Religious Progressives Left Behind
Special Report Documents Skewed Representation of Religion in Major News Media
Conservative Religious Leaders Far Outnumber Progressive Leaders in Media Despite Views of Most Americans
Report attached as PDF or available online at: http://mediamatters.org/reports/leftbehind/
Washington, D.C. -- Media Matters for America today released "Left Behind: The Skewed Representation of Religion in Major News Media," a special report documenting the disparity between media coverage of conservative and progressive religious leaders. Since the 2004 elections, there has been a dramatic increase in the coverage of religion in newspapers and television across the country. This increase has overwhelmingly focused on conservative religious figures as the definitive voice of religion at the expense of the vast majority of religious Americans.
"For religious progressives, this report won't come as a surprise -- they know firsthand that when it comes to a media discussion of religious issues, they rarely have a seat at the table," said David Brock, President and CEO of Media Matters. "If the public is to have confidence in the media, the views of the vast majority of religious Americans must be represented. As our report details, those who get their news from leading press outlets could only assume that a right-wing conservative voice and a religious voice are one in the same -- that is clearly not the case."
Media Matters undertook this study in large part because of the media's response to the 2004 elections, in which key media figures widely overemphasized the impact of "values voters" -- a misleading term used by the media to describe conservative religious voters motivated by opposition to same-sex marriage and abortion, which suggested that progressive voters did not care similarly about values.
In their coverage, news organizations overwhelmingly presented a picture in which religious Americans were defined as conservative Americans. This representation in the media proved to be a misleading characterization of how these so-called "values voters" influenced the 2006 elections, in which the "value" cited most by voters was the Iraq war, not issues such as abortion and same-sex marriage.
- A 2006 Zogby International exit poll showed that the "moral issue" cited most by voters was the Iraq war, and that more than twice as many voters cited greed and materialism or poverty and economic justice as "the most urgent moral crisis in American culture" as those who cited abortion or same-sex marriage.
- Despite their depiction in the mainstream media, only 10 percent of evangelical Christians said abortion and same-sex marriage would be the most important factor in determining their vote.
- Even though close to 90 percent of Americans identified themselves as religious in a 2006 study by the Center for American Values in Public Life, according to a post-election survey in 2004, only 32 percent of Americans identified themselves as conservative.
KEY FINDINGS:
- Combining newspapers and television, conservative religious leaders we studied were quoted, mentioned, or interviewed in news stories 2.8 times as often as were progressive religious leaders.
- On television news -- the three major television networks, the three major cable channels, and PBS -- conservative religious leaders were quoted, mentioned, or interviewed almost 3.8 times as often as progressive leaders.
- In major newspapers, conservative religious leaders were quoted, mentioned, or interviewed 2.7 times as often as progressive leaders.
Report attached as PDF or available online at: www.mediamatters.org/LeftBehind








The Jesus of the New Testament is a stranger to the right wing conservatives who claim to be Christians.
Clowns like Robertson of the 700 club, and the late Falwell spouted Antichrist sentiment (God hates f*gs) as if Jesus never said to love one another. They also espoused that Jesus wants you to be rich. Their ignorance of God is only out done by their contempt for people who differ from them. May God have mercy on them, but I think they knew what they were doing.
The media just goes along and never examines the claims of those who claim Christ as their own.
"Clowns like Robertson of the 700 club, and the late Falwell spouted Antichrist sentiment (God hates f*gs)"
When did Robertson or Falwell ever say that "God hates f*gs?" If you have a source for that I'd like to see it.
do you actually believe that robertson and Falwell have not repeatedly espoused the "SENTIMENT" that God hates homosexuals? Quit with the word sparsing and analyze the content.
No they haven't. They both believe in the saying "Hate the sin, love the sinner." That's what they've both tried to do throughout their whole careers. There are very few conservatives who actually hate gays. Fred Phelps is the only one I can think of, if you can even call him a conservative. But people like Robertson, Falwell, and Dobson have always made it clear that we should love homosexuals even though they are living an immoral lifestyle. We should reach out to them and show them love and show them that there is a better and more fulfilling way to live.
Falwell said "Aids is the wrath of a just God against homosexuals". You can't defend that statement and it essentially blows your argument of hating the sin and loving the sinner out of the water. Don't sugarcoat people like Robertson and Falwell who have no intergrity. For Pete's sake, Robertson claims he has conversations with God who tells him of future events. They make medicine for people like that.
Well, they implied, rather strongly, that God punished us by "letting" the terrorists hit us on 9/11 partly because of our tolerance for gays. What would you call that (other than nonsense)?
Yea well they could have said it...if they didn't say it I know they were thinking it and that is just as bad.
I strongly disagreed with that comment when Falwell said it. He stuck his foot in his mouth on that one. However, I think he was speaking more to the fact that homosexual activists have an agenda to try to normalize homosexuality in this country and make it a morally acceptable lifestyle. Many of the homosexual activists are coming into our public schools and brainwashing our kids that homosexuality is normal and morally acceptable. I believe that's what Falwell was referring to and not homosexuals themselves. He was speaking about the radical homosexual agenda, even though I believe he went way too far by blaming them for 9-11.
I can think of no logical reason why homosexuality should not be morally acceptable in the eyes of the law. Given that, I believe it was Falwell and those like him who hold the extreme position, not the homosexual activists.
You can personally disapprove of it all day long, but I defy you to give me one logical, non-religious reason why your disapproval should be codified into law.
Had I the stomach for it I could go over the record and find appropriate digs by these so-called Christians.
But I have a bad heart though and reading the kind of crap these jerks spout gives me palpitations that set my pacemaker off. Oh yes, I pray for Pat and Jerry's souls, but God grants me grace for being a little sarcastic in my prayers I hope.
God is love.