About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Fox & Friends Again Calls For Tax Hike On Poor

January 25, 2012 9:42 am ET

From the January 25 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Doocy: "Shared Sacrifice" Means "Expand[ing]" Taxpayer Base To 51% Who Don't Pay "Federal Taxes"

Fox Calls For Higher Taxes On Middle Class: "The Progressive Income Tax Has Not Been So Fair"

Carlson Needs To "Look At The Facts" On Taxes, Income Of The Wealthy

Fox Still Pushing Falsehood That Half Of Americans Are "Not Paying Taxes"

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Fallacyhunter (January 25, 2012 9:45 am ET)
      18  
      So what exactly does Brian think America would look like with a regressive tax system? Would he feel safe at night?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Imbecile (January 25, 2012 9:48 am ET)
        11  
        It would look like god intended, of course. That would make him feel extra super safe.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by neon desert (January 25, 2012 10:32 am ET)
          12  
          It would look fair. Like, if everybody had to pay a 17% flat tax.

          No, wait - that would mean that Romney would be paying around $3.4 million, while some lazy welfare queen wanna-be would only be paying around $3,400. That's not hardly fair.

          It would be more like if everybody had to pay a $5,000 flat tax. Every man, woman and child would pay $5k. Mitt would pay $5k, welfare queens would pay $5k... Now THAT's fair.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Imbecile (January 25, 2012 10:39 am ET)
            10  
            By jove, I think you've got it!
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Imbecile (January 25, 2012 10:39 am ET)
            9  
            But wait, what if you're unemployed or on disability and have no measurable income?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by worrierking (January 25, 2012 10:48 am ET)
              8 1
              Payments can be arranged. Lenders are standing by. Call 1 800 FAIRTAX.

              Low payments of $100 per month are available if you call now.

              (Payment assumes at least one dollar per month will go towards the principle. No more than $99 per month will be added to principle.)
              Report Abuse
              • Author by neon desert (January 25, 2012 11:10 am ET)
                10  
                And prisons. We have lots of prisons we need to fill.

                And think of it - welfare queens with 3 kids = $20,000. That would sure help keep the population of the bla... er, "de-incintivize" procreation among those who couldn't afford it.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by danielsangeo (January 25, 2012 11:53 am ET)
                  9  
                  "Are there no prisons?" asked Scrooge.
                  "Plenty of prisons," said the gentleman, laying down the pen again.
                  "And the Union workhouses?" demanded Scrooge. "Are they still in operation?"
                  "They are. Still," returned the gentleman, "I wish I could say they were not."
                  "The Treadmill and the Poor Law are in full vigour, then?" said Scrooge.
                  "Both very busy, sir."
                  "Oh! I was afraid, from what you said at first, that something had occurred to stop them in their useful course," said Scrooge. "I'm very glad to hear it."
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by barscotch9441 (January 25, 2012 12:19 pm ET)
              6  
              Your scenario faces two easy answers in this age of TEABagging morans.

              First you mentioned the unemployed. If you're unemployed, you can start by getting a job. If you can't get a job, you can seek help from your family or your church. Or you can starve.

              Then you mentioned being on disability. Disability? HAHAHAHAHA!!! Betcha they'd clip that, too.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 25, 2012 1:32 pm ET)
              6  
              ...what if you're unemployed or on disability and have no measurable income?


              You can join Captain Newt's Power Janitor Task Force to work off your debt !! ( Including the rental cost of wheelchair / floor buffer hybrids for the disabled)
              Report Abuse
      • Author by n'est-ce pas (January 25, 2012 10:31 am ET)
        16  
        Brad Pitt's monologue in Fight Club comes to mind whenever I hear these rich azzholes talking about the poor like they have it so good...
        Look, the people you are after are the people you depend on. We cook your meals, we haul your trash, we connect your calls, we drive your ambulances. We guard you while you sleep. Do not... [screw] with us.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Saturnalian (January 25, 2012 12:26 pm ET)
        3  
        If there was a Liars Tax enacted on FUX we'd have no national debt.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by David2012 (January 25, 2012 9:46 am ET)
      11  
      "Really, if the lower orders don't set a good example, what on earth is the use of them?"

      Oscar Wilde
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Jimijams (January 25, 2012 9:49 am ET)
      15  
      Yes, the poor can start paying their fair share.
      What's that you say? The poor don't have any money to pay, but the wealthy do? The wealthy who got wealthy because of the Bush tax cuts that were supposed to create jobs that were never created so that the poor could get better work and start paying more in taxes.

      Guy can't get past grade school logic.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by The_Cat (January 25, 2012 9:53 am ET)
      15  
      Hey, guess what, Fox & Friends! I would be one of the 47% with no federal tax liability at the end of the year except for my wife's salary, and I pay federal income taxes out of every single paycheck. Now, normally I would get most of that back at the end of the year, BUT I STILL PAY IN. They still take that money out of my check and keep it interest free until we settle up in April.

      The reason 47% of Americans end the year with no tax liability has nothing, NOTHING, to do with our tax code. No, the reason that many people end up getting their own money back from the federal government is because the poor have seen their wages decrease compared to inflation over the last 40 years. The middle class, over the same 40 years, have gotten about 11% in raises. The wealthy have seen their income skyrocket by 256%. So, the reason more Americans aren't paying taxes is because more than ever, more Americans aren't getting the raises they deserve.

      Tell you what, Toxic Friends, you convince your corporate masters to hand out 40 years of overdue raises, and we'll see how many more Americans are suddenly paying taxes, okay?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Jimijams (January 25, 2012 9:57 am ET)
        8  
        Not to mention state and local taxes that are paid in the form of a sales tax every single time anyone (Even non-residents) pays for anything. You know, the sales taxes that go to build roads, bridges, fix county hospitals, pay for street lights to be on and parks to be cleaned.

        But nope, republicans and Fox think that 47% don't pay ANY taxes at all, which is complete bull.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by CrashGordon (January 25, 2012 11:06 am ET)
          5  
          Fox is usually very careful to say that 46% pay no federal income taxes, but I'm convinced they downplay that last part so that their viewers construe that as pay no taxes. Fox is also careful to not point out that the reason they pay no federal income taxes is because after paying all the other taxes and deductible expenses, there's not enough income left to tax.

          I bet they won't highlight that Mitt Romney actually pays little or no federal income taxes on most of his income. Instead, he pays a much lower capital gains tax.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by wenfen (January 25, 2012 10:25 am ET)
        15  
        I love what you are saying...but, guess what? You, and everyone else here are speaking to the choir. Not in a million years will we be able to convince those heartless dumbazzes sitting on thier big comfy couch over at Fair and Unbalanced that what they spew is complete and utter B.S.

        Never gonna happen. I hate them. I try to pray they will first find a heart. And then promptly look into it and ask for compassion and empathy. I am not very optimistic, however.

        Until then, I will wait upon my much "undeserved" tax refund from the federal government so that I can get my 10 year old car fixed so that I can continue to get to my 13 dollar an hour job wiping other people's asses (literally) and continue to pay my rent and feed my kids for another year.

        I know, I know, this free ride of mine is sooooo sweet. I love sticking it to them suckers, them elites who are only trying to make it better for lowly and undeserving me.

        WINNING!!!! (Duh)
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Imbecile (January 25, 2012 10:42 am ET)
          15  
          You have a car?

          Do you have a refrigerator and a microwave, too?

          I've always wanted to speak with a real, live, wealthy person. What's it like? Being wealthy?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by wenfen (January 25, 2012 10:56 am ET)
            10  
            Hey, I know how to do poor...I make poor look sexy.

            Guess what else I have? Hold on now...a telephone. Yep. Don't hate me cause I'm poor.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by foole (January 25, 2012 11:06 am ET)
              9  
              A TELEPHONE!?!?! You are just being modest. You're not one of those greedy poor people, you're one of the unfortunate rich people. We're gonna make those heartless poor people start pulling their weight. It shouldn't be too hard, some of them don't eat much.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by wenfen (January 25, 2012 11:12 am ET)
                6  
                Well then, they should get on the Food Stamp train. Obama will hook em up. (So, I heard, anyway)
                Report Abuse
            • Author by Imbecile (January 25, 2012 11:17 am ET)
              7  
              I bet it's one of those fancy telephones, too, with all the buttons and numbers and such.
              Report Abuse
    • Author by foole (January 25, 2012 9:58 am ET)
      14  
      The "poor" people...pffft...them with their microwaves and refrigerators...while all the unforunate rich people have to pay all the taxes...well all the taxes on the money they can't squirrel away in tax shelters...meaning they may not be able to buy 3 new yachts this year...only 2. Time to take those "poor" people to the woodshed. You're poor you say? Well what kind of appliances do you have my "poor" friend. Poor people really pi$$ me off.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Rsw58 (January 25, 2012 9:59 am ET)
      9  
      So it's "class warfare" if you want to raise taxes on the uber-rich but "being fair" if you want to raise taxes the poor? I get it. That make perfect sense---if your are a right-wing idiot. Yes indeed poor people are getting a free ride right guys? But those poor, oppressed rich people are the ones we need to feel sorry for. Seriously, the people who work on Fox are scum.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by beDecent (January 25, 2012 10:06 am ET)
        9  
        I don't know about you, but I feel so bad for Romney only getting to keep $18.6 million of his $21.6 million AGI (not taking into account any deductions from his $27 million income). How did he ever survive?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by foole (January 25, 2012 10:56 am ET)
          6  
          It's a miracle he was able to feed his huge family and maintain his several residences. Someone has to just stand up and say it...poor people aren't pulling their malnourished weight in this country!
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 25, 2012 2:33 pm ET)
          5  
          I have to laugh at Mittens and his defenders coming out and saying that he paid what was required by law ( and not a penny more, dammit).

          Of course, people like newt and mitt have the means to hide a lot of things, but let's take them at their words, they've disclosed everything. That's the F-ing point, they're the people who get to influence how the tax laws are written. I don't think anybody was accusing them of breaking the law, just calling them out on their whining about how they're being punished for success.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 25, 2012 2:49 pm ET)
          6  
          I wasn't going to add this anecdote, but it's on my mind right now regarding the regressive tax system. I'll try to make it brief.

          Sometime in the early 2000s I met this kid ( well, early-mid 20s) who worked for a contractor I used to do some business with. He was a carpenter, recently married with a brand new baby. Real nice, honest, hard-working chap.

          I talked to him often during those years of the Bush administration, as wages were flattening out and the construction industry was floundering, and I knew he was jacking up his credit cards a bit. Not going out to restaurants or taking vacations, just getting by on his pay and his wife's( the new Mom) part-time pay.

          A few years ago I ran into him, as I do occasionally, in my neighborhood. He'd been hit with all of those increased interest rates on his credit cards ( the banks who fund most presidential campaigns, notably W's), telling me he was late on a payment, which raised all of his cards to high 20s or 30% interest.

          In sort of a hopeless situation, he defaulted, using one of those credit arbitrators to settle the accounts, and ruining his credit.

          I bumped into him again just recently, and he's doing much better, as construction has rebounded a little in the past few years, and he's paid off all of his debt. But he told me something that shocked me ( somehow, he was able to laugh as he told me, what a sport); The I.R.S. sent him a letter informing him that he owed taxes on the amount that one of the creditors had reduced his balance by.

          That is, let's say he had a balance of $5,000 ( probably on a borrowed amount that he'd repaid several times over), and was able to settle it through arbitration for $3,000. That $2,000 'discount' is reported as income of his, and a write-off for the bank, who reports it to the IRS. He's spent the past several years trying to get even, and now he owes the Fed three or four hundred bucks.

          That is who is getting nailed for taxes. Those banks who have been making a killing off of the bad economy can make their money off of people trying to get by, keep them treading water for years while collecting the principal several times over, then settle on an amount, counting the reduction as a gift.

          So screw Mitt Romney and his persecution complex.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by beDecent (January 25, 2012 3:41 pm ET)
            3  
            Thank goodness he can laugh at it, that's horrible. You need to have money in the first place to run for office, a guy like him would never make it, let alone be able to take the time off from work to campaign--it's a sick cycle of the rich writing tax laws that benefit them and hurt the middle class and poor. And other laws, i.e. welfare reform, which took more people off of welfare but did NOT solve any of the problems those people had, it only exacerbated them. (So screw Santorum, too.)
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 25, 2012 4:41 pm ET)
              3  
              Really, I tried to keep it brief, but wanted to get the details in. Considering the data on credit card debt held by the typical family, and how many must have been buried through job loss or just the bad economy, this situation has to be pretty common.

              Imagine, millions of people just trying to scratch by, destroying their credit, and getting boned for a few hundred on top of it, while the elites sit around figuring ways to shift more of the tax burden to the average American. These are the people MItt Romney thinks are jealous of him.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by beDecent (January 26, 2012 10:21 am ET)
                2  
                My fiance and I have two credit cards we're trying to pay off, and we're expecting a baby in August. Luckily for us, his brother offered to pay one of them for us and we'll pay him back instead of paying any more interest to the bank. Some people who make good money are decent human beings! (He's also really good with his money in the first place.)
                Report Abuse
    • Author by beDecent (January 25, 2012 9:59 am ET)
      10  
      Apparently, it's only class warfare when the president calls for tax hikes on those who actually have the money to pay for it, but to raise taxes on people who don't have any money is a-okay.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Imbecile (January 25, 2012 10:06 am ET)
        6  
        It's not just "a-okay" it's patriotic and dutiful of the poor to support the wealthy. That wealth doesn't create itself, you know.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by beDecent (January 25, 2012 10:15 am ET)
          6  
          I should just quit bitching and pay my 25% tax rate silently, like a real 'merican.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Imbecile (January 25, 2012 10:26 am ET)
            5  
            That's the spirit.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by CrashGordon (January 25, 2012 11:10 am ET)
            4  
            No, you should embrace supply-side economics and wait for that wealth to trickle down on you. Then, maybe someday you'll be lucky enough to be in the 35% tax bracket so that you'll get to pay most of your income at 15%.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by nerzog (January 25, 2012 11:17 am ET)
              7  
              Here's the funny thing; Romneybot made about 60 times more than the folks in the 35% tax bracket, for not working, and payed only 15%. How's that for "class warfare"?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by dolfan (January 25, 2012 11:55 am ET)
                3  
                They are claiming that he is being taxes twice for the original investment. As far as I know it, this is addressed in the tax form to ensure this doesn't happen.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by barscotch9441 (January 25, 2012 12:28 pm ET)
                  2  
                  Who claims that? That's some grade-A bullcrap I won't believe for a second. The man makes eight fv<|<ing figures. I'm pretty sure he can afford lawyers and accountants good enough to keep him from paying any more taxes than he has to.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by chuckie (January 26, 2012 11:59 am ET)
                    1  
                    I'm pretty sure he can afford lawyers and accountants good enough to keep him from paying any more taxes than he has to.

                    And lobbyists to change the tax code if it inconvenient.
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by nerzog (January 25, 2012 12:54 pm ET)
                  6  
                  That's another Republican talking point, pretending that Capital Gains tax is "double taxation". Using that faulty logic, some of them want to eliminate Capital Gains tax altogether.

                  Even if he was taxed 35% on the money he used for the initial investment, so what? Everything he's made since has been taxed at 15%. For example, if he made a million dollars, paid the 35%, then invested it, all subsequent dividends are taxed at 15%, no matter how much it is.

                  The original core of the investment was taxed, but the dividends are new money. Double taxation is a myth.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by jarossiter (January 25, 2012 1:18 pm ET)
                    2  
                    Yeah, they use the same logic for the inheritance tax.

                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 25, 2012 1:36 pm ET)
                    3  
                    Wingnuts are easily fooled by that. They don't get that transactions are taxed, not the physical dollar bills.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by MiniTru (January 25, 2012 3:42 pm ET)
                    4  
                    My salary was taxed before I received the take-home portion of it, yet when I buy something, it gets taxed again. Romney should suck it up. Money is taxed in this country when it is transferred from one entity to another. If it is dividend income, it is being transferred to him, so he pays taxes on it. Period.
                    Report Abuse
      • Author by Brabantio (January 25, 2012 12:32 pm ET)
        7 2
        Apparently, it's only class warfare when the president calls for tax hikes on those who actually have the money to pay for it, but to raise taxes on people who don't have any money is a-okay.
        I swear I hadn't seen this article when the "wealth redistribution" canard came around on the "war on success" thread, and I said that you only hear about that when it's the rich losing money. I couldn't have written a better theoretical display than this.

        On the same program, on the same day, people talk about "war on success" and then call for "war on the poor" (if the definition of "war" comes from a consistent standard). That is either a complete mental disconnect, or shameless and willful hypocrisy.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (January 25, 2012 1:12 pm ET)
          2  
          I vote for shameless and willful hypocrisy. I don't think the FOXbots truly believe any of this sh*t. They're paid big bucks to lie.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by beDecent (January 25, 2012 1:29 pm ET)
          2  
          It has to be shameless and willful hypocrisy, they get nice paychecks to spout this bull. Then again, at this point they may believe it--they say if you repeat a lie to yourself often enough you'll start to believe it.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by chuckie (January 26, 2012 12:03 pm ET)
            1  
            "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not undrstanding it.

            Sorry< I don't remember the source of that statement.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by epkklk851 (January 25, 2012 10:01 am ET)
      7 1
      The President is declaring "Class Warfare" because he wants millionaires and billionaires to pay their fair share, but Fox is just being fair and balance when they demand that people who aren't earning enough to pay income taxes to pay more taxes because the higher percentage of their income goes to paying other, more local taxes, and payroll taxes.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Spooky Dooooooooood (January 25, 2012 10:11 am ET)
      9  
      Don't worry, Newt will make poor public school kids pay back society by taking over the Janitor's duties.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 25, 2012 1:37 pm ET)
           
        Oops, should have read down before accidentally stealing your bit. ;0)
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Nihilist (January 25, 2012 10:12 am ET)
      2  
      whats sick about this, is the baggers believe this stuff. even while they submit their own 1040ez form to get back their fica...
      oh by the way fox and fiends, you better go after those poor workers too for using the form ez. its free to file you fed tax, and get returns this year.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Spooky Dooooooooood (January 25, 2012 10:15 am ET)
      8  
      You know, if poor people would just pull themselves up by their bootstraps then in 5 maybe 6 years they too would make enough money that their investments alone would spin off $40,000,000.00 a year in investment income. Of course then they would have to shoulder the burden of paying a devastating 15% tax on those gains which would put them back in the poor house the next year. This class warfare is killing us!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Spooky Dooooooooood (January 25, 2012 10:16 am ET)
      4  
      Does anyone else see a resemblance between Newt Gingrich and Baby Huey?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by GBU-15 (January 25, 2012 10:24 am ET)
      4  
      Yeah! Dooce says kick in a buck! Kick in something! Dooce. The guy that sits on a couch and reads from a telepromter. Thinks that you working stiffs should contribute more in taxes. What, pray tell, keeps Dooce himself from "kicking in a few more bucks"? Hey Panzy! Boxhead! Expain to me why Doocy, who makes millions sitting on a couch. Can't kick in a few more bucks for the country he claims to love? Yet some poor guy who is barely making from paycheck to paycheck should pay more. It's only class warfare when you fight back!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wenfen (January 25, 2012 10:37 am ET)
      1  
      Everyone should tune into MSNBC. Gabby Giffords is leaving. So sad.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (January 25, 2012 10:55 am ET)
      5  
      Every time these liars bring this up, I can't help but think of the time that Blimpy Limbaugh proposed it as an April Fool's joke, about ten years ago. His callers, too stupid to get the joke, were all for it.

      Now, the Troglodytes are actually serious about it. Jesus H. Christ; they're stupid.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wenfen (January 25, 2012 10:58 am ET)
        3  
        They roll around in their stoopid first thing every day and head out the door...
        Report Abuse
    • Author by bintx (January 25, 2012 11:07 am ET)
      9 3
      CBS did an immediate survey following the SOTU address. The majority of Republicans in the survey agreed with Obama's stated agenda. In fact, 91% of the survey participants agreed with it.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by CrashGordon (January 25, 2012 11:13 am ET)
        15  
        That's because Fox, Limbaugh, the Heritage Foundation, and the Republican candidates haven't had time to spread lies and misinformation about the substance of it yet.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Imbecile (January 25, 2012 11:19 am ET)
          6 1
          Exactly. They should conduct that poll again on Friday after the Republican media has had a chance to lie about it. Those liberal CBS people took that poll so quickly because they wanted it to have a liberal bias.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by MiG (January 25, 2012 12:55 pm ET)
        3  
        Bintx, I couldn't find the survey you refer to. It may be a coincidence, but a CBS survey after last year's SOTU speech resulted in a 91% approval. CBS SOTU survey 2011..
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (January 25, 2012 4:39 pm ET)
          1 1
          I read about it earlier today on a news site . . . don't remember which one. Still on pain killers from surgery. Maybe someone posted it incorrectly. Sorry.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by MiG (January 25, 2012 5:23 pm ET)
               
            Actually I found at least one site falsely claiming that the survey from last year was new. It's an honest mistake. Especially because last nights SOTU speech was so awesome.

            I wish you a swift recovery. You deserve it.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by Liberal in the South (January 25, 2012 11:19 am ET)
      3 2
      that's easy to say when you make a ton of money. It's not about the relativity here (everyone pays the same - a flat tax), it has to do with at the end of the month how much money one has for savings or discretionary income. I don't know about the rest of you but after all my bills are settled for necessities (rent, food, electricity, car insurance, [whispers quietly] iphone, etc) I have barely any money left over for gas and other needs, new clothes for work etc. The hike would make a difference and I'd end up paying out more than I take in, which is exactly what the president was against in his speech. Bravo Obama, thanks for looking out for me. Shame on you Fox and Friends for hating the consumer base of this economy.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Spooky Dooooooooood (January 25, 2012 11:27 am ET)
      4  
      I feel so much better about Mitt Romney now that I know he gives a million dollars a year to the fantastically inventive Mormon Church of the super natural Jesus Christ of Later day Saints.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by boxtop455113 (January 25, 2012 11:27 am ET)
      1 18
      let's just have a flat tax.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ScienceBuff (January 25, 2012 11:38 am ET)
        10 1
        That's another way of accomplishing higher taxes on the poor.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by marco21 (January 25, 2012 11:46 am ET)
        10  
        Republicans like saying Flat Tax because it is short, not because they understand the ramifications.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by phredicles (January 25, 2012 12:00 pm ET)
          10  
          Oh, they understand; they just hope their dim bulb supporters don't. And judging from the comment that started this sub-thread, it's working.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by wenfen (January 25, 2012 12:01 pm ET)
        4  
        You probably shouldn't say anything....ever.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by MiddleLeft (January 25, 2012 12:03 pm ET)
        4  
        Besides being unfair, the flat tax is impossible without closing all the "loopholes". It is impossible to close all the loopholes.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Imbecile (January 25, 2012 12:05 pm ET)
        8 1
        let's just have a flat tax.


        Simple solutions for simple minds.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Liberal in the South (January 25, 2012 12:08 pm ET)
        6 1
        I don't know how much you/your family makes, but a flat tax would take away my buying power and the buying power of millions, the gains in revenue would be lost by decreases in sales tax and the demand of good would fall causing a decrease in jobs.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (January 25, 2012 12:26 pm ET)
          7  
          The Troglodytes refuse to acknowledge the logic of a progressive tax system, because a few Billionaires hired Think Tanks years ago to propagandize the issue, all to reduce their own taxes.

          You're right, of course, just as you mentioned in your previous post. Even taxed at 35%, the millionaire has plenty left to live a lavish lifestyle. The worker making $40,000, however, spends anything left after taxes on essentials, with maybe enough disposable income to eat out or go to a movie once in a while. If he's really lucky, he's able to squirrel a little bit away for retirement.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Liberal in the South (January 25, 2012 12:37 pm ET)
            6 2
            exactly. what I'd give to be a thousandaire, let alone a millionaire, I'd pay 50% taxes on a mill over deciding whether or not to pay my school loans this month.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by n'est-ce pas (January 25, 2012 12:18 pm ET)
        3 1
        Um, let's not. Flat taxes crush the poor while giving the rich cover. They also make it impossible for the government to raise taxes during times of national emergency, such as when we're involved in two wars....
        Report Abuse
        • Author by CrashGordon (January 25, 2012 12:51 pm ET)
          2  
          Silly n'est-ce pas, being involved in two wars is a time to CUT taxes. Didn't you learn anything from the Bush years? That way, by the time your party is thrown out of office, the wealthy are on a much higher plane and you can start harping about the debt! Two birds with one stone.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by chuckie (January 26, 2012 12:27 pm ET)
          1
        Report Abuse
    • Author by marco21 (January 25, 2012 11:30 am ET)
      9  
      Like good christians they proclaim to be - F the poor.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (January 25, 2012 12:20 pm ET)
        5  
        Well, see, Jesus didn't really mean all that stuff he said about the camel and the needle, or telling the rich man to sell his stuff and give it to the poor. That was just symbolism; Jesus was a crony capitalist at heart.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by foole (January 25, 2012 12:31 pm ET)
          5  
          Praise Supply Side Jesus! SSJ who once told his followers, "Don't you worry your disgustingly rich heads about getting into Heaven. If you have the resources to build a big enough needle, you can get a camel through there." Hallelujah!!!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by dolfan (January 25, 2012 11:51 am ET)
      5  
      That money invested is actually "working" for you to make money and therefore should be taxed as such. Bottom line is that you should be taxed on all INcome weather it be labor earned or money earned.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Spooky Dooooooooood (January 25, 2012 12:02 pm ET)
           
        But what about all the jobs Mitt has trimmed from the bloated workforce? I like to think of that as improved quality job creation.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Spooky Dooooooooood (January 25, 2012 12:26 pm ET)
        2  
        Why do you hate job creators so much?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by YouTubeJEFF9K (January 25, 2012 12:17 pm ET)
      4  
      Maybe these people are too young to remember what riots in America look like.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Imbecile (January 25, 2012 12:39 pm ET)
        5  
        I'm thinking they believe that it's mostly liberals who will protest (riot in their minds), and they're almost giddy at the thought of them being pepper-sprayed, stomped on, and (in a few comments I've seen) shot by police.

        This new type of Republican (part tea party, part fascist) really has bought into the hateful rhetoric and actually sees liberals as the enemy and hope against hope that they get to inflict some violence.

        This is what our Republican media has brought us to.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mcbane (January 25, 2012 12:48 pm ET)
          1  
          It also brings us folks like this...
          Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (January 25, 2012 1:02 pm ET)
          4  
          Maybe it's not as new as we think. If you look at a map of the Red States, it looks remarkably like the old Confederacy, with some extra Western States thrown in for seasoning.

          150 years ago, the ancestors of these people took up arms and committed mass treason because they resented the Northern Liberals telling them what to do. That resentment has been seething under the surface ever since, and the Teabaggers have taken full advantage of it, just as Nixon did with his Southern Strategy.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by overmars jr. (January 25, 2012 1:10 pm ET)
      2  
      Hands down, the most intentionally insidious program in American TV history. Where to even begin shooting down their highly manufactured, completely dishonest points and "facts"?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by BobsYourUncle (January 25, 2012 1:12 pm ET)
      1 1
      How about the first $20,000 untaxed then all the rest wether from labor or investment at 25% no deductions and eliminate all sales tax?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (January 25, 2012 1:35 pm ET)
        1  
        Sounds interesting on the surface, but the Sales Tax would be the deal-breaker for the Republicans.

        Here in Tennessee, Sales Tax is the main revenue source. In fact, our Teabaggers are working on a Constitutional Amendment to outlaw any future Income Tax. Last time somebody proposed an Income Tax, the Hate Radio jocks organized their own version of an Occupy-the-Capitol protest.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Virgil_Kane (January 25, 2012 1:17 pm ET)
         
      I would like to see millionaires and billionaires taxed so much it hurts. They should know how it feels like the rest of us.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Brabantio (January 25, 2012 1:56 pm ET)
        4 2
        Many of them are taxed so much it hurts. It's just that those people have an extremely low threshold of pain.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Lizinbklyn (January 25, 2012 4:27 pm ET)
      2  
      HAHAHAHAHA, Kick in a buck, too funny, republican sc*m . .

      My 85 year old mother gets $880.00/mo. from SS - She doesn't have an extra buck, BUCK-O . .

      Without me she'd be eating dog food!!!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Virgil_Kane (January 25, 2012 5:22 pm ET)
        1  
        She's such a freeloader. Did you know Rush limbaugh makes more money in 4 minutes than your mother gets in a whole month? Doesn't that make you sick?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by scanlontodd9871 (January 26, 2012 7:45 am ET)
      1  
      And she calls herself the moderate on the curvy couch. What a freaking joke.
      Report Abuse