP-related PACs. News Corporation, owned by Rupert Murdoch, has also given a total of $45,000 to other Democratic and Republican committees.

          On the Democratic side, that includes $30,000 to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and $15,000 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. As for Republicans, News Corporation donated $30,000 to the National Republican Congressional Committee and $15,000 to the National Republican Senatorial Committee.

          A corporation's PAC is subject to a maximum spending limit of $5,000 per candidate per year and $15,000 per political party per year.

          News Corporation is not alone among media corporations who donated to political parties and candidates, ultimately raising the issue of whether media companies and politics should mix.

          "This is one piece of the puzzle that the public should consider when they are viewing coverage of politics," said Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics.

          General Electric, which owns NBC, has also made substantial political contributions in the 2010 election cycle. For example, GE donated $688,900 to Democrats through its PAC this election cycle compared to $410,100 to Republicans. The company has also given $75,500 to Democratic-affiliated leadership PACs and $74,500 to Republican-affiliated leadership PACs.

          Meanwhile, GE has donated $237,000 to the Democratic Governors Association and $205,000 to the Republican Governors Association"

          http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/08/17/fox-news-takes-heat-for-news-corporations-gop-donation/

          Thousands of dollars... as opposed to a million dollars... He(Hotwings) is technically correct, but the scale of the donation given to the RGA is signifigantly larger... Like, and order of magnitude larger...
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Major Tom (September 03, 2010 3:58 pm ET)
           
        Depends what you mean by 'a lot.'
        Report Abuse
    • Author by StPete (September 04, 2010 9:54 am ET)
         
      The dollar value of News Corp's contributions to both parties is minimal compared to the dollar value of their daily GOP propaganda. By donating to the Democratic Party, News Corp simply buys itself a little cover.
      Report Abuse