About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Guilfoyle: Contraception Regulation Part Of Obama's Alleged "War Against The Catholic Church"

January 24, 2012 9:20 pm ET

From the January 24 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by bailorgana (January 24, 2012 9:24 pm ET)
      6  
      I cant belive she was married to gavin newsom. Gavin must of lost a bet.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by What Happened to Gannon (January 24, 2012 9:40 pm ET)
      6  
      That bleach is at war with Guilfoyle's brain.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Bongo Fury (January 24, 2012 10:05 pm ET)
        7  
        Obama hates everybody save for communists and puppy beaters. Call any vegetable and the the chances are good..The vegetable will respond to you.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (January 24, 2012 10:15 pm ET)
          5  
          It's rumored he even hates the Duke of Prunes.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by grmce (January 25, 2012 2:53 am ET)
             
          Obama hates everybody save for communists and puppy beaters
          I think there's a literal there - shouldn't that read "Obama hates everybody save for communists and puppy eaters".
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Dem02020 (January 24, 2012 10:55 pm ET)
      7  

      It's official, the all-important word WAR, as used in national policy talk for ages, has completely lost it's true meaning with these people, for their metaphorical misuse and overuse of it.

      The word WAR used to mean "armed and hostile conflict between nations or states", but now it simply means political opposition, however civil or peaceful.

      Big jump there, in giving the word WAR a new and different meaning, through a strange and persistent metaphorical misuse... makes me wonder what it is we shall call an armed and hostile conflict between nations, should one actually happen.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by 17andLiberal (January 24, 2012 11:14 pm ET)
        4  
        The word WAR used to mean "armed and hostile conflict between nations or states", but now it simply means political opposition, however civil or peaceful.

        More often, it means imagined political opposition, however unevidenced or nonexistant, ie. the "War" on Christmas/religion
        Report Abuse
      • Author by grmce (January 25, 2012 3:20 am ET)
        1 1
        Don't forget the "war on poverty", "war on drugs", "war on cancer", "war on inflation"... war on anything that gets on your bloody wick. Oh, and don't forget the "war on terrorism".

        I suspect that for most of the chicken-hawks their ideal would be a war on peace to keep the plebs in place.

        Now, what was that book I read once? I think it was at school - where the State managed to subjugate the populace by creating a state of perpetual war. What was it now? - I remember, 1984.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Dem02020 (January 25, 2012 7:05 am ET)
          1  

          A WAR on PEACE, that's a good one!

          And don't forget the COLD WAR.

          As far as the Orwell novel goes, another important element to it was the use of language, and the twisting of words in giving them new and different meanings... like the word WAR itself, making the word WAR vague and meaningless, thereby tricking the people into thinking a WAR can and should be fought against everyone and any thing.

          1984: the year Reagan was re-elected.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by grmce (January 25, 2012 7:34 am ET)
            1  
            You've obviously been paying attention in class.

            10/10 with a gold star and a Koala stamp.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by pete x tp (January 24, 2012 11:07 pm ET)
      3  
      I guess that Ms. Gutterfowl's uterus is made of stone so she needn't worry about contraception.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by grmce (January 25, 2012 4:11 am ET)
           
        Puts me in mind of the (possibly apocryphal - I've heard it ascribed to several persons) exchange between a heckler and a politician on the stump:

        Heckler: "What about abortion?"

        Politician: "In your case I'd make it retrospective."
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Litwiz (January 25, 2012 12:34 am ET)
      5  
      As a woman, I am offended. I do not, will not ever, allow a corrupt organization that victimizes children, preys on the elderly, and holds "eternal life" by a whimsical thread to anyone stupid enough to fall for it. Contraception is NOT a war on Catholicism. The pedophile priests do that themselves.

      If you do, however, believe that the Pope is infallible, that bread literally becomes body and wine, blood, and if you do believe that taking the pill will lead to eternal hellfire and bloody damnation, then don't take it. You know, I've never heard my Hindi friends discuss laws to take away my right to eat a good carne asada (beef) burrito. They are smart enough--and not threatened by dogma and hell--to know that what I do is on me and what they do is on them.

      Keep you paws off my body~ and yes, I'll fight tooth and nail for it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Sieg_Zeon (January 26, 2012 12:45 pm ET)
      1  
      How much longer untill republicans seek to outlaw menstruation as a form of abortion ?
      Report Abuse