Fox's Sandy Rios: "Feminine Confusion" Over Komen And Planned Parenthood Is "The Part Of My Gender I'm Ashamed Of"
February 03, 2012 3:08 pm ET
From the February 3 edition of Fox News' America Live:
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.


















Oh, and Sandy, I don't think your gender is too thrilled you're a part of it right now either.
Everybody votes according to their own values, but the ChristoFascists have decided that their values are officially THE values, and the mainstream media goes right along with it.
Women apparently support other women in their health, and Komen decided that they didn't want to do that.
The cons want to kill the poor, state by state . .
Grayson was right. Republicans want you TO DIE - F A S T
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/02/02/1061151/-New-Komen-Foundation-policy-also-refuses-funding-for-embryonic-stem-cell%C2%A0research
There should be as much public condemnation on these actions as with PP.
I would like to see a full-blown investigation of all of their activities--I suspect there is more--sort of like Romney and his offshore bank accounts. The IRS, Better Bus. Bureau's charity reports, and Congress needs to explore their non-charitable decisions.
This whole thing is political from the top to the bottom. Komen's name is damaged goods.
Well, to be fair, that is an actual CRIMINAL investigation. Unlike PP, which is only under a POLITICALLY MOTIVATED investigation.
.. Your live link here...
Emotional? Check.
Vitriolic? Check.
Irrational? Check.
Yup, Mayor Bloomberg stood up and sent $250,000 privately to PP!
Is that statement something she should be telling Doctor Ablow?
When a guy from the right gets interrupted by his opposite, he raises his voice slightly -- just in volume, not in pitch -- and says, "I didn't interrupt you. Let me finish..." and then goes right back to his talking point without taking a breath. They do it even if they DID interrupt, and no one EVER calls them on it. The tactic is beautifully effective -- 99% of the time, it shuts the other person up because they were called out for the interruption, and it sets it up in the mind of viewers that the OTHER person was rude.
99% of the time, when a guy from the left gets interrupted by his opposite -- unless it's the host of the show -- he STOPS TALKING or pauses and then responds to the interruption. This makes the interruption an effective tactic because it derails the point being made and turns the conversation in the direction the RW talker wants it to go. The few times I've seen a progressive try the "I didn't interrupt you..." tactic, they end up sounding petulant, or the RW guy responds, "You did, too!"
Your statement brings Boxtop to mind .
You're not only not guilty of anything, in a just world they'd leave you alone.
DOUBLE STANDARD or Political Ideology? You make the choice.
Penn State: criminal investigation into the sexual abuse of MANY children, funds retained.
Rios' Rant
When she used "emotional...vitriolic" to describe the response to SBK's actions while she spewed dogma-driven, bible-thumping, right-wing bile, she proved she has absolutely NO concept of hypocrisy.
I see a positive trend in how the American people, or should I say the American conscious, are beginning to look at how utterly bat crap crazy the farthest parts of the right wing have become and are reacting accordingly.
I can say with Art !
.................... .. Fox's Sandy Rios ...
But in Rios' defense, I believe that by "femine confusion" Rios meant "lady's problems".
I think you are trying to identify a horse by spotting a zebra. There is no defense of this total joke of a human.
"We want to apologize to the American public for recent decisions that resulted in completely unexpected scrutiny of our CEO's unconscionably high salary, obscenely high overhead to actual good ratio, longstanding links to Republican politicians, huge budget for taking oppressive legal actions against other charities that dare use the word 'cure', vast marketing and lobbying budgets, and long-standing history of secretly lobbying against federal assistance to women with breast cancer.
"Based upon the last ten years, we truly had no idea that we couldn't do whatever the hell we wanted with gullible contributors' money. We thought that the corpse of our CEO's sister was an impenetrable shield that protected all of our actions from scrutiny or accountability. We appreciate your support while we try to figure out WTF has changed.
"However, although the sudden spike in scrutiny and precipitous drop in fundraising and sponsorships scared the crap out of us, we want to assure all of you that, even as we desperately attempt to salvage something out of the conflagration burning our brand to the ground, we will continue to flat-out lie to your face and generally assume you are all still such credulous imbeciles that we can shamelessly stick to obvious falsehoods or change our story from minute to minute as whim or panic dictate.
Now please stop looking into our finances, lobbying and legal activities and strong political connections with right wing politicians. Stop it right now or Susan will be angry, very angry with you. Thank you."