About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Fox's Ramsey: "Last Night Our President Declared War On Success"

January 25, 2012 9:01 am ET

From the January 25 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Doocy: Obama Used "Warren Buffett's Secretary To Kick Off His Class Warfare Campaign"

Kilmeade: Obama Will "Bring Up The Class Warfare Stuff" In His State Of The Union Address

Fox's Year Of Class Warfare


Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by RKAllen (January 25, 2012 9:06 am ET)
      27  
      The hell he did!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (January 25, 2012 1:42 pm ET)
        2  
        How can I soar with eagles when i am surrounded by turqueys ?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by johnbrown (January 25, 2012 6:57 pm ET)
        4  
        The only economic war I've seen over the past 30 years is the real class warfare St.Ronnie and Bush Jr. declared on the poor and middle class having them pay a higher rate in taxes than the wealthy.If that isn't class warfare I don't know what one is.I've seen Ramsey on CNN(I try to avoid Fox News because I don't watch programs that insult my intelligence)and they try to portray him as middle of the road.Wish they'd see he's a typical AM right wing talk show host with an agenda like the rest of them.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Unreality (January 25, 2012 11:42 pm ET)
          3  
          I listened to Ramsey the other day and his show is little more than a long-form infomercial for all the get rich quick scams out there. Every guest on the hour I was driving was shilling for a "seminar" or "retreat" that I am sure cost $5-10,000.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by teh.stoopid.lib (January 25, 2012 9:07 am ET)
      31  
      Sick to fukcing death of hearing about how hard millionaires work. How hard do average Americans work? How hard do soldiers, firefighters, cops, teachers, etc. work? These are honorable, noble professions that many feel 'called' to and they work their asses off. How many of them will EVER be millionaires?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Imbecile (January 25, 2012 9:45 am ET)
        18  
        Well, obviously, if you're a millionaire or wealthier, that's just god's way of telling the world how much harder you worked than everyone else. You see, the Calvinists (and a lot of these "libertarians" who think poor people deserve their poverty don't realize they're advocating an incredibly tyrannical Christian doctrine) are convinced that predestination is alive and well in modern-day America.

        On the other end of that coin, poverty is just god's way of telling everyone you aren't going to heaven.

        Yeah, according to Calvinists, even Jesus is burning in the eternal fires of hell. Of course, they won't admit that, but the logical conclusion of their beliefs dictates it.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by teh.stoopid.lib (January 25, 2012 9:50 am ET)
          14  
          How does Mark 10:25 fit into their philosophy? Or do they just disappear that one like all the others that don't fit?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Imbecile (January 25, 2012 9:55 am ET)
            16  
            I think we all know that there is a particular faction of christianity that believes they alone have been set aside for salvation. Some in that sect have found a way to merge their capitalist greed and their piety into one, single warped belief system that equates currency with faith.

            Now, there may be aspects in the teachings of Jesus that counter their predetermined beliefs, such as taking care of the poor, and loving one's enemy as one loves oneself, and things like that, that have become synonymous with "communism" and "nazis" to those who have wedded money and religion. When something comes along like Mark 10:25 that seems to contradict what they have predetermined, they just call it liberal bias, a.k.a. naziism, and ignore it.

            So, you see, that's a nazi communist camel you're trying to force down their throats.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by The_Cat (January 25, 2012 10:36 am ET)
            7  
            It doesn't, teh.stoopid.lib. The Golden Rule they operate by is 'he who has the gold makes the rules'. Different kind of worship. Different deity altogether.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by chuckie (January 25, 2012 10:10 am ET)
        10  
        It IS hard to get one of your parents to earn millions of dollars and then give it to you. Or one of your grandparents or ....

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Unreality (January 25, 2012 11:46 pm ET)
          1  
          As Warren Buffett says, "Some of us won the womb lottery!" BTW, while he didn't inherit a pile, his dad was a member of congress and he was fortunate to attend good university (Columbia) and build a network of infuential and connected friends.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by goonhee9633 (January 25, 2012 1:44 pm ET)
        3  
        I hear you. And where did those statistics come from, the 17.3 years, and 70-80 hours of work per week. In a seven day week that leaves about 90 hours left for everything else, including sleep, although maybe these self made millionaires don't require that while they are making their fortune. How much time do these imaginary folks spend with their families or other people outside of work? Do they drive to anywhere besides work, or shop for food? Do they even eat? This is all a myth. Becoming a millionaire is not a function of how many hours you work; it's likely a function of what your efforts are focused on. How hard do you think those three stooges on the couch work. They say what they're told to say and are rewarded handsomely.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Unreality (January 26, 2012 12:07 am ET)
          3  
          During my typical tech startups most of the founders have put in 100 hour weeks for 1-2-3 years. Easy if you don't have kids. No PTA meetings, no live sports, no movies, no exercise, no vacation. Keep the commute short. Have food brought in, work 16 hour days, sleep 5-6 hours max.

          It's not sustainable forever, nor is it really productive after an extended time, and it's not how you make $1M a year!

          The key is to create intellectual property of value, not just a thing or service.

          But it's also true the odds of getting $1 M are still long.

          You might find a business model in which you can entice lots of people to work only on commission as independent contractors, exploit them, make a high margin off each one, and pocket $1M a year. It requires a pretty good sociopath to make work but many brokerages like stock, real estate and insurance work that way.

          I have some tech friends who have netted $5M, one guy $50-80M, and the tops about $250M at peak of market. All on paper of course. I almost cashed out in the low end of that category with one of my startups, but the market blew up and the acquirer backed out. Pretty typical of business cycles.

          Additionally, as you might imagine, after a few years of 100 hour weeks odds are high of a divorce, dividing that money in half for everyone of those guys I mentioned!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by foole (January 25, 2012 9:07 am ET)
      26  
      Geez, Dave, I watched the whole speech and never once heard The President say anything about "war on success" or that "success is bad". Makes me kind of wonder if you're just hearing things you want to hear in the speech, or if you're just an outright filthy liar. Hmmmmm, which could it be?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (January 25, 2012 9:15 am ET)
        15  
        "...I watched the whole speech..."
        Well, there you go. Fux viewers and Dittoheads wouldn't waste their time listening to that Kenyan/Muslim/Nazi/Socialist/Commie. They'll depend of these bloviators and those on hate radio to give them the straight dope.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by blue saccha (January 25, 2012 9:24 am ET)
        1 30
        you have to read between the lines...it is obvious that obama wants to redistribute wealth in this country..."spread the wealth around"
        Report Abuse
        • Author by teh.stoopid.lib (January 25, 2012 9:26 am ET)
          20  
          ...or you could get your head out of the FOXs rear and think for yourself. That's always an option.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by blue saccha (January 25, 2012 9:31 am ET)
              29
            ahh..nice intelijent response as usual...the fact remains...obama did say he wants to spread the wealth around, yes?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by jarossiter (January 25, 2012 9:41 am ET)
              22  
              So tell me, what exactly is wrong with not allowing all of the wealth to pool at the top?

              As Pres. Obama also said, the wealthy did not get there on their own.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Imbecile (January 25, 2012 9:47 am ET)
              20  
              What's wrong with making sure we have a nation strong enough in all aspects to be the best?

              What in the constitution dictates that we have to have enormous wealth disparity in America?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by foole (January 25, 2012 9:53 am ET)
                18  
                The top 400 people in this country have more wealth than the bottom 50% of the people in this country. If we truly want to reclaim the greatness America once achieved, we've got to start shaking loose some of the billions the top 1% have stashed away. We can't maintain a consumer society if there are no consumers.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Imbecile (January 25, 2012 10:03 am ET)
                  16  
                  Exactly. I wonder what they think the endgame for a system like this would be? That they'll all just float away in their private islands with their wealth and never have to interact with the proles while continuing to amass great wealth at everyone else's expense?

                  Do they all believe they'll all die wealthy and happy in perpetuity? Is this about power and control and wealth is the only way they think they can attain that power and control? Do they think it will last?

                  I can't figure them out to save my life.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by foole (January 25, 2012 10:21 am ET)
                    12  
                    It really doesn't make any sense. Destroy the system that has made all of this money for you, and you'll one day be sitting around surrounded by stacks and stacks of what is essentially just so much paper. It's like Robert Reich says, everyone does better in a thriving economy. I keep waiting for the wealthy and powerful to wake up to this. Looks like I'm gonna be waiting for a long time. Apparently, rich people are pretty stupid.
                    Report Abuse
            • Author by gmccpa (January 25, 2012 9:58 am ET)
              18  
              Here we go again with that redistribute the wealth GARBAGE.

              If you want an intelligent reponse, do some research. The wealth has already been redistributed...only its been redistributed UP..to the wealthy. So now, they are reaping the benefit of increased wealth...and much lower taxes (or maybe the lower taxes contributed to the increase). Either way, they've benefited greatly...and now want to 'fix' the whole thing by paying less taxes...and taxing those that can least afford it.

              Really, do you honestly think someone like Mitt Romney would suffer if his tax rate was a few pct points higher? 14%??? If you and I worked our butts off for a $10 or $15K bonus, its likely we would pay double that.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by iglou (January 25, 2012 11:37 am ET)
                9  
                Exactly! We're seeing the result of years of trickle-up economic policy that disproportionally favours those in the upper brackets.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (January 25, 2012 10:35 am ET)
              14 1
              "intelijent" LOL!

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 25, 2012 12:48 pm ET)
                12  
                I like when the illiterate trolls type some stupid thing they heard from Fox, then act all condescending when the response to it isn't 'intellijent' enough for them.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by gmccpa (January 25, 2012 12:53 pm ET)
                4  
                intelijent...funny!!
                Report Abuse
            • Author by rms (January 25, 2012 12:08 pm ET)
              10  
              No, he did NOT use the word "spread," or even infer the motives you are attaching to his address. Clearly he wants everyone to have the same possibility of achieving the American dream. Sorry you missed the speech.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by mjh (January 25, 2012 3:13 pm ET)
              3  
              "the fact remains...obama did say he wants to spread the wealth around, yes?" -- brown sackof



              Per the transcript, no. Perhaps if you listed/watched/read the speech itself, rather than the Fox condensed version, you would be aware of this . . .

              Report Abuse
              • Author by aBeck in 10-O-C (January 25, 2012 4:11 pm ET)
                4  
                Nice try mjh, with the old transcript ploy. But as Saccha points out, it is in there.....in all that blank space between the actual words. You need your special wingnut glasses to "read between the lines".

                "So put in your earplugs,
                Put on your eyeshades,
                You know where to put the cork!"

                Report Abuse
            • Author by kabniel (January 26, 2012 4:25 am ET)
              1  
              blue

              It is what you deserved LIAR. That isnt a FACT that is your delusional fantasy. Sorry that you are too stupid to even know what a FACT is.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (January 25, 2012 9:58 am ET)
          21  
          Give it a rest. Any taxation is "redistributing wealth". It's a Troglodyte talking point that has no meaning.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Brabantio (January 25, 2012 11:01 am ET)
            15 1
            It's funny how you only hear about "redistributing wealth" when it's the rich people losing money on the deal.

            I guess we all know who buys the bullhorn, right?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by MiddleLeft (January 25, 2012 12:07 pm ET)
            8  
            The primary purpose of any government (besides national defense) is in fact the distribution of wealth.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 25, 2012 12:51 pm ET)
              11  
              And the primary purpose of money is for the redistribution of wealth. The only benefit of having that wealth is when you 'redistribute' it to get something.

              Accumulating massive wealth is just like the hoarding by those people on TV with the two rooms filled with their magazine collection, it's the result of a mental illness.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (January 25, 2012 10:33 am ET)
          7 3
          Concern troll alert.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by danielsangeo (January 25, 2012 12:47 pm ET)
          10  
          you have to read between the lines


          AKA "Make stuff up"
          Report Abuse
        • Author by barscotch9441 (January 25, 2012 12:56 pm ET)
          6  
          Yeah, kinda like Saint Ronnie did with his 50% top-bracket tax rate. Maybe if Pinky and the Brain hadn't CUT top-bracket rates DURING 2 WARS we wouldn't be this mess. STFU & GTFO simpleton. Go snort some Koch off Eric Cantor's leg.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by kabniel (January 26, 2012 4:24 am ET)
             
          blue

          What is obvious is that you are a liar and a brainwashed moron. You are too stupid to READ much less understand anything between the lines
          Report Abuse
      • Author by dogbreath (January 25, 2012 9:44 am ET)
        16  
        Agreed. As is recall he said distinctly the opposite.

        Let's never forget: Millions of Americans who work hard and play by the rules every day deserve a government and a financial system that do the same. It's time to apply the same rules from top to bottom: no bailouts, no handouts, and no copouts. An America built to last insists on responsibility from everybody.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (January 25, 2012 10:00 am ET)
          15  
          Maybe he was declaring war on excess.

          For me, one of the most profound lines was when he challenged the "Job Creators" to ask themselves "What can I do to bring jobs back to my country?"

          Of course, we know what their answer will be; they'll flip him off.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by iglou (January 25, 2012 11:40 am ET)
            8  
            Exactly why does that top bracket deserve a break if they don't do anything to keep up employment?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by soros (January 25, 2012 2:20 pm ET)
            1 10
            Do you think Obama asked Steve Jobs that question when he was alive? Doesn't seem like it because the Chinese are still exploiting slave labor and poisoning their environment to build the iPhone we all love.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 25, 2012 12:43 pm ET)
        8  
        foole, you must be getting the same edited versions of the speeches that I get. Fox ( and wingnut radio) is always commenting on parts of the president's speeches that aren't even in the versions I hear.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by 17andLiberal (January 25, 2012 1:04 pm ET)
          10  
          You only hear what he's actually saying, but they know what he's thinking.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by danielsangeo (January 25, 2012 1:14 pm ET)
            11  
            Obama: "I will expand gun rights for all Americans."
            Righties: "You have to read between the lines. Obama wants to repeal the 2nd Amendment!"

            Obama: "I want to celebrate success."
            Righties: "You have to read between the lines. Obama wants to institute communism and become a totalitarian dictator!"

            Obama: "I am a Christian."
            Righties: "MUUUUSSSSSLIIIIIMMMMM!!!!!"
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mjh (January 25, 2012 3:23 pm ET)
              3  
              "You only hear what he's actually saying, but they know what he's thinking."


              Obama: "I will expand gun rights for all Americans."
              Righties: "You have to read between the lines. Obama wants to repeal the 2nd Amendment!"

              Obama: "I want to celebrate success."
              Righties: "You have to read between the lines. Obama wants to institute communism and become a totalitarian dictator!"

              Obama: "I am a Christian."
              Righties: "MUUUUSSSSSLIIIIIMMMMM!!!!!"



              An example of the trogs' "dog hearing" that Gary Larson captured perfectly . . .


              Report Abuse
          • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 25, 2012 1:18 pm ET)
            5  
            Of course, or as one of the obedient Foxbots put it on this thread "Reading between the lines".

            That's always dangerous, when people who have trouble following simple conversations on the surface, what's plainly being said, start trying to analyze the deeper meanings of others words.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by foole (January 25, 2012 2:08 pm ET)
              6  
              I told someone yesterday that if The President didn't say enough stuff for them to act outraged about in the SOTU, they would just make stuff up. And, I'll be damned if they haven't.

              And trogs looking for deeper meanings to things always ends up badly. Trogs aren't good at anything "deep". They need to stick with not understanding what is actually said instead of not understanding what they think someone was saying. Trogs thinking always leads to trouble.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 25, 2012 2:56 pm ET)
                5  
                Trogs trying to think is like chimpanzees playing with power tools. Never pretty. Logic, math, statistics... these should all have warning labels on them written in that big red font that wingnuts like so much.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by mjh (January 25, 2012 3:26 pm ET)
                  3  
                  "Trogs trying to think is like chimpanzees playing with power tools."


                  ROFL, Andy -- that statement reminded of the one about how if you let chimps bang away at typewriters long enough, they'll eventually produce Shakespeare.

                  So, are you saying that if the chimps play with power tools long enough, they'll eventually construct a three bedroom house? :^)

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 25, 2012 3:43 pm ET)
                    6  
                    No, the chimps were only part of a simile. Chimps are capable of learning, and have been known to use simple tools, but it may take millions of years of evolution and trial and error for them to build a house to meet building codes.

                    Wingnuts move in the opposite direction, always causing more chaos and confusion the more effort they put into doing something.

                    I saw a good illustration of this last night on one of the cable shows. Remember that old woman in the grey fright wig who asked John McCain about the president being an Arab ? The audience laughed, and McCain corrected her.

                    This was juxtaposed with that more recent event, where a woman questioning Rick Santorum called the president an avowed Muslim with no legal right to be in the White House. This was met with cheers, and no correction from the GOP candidate.

                    Now, these weren't the exact same audience, Santorum's fans are probably more fundamentalist extremists than McCain's, but they were both made up of the Republican base, so the point was made;

                    With all of the reporting and info available over the past few years regarding Obama's religion / ethnicity / citizenship / place of birth, the wingnuts now know less than they did a few years ago.

                    Education actually has the opposite effect on the right wing brain than it does on a human brain. QED.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by aBeck in 10-O-C (January 26, 2012 4:35 am ET)
                      5  
                      You make a compelling argument; but with your applied logic you are missing something in your analysis Andy.

                      First, the Santorum woman was described as an old woman with a cane, so she is essentially the same woman as McCain encountered.....a Fox Geezer loaded with the same wingbot 1.0 software!

                      Second, you note " all of the reporting and info available over the past few years regarding Obama's religion / ethnicity / citizenship / place of birth"...

                      You are not reporting conditions from inside "the bubble" where that array of "info" is not available for public consumption on Fox News or on talk radio. Therefore that info doesn't even exist to educate or otherwise influence wingnuts one way or the other.

                      You are assuming some sort of different data set that updates the wingbot curriculum. All that those folks have learned in three years of repetition is that everything they knew then is still true today. Their education process involves using the same textbook over and over.
                      That also explains why they all present themselves as self-righteous and arrogant authorities on a subject!!!!

                      To adapt an old employers' adage:
                      Having three years of education is not the same as one year of education repeated twice more.
                      You have to learn something, don't you?
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 26, 2012 8:37 am ET)
                        2  
                        Back to the drawing board.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by aBeck in 10-O-C (January 26, 2012 12:15 pm ET)
                          1  
                          Don't sweat it. It is an easy fix.

                          Your premise was sound. You simply forgot to carry the 1 when converting your reverse-axial-inversion-integer before tranferring the synaptic firing ratio into the Prokopiev calculation's matrix.

                          Quantum cartography of the wingnut universe is a new frontier in science... or comedy--I can't decide. Keep it coming.
                          Report Abuse
                    • Author by spiritcaller4585 (January 26, 2012 9:18 pm ET)
                      1  
                      the wingnuts now know less than they did a few years ago.

                      Well, research shows that
                      Low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies... Those ideologies, in turn, stress hierarchy and resistance to change, attitudes that can contribute to prejudice

                      No wonder these wingnuts hate science so much.
                      Report Abuse
    • Author by uncle.billy (January 25, 2012 9:08 am ET)
      16  
      The president I watched declared war on failure, I don't know who you were watching probably the 5.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Jimijams (January 25, 2012 9:08 am ET)
      15  
      They should be forced to look up definitions of words like war, socialism, Marxist, fascism, Communism, and of course racism.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Spooky Dooooooooood (January 25, 2012 9:08 am ET)
      13  
      He declared war on some pirates last night.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by thaneb (January 25, 2012 9:14 am ET)
        10  
        And quite successfully. Will these goons ignore that? Spin it?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by teh.stoopid.lib (January 25, 2012 9:16 am ET)
          14  
          I saw a comment on a story about it this morning saying how awful it was that the president put the lives of so many of our heroes in danger just to save one American. These people are sick.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Conchobhar (January 25, 2012 9:20 am ET)
            14  
            I'd be willing to bet that commenter praised Bush to the skies for the Jessica Lynch 'rescue.'
            Report Abuse
            • Author by dogbreath (January 25, 2012 9:46 am ET)
              11  
              And continue to believe that it was actually a rescue mission.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Conchobhar (January 25, 2012 1:10 pm ET)
                2  
                And probably hates Pat Tillman's mother for uncovering the truth about her son's death and thereby destroying a propaganda meme.
                Report Abuse
        • Author by Conchobhar (January 25, 2012 9:17 am ET)
          8  
          They're already spinning.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by tuffstuff (January 25, 2012 9:11 am ET)
        21
      some butt pirates
      Report Abuse
    • Author by CAL (January 25, 2012 9:17 am ET)
      12  
      No not hardly. Instead it's corporatist a55holes like you, who for three decades have been waging war against working class citizens.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by David2012 (January 25, 2012 9:20 am ET)
      14  
      Another "war"??

      Man, I wish these people would come up with some other metaphor once in awhile.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Imbecile (January 25, 2012 10:09 am ET)
        13  
        You're just trying to wage war on their war metaphor.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by BobsYourUncle (January 25, 2012 12:32 pm ET)
          5  
          You're just trying to wage war on their war metaphor.

          I can see that being in the daily show.....
          Report Abuse
      • Author by barscotch9441 (January 25, 2012 1:03 pm ET)
        4  
        Nope - It's the "Desparation Samba" followed by the "Repetition Rhumba" from Rammin' Dave for all of ya, here on the request line at WBGT - "The Bigot!" It's 85 degrees out there, folks, so BUN-DLE UP! It's 1:03 at the Bigot.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Brabantio (January 25, 2012 9:22 am ET)
      10  
      "Success" is to accomplish what one aspires to do. Winning a game of Chess is "success" whether money was at stake or not.

      Not that money isn't important at all, but this mindset that money is all that matters is what's really depressing. How about a sense of accomplishment, pride, respect of the community and other business owners? Do those things not exist in the world of successful people? Supposedly people are only interested in making as much money as possible, and if that result is moderated by the government then they'll all just say to hell with the system and go on welfare.

      Somehow, I doubt it.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by danielsangeo (January 25, 2012 12:49 pm ET)
        6  
        Exactly. Why do these people think that "success" means "having a lot of money"? A bank robber could have a lot of money but that doesn't make him or her a "success". Just someone that has a lot of money.

        Madoff had a lot of money. Was he a "success"? Was going after Madoff "punishing success"?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by David2012 (January 25, 2012 9:23 am ET)
      6  
      I really, really, really wish that Gretchen, the Deuce, and Beetlebrow would decide that they were going to show the rest of us and go Galt.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Rickamabob (January 25, 2012 9:25 am ET)
      15  
      Well, on Inauguration Day Fox "News" declared war on President Obama.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (January 25, 2012 3:29 pm ET)
        4  
        "Well, on Inauguration Day Fox "News" declared war on President Obama."


        No -- on Inauguration Day they launched their offensives; the formal declaration of war was the day after Election Day . . .

        Report Abuse
    • Author by epkklk851 (January 25, 2012 9:30 am ET)
      15 1
      What a load of horse hockey! I am disgusted with all this talk of "Class Warfare" and a supposed "War on Success". So what if it takes an average of 17.3 years for someone to become a millionaire? What about all the people who work just that hard for twice as long and end up with nowhere near a million dollars? I'm a working American; my parents were working Americans. I made in a year what Mitt Romney makes in a day. I'm not complaining, but he doesn't work for his money; he holds investments and they make money for Mitt, he doesn't really "work" for a living. I make about the average income for an American household, but I don't feel secure in my place. I worry about my children and if they will ever get to my level of comfort in the world. I worry about the people who don't have health insurance. I worry about people not having a steady job, but having to move from job to job. I worry about people not having pensions and having to work until they die. I don't really worry about millionaires who can pay their way.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Fallacyhunter (January 25, 2012 9:36 am ET)
      6  
      War, war, war all the time...I guess it makes sense that this cavalcade of chickenhawks love to co-opt the word for every petty delusion they have. What else are they going to do with the word?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (January 25, 2012 9:55 am ET)
      13  
      Dave is partially responsible for convincing the Troglodytes that if they work hard and put money in the stock market, they'll retire millionaires. It's one of the reasons so many people making $40,000 or less fight so hard to protect tax breaks for Billionaires; they think they'll be one some day.

      The thing is, if you become a millionaire that way, the tax hikes Obama mentioned will never affect you. He's talking about people who make more than a million each year. People like Dave Ramsey and the three lying jackasses on the couch.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MickD (January 25, 2012 10:06 am ET)
      10 1
      I wish Scarlett O'Hara was at FoxNoose...

      "Fiddle-dee-dee! War, war, war; this war talk's spoiling all the fun at every party this spring. I get so bored I could scream."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Rsw58 (January 25, 2012 10:19 am ET)
      11  
      Oh f**k you Ramsey! I get so sick of hearing people like you whine about "the war on success" and about how "hard" millionaires work, blahh, blahh, blahh! I guess those of us who aren't millionaires don't do squat all day huh? We don't work hard right? Take your stupid opinions and shove it where the sun don't shine!
      All we are asking is that the rich pay their fair share. That's all! We're not after all their precious money. So stop with the "war on success" BS.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (January 25, 2012 10:44 am ET)
        14  
        I wonder... how hard did Romneybot work last year for his $20,000,000? As far as I know, he spent most of the year campaigning for President and making speeches. In fact, didn't he once joke that he was "unemployed"? He's still getting paid for "work" he did years ago.

        Now, I'm not saying that he didn't "earn" that money, but did he really work harder for it than the Firefighter making $50,000?

        Essentially, that's what the Troglodytes want us to believe.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Imbecile (January 25, 2012 10:55 am ET)
          10  
          But, people like firefighters and police officers and other "first responders" aren't supposed to want to earn more money. The gratitude of a grateful nation and the patriotism they feel when they see a corny montage commercial on TV celebrating all their sacrifices is supposed to be good enough.

          And besides, I think we've already clearly established that hard work is measured by wealth, which means that Mitt Romney worked 400 times harder than any firefighter last year.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Fallacyhunter (January 25, 2012 11:45 am ET)
            4  
            You know, it is kind of a twisted Worthington Law isn't it? More income equals more personal worth...no wonder we all want to get rich.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by shaggles (January 25, 2012 11:41 am ET)
          8  
          If Romney "worked" for his income he wouldn't be paying the Capital Gains rate.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by nerzog (January 25, 2012 11:53 am ET)
            8  
            Here's the really objectionable part; as I understand it, Royalties are taxed as regular income. So, if I write a book or a song, the Royalties I get paid years later would be taxed at the 35% rate, if I make enough.

            But people like Romneybot, who invested money years ago, get paid dividends on that investment and pay only 15%. In essence, royalties and dividends are the same, yet Romneybot is taxed less because some lobbyist has dubbed him a "job creator".

            How is that fair?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by shaggles (January 25, 2012 1:52 pm ET)
              4  
              Worse than that even is the fact that Republicans have been trying to reduce the Capitals Gains rate to zero for decades. In the world they seem to want capital gains and inheritance would not be taxed at all but earned income would be taxed at 15% whether you made $5000 or $5,000,000. And somehow we would be able to balance the budget that way.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by CoolSlaw (January 25, 2012 11:53 am ET)
            9  
            Isn't he technically paying LESS then the capital gains rate?

            On the books at least, he pays that "wink wink".

            Report Abuse
        • Author by mjh (January 25, 2012 3:33 pm ET)
          3  
          "As far as I know, he spent most of the year campaigning for President and making speeches."


          And that gig apparently pays well . . .


          Report Abuse
    • Author by bintx (January 25, 2012 10:32 am ET)
      8 2
      Actually, he just called for the right for ALL Americans to be able to "succeed."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (January 25, 2012 11:00 am ET)
      9  
      Why is the free enterprise system a religion to these people?

      Because they love money more than anything else on earth...?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by CoolSlaw (January 25, 2012 11:59 am ET)
        7  
        Why is the free enterprise system a religion to these people?


        Sadly, just like these Christians who boo the golden rule, the religion of free enterprise is riddled with hypocrites and false prophets(and profits) as well. Just like Christians who pick and choose what apocryphal passages from the Old Testament to enforce and which to ignore, the free market faithful decide which economic theories work and don't work based on little more then faith. Like Christians downplaying the mistakes made by leaders in the past, so do the free market fundamentalist ignore the success of the New Deal, and refuse to acknowledge the failures of supply side theory.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Conchobhar (January 25, 2012 1:18 pm ET)
          6  
          In the 5ifties and Sixties, when I was in (mostly Catholic) school, one of the arguments against Communism is that it erased the human, spiritual value of a person, and made people mere economic units. Oh, brave new world! Corporate Christianity has done the same thing.
          (for the post-birth, anyway)
          Report Abuse
        • Author by GreenLantern (January 25, 2012 10:51 pm ET)
          3  
          The "free market" is one of the most un-Christian principles ever. Yet these idiots ignore Christ over and over again and claim that it is their MOST Christian value.......
          Smoking faux is bad for both your intelligence AND your morals!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (January 25, 2012 11:15 am ET)
      9  
      This morning Ramsey declared war on the vast majority of Americans.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (January 25, 2012 11:55 am ET)
        7  
        I respected Ramsey at one time, but over the last few years, he's just become another Republican talking points parrot.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Fallacyhunter (January 25, 2012 12:25 pm ET)
          10  
          When I was in grad school in the New River Valley, I would listen to his radio show during my commute; but very quickly I realized that despite his constant Bible clutching and folksy Christian bon mots about finance, he had a startling lack of empathy and a very simple minded one size fits all approach to just about everything...in other words, I think he's always sucked.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by nerzog (January 25, 2012 12:46 pm ET)
            5  
            That's a good point. Maybe it just took me a while to realize that he's nothing more than a Bible Thumping Republican tool.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by marco21 (January 25, 2012 11:32 am ET)
      6  
      Good God, what a joke. We get it, Fox. You don't need to pull more "experts" out of the woodwork to bolster your phony baloney election-losing strategy.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by CoolSlaw (January 25, 2012 11:49 am ET)
      16  
      STOP just STOP!!!!

      Not everything President Obama does is "declaring WAR" on something.

      Ramsey just declared WAR on originality.

      Fox news declares WAR on journalism.

      Fox and Friends declares WAR on intelligence.

      Roger Ailes declares WAR on democracy.

      Clothing declares WAR on nudity.

      Charlie Sheen declares WAR on humility.

      Music declares WAR on silence.

      Media Matters declares WAR on misinformation.

      Chairs declare WAR on standing.

      What an easy, brainless use of hyperbole. Please get some new material. Declaring war on stuff now is meaningless since everything anyone does or doesn't do is declaring a war on something.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by donwelty (January 25, 2012 12:26 pm ET)
      3  
      We got war on --

      Christmas
      Free enterprise
      religion
      capitalism
      Halloween

      What else? How about war on
      motherhood
      the flag
      apple pie
      plants
      stupidity
      the American ______ (whatever fits)

      With a little creativity, the possibilities may appear endless.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dolfan (January 25, 2012 12:35 pm ET)
      3  
      Lots of "Independent" reporting going on at Fox again this morning.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (January 25, 2012 12:35 pm ET)
      5  
      I cannot imagine being so dimwitted that these three would make sense to me.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 25, 2012 1:12 pm ET)
        6  
        I believe boxtop has cited The Five as a source, so you may not have to 'imagine' much. Fox & Friends may be the more cerebral, "egghead" show, the one that makes him switch over to cartoons.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (January 25, 2012 3:35 pm ET)
        2  
        "I cannot imagine being so dimwitted that these three would make sense to me."


        As I told Imbecile in another thread, butting your head repeatedly against concrete helps . . .

        Report Abuse
    • Author by MiniTru (January 25, 2012 12:56 pm ET)
      7  
      Fox's Ramsey: "Last Night Our President Declared War On Success"
      Therefore, Ramsey is safe from harm.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Spooky Dooooooooood (January 25, 2012 1:26 pm ET)
      8  
      I wish these people would make up their minds. Is this the most timid ineffective president of all time or is he the all time worst bully, constantly cramming things down their collective throats.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mjh (January 25, 2012 3:08 pm ET)
      3  
      Fox's Ramsey: "Last Night Our President Declared War On Success"


      More proof that wingnuts live in an alternate reality.

      I just finished watching the enhanced SOTUA at whitehouse.gov, and heard no declaration of war, from either the President or the Congress, on success, Christmas, drugs, or any other non-warmaking entity . . .

      Report Abuse
    • Author by johnbrown (January 25, 2012 6:36 pm ET)
      3  
      Since 99% of the country aren't millionaires I don't understand why so many people go along with the garbage these say.Maybe its Gretchen's legs, Dave Ramsey's folksy way of talking, Kilmeade's hatefulness,or the screaming headlines or pretty stage they use.Its substance not style people!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mcnairbo6573 (January 25, 2012 7:02 pm ET)
      3  
      24/7 Fox news wages war on the other 99% of us who aren't wealthy.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by barbara960 (January 25, 2012 9:22 pm ET)
      2  
      Is Doocy an idiot or what?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by GreenLantern (January 25, 2012 10:47 pm ET)
      3  
      At church, my wife and I took the dave ramsey course after we needed to file medical bankruptcy to keep the insurance companies from killing my wife. His advice helped us a lot but it was all pretty common sense. I used to respect him and actually still get his newsletter but when "that black man" became president, all of a sudden, he started towing the hate-wing line. His stuff is supposed to be Christian based, but the longer he has been extremely wealthy, telling people in slick seminars and DVD's and books and radio show, he is just becoming what it seems like ALL (sorry, MOST) of them become. Heartless, unChristian, unmoral front men, talking heads and keep the wealth and all the power in our few hands, billionaires club. Too bad when he tries to put that camel through the eyes of a needle.......
      Report Abuse