Limbaugh defends O'Donnell's evolution views and attacks Darwin

What Darwin meant to say was "Survival Of The Fattest". That better explains the existence of the Blimp.

Impossible.

I liked the part where Blimpy the Chimp referred to himself as an "advanced human" right in the middle of demonstrating that he doesn't understand evolution.

In fact, I thought that was going to be the highlight for me, until he says;

" Now, I know, evolution is Darwin."

Where most people who were able to keep up with the rest of the class at least through high school know that evolution is natural science, El Rushbo thinks it's something invented by Darwin.

Tomorrow's lesson: Electricity is Ben Franklin.

Don't forget the morons who think that man used to ride dinosaurs with saddles:

Gravity is not Blimpy's friend.

Well...O'Donnell IS brain dead.

Honestly, I agree with those who say that those who deny evolution should be disqualified from public office because they may be in the position to make important decisions regarding science and education.

No wonder she keeps running for office over and over. It's the only job where you can get away with padding your resume (assuming you have an -R after your name.)

...she's a serial liar.

Just like Sarah Palin...

Not just science. They do the same thing with election results, tax cuts, etc.

In fact, they consider the scorn of scientists and other educated people as a badge of honor.

It like I said, they see the fact that the Conservative position is not supported by science as a reason to doubt SCIENCE, rather than the Conservative position!

These neo-cons really have to ask themselves the following question:

If you have to lie to advance your agenda, is your agenda really worth advancing?

Desperate times call for desperate measures. In the face of reality, charge forward. Damn the torpedoed facts; full speed ahead!

How far will these right wingnuts go to defy logic and facts?

Well... Limbaugh makes $35 Million a year. And they're paying that for just one guy!

So the answer I guess is... as far as their money can take them and still result in a net profit.

----------------------------------
IMHO

that hurt me.

Shhhhh. . . you'll scare them. Science is scary because it involves that learnin' stuff.

I remember a comedian once asked the question: "If you're driving at the speed of light, and you turn on your headlights, does anything happen?"

Are you saying that there is only one truth and no matter what path is taken in the world of science, the same conclusion is achieved? Is that why every religion basically has it's own conclusions?

Every once in a while the right wing noise machine lets something like this slip. It then becomes painfully clear that they don't believe and/or know what they are talking about but will continue to say it because the know they have to push the Republican party back into power.

Actually, I watched a documentary where Einstein was given the moniker of one of the greatest minds ever. I now forget which (his general or his special theory) was referred to as such, but the presenters talked to various scientists (Hawlking, Davis, etc) and they mentioned that the one theory was so far off the beaten track and 'common sense' that it is likely that nobody would ever have thought of it. The other would likely have been 'discovered' by others yes, but the one was simply not discoverable outside of a genius-type leap in logic and reasoning.

Of course, I'd also argue that you can't really claim that a person was 'responsible' for any large generational scientific gains. Because every gain and discovery is dependent on those who came before and figured other stuff out first. In that sense, the first cave-man who discovered fire and how to reproduce it could be cited as the father of everything I would imagine. Good ole' Unga-Bunga with his fiery stick made the continued survival of mankind possible. Of course, no rational person would ever actually make that argument, but it kind of illustrates how twisted the reasoning can get when we start playing 'who's the best/most important scientist' with historical figures. :)

Yea...and that erections evolved into Viagra.

Lizards?

Great White Sharks?

Don't get too cocky. I'm sure some of them would be dumb enough to try. "If man evolved from monkeys, then why are there still monkeys? Huh?"

Wow a trifecta of ignorance of ecology, biology and anthropology.

Stupid right wing nutjobs

Oh, crap... now I'm forced to agree with you on something.

. . .how could you F this up, bad science is one thing, but bad satire is unforgivable

KNOWLEDGE? SERIOUSLY?