Fox's Bolton Falsely Claims Every President "Since Johnson" Has Rejected "Idea That The '67 Lines Have Any Political Signifigance"
May 24, 2011 12:35 pm ET
From the May 24 edition of Fox News' Happening Now:
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
















http://quod.lib.umich.edu/p/ppotpus/4732130.1977.001/361?page=root;rgn=full+text;size=100;view=image
And both Clinton's and Bush's plans were premised on the '67 borders, with adjustments and land swaps to make them more defensible.
It's not an accidental mistake by some misinformed troll or some incurious talk show host like Hannity.
There should be an end to the occupation that began in 1967…The agreement must establish Palestine as a homeland for the Palestinian people, just as Israel is a homeland for the Jewish people.
Achieving an agreement will require painful political concessions by both sides…While territory is an issue for both parties to decide, I believe that any peace agreement between them [the Israelis and Palestinians] will require mutually agreed adjustments to the armistice lines of 1949 to reflect current realities and to ensure that the Palestinian state is viable and contiguous.
Oh, that's right, your fricken' boss.
A leader could mention the borders that existed in any year between 1949 and 1967 and be talking about the same borders.
challenger like never before?