About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Bolling Rushes To Defense Of Alabama's Controversial Law Targeting "Illegals"

August 02, 2011 5:52 pm ET

From the August 2 edition of Fox News' The Five:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Discussing "Illegals," Bolling Claimed: "This Isn't About Race"

Fox Defends Controversial AL Immigration Law While Largely Ignoring Critics' Concerns

With Renewed National Focus On Immigration Reform, Fox Revs Up Anti-Immigrant Campaign

Right-wing media falsely claim Obama said border security is "impossible"

Fox Uses White House Meeting On Immigration Reform To Insult Undocumented Immigrants And Border Security

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by beDecent (August 02, 2011 6:10 pm ET)
      5 1
      It doesn't target "illegals." It targets brown people.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by samurai99 (August 02, 2011 6:18 pm ET)
      3  
      Seriously, are people in the south blind to what keeps happening? Georgia passed a law scaring away illegals and it tanked their farm industries, and now Alabama passes a law driving its prison costs through the roof? When will it end?

      Personally, I thing Obama shouldn't sue, he should just refuse to pick up anybody they arrest. Let them deal with the full cost.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by panzer (August 02, 2011 6:23 pm ET)
      1 8
      More liberal lies.

      Beckel "We have another state...that has decided to write it's own immigration law, and not let the United States of America, which does do immigration laws, implement their own laws."
      Report Abuse
      • Author by handsomejack54 (August 02, 2011 6:28 pm ET)
        7  
        More conservative lies.

        Bolling: "E-Verify would solve the problem completely."
        Report Abuse
        • Author by panzer (August 02, 2011 7:41 pm ET)
            4
          So you admit Beckel was lying?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Deluded (August 02, 2011 8:03 pm ET)
            2  
            No you did.

            He admitted (using the same word you did in your post) that Bolling lied.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by panzer (August 02, 2011 8:12 pm ET)
                4
              Where did I lie?

              Report Abuse
              • Author by heehee..santorum (August 02, 2011 8:57 pm ET)
                4  
                Frankly Scarlett, I don't give a damn.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by Deluded (August 03, 2011 7:46 pm ET)
                   
                You're Bolling?

                Actually here's the breakdown.

                In response to what you posted about the article being "liberal lies" (without really showing other than post a segment that asserts that Bob Beckel lied), jack posted that what Bolling said about E-Verify being the solution was a lie (at this point we have 2 assertions of lies, no backups of said assertions). Jack wasn't saying anything about Beckel lying, he was talking about Bolling lying.

                Yet your response to that was "So you admit that Beckel was lying?" when he did not even mention Beckel at all (wonder why?).

                I responded directly to what I saw was a question: "So you (jack) admit that Beckel was lying?" My response: "No, YOU did." You were the only one who was "admitting" that Beckel was lying, indeed you were the only one who brought it up at all, jack was talking about Bolling.

                But you thought I was calling you a liar by that statement (No you did), hence your response. Unless you're Bolling, no one in this thread chain has called you a liar.....yet.
                Report Abuse
    • Author by harleywood (August 02, 2011 8:05 pm ET)
         
      Fox just can't help it's self to be a hateful racist network of goons
      Report Abuse