About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Kilmeade: Obama Will "Bring Up The Class Warfare Stuff" In His State Of The Union Address

January 23, 2012 9:49 am ET

From the January 23 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Fox's Steve Doocy: Obama "Has Effectively Launched A Class Warfare Against People Who Make A Lot Of Money"

Kilmeade On Taxes: "We Should Be Supporting" The "Mega-Wealthy," Not "Punish[ing] Them"

Fox Again Cries "Class Warfare"

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by foole (January 23, 2012 9:54 am ET)
      20  
      Yes, Blochead, he will bring up the "class warfare" stuff. Hopefully early on and frequently during his speech. It's effective because it's true.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Reinhard (January 23, 2012 9:56 am ET)
      15  
      Thanks Gretchen. I thought there would be some bias injected into this discussion. Thank God you're independent.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Spooky Dooooooooood (January 23, 2012 10:02 am ET)
      14  
      Having the wealthiest Americans go back to their pre Bush tax cuts is class warfare? That's funny.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Spooky Dooooooooood (January 23, 2012 10:13 am ET)
        10  
        Remember when Bush spent $300,000,000.00. to mail out notices that alerted Americans that he was about to send everyone a tax rebate check? That was in addition to giving millionaires a nice tax break ... while we were fighting two wars.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (January 23, 2012 10:03 am ET)
      10  
      You mean the Class Warfare between Romneybot and the rest of the lowly 1% who, according to him, don't make much money? Or between those like Romneybot who pay 15% tax on their investments, and those who actually work for a living and pay 36%?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by gg (January 23, 2012 10:11 am ET)
        10  
        Don't forget the $347,000 in speaker fees that Romney rounded down to not that much.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (January 23, 2012 10:26 am ET)
          8  
          Exactly. I was surprised to learn that the threshold for the top 1% is about 350,000. I would have thought it higher. It just demonstrates what a tiny sliver of Americans Romneybot represents. He was born rich and got richer.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by montanabuddha (January 23, 2012 10:39 am ET)
            10  
            It amuses me when Romney tries to associate himself with the "common people". At least Newwt owns his elitist swine .01%er image.

            My question for the next debate....:

            How much is a gallon of milk?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by shaggles (January 23, 2012 2:08 pm ET)
              4  
              That would be a totally awesome question. Mind you I'm not sure anyone in Washington could answer it any better than Romney or Gingrich.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 11:58 am ET)
            1 15
            Romney earned his own money. By the time his father passed he was already a millionaire, and what money he did inherit he used to set up a charity with BYU.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (January 23, 2012 12:52 pm ET)
              17 2
              BS, highliter. Romney was raised in wealth and has lived in wealth his entire life.

              Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (January 23, 2012 12:53 pm ET)
              16  
              You don't think being the son of a rich former Governor of Michigan had anything to do with part of his success? The whole, "Who you know" thing goes quite a long ways when your dad was a Governor. Not saying it's wrong, but let's be honest about things.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by jarossiter (January 23, 2012 12:56 pm ET)
                14  
                Just like GW's success was due to who his father was/is.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Conchobhar (January 23, 2012 3:24 pm ET)
                  4  
                  To be fair, Romney has accomplishments of his own that W doesn't come close to. I believe he earned two degrees at the same time, so his educational record dwarfs Shrub's. He also, whatever you thing of the ethic/morality of his actions, was wildly successful in the business world, in contrast to Bush, who had to be continually bailed out by his father's connections.

                  None of that negates the argument that Mittens is totally out of touch with the realities of life in the 99%, as he proves on a daily basis.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by terrapin53 (January 25, 2012 8:04 am ET)
                    1  
                    Bush traded Sammy Sosa to the White Sox. That tells you what kind of business man he was.
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 23, 2012 4:26 pm ET)
                  4  
                  GW's success ? Oh, you mean he allegedly was elected a few times and made some money. I thought you meant actual "success".
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by So Fain (January 23, 2012 1:10 pm ET)
              11  
              Awwww... His poor Dad (born in a Mormon community in Mexico) was only the CEO of American Motors Corporation, Governor of Michigan and an eventual Presidential candidate. How could he have possible given poor Mitt a leg up? It makes me want to cry.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by nerzog (January 23, 2012 1:29 pm ET)
                7  
                Somehow, we're expected to believe that Romneybot's education and subsequent business opportunities had absolutely nothing to do with who his father was.

                Oh, of course not.
                Report Abuse
        • Author by Conchobhar (January 23, 2012 3:18 pm ET)
          5  
          Don't forget the $347,000 in speaker fees that Romney rounded down to not that much.
          Not to pick nits, but you've transposed the 7 and the 4, if the numbers I've seen are correct.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 11:54 am ET)
          12
        Oh now hang on. I once said I paid 40% and got blasted here that no one I mean no one comes close to paying 40%
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dogbreath (January 23, 2012 11:57 am ET)
          8  
          The top rate is what? 35% You need a new accountant.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 12:01 pm ET)
              12
            No it’s called state, local, sales and property.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (January 23, 2012 12:53 pm ET)
              9  
              We're talking federal income tax rates here.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by shaggles (January 23, 2012 1:41 pm ET)
                6  
                No fair. Only the right is allowed to use that to claim that 1/2 of all Americans don't pay any taxes at all.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 3:08 pm ET)
                  8
                Ok fine then if it's possible as Nerzog said for working class people to pay 36% federal taxes then my claim of paying over 40% total tax burden is well within reason. I was called a liar more time than I can count for saying my total tax burden was over 40.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Conchobhar (January 23, 2012 3:16 pm ET)
                  3  
                  I was called a liar more time than I can count for saying my total tax burden was over 40.
                  Well, you shouldn't have been.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by danielsangeo (January 23, 2012 4:02 pm ET)
                    4  
                    Well, highliter is leaving out that he believes that the poor don't pay any taxes.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Conchobhar (January 23, 2012 4:38 pm ET)
                      3  
                      Well, that's kind of dishonest, since he includes local and sales taxes in his own total.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 5:02 pm ET)
                          4
                        Some poor people’s tax liability is zero. With the EIC people can literally get thousands more back than they paid in. Someone who makes 20k and has 3 dependants’ gets 7.5k back over what they paid in and will have a total tax rate of zero or even a negative tax rate.
                        Report Abuse
                    • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 5:01 pm ET)
                        3
                      Some poor people’s tax liability is zero. With the EIC people can literally get thousands more back than they paid in. Someone who makes 20k and has 3 dependants’ gets 7.5k back over what they paid in and will have a total tax rate of zero or even a negative tax rate.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by danielsangeo (January 23, 2012 5:04 pm ET)
                        3  
                        See what I mean, Conchobhar?
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 5:10 pm ET)
                            2
                          Please refute anything in my post if it’s not true.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by danielsangeo (January 23, 2012 5:21 pm ET)
                            2  
                            What is the total tax burden (before credits) on that person making 20k with 3 dependents?
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 5:26 pm ET)
                                2
                              Who cares what it is before the credits Fact is the credits exist and lead to people with negative tax liability.
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by danielsangeo (January 23, 2012 5:29 pm ET)
                                3  
                                I care. It's crucial to your claim.
                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 5:39 pm ET)
                                    2
                                  You cannot refute the fact that a person with 20k in income and 3 dependants has a federal tax liability of 0. Now add on 5k for the EIC and another 2.5 for the standard child credit and they ya go 7500 on the positive side.
                                  Report Abuse
                                  • Author by danielsangeo (January 23, 2012 5:45 pm ET)
                                    3  
                                    That's federal tax. I didn't say that.
                                    Report Abuse
                                  • Author by The_Cat (January 23, 2012 9:31 pm ET)
                                    2  
                                    You cannot refute the fact that a person with 20k in income and 3 dependants has a federal tax liability of 0.

                                    highliter, do you have any idea what it costs to keep a family of four in food, shelter, and clothing? Do you know how far below the poverty level this mythical family of our is? Do you really believe that you can come to this family and demand more of their money in federal taxes so the millionaires and billionaires can keep their tax cuts? Seriously? Because if that's the case, you have no soul.
                                    Report Abuse
                                    • Author by highliter (January 24, 2012 10:52 am ET)
                                        1
                                      Mythical? There are three in the office I’m in now. I wasn’t arguing that they should be taxed anymore. Just pointing out that some peoples fair share is a check.
                                      Report Abuse
                                      • Author by Johaely (January 24, 2012 3:31 pm ET)
                                        1  
                                        You only see it in terms of federal income taxes. They pay the taxes, but since their income is far too low (that's below half the median, seriously, they are dirt poor), they receive part of their money back. And you are here making a fuss about the fact that you who, according to you, has practically a million dollars in property have to pay more. Seriously do you even know what's empathy?
                                        Report Abuse
                                  • Author by David2012 (January 24, 2012 8:27 am ET)
                                    1  
                                    Thanks to Milton Friedman and Richard Nixon.

                                    The negative income tax, i.e., the earned income credit, is a conservative initiative, highliter. Look it up.
                                    Report Abuse
                          • Author by danielsangeo (January 23, 2012 5:22 pm ET)
                            3  
                            Also, what is your total tax burden, after credits?
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 5:28 pm ET)
                                1
                              Read the thread I already said my total tax burden is 40+
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by danielsangeo (January 23, 2012 5:30 pm ET)
                                3  
                                Even after credits? Are you sure about that?
                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 5:36 pm ET)
                                    3
                                  I don’t qualify for any income based credits.

                                  Go to any tax estimation and put in single 3 dependants 20k income and you will get 7500 back.
                                  Report Abuse
                                  • Author by danielsangeo (January 23, 2012 5:45 pm ET)
                                    3  
                                    Wait, what? How do you NOT qualify for any credits?
                                    Report Abuse
                                    • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 5:58 pm ET)
                                        3
                                      I said any INCOME based tax credit, such as the EIC. Quit dodging the question on whether or not it's possible to have zero tax liability.
                                      Report Abuse
                                      • Author by danielsangeo (January 23, 2012 6:07 pm ET)
                                        3  
                                        But we're talking about total tax liability. Quit dodging this.
                                        Report Abuse
                                  • Author by bintx (January 23, 2012 5:45 pm ET)
                                    5  
                                    A question for you, highliter. Since you appear to be jealous of this person who is single with three dependents making 20k . . . why don't you try it, hon? I mean, since it seems to tick you off that this person is living high off the hog trying to support a family on that $20,000,00 + the EIC of $7500, I'm sure you'd just LOVE to change places with them, huh?

                                    What a clod. You're no conservative, you're just a greedy, self-centered SOB.
                                    Report Abuse
                                  • Author by bintx (January 23, 2012 5:47 pm ET)
                                    4 1
                                    Oh, and based upon previous posts wherein you claim to have all sorts of rental property, etc., I guarantee that you DO qualify for income based credits.
                                    Report Abuse
                                    • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 5:55 pm ET)
                                        3
                                      That’s not my point. I’m just pointing out that there are people who have no tax liability. That just a fact that most here wont admit to.

                                      There are no income based tax credits for rental property. There are deductions which are based of expenses. I sometime qualify for energy tax credits, buy again those are based of improvement expenses not income level.
                                      Report Abuse
                                      • Author by danielsangeo (January 23, 2012 6:01 pm ET)
                                        5  
                                        You mean, no FEDERAL tax liability. We're not talking about that. We're talking TOTAL TAX LIABILITY.

                                        And, yes, there are income based tax credits for rental property.

                                        Interest is a deductible expense. Depreciation is a deductible expense. Repairs is a deductible expense. Driving for your rental properties is a deductible expense, including usage of your vehicle. Your office that you use to administrate your rental properties is deductible. Insurance is deductible. And so on and so on.

                                        These expenses are tax credits, highliter.
                                        Report Abuse
                                        • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 6:10 pm ET)
                                            3
                                          Nope they are tax deduction not credits. Big difference. And they sure are not based off my income. Tax credits reduce your actually tax liability where as tax deduction lower your taxable income. Deductions also cannot lower your tax liability below zero where tax credits can.

                                          And you are still wrong someone who gets back 7500 more than they pay in federal will have ZERO TOTAL tax liability. There is no way their state and local taxes will equal more that that 7500; Therefore they will have ZERO or a NEGATIVE TOTAL TAX LIABILITY!
                                          Report Abuse
                                          • Author by danielsangeo (January 23, 2012 6:17 pm ET)
                                            4  
                                            How much is the total tax liability of someone that makes $20k with three dependents?

                                            Please provide citations.
                                            Report Abuse
                                            • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 6:24 pm ET)
                                                4
                                              IT'S CALLED MATH AND THE TAX CODE.
                                              Report Abuse
                                              • Author by danielsangeo (January 23, 2012 6:26 pm ET)
                                                4  
                                                I'm waiting. What is the total tax liability of someone that makes $20k with three dependents?




                                                You don't know, do you?
                                                Report Abuse
                                                • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 6:31 pm ET)
                                                    3
                                                  It depends on the state. I know the federal tax liability is a positive 38% So in order to actually have any kind of tax liability they would have to pay 39% in state and local taxes which is not happening. . You cannot provide a single shred of evidence proving me wrong while I have cited you exact number from the tax code. I'm done with you are an idiot
                                                  Report Abuse
                                                  • Author by danielsangeo (January 23, 2012 6:33 pm ET)
                                                    3  
                                                    I don't need to prove you wrong. You need to prove yourself right.

                                                    I have a feeling I'll be waiting an extraordinarily long time while you evade and insult me.
                                                    Report Abuse
                                              • Author by bintx (January 23, 2012 7:07 pm ET)
                                                3 1
                                                You apparently don't know the difference between Adjusted Gross Income and Taxable Income, highliter, because you had consistently confused them in your posts.
                                                Report Abuse
                                      • Author by bintx (January 23, 2012 6:12 pm ET)
                                        3 1
                                        The reason that people here won't admit to it, is because it's bull hockey. Every one in this country has a tax burden. Not everyone has a Federal income tax burden.

                                        And, yes, it is the point. You are ticked because these HORRID people don't have Federal tax burdens. Try supporting a family on $20,000/year, highliter.

                                        As I said, you're no conservative, you're simply a greedy SOB who cares more about money than you do people. What a very, very sad person you are.
                                        Report Abuse
                                        • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 6:16 pm ET)
                                            3
                                          Answer me this how does someone in the positive 7500$ have a tax burden at all. What taxes do they pay that are not offset by the 7500 profit they made of federal taxes.
                                          Report Abuse
                                          • Author by danielsangeo (January 23, 2012 6:17 pm ET)
                                            3  
                                            This is your claim. Back it up.
                                            Report Abuse
                                            • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 6:23 pm ET)
                                                3
                                              I gave you the straight numbers. 20k in income with three dependants has a zero federal tax liability, now add on the credits for EIC 5000 standard child tax credit 2500 and there ya go 7500 more than you paid in. You cannot dispute these numbers because they are FACT. In order to even have a total tax liability that is not negative that same person would have to pay 38% in state and local taxes. No one pays that in state and local taxes.

                                              Now shut up and go away you have failed.
                                              Report Abuse
                                              • Author by danielsangeo (January 23, 2012 6:31 pm ET)
                                                3  
                                                Um, your math is off. The $7.5k credit goes to paying the federal tax. The federal tax is not going to be zero. For an AGI of $20k, your tax is about $2500. The $7.5k credit pays the $2.5k tax and results in a net refund of $5k. Now, provide for me the amount of total tax liability for a person making $20k with 3 dependents.

                                                Provide those numbers.
                                                Report Abuse
                                                • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 6:40 pm ET)
                                                    3
                                                  Surprise!! your wrong again standard deductions and dependant deductions reduce that 2500 to ZERO Then you add the EIC and Child tax credit and you get you 7.5. Their actual tax refund would be around 10k. With 7.5 of that being profit. Do you ever get tired of being wrong? Go to any tax calculation and do the mat for yourself.
                                                  Report Abuse
                                                  • Author by bintx (January 23, 2012 6:53 pm ET)
                                                    3 1
                                                    You and daniel are talking about two different things. He is speaking of AGI and you are speaking of taxable income.

                                                    I'll ask you again, since you seem so jealous of these folks, why don't you forgo your apparently MASSIVE wealth and change places with them. Try living on their income.

                                                    You're a clod.
                                                    Report Abuse
                                                  • Author by danielsangeo (January 23, 2012 6:55 pm ET)
                                                    4  
                                                    You were talking about just the EIC and Child Tax credit.

                                                    And you still haven't backed up your claim. You claimed that someone earning $20k/year with 3 children had a zero tax liability.

                                                    You seem to be fleeing from this claim now.
                                                    Report Abuse
                                                    • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 7:03 pm ET)
                                                        3
                                                      Holy crap someone who’s earns 20k on their W2s after deductions has a ZERO TAX liability.

                                                      Try this site and do the math yourself.
                                                      Report Abuse
                                                      • Author by danielsangeo (January 23, 2012 7:10 pm ET)
                                                        4  
                                                        The subject here is *TOTAL TAX LIABILITY*. You claim to have 38% total tax liability when figuring up all the taxes together, including sales tax.

                                                        Compare apples to oranges, highliter.

                                                        What is the *t*o*t*a*l* *t*a*x* *l*i*a*b*i*l*i*t*y for someone who earns $20k with three exemptions? Stop running away from your claim?
                                                        Report Abuse
                                                  • Author by bintx (January 23, 2012 6:58 pm ET)
                                                    3 1
                                                    Oh, and EIC is figured based upon AGI, not taxable income.
                                                    Report Abuse
                                                    • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 7:06 pm ET)
                                                        2
                                                      Yep and someone with 20k AGI gets 5049 in EIC
                                                      Report Abuse
                                                      • Author by bintx (January 23, 2012 7:13 pm ET)
                                                        3 1
                                                        You were wrong. You've been using taxable income to make your argument. EIC is not figured on taxable income, it's figured on AGI BEFORE dependent deductions are made.
                                                        Report Abuse
                                                • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 6:43 pm ET)
                                                    3
                                                  You really need to learn how taxes work
                                                  Report Abuse
                                                  • Author by danielsangeo (January 23, 2012 6:56 pm ET)
                                                    3  
                                                    I know how taxes work. Do you?
                                                    Report Abuse
                                                  • Author by bintx (January 23, 2012 6:59 pm ET)
                                                    3 1
                                                    Apparently, you don't know. You keep talking about taxable income for your calculations. EIC is based upon Adjusted Gross Income.
                                                    Report Abuse
                                                    • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 7:08 pm ET)
                                                        2
                                                      Yep and someone with 20k AGI gets 5049 in EIC with 3 dependants
                                                      Report Abuse
                                                      • Author by bintx (January 23, 2012 7:17 pm ET)
                                                        3 1
                                                        Further, the maximum credit in 2011 for EIC with 3 dependents in $5,751 and that's with earned and AGI income up to $43,998.FYI.

                                                        Before you start attacking someone else for not knowing what they're talking about, you should make sure that you do.
                                                        Report Abuse
                                                        • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 7:32 pm ET)
                                                            2
                                                          FROM IRS

                                                          Based on the amounts you entered, your 2011 Earned Income is $20,000 and your Adjusted Gross Income is $20,000.

                                                          Your estimated Earned Income Tax Credit amount for 2011 is $5,040.

                                                          A printable summary of your Earned Income Tax Credit and entered income amounts is available.

                                                          NOTE: Remember, this is only an estimate. To determine the exact amount of your credit and claim the EITC with these qualifying children, you must complete and attach Schedule EIC to your Form 1040 or Form 1040A and send it to the IRS.
                                                          Report Abuse
                                                          • Author by bintx (January 23, 2012 8:14 pm ET)
                                                            2 1
                                                            You were basing your post on TAXABLE income, highliter. EIC is based upon AGI. You were wrong.
                                                            Report Abuse
                                          • Author by bintx (January 23, 2012 6:50 pm ET)
                                            3 1
                                            You made the claim, highliter, you answer your asinine question.

                                            I'll repeat, you are a very sad, sad little slob.
                                            Report Abuse
                                            • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 6:58 pm ET)
                                                3
                                              The reason that people here won't admit to it, is because it's bull hockey. Every one in this country has a tax burden. Not everyone has a Federal income tax burden.


                                              I showed how someone can be 7500 in the positive on their federal income taxes. Now explain to me how these people have any kind of tax burden?

                                              In order for them to have any kind of tax burden their state local and pay roll taxes would have to be over 38%.

                                              Report Abuse
                                              • Author by bintx (January 23, 2012 7:00 pm ET)
                                                3 1
                                                No, you didn't. Your expert tax calculations were wrong. You were basing them on taxable income. EIC is based upon Adjusted Gross Income.

                                                I'll ask again, do you want to trade places with these people that you abhor?
                                                Report Abuse
                                                • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 7:12 pm ET)
                                                    3
                                                  Your wrong here are the numbers from HR block.

                                                  AGI 20,000
                                                  Standard Deduction 5,800
                                                  Personal Exemptions 14,800
                                                  Taxable Income = 0
                                                  EIC 5,049
                                                  Additional Child Credit 2,550

                                                  Your refund is 7,599
                                                  Report Abuse
                                                  • Author by bintx (January 23, 2012 7:18 pm ET)
                                                    3 1
                                                    I just posted the chart from the IRS website.

                                                    You were wrong in your comments. You had taxable income confused with Adjusted Gross Income. You had NO IDEA what the hell you were talking about.
                                                    Report Abuse
                                                • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 7:31 pm ET)
                                                    2
                                                  From the IRS Site

                                                  Based on the amounts you entered, your 2011 Earned Income is $20,000 and your Adjusted Gross Income is $20,000.

                                                  Your estimated Earned Income Tax Credit amount for 2011 is $5,040.

                                                  A printable summary of your Earned Income Tax Credit and entered income amounts is available.

                                                  NOTE: Remember, this is only an estimate. To determine the exact amount of your credit and claim the EITC with these qualifying children, you must complete and attach Schedule EIC to your Form 1040 or Form 1040A and send it to the IRS.
                                                  Report Abuse
                                                • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 7:31 pm ET)
                                                    1
                                                  From the IRS Site

                                                  Based on the amounts you entered, your 2011 Earned Income is $20,000 and your Adjusted Gross Income is $20,000.

                                                  Your estimated Earned Income Tax Credit amount for 2011 is $5,040.

                                                  A printable summary of your Earned Income Tax Credit and entered income amounts is available.

                                                  NOTE: Remember, this is only an estimate. To determine the exact amount of your credit and claim the EITC with these qualifying children, you must complete and attach Schedule EIC to your Form 1040 or Form 1040A and send it to the IRS.
                                                  Report Abuse
                                                  • Author by bintx (January 23, 2012 8:16 pm ET)
                                                    2 1
                                                    This has nothing to do with what you were posting, highliter. You were using $20,000 as the TAXABLE income upon which to figure EIC. EIC is based upon Adjusted Gross Income. You were telling other folks that they knew nothing about taxes when, in fact, it was you who didn't know.
                                                    Report Abuse
                                                    • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 9:06 pm ET)
                                                        1
                                                      AGI 20,000
                                                      Standard Deduction 5,800
                                                      Personal Exemptions 14,800
                                                      Taxable Income = 0
                                                      EIC 5,049
                                                      Additional Child Credit 2,550

                                                      Your refund is 7,599

                                                      What part of this is wrong.
                                                      Report Abuse
                                                    • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 9:17 pm ET)
                                                        2
                                                      FACT someone with AGI of 20k (not taxable income) and 3 dependants gets 5049$ tax credit from the EIC, and an additional 2550 dollars in standard child tax credits. For a Total of 7599 in TAX CREDITS.

                                                      FACT someone with AGI of 20k and 3 dependants has ZERO TAXABLE INCOME after deductions.

                                                      FACT Someone who has ZERO Taxable income has no tax liability and therefore will get back any federal income tax already paid in plus the 7599 in tax credits.


                                                      These are FACTS and cannot be refuted.
                                                      Report Abuse
                                                      • Author by danielsangeo (January 23, 2012 9:38 pm ET)
                                                        2  
                                                        You ran away from your original claim.
                                                        Report Abuse
                                                        • Author by highliter (January 24, 2012 10:50 am ET)
                                                            1
                                                          No I didn’t that same person who makes 7500 from there federal taxes will have no tax burden. Their state local and payroll taxes will not exceed the 7500 they made off their federal taxes. Therefore there total tax burden will be 0.
                                                          Report Abuse
                • Author by nerzog (January 23, 2012 4:47 pm ET)
                  4  
                  Maybe you missed my point, or maybe my point was poorly made. The 36% (actually, should be 35%) is what would be paid by people earning over $380,000 in ordinary income, which Romneybot thinks is "not much money", yet he pays only 15% on what is probably a sh*tload of investment income.
                  Report Abuse
      • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 3:26 pm ET)
          9
        You do realize that he already paid 36% on the money he used to invest right?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by danielsangeo (January 23, 2012 4:02 pm ET)
          4  
          And?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by foghornleghorn (January 23, 2012 4:28 pm ET)
            8  
            It kills me that nutjobs continue to value wealth-related income over work-related income.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by nerzog (January 23, 2012 5:07 pm ET)
              7  
              It's because they've been brainwashed to think that way by Think Tanks hired by people who make most of their income from investments. Their ultimate goal is to eliminate all capital gains taxes.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 23, 2012 4:29 pm ET)
          6  
          You don't really pay taxes on money, you pay it on transactions, or the redistribution of money. This is why everybody knows you're full of crap, that you don't understand fundamental ideas like this.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by raddave43 (January 23, 2012 11:00 pm ET)
          3  
          But he didn't pay that amount on the money he earned from that investment.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Jimijams (January 23, 2012 10:05 am ET)
      7  
      Kilmeade is so out of touch with reality, he doesn't even know what the terms he uses mean.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by GBU-15 (January 23, 2012 10:12 am ET)
      7  
      And these are the same people who hounded Obama about releasing his birth certificate and college transcripts. Romney knows that he has been raking in the dough for years and been hiding some of it. The rich shelter their money from taxation while the poor have no choice but to pay! If some of the deficit can be made up by getting some of these funds then why is it called class warfare? This is money owed to the government that responsible citizens are obligated to pay!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Liberal in the South (January 23, 2012 10:20 am ET)
        9 1
        Oh come on, we all have accounts in the Caymans...
        Report Abuse
      • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 12:00 pm ET)
          15
        I’m sure the Kennedys would gladly pay taxes on all their illegal money from bootlegging that is hidden offshore.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (January 23, 2012 12:54 pm ET)
          10  
          Bootlegging?

          Are you living in the 20's and era of prohibition?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 3:21 pm ET)
              8
            The source of the Kennedy family wealth came from bootlegging, Much of which still resides in offshore accounts.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mjh (January 23, 2012 4:01 pm ET)
              4  
              "The source of the Kennedy family wealth came from bootlegging, Much of which still resides in offshore accounts." -- lowlighter


              [citation needed]

              Report Abuse
            • Author by foghornleghorn (January 23, 2012 4:29 pm ET)
              5  
              The source of the Bush family wealth came from dealing with the Nazis.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by The_Cat (January 23, 2012 9:43 pm ET)
                1  
                I suppose it's the romantic in me that really doesn't mind making money off of bootlegging. It's just so... American. Ya know? But doing business with the Nazis? That's just not cool.
                Report Abuse
        • Author by n'est-ce pas (January 23, 2012 12:59 pm ET)
          9  
          What? Deflect much?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (January 23, 2012 1:05 pm ET)
          8 2
          Ooohhh, highliter threw in the Kennedys . . . Why do you folks do that? Me? I don't care about the Kennedys one way or the other. I have never been in the position to vote for one . . . ever. I was 7 when JFK was elected and 15 when RFK was murdered.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Progressive_IL (January 23, 2012 2:40 pm ET)
            9  
            Right? Unless you happened to live in Massachusetts prior to Teddy's death in 2009, Americans have not actually been able to vote for a member of the Kennedy family in over 40 years.

            Next thing you know with HiLiar, he'll bring up Chappaquiddick.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by kabniel (January 23, 2012 3:13 pm ET)
          3  
          HiLIAR

          REALLY? Here is a clue. When you get THAT desperate just STFU
          Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (January 23, 2012 10:22 am ET)
      10 1
      These guys seem to forget that since the founding of our country, class warfare has always been waged. It's just that the rich, have been waging it on the middle and lower socioeconomic classes, well, like I said, since the founding of this country. Who do they think wrote the Constitution? Rich land owners. Who made up most of Congress for a long time? Rich land owners.

      More and more, and looking at the ever widening gap of income between rich and poor, the poor and middle class are LOSING this class warfare, and really have been for a long time. To win wars, one needs funding. The rich have it. The poor and middle class don't.

      The mere fact that middle class wages have been stagnant, or have gone down over the past 20 years seems to elude these morons. Sure, there is class warfare, but it is being waged against the majority of us by the minority wealthy. Always has been, and probably always will be.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (January 23, 2012 10:22 am ET)
      12  
      As has been pointed out here by others, the upper .01% have been conducting a class massacre upon the rest of us for 30 years. Now that those being trickled on are starting to object, the Plutocrats are squealing like stuck pigs, whining that their six-car garages and multiple McMansions are just not enough... they need more concessions, or they'll stop blessing us with jobs.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by boxtop (January 23, 2012 10:52 am ET)
      1 16
      We have the rich, middle class and poor. Nothing has changed.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (January 23, 2012 10:54 am ET)
        10  
        Nothing has changed since when? Yesterday? Maybe not. 30 years ago? A lot has changed.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by boxtop (January 23, 2012 10:56 am ET)
            13
          How?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by magnolialover (January 23, 2012 10:58 am ET)
            13  
            Widening gaps in income disparity for one thing.

            Stagnant wage increases for the poor and middle class for another.

            Those are really the 2 biggest things.

            In other words, let me put it to you in terms you'll understand. The rich have constantly gotten richer, while the poor have gotten much poorer over the last 30 years. The money that the middle class earns now, buys a lot LESS than it did 30 years ago.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by boxtop (January 23, 2012 11:00 am ET)
            1 10
            Maybe you are right to a point. Because of high housing prices in southern california, I see more people unable to keep their houses and I observe many people down and out.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by boxtop (January 23, 2012 11:02 am ET)
              1 10
              But don't blame or penalize people that have worked their way to the top.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by magnolialover (January 23, 2012 11:12 am ET)
                14  
                We're not blaming them. You're playing the old, hammer the succesful card that conservatives like to try and play. What we're saying, is that the more wealthy amongst us need to pay their fair share. They're not. It's that simple. Plus, the wealthier you are in America, the more you GET out of the system than middle class and poor folks.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by RKAllen (January 23, 2012 11:17 am ET)
                12  
                What is your opinion on people who want to organize against their employer to ensure living wages, safe working conditions, and benefits?

                What is your opinion of the majority of the people who do the actual production/work to make the few so wealthy?

                ... are they to blame?

                When can we have a discussion about income disparity in this country without people screaming "class warfare?" When is it ever okay to have this discussion? In the "closed rooms" that Romney has suggested?

                Also, you are aware that most wealth today is actually inherited, right?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 12:04 pm ET)
                  1 11
                  Also, you are aware that most wealth today is actually inherited, right?


                  Completely untrue. Care to try and back that up.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Liberal in the South (January 23, 2012 12:17 pm ET)
                    11 1
                    If you are referring to this article in the WSJ about inherited money declining, read some of the comments about where it fails to factor in interest and money made on inheritance.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by nerzog (January 23, 2012 12:50 pm ET)
                      11  
                      The comments below the article are quite interesting. As a professor once told me, Figures never lie, but liars do figure.

                      The article is not very convincing, and the writer is obviously trying to leave the impression that vast numbers of lowly middle class people have risen to the ranks of the wealthy. (Of course, He's probably operating within the FOX "News" definition of "Middle Class"... anything below $300,000.) What's really happening is that more wealthy people are becoming extremely wealthy.
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by highliter (January 24, 2012 10:58 am ET)
                         
                      you are aware that most wealth today is actually inherited, right?


                      Im gonna say no one can back this up since no one has.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by RKAllen (January 25, 2012 9:35 am ET)
                           
                        My appo.logies. Hadn't realised that anyone had even responded to this thread.

                        Sure, do you want to discuss direct or indirect inheritance of wealth?

                        In the case of direct inheritance you would be correct, most of the nations wealth is not in inheritance.

                        However, through indirect inheritance, wealth was greatly increased by those who had large inheritances. Take a look at this years Forbes list of richest people in the nation. Five of the top ten inherited their wealth, three of them being Waltons.
                        Report Abuse
              • Author by nerzog (January 23, 2012 11:23 am ET)
                10  
                The simple truth is that some of the "success" of the top .01% has come at the expense of the Middle Class. Don't believe it? Please tell us who benefits and who loses when an American Corporation closes a domestic factory and ships those jobs to VietNam or India?

                Take your time.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 3:24 pm ET)
                  1 8
                  The consumer.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Liberal in the South (January 23, 2012 3:58 pm ET)
                    8 1
                    most often times the selling price of the good produced doest not decrease with decreased cost of production. In a perfect world the difference in COGS would get passed on to consumers. However all logic of capitalism says do not pass it on, instead reap profits to increase dividends and bonuses for the top.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by danielsangeo (January 23, 2012 4:05 pm ET)
                      8  
                      Yep.

                      America:
                      Cost for production: $10
                      Cost for item: $20
                      Profit: $10

                      Overseas:
                      Cost for production: $1
                      Cost for item: $20
                      Profit: $19

                      The cost for the item doesn't go down. The profits go up.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by nerzog (January 23, 2012 4:51 pm ET)
                        5  
                        Good point. When you buy a $100 pair of athletic shoes, where does most of that money go? To the laborer in Hong Kong who makes the shoes? I don't think so.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 5:09 pm ET)
                            6
                          Ya like the only expense a business has is labor.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by danielsangeo (January 23, 2012 5:10 pm ET)
                            4  
                            I didn't say "labor", did I? I said "Cost for production".
                            Report Abuse
                          • Author by kabniel (January 23, 2012 5:19 pm ET)
                            1  
                            HiLIAR

                            GOD but you are pathetic and disengenuous
                            Report Abuse
                          • Author by nerzog (January 23, 2012 5:51 pm ET)
                            1  
                            Generally speaking, the largest expense for a business is payroll.
                            Report Abuse
                          • Author by The_Cat (January 23, 2012 9:55 pm ET)
                            1  
                            Ya like the only expense a business has is labor.

                            If you knew anything about the business world, highliter, you would know that payroll is in fact the single biggest expense in a company.
                            Report Abuse
                  • Author by danielsangeo (January 23, 2012 4:04 pm ET)
                    5  
                    How does the consumer win when their job is gone?
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 23, 2012 4:33 pm ET)
                      6  
                      That's what I was going to mention, it's like he didn't even consider who had been working at that business.

                      That may have been one of the stupidest comments I've ever seen on a website, even having read many of highliter's in the past.
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by bintx (January 23, 2012 4:35 pm ET)
                      3 1
                      He doesn't know. He's just repeating what he's been told to say.
                      Report Abuse
                  • Author by kabniel (January 23, 2012 4:44 pm ET)
                    2  
                    HiLIAR

                    Spoken like a true brainwashed soulless Randinista moron. People mean nothing to you, since you have no decency, only profits. You are a pitiful minion of Mammon. Humanity itself is a foriegn concept to you
                    Report Abuse
      • Author by Liberal in the South (January 23, 2012 11:02 am ET)
        7 2
        I agree in the sense that there had been classifications but the gap between them is what is alarming. The middle income population drives the economy, we need confidence to spend on goods.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (January 23, 2012 11:24 am ET)
          6  
          The Plutocrats need to read the old story of the Golden Goose, then get their kids to explain it to them.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Liberal in the South (January 23, 2012 12:08 pm ET)
            6 2
            but but...son...the moral of the story is to cut the goose open to get the gold! Don't tell me there wasn't any gold inside, they didn't look hard enough you fascist!
            Report Abuse
            • Author by highliter (January 23, 2012 6:45 pm ET)
              1 3
              The liberal lesson would be to tax the sh!t out of the Golden Goose for producing those eggs. After all they are income.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by danielsangeo (January 23, 2012 7:03 pm ET)
                2  
                Nope. You're lying.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by kabniel (January 23, 2012 8:06 pm ET)
                1  
                HiLIAR

                You are stupid, brainwashed and you are a liar. How many times do I have to tell you that you are FAR too stupid to know anything about what liberals want, think, or would do?

                Or if we are just going to say rude ridiculous things that we pull directly from our lower torsos then the conservative way would be to take the goose from the guy and give him to the rich man in the villiage then take the guys children so both of you conservatives can take turns molesting them
                Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (January 23, 2012 11:01 am ET)
      6  
      Class Warfare, or Intelligence Warfare? Newt pretends to be smart, but he's really just eccentric.

      Romneybot is such a dork that he can't even pretend to be smart. Here's my favorite Romneybot quote so far: "I believe in an America where millions of Americans believe in an America that’s the America millions of Americans believe in. That's the America I love."

      Here's where I found it; that Liberal Rag, The National Review: The Man Who Gave us Newt

      Obama will look so smart next to these clowns that the FOXbots will be reduced to accusing him of Intellectual Elitism.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by galmud (January 23, 2012 11:06 am ET)
        4  
        Romney only looks smart when he's surrounded by idiots like Rick "before he was before was uh.. ooops sorry" Perry
        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (January 23, 2012 11:19 am ET)
          6  
          I think there is a predisposition among most Americans to assume that someone who has accumulated as much wealth as Romneybot must be smart, or something.

          In my limited dealings with the so-called Captains of Industry, I can testify that intelligence is not necessarily a prerequisite for climbing the corporate ladder. It certainly doesn't hurt, but there are plenty of fortunate, well-connected dumba$$es running companies in our pseudo-capitalist utopia.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by galmud (January 23, 2012 11:02 am ET)
      5  
      Kilmeade: Obama Will "Bring Up The Class Warfare Stuff" In His State Of The Union Address

      No YOU will bring up the "class warfare stuff". And apparantly you couldnt even wait until after the SOTU to start whining about it
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (January 23, 2012 11:11 am ET)
      5  
      Kilmeade has no idea what "class warfare" means.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by foole (January 23, 2012 12:14 pm ET)
        5  
        That's cause he has no class and is only a fan of warfare if he:

        1. isn't directly involved

        or

        2. is told to be.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by temphandle tearfully55timetable (January 23, 2012 12:52 pm ET)
      3  
      Once Again,"fair and balanced" couch dwellers creating a narrative!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by draftedin68 (January 23, 2012 1:40 pm ET)
        2  

        I'm tellin' ya, it's that evil couch that makes them all seem so goddamned stupid.

        BTW, here is a preview of the "class warfare" from President Obama.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by little poncho (January 23, 2012 2:07 pm ET)
      3 1
      larry, blondie & moe,will have to have an intern explain the STATE OF THE UNION to them, then spin it and put it on the telemprompter. they will turn common sense,into B.S.!!!!!!!!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by kabniel (January 23, 2012 3:15 pm ET)
      6  
      Well Killmeade do you mean Obama might reference the class warfare that the right is waging on the working class? I certainly hope he does
      Report Abuse
    • Author by terrapin53 (January 25, 2012 8:02 am ET)
         
      Isn't class warfare the conservative/GOP term? I am not sure I have ever heard Obama say this is class warfare. Even last night in his speech he said "you can call this class warfare", but he was talking to the opposition at the time when he said it. At least that's the way I took it.
      Report Abuse