O'Reilly Says "Van Jones Doesn't Scare Me"; Beck Responds With Yoda Impression
February 25, 2011 9:50 pm ET
From the February 25 edition of Fox News Channel's The O'Reilly Factor:
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
Previously:
When are you going to apologize for calling Shirley Sherrod a racist?
I'll assume you are at least that intelligent. Since Olbermann repeatedly did his commentary in stupid voices, imitating others , he is entirely appropriate for this thread. Too complicated for you?
But you guy(s) are missing the point again...I thought Van Jones was supposed to be a grave threat to our government. Beck called him evil. Now he's undercutting that claim with very bad comic impersonations? Which is it, Glenn? Oh never mind.
But it's the same Beck paranoia...
And Beck has had many intelligent topics to his shows, I guess you missed some of the better ones, like the show with a group of medical professionals who largely opposed Obamacare. And his show with conservative black people was quite good too. But I know that anything over a minute or two is just too much for you, you prefer the edited clips that mmfa presents on a daily babis.
As to the show with the doctors, I thought they made some interesting points and I'm by no means on the hook for this health care reform as it is, but I also would have liked to fact check those doctors. How do I know what they weren't telling me was half truths? Glenn likes half truths.
Glenn Beck has cobbled together some of the least credible people to influence his audience and to support his theories. Ya know why? Glenn Beck is a paranoid conspiracy theorist with a religious bent.(Also, the "aww shucks" act is old and a cover. He is a deeply dark,depressed and unstable personality)
And as far as the doctors go, why didn't YOU fact check them?
And BTW, I just had to have my roof inspected for insurance purposes, I hired a woman roofer, so no I am not surprised if a woman is a plumber or mechanic.
And speaking of half truths , what do you think of Rachel Maddow's comments on the Wisconsin budget controversy?
I’m here to report that there is nothing wrong in the state of Wisconsin. Wisconsin is fine. Wisconsin is great, actually. Despite what you may have heard about Wisconsin’s finances, Wisconsin is on track to have a budget surplus this year"
Is that a half truth? or perhaps a lie?
You mention "them" several times and then list Cain and Thomas as examples. Clearly, Thomas is listed only because he fits the description of "conservative black American(s)".
Your replies denying any connection between race and the mentioning of Clarence Thomas are disingenuous (at best).
So pointing out they engaged in an illegal conflict of interest and failed to pay taxes is "stiring(sic) [them] up"?
Yes you're right, amazing.
http://dailycaller.com/2011/02/03/anti-koch-progressives-call-violent-acts-fox-news-justice-clarence-thomas-conservatives-rally/
Don't miss the video, your people in action.
Why don't you show me an example of that racism? Because I'm pretty sure that most progressives, like most Americans in general, are completely, blissfully unaware of who Herman Cain even is. Isn't he that guy who thinks running a pizza joint makes him presidential material?
http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/02/15/alternets-racist-tirade-against-herman-cain-black-garbage-pail-kid-monkey-core-condemns/
And BTW, the liberal progressive , trash site that published this racist garbage is an organization that has been around for almost 15 years and has readership of about 3 million a month. And the fine progressive mind that wrote that piece has also been featured in the NY Times, the Utne Reader and other well known publications. So apparently you are dead wrong that no one has heard of him. Perhaps you are ignorant of him but informed people are not. Certainly not the fine liberal minds at the NY Times, they love him.
Now that you have seen an example of his fine work , I am certain you will embrace his work. It is right up your alley.
Lets play this:
1)George Wallace was a conservative. George Wallace was a racist. Therefore conservatives are racist.
2)alwaysright1 says he/she is a conservative. alwaysright1 is a racist.
See how that works?
When you say, "the hatred expressed by so called progressives toward Clarence Thomas" is partially correct. No matter what label they add to their political beliefs, progressive or anything else, if they are making assumptions based on race, they are racist. End of sentence.
I read on-line that Rachel Maddow addressed specifically those comments the next night on her show. You can see a replay somewhere. I don't know about that though. Rachel Maddow doesn't speak for me. MSNBC doesn't speak for me. I think you set up a false dichotomy. You think it's MSNBC vs Fox. In my opinion, they are both part of the problem. I will say that Fox is a political organization and routinely lies by omission over and over again. That's my opinion.
Just to end you asked, "And as far as the doctors go, why didn't YOU fact check them?" Listen, you're not gonna catch me with a Glenn Beck phrase. I spent 8 long years in higher learning, and everyday since researching. I'm not eating Doritos and being fed as Glenn would say.
Politifact is refusing to withdraw their appraisal based on her "tone." Never mind the fact that they truncated her comment to make it sound the way they wanted it to sound.
Really, fairliberal, get your head out of your a**.
"I'll have you know some of my favorite episodes are black!"
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Thanks, fairliberal.
Beck can only throw rocks form a top his galvanized tower. And all because of why? Because a group Van Jones was co-founder organized a boycott against Beck.
**The fact that he hasn't even invited...
But it seems i was wrong in attributing O'relly's quote to Beck. Doesn't change the fact that Beck is a coward though.
http://spectator.org/archives/2009/09/04/the-real-van-jones-scandal-why/print
what was his motivation
Basically Van is fighting for top billing between the bearded lady (Piven?) and the freak (Trumka?).
Either way, Van has become nothing more thana pawn.
"He is so not scare of Van Jones, that he made sure to sick his audience against Jones, tarnished his reputation and refuses to meet him face to face"
"By tarring Van Jones as some dangerous Revolutionary, Beck has tarnished his reputation (he resigned form his advizer position) adn created an enemy for his audience to hiss and boo at. The fact that he has even invited him to his show, shows Beck's massive cowardice.
Beck can only throw rocks form a top his galvanized tower. And all because of why? Because a group Van Jones was co-founder organized a boycott against Beck"
Too much, you guys, really? Lets ask Bill sometime, Glenn is one of his best friends, tey travel aorund the country together doing shows. Van Jones is an admitted communist, just watch a video of the guy, and you don't have to look far for enemies of Theses United States, Bill Ayers, Cloward and Piven, George Soros, oh and Van Jones himself. I have seen the video's of Glenn inviting both Soros and Van Jones on his show, so in conclusion, I again see there is never, ever any truth or proof on MMFA.
The invite to Soros I remember.
Van Jone's invitation to Beck I remember. He's not been with the communist's for many many years. You got anything current by him alined with communism? Into the growing green economy these days.
Any other support for your testimony?
BTW: Cloward and Piven don't have as much influence as you think they did. Also, Cloward has been dead for a decade already.
Progressive zombies are the worst kind!
Exactly! And, what is truly hilarious is that gman clearly does not even know this. Like all Beckers, he only knows what Beck told him he knows on his latest show. Incredible.
Have you ever listened to The Everly Brothers?
"So where do you want to go to eat tonight?"
"How about Olive Garden?"
"I'm not really in the mood for that..."
"May I quote--may I quote--waitwaitwait--may I quote Yoda?"
He starts off denigrating the Hollywood elite (not sure who they are but I would guess that he believes them to be more "puppet master jews") makes some out-there statements about the coming revolution led by Van Jones and when pressed by O'Reilly justifies his fictional narrative with an appeal to fictional Hollywood iconography (yoda). Man, you got to be dumb to be led by this guy.