About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Fox's Cameron: On Park51, Obama is "sort of hiding behind" fact there's no law that "prevents people from being stupid"

September 10, 2010 9:05 pm ET

From the September 10 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Fox's Johnson asks if Park51 developers should "give up their First Amendment rights"

Kilmeade: "Yeah, you can build" Park51, "but how dumb"

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Quicksilver M.S (September 10, 2010 9:19 pm ET)
      7  
      Cameron: On Park51, Obama is "sort of hiding behind" fact there's no law that "prevents people from being stupid"

      [http://quicksilver-messenger.s.tripod.com/quicksilvers_photos/thumbnails/400x300/barracada_award.jpg]
      Report Abuse
    • Author by John Paradox (September 10, 2010 9:20 pm ET)
      8  
      That's why there's Faux News.

      BTW.. check out what was on the 17th floor of the South Tower of the WTC.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by aj6525 (September 10, 2010 10:11 pm ET)
        3  
        Thank you for the link. Very interesting.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by dogbreath (September 10, 2010 10:37 pm ET)
        3  
        Wow. Some people are going to start protesting.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by aBeck in 10-O-C (September 11, 2010 1:21 am ET)
        8  
        Holy cow JP. A few weeks ago, when people were trying to portray Park51 as a "mosque" for having prayer space, I tried google researching to see if there was a chapel or similar prayer space in the WTC and I turned up nothing and let it go.

        The revelation of a 'mosque" inside the South Tower is unbearable irony in the context of the current ridiculous controversy. My brain is exploding.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 11, 2010 1:23 am ET)
        3  
        So it was an inside job ! </ very distasteful sarc>
        Report Abuse
    • Author by clearstate (September 10, 2010 9:24 pm ET)
      3  
      That's why you have Fox to be stupid for you.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Bongo Fury (September 10, 2010 9:34 pm ET)
        3  
        Fox is an advanced course in the art of stupidity and gullibility.Projection protection maybe?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Andy Kreiss (September 11, 2010 1:27 am ET)
        4  
        This one's too easy, a hanging curve ball. Fox making a point of the fact that there's no law against teh stoopid ? They actually fought in court for the right to be stoopid.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mescal (September 11, 2010 1:55 am ET)
          5  
          To be fair, Faux was also fighting for their right to be dishonest.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Unreality (September 11, 2010 2:21 am ET)
            4  
            Actually, they merely want to be profitable. THey are amoral.

            Stupid, dishonest, bizarro, blonde meat puppets, Hooter's chicks -- the content is irrelevant. If they could be more profitable being honest and accurate they'd do that. But honest and accurate news requires lots of people to make it work, so it's less profitable.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mescal (September 11, 2010 3:26 am ET)
              5  
              Excellent point, N_I. As both Raymond Chandler and then Woodward and Bernstein were able to figure out, always "follow the money". By relentlessly lying and appealing to the bigotries and intellectual deficiencies of its target audience, Faux News has been able to regularly rack up high ratings and big advertising dollars. It has also been able to establish a profitably symbiotic relationship with the Republican Party.

              The Pugs... under Reagan... had dispensed with the Fairness Doctrine, as well as the long established limitations on the number and types of media outlets that large corporations were allowed to hold. These laws had been designed to prevent any few large corporate behemoths from completely dominating the market at the expense of the American public's ability to experience diverse intellectual and political points of view. The Pugs, through their shredding of these long established protections, had made the very existence of Faux News possible, and has been rewarded ever since by Faux's incessant cheerleading and relentless promotion of demonstrably false right wing memes. Faux has nakedly and unashamedly served as the central propaganda wing of the Republican Party, as well as chief advocate for America's fast swelling plutocracy.

              Anyone familiar with Lewis Carroll should know that it is Faux News that should be singing 'I am the Walrus', as they lead their audience of angry and deluded oysters to lunch.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by John Paradox (September 11, 2010 4:31 am ET)
                4  
                Anyone familiar with Lewis Carroll should know that it is Faux News that should be singing 'I am the Walrus', as they lead their audience of angry and deluded oysters to lunch.


                To expand: Jesus was a carpenter (or at least the son of one). Seems he's oft invoked.

                the long established limitations on the number and types of media outlets that large corporations were allowed to hold.


                THAT's much more important that the FD. I usually worked for small operations (think WKRP on acid), and really disliked when the newspaper/TV/Radio limits were pulled.

                By relentlessly lying and appealing to the bigotries and intellectual deficiencies of its target audience, Faux News has been able to regularly rack up high ratings and big advertising dollars.


                Think of this (and I apologize for being binary) as if there were two different types of 'news consumers'.

                One is the 'hit and run' who hears the news on the car radio, checks out part of the newspaper (or uses a site that consolidates various sources.. e.g. Google News), watches the TV Big 3 Newscasts, and local, and they get bits and pieces from various sources.
                On the Internet, they read various blogs and sources if they are interested in the subject (e.g. Sports, Tech, Politics). They will use primary (or secondary with links or information on primary) sources.

                The other would be the 'sit and consume' who keeps the car radio on AM "Talk", reads few papers (probably the only local?), watches FOX, so there's pretty much a constant beat of the same views (see: Fox News Memo)
                They will get information from only specific blogs or sites on the Internet, and use them as standard references instead of primary sources (except when the blog is the primary source)

                enough rant

                Report Abuse
    • Author by cugagcmu805031 (September 10, 2010 11:14 pm ET)
      6  
      I thought these guys were supposed to be so smart. Based on what the president said in his presser today, he's not hiding behind anything. I would say that he's standing on the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, the rule of law, and American principles and values.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by grmce (September 11, 2010 3:55 am ET)
      3  
      there's no law that "prevents people from being stupid"
      Well that keeps Mr. Cameron safe.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rtejon (September 11, 2010 7:11 am ET)
      2  
      And Fox enjoys a 2000 court decision that affirms its right to lie.
      Report Abuse